Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China
FanJiang ZENG1,2, Cong SONG1,2,3, HaiFeng GUO1,2,3, Bo LIU1,2,3, WeiCheng LUO1, DongWei GUI1,2, Stefan ARNDT4, DaLi GUO5
1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi 830011, China; 2 Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem, Cele 848300, China; 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4 School of Forest and Ecosystem Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3363, Australia; 5 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China
FanJiang ZENG1,2, Cong SONG1,2,3, HaiFeng GUO1,2,3, Bo LIU1,2,3, WeiCheng LUO1, DongWei GUI1,2, Stefan ARNDT4, DaLi GUO5
1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi 830011, China; 2 Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem, Cele 848300, China; 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4 School of Forest and Ecosystem Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3363, Australia; 5 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
摘要 Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) is a spiny, perennial herb. The species grows in the salinized, arid regions in North China. This study investigated the response characteristics of the root growth and the distribution of one-year-old A. sparsifolia seedlings to different groundwater depths in controlled plots. The ecological adaptability of the root systems of A. sparsifolia seedlings was examined using the artificial digging method. Results showed that: (1) A. sparsifolia seedlings adapted to an increase in groundwater depth mainly through increasing the penetration depth and growth rate of vertical roots. The vertical roots grew rapidly when soil moisture content reached 3%–9%, but slowly when soil moisture content was 13%–20%. The vertical roots stopped growing when soil moisture content reached 30% (the critical soil moisture point). (2) The morphological plasticity of roots is an important strategy used by A. sparsifolia seedlings to obtain water and adapt to dry soil conditions. When the groundwater table was shallow, horizontal roots quickly expanded and tillering increased in order to compete for light resources, whereas when the groundwater table was deeper, vertical roots developed quickly to exploit space in the deeper soil layers. (3) The decrease in groundwater depth was probably responsible for the root distribution in the shallow soil layers. Root biomass and surface area both decreased with soil depth. One strategy of A. sparsifolia seedlings in dealing with the increase in groundwater depth is to increase root biomass in the deep soil layers. The relationship between the root growth/distribution of A. sparsifolia and the depth of groundwater table can be used as guidance for harvesting A. sparsifolia biomass and managing water resources for forage grasses. It is also of ecological significance as it reveals how desert plants adapt to arid environments.
Abstract: Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) is a spiny, perennial herb. The species grows in the salinized, arid regions in North China. This study investigated the response characteristics of the root growth and the distribution of one-year-old A. sparsifolia seedlings to different groundwater depths in controlled plots. The ecological adaptability of the root systems of A. sparsifolia seedlings was examined using the artificial digging method. Results showed that: (1) A. sparsifolia seedlings adapted to an increase in groundwater depth mainly through increasing the penetration depth and growth rate of vertical roots. The vertical roots grew rapidly when soil moisture content reached 3%–9%, but slowly when soil moisture content was 13%–20%. The vertical roots stopped growing when soil moisture content reached 30% (the critical soil moisture point). (2) The morphological plasticity of roots is an important strategy used by A. sparsifolia seedlings to obtain water and adapt to dry soil conditions. When the groundwater table was shallow, horizontal roots quickly expanded and tillering increased in order to compete for light resources, whereas when the groundwater table was deeper, vertical roots developed quickly to exploit space in the deeper soil layers. (3) The decrease in groundwater depth was probably responsible for the root distribution in the shallow soil layers. Root biomass and surface area both decreased with soil depth. One strategy of A. sparsifolia seedlings in dealing with the increase in groundwater depth is to increase root biomass in the deep soil layers. The relationship between the root growth/distribution of A. sparsifolia and the depth of groundwater table can be used as guidance for harvesting A. sparsifolia biomass and managing water resources for forage grasses. It is also of ecological significance as it reveals how desert plants adapt to arid environments.
The Knowledge Innovation Program of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-316), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31070477, 30870471) and the West Light Foundation of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences (XBBS201105)
通讯作者:
FanJiang ZENG
E-mail: zengfj@ms.xjb.ac.cn
引用本文:
FanJiang ZENG, Cong SONG, HaiFeng GUO, Bo LIU, WeiCheng LUO, DongWei GUI, Stefan. Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China[J]. 干旱区科学, 2013, 5(2): 220-232.
FanJiang ZENG, Cong SONG, HaiFeng GUO, Bo LIU, WeiCheng LUO, DongWei GUI, Stefan. Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(2): 220-232.
Agzhigitova N I, Allanazarova U, Kapustina L A, et al. 1995. Transformation of desert pasture vegetation under effect of anthropogenic pressure. Problems of Desert Development, 3: 62−65.Arndt S K, Arampatsis C, Foetzki A, et al. 2004a. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(2): 259−270.Arndt S K, Kahmen A, Arampatsis C, et al. 2004b. Nitrogen fixation and metabolism by groundwater-dependent perennial plants in a hyperarid desert. Oecologia, 141(3): 385−394.Ball W S, Robbins W W. 1933. Camelthorn, Alhagi camelorum fish. Monthly Bulletin of the California State Department of Agriculture, 22: 258−260. Bradshaw A D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: Caspari E W. Advances in Genetics. London: Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd., Berkeley Square House, 13: 115−155.Caldwell M M, Richards J H. 1986. Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. In: Givnish T J. On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251−271.Canadell J, Zedler P H. 1995. Underground structures of woody plants in Mediterranean ecosystems of Australia, California and Chile. In: Arroyo M T K, Zedler P H, Fox M D. Ecology and Biogeography of Mediterranean Ecosystems in Chile, California, and Australia. New York: Springer-Verlag, 177−210.Dahlman R C, Kucera C L. 1965. Root productivity and turnover in native prairie. Ecology, 46: 84−89.de Kroon H, Visser E J W. 2003. Root Ecology. Heidelberg: Springe Berlin Heidelberg, 150−191.Drennan P M, Nobel P S. 1996. Temperature influences on root growth for Encelia farinosa (Asteraceae), Pleuraphis rigida (Poaceae), and Agave deserti (Agavaceae) under current and doubled CO2 concentrations. American Journal of Botany, 83: 133−139.George E, Seith B, Schaeffer C, et al. 1997. Responses of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiology, 17(1): 39−45.Gong Y M, Hu Y K, Fang F, et al. 2012. Carbon storage and vertical distribution in three shrubland communities in Gurbantünggüt Desert, Uygur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(5): 541–549.Graham E H. 1941. Legumes for Erosion Control and Wildlife. Washington: U. S. Department of Agriculture.Grime J P, Campbell B D, Mackey J M I. 1991. Root plasticity, nitrogen capture and competitive ability. In: Atkinson D. Plant Root Growth: An Ecological Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press, 381−397.Horton J L, Hart S C, Kolb T E. 2003. Physiological condition and water source use of Sonoran Desert riparian trees at the Bill Williams River, Arizona, USA. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 39(1): 69−82.Huey R B, Gilchrist G W, Carlson M L, et al. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science, 287(5451): 308−309.Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, et al. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108(3): 389−411.Jackson R B, Mooney H A, Schulze E D. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(14): 7362−7366.Jastrow J D, Miller R M. 1993. Neighbor influences on root morphology and mycorrhizal fungus colonization in tallgrass prairie plants. Ecology, 74(2): 561−569.Joslin J D, Wolfe M H, Hanson P J. 2000. Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytologist, 147(1): 117−129.Kembel S W, Cahill Jr F J. 2005. Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. The American Naturalist, 166(2): 216−230.Khafagi A A F. 1995. The taxonomic significance of seed protein in some fabaceae species in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science, 40(1): 1−10.Li X Y, Zhang X M, Zeng F J, et al. 2002. Water relations on Alhagi sparsifolia in the southern fringe of Taklamakan Desert. Acta Botanica Sinica, 44(10): 1219−1224.Li X Y, Lin L S, Zhao Q, et al. 2010. Influence of groundwater depth on species composition and community structure in the transition zone of Cele oasis. Journal of Arid Land, 2(4): 235−242.Lloret F, Casanovas C, Penuelas J, et al. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13(2): 210−216.Ma X D, Chen Y N, Zhu C G, et al. 2011. The variation in soil moisture and the appropriate groundwater table for desert riparian forest along the Lower Tarim River. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(1): 150−162.Nilsson C, Jansson R, Zinko U. 1997. Long-term responses of river-margin vegetation to water-level regulation. Science, 276(5313): 798−800.Pallardy S G, Rhoads J L. 1993. Morphological adaptations to drought in seedlings of deciduous angiosperms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(9): 1766−1774.Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 481−486.Reader R J, Jalili A, Grime J P, et al. 1993. A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. Journal of Ecology, 81(3): 543−550.Rood S B, Zanewich K, Stefura C, et al. 2000. Influence of water table decline on growth allocation and endogenous gibberellins in black cottonwood. Tree Physiology, 20(12): 831−836.Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90(3): 480−494.Schenk H J. 2005. Vertical vegetation structure below ground: scaling from root to globe. In: Esser k, Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, et al. Progress in Botany. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 66: 341−373.Schulze E D, Mooney H A, Sala O E, et al. 1996. Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia, 108(3): 503−511.Sharp R E, Davies W J. 1985. Root growth and water uptake by maize plant in drying soil. Journal of Experimental Botany, 36(9): 1441−1456.Shaver G R, Billings W D. 1975. Root production and root turnover in a wet tundra ecosystem, Barrow, Alaska. Ecology, 56(2): 401−409.Thomas F M, Arndt S K, Bruelheide H, et al. 2000. Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a central-Asian desert: presentation and first results. Journal of Applied Botany, 74(5−6): 212−219.Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, et al. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10(5): 212−217.Zhang K, Tian C Y, Li C J. 2012. Root growth and spatio-temporal distribution of three common annual halophytes in a saline desert, northern Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land, 4(3): 330−341.Zhou Z C, Shangguan Z P. 2007. Vertical distribution of fine roots in relation to soil factors in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. forest of the Loess Plateau of China. Plant and Soil, 291(1−2): 119−129.
2013, Vol. 5 
