Changes in carbon dioxide emissions and LMDI-based impact factor decomposition: the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region as a case
Li ZHANG1,2, Jun LEI1*, Xuan ZHOU3, XiaoLei ZHANG1, Wen DONG1, Yu YANG2,4
1 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049，China;
3 Department of Mathematics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
4 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Changes in carbon dioxide emissions and LMDI-based impact factor decomposition: the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region as a case
Li ZHANG1,2, Jun LEI1*, Xuan ZHOU3, XiaoLei ZHANG1, Wen DONG1, Yu YANG2,4
1 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049，China;
3 Department of Mathematics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
4 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
摘要 Studies on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at provincial level can provide a scientific basis for the optimal use of energy and the formulation of CO2 reduction policies. We studied the variation of CO2 emissions of primary energy consumption and its influencing factors based on data in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region from 1952 to 2008, which were calculated according to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Xinjiang’s CO2 emission process from 1952 to 2008 could be divided into five stages according to the growth rates of total amount of CO2 emissions and CO2 emission intensity. The impact factors were quantitatively analyzed using Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method in each stage. Various factors, including government policies and technological progress related to the role of CO2 emissions, were comprehensively analyzed, and the internal rela-tionships among various factors were clarified. The results show that the contribution rates of various impact factors are different in each stage. Overall, economic growth and energy consumption intensity were the main driving factors for CO2 emissions. Since the implementation of the birth control policy, the driving force of population growth on the increase in CO2 emissions has slowly weakened. The energy consumption intensity was further affected by the industrial structure and energy consumption intensity of primary, secondary and tertiary industries, with the energy consumption intensity of the secondary industries and the proportion of secondary industries being the most important factors affecting the energy consumption intensity. Governmental policies and technological progress were also important factors that affected CO2 emissions.
Abstract: Studies on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at provincial level can provide a scientific basis for the optimal use of energy and the formulation of CO2 reduction policies. We studied the variation of CO2 emissions of primary energy consumption and its influencing factors based on data in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region from 1952 to 2008, which were calculated according to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Xinjiang’s CO2 emission process from 1952 to 2008 could be divided into five stages according to the growth rates of total amount of CO2 emissions and CO2 emission intensity. The impact factors were quantitatively analyzed using Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method in each stage. Various factors, including government policies and technological progress related to the role of CO2 emissions, were comprehensively analyzed, and the internal rela-tionships among various factors were clarified. The results show that the contribution rates of various impact factors are different in each stage. Overall, economic growth and energy consumption intensity were the main driving factors for CO2 emissions. Since the implementation of the birth control policy, the driving force of population growth on the increase in CO2 emissions has slowly weakened. The energy consumption intensity was further affected by the industrial structure and energy consumption intensity of primary, secondary and tertiary industries, with the energy consumption intensity of the secondary industries and the proportion of secondary industries being the most important factors affecting the energy consumption intensity. Governmental policies and technological progress were also important factors that affected CO2 emissions.
This project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41101159) and the Western Doctor Project of West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XBBS201009).
通讯作者:
Jun LEI
E-mail: leijun@ms.xjb.ac.cn
引用本文:
Li ZHANG, Jun LEI, Xuan ZHOU, XiaoLei ZHANG, Wen DONG, Yu YANG. Changes in carbon dioxide emissions and LMDI-based impact factor decomposition: the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region as a case[J]. 干旱区科学, 2014, 6(2): 145-155.
Li ZHANG, Jun LEI, Xuan ZHOU, XiaoLei ZHANG, Wen DONG, Yu YANG. Changes in carbon dioxide emissions and LMDI-based impact factor decomposition: the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region as a case. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(2): 145-155.
Carmichael G R, Streets D G, Calori G, et al. 2002. Changing trends in sulfur emissions in Asia: implications for acid deposition, air pollution, and climate. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(22): 4707–4713.Chang Y F, Lewis C, Lin S J. 2008. Comprehensive evaluation of industrial CO2 emission (1989–2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition. Energy Policy, 36(7): 2471–2480.Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, et al. 2006. The 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 11–29[2012-05-01]. http://down.pinggu.org/html/20100611/14645.html.Fan Y, Liu L C, Wu G, et al. 2006. Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4): 377–395.Fan Y, Liang Q M, Wei Y M, et al. 2007. A model for China’s energy requirements and CO2 emissions analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(3): 378–393.Hong X. 2011. The calculation of carbon emissions of Shandong province and the comparison with the national average. Energy Procedia, 5: 1514–1518.Itousek P M, Mooney H A, Jane L, et al. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(25): 494–499.Kadian R, Dahiya R P, Garg H P. 2007. Energy-related emissions and mitigation opportunities from the household sector in Delhi. Energy Policy, 35(12): 6195–6211.Leung D Y C, Lee Y T. 2000. Greenhouse gas emissions in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 34(26): 4487–4498.Li L, Chen C, Xie S, et al. 2010. Energy demand and carbon emissions under different development scenarios for Shanghai, China. Energy Policy, 38(9): 4797–4807.Lin B Q, Sun C W. 2010. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy, 38(1): 613–621.Liu W D, Zhang L, Wang L M, et al. 2010. A sketch map of low-carbon economic development in China. Geographical Research, 5: 778–788.Lu C Y, Zhang X L, He J K. 2010. A CGE analysis to study the impacts of energy investment on economic growth and carbon dioxide emission: a case of Shaanxi province in western China. Energy, 35(11): 4319–4327.Ma C, Ju M T, Zhang X C, et al. 2011. Energy consumption and carbon emissions in a coastal city in China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 4: 1–9.Niu X G, Niu J G, Men D. 2011. Energy consumption and carbon emissions: analysis and prediction—the case of Hebei province in China. Energy Procedia, 5: 2271–92277.Scholes R J, Noble I R. 2001. Storing Carbon on Land. Science, 29(2): 1012–1013.Siddiqi T A. 1995. Asia-wide emissions of greenhouse gases. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 20(1): 213–232.Sinyak Y. 1995. Economics of a global strategy for reduction of carbon emissions. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 5(1): 30–51.Statistical Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. 1989–2010. Statistical Yearbooks of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Statistical Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. 2005. Statistical Yearbooks of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from 1955 to 2005. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Wang S S, Zhou D Q, Zhou P, et al. 2011a. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 39(9): 4870–4875.Wang R, Liu W J, Xiao L S, et al. 2011b. Path towards achieving of China’s 2020 carbon emission reduction target—A discussion of low-carbon energy policies at province level. Energy Policy, 39(5): 2740–2747.Yao L L, Gao Z G. 2011. The role of Xinjiang in low carbon China: challenges and strategy. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2: 41–44.Zha D L, Zhou D Q, Zhou P. 2010. Driving forces of residential CO2 emissions in urban and rural China: an index decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 38(7): 3377–3383.Zhang B, Chen G Q. 2010. Methane emissions by Chinese economy: inventory and embodiment analysis. Energy Policy, 38(8): 4304–4316.Zhang L, Huang Y X, Li Y M, et al. 2010. An investigation on spatial changing pattern of CO2 emissions in China. Resources Science, 2: 211–217.
2014, Vol. 6 
