Relations between soil heterogeneity and common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization in Keriya River Basin, Xinjiang of China
Lu GONG1,2, ChangJun LI1,3,4, Tashpolat TIYIP1,2
1 College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046, China;
3 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
4 Cele National Station of Observation & Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem in Xinjiang, Cele 848300, China
Relations between soil heterogeneity and common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization in Keriya River Basin, Xinjiang of China
Lu GONG1,2, ChangJun LI1,3,4, Tashpolat TIYIP1,2
1 College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046, China;
3 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
4 Cele National Station of Observation & Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem in Xinjiang, Cele 848300, China
摘要 How common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization correlates to soil heterogeneity and environmental determinants remains unclear in arid areas. We conducted a field investigation and soil sampling in 100 plots along Keriya River Basin to uncover the relationship between common reed and heterogeneous soils. Reed colonization variables and its soil properties were measured and recorded for the analysis of their relationship using pearson correlation and redundancy analysis methods. The comparison results of common reed characteristics among 100 plots showed that common reeds performed strong tolerance and ecophysiological plasticity to edaphic stresses. Common reed colonization was tightly connected to soil heterogeneity according to the correla-tion analysis between its colonization characteristics and soil properties. Common reed colonization got feedbacks on soil properties as well, including the increase of soil organic matter and the alleviation of salt uplifting. The main limiting environmental determinant of common reed colonization was soil salt, followed by pH and soil water content.
Abstract: How common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization correlates to soil heterogeneity and environmental determinants remains unclear in arid areas. We conducted a field investigation and soil sampling in 100 plots along Keriya River Basin to uncover the relationship between common reed and heterogeneous soils. Reed colonization variables and its soil properties were measured and recorded for the analysis of their relationship using pearson correlation and redundancy analysis methods. The comparison results of common reed characteristics among 100 plots showed that common reeds performed strong tolerance and ecophysiological plasticity to edaphic stresses. Common reed colonization was tightly connected to soil heterogeneity according to the correla-tion analysis between its colonization characteristics and soil properties. Common reed colonization got feedbacks on soil properties as well, including the increase of soil organic matter and the alleviation of salt uplifting. The main limiting environmental determinant of common reed colonization was soil salt, followed by pH and soil water content.
Research was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1138303).
通讯作者:
Lu GONG
E-mail: gonglu721@163.com
引用本文:
Lu GONG, ChangJun LI, Tashpolat TIYIP. Relations between soil heterogeneity and common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization in Keriya River Basin, Xinjiang of China[J]. 干旱区科学, 2014, 6(6): 753-761.
Lu GONG, ChangJun LI, Tashpolat TIYIP. Relations between soil heterogeneity and common reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) colonization in Keriya River Basin, Xinjiang of China. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(6): 753-761.
Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 3: 52–66.Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano J M. 2012. Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63: 43–57.Baer S G, Blair J M, Collins S L, et al. 2004. Plant community responses to resource availability and heterogeneity during restoration. Oecologia, 139: 617–629. Bardgett R D, Bowman W D, Kaufmann R, et al. 2005. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20: 634–641.Bardgett R D, de Deyn G B, Ostle N J. 2009. Plant-soil interactions and the carbon cycle. Journal of Ecology, 97: 838–839.Bart D, Hartman J M. 2000. Environmental determinants of Phragmites australis expansion in a New Jersey salt marsh: An experimental approach. Oikos, 89: 59–69.Benoit L K, Askins R A. 1999. Impact of the spread of Phragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes. Wetlands, 19: 194–208.Burdick D M, Konisky R A. 2003. Determinants of expansion for Phragmites australis, common reed, in natural and impacted coastal marshes. Estuaries, 26: 407–116.Burke I C, Lauenroth W K, Riggle R, et al. 1999. Spatial variability of soil properties in the shortgrass steppe: the relative importance of topography, grazing, microsite, and plant species in controlling spatial patterns. Ecosystems, 2: 422–438.Chambers R M, Osgood D T, Bart D J, et al. 2003. Phragmites australis invasion and expansion in tidal wetlands: Interactions among salinity, sulfide, and hydrology. Estuaries, 26: 398–406. Clevering O A. 1998. An investigation into the effects of nitrogen on growth and morphology of stable and die-back populations of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany, 60: 11–25.Collins B, Wein G. 1998. Soil heterogeneity effects on canopy structure and composition during early succession. Plant Ecology, 138: 217–217.Elhaak M A, Sharaf el-din A, Shammour R H. 1993. Response of Phragmites australis to water stress from flooding to drought. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 25: 41–46.Ehrenfeld J G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems, 6: 503–523Ehrenfeld J G, Ravit B, Elgersma K. 2005. Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resource, 30: 75–115. Eppstein M J, Molofsky J. 2007. Invasiveness in plant communities with feedbacks. Ecology Letters, 10: 253–263.Hara T, Van Der Toorn J, Mook J H. 1993. Growth dynamics and size structure of shoots of Phragmites australis, a clonal plant. Journal of Ecology, 81: 47–60. Headley T R, Davison L, Huett D O, et al. 2012. Evapotranspiration from subsurface horizontal flow wetlands planted with Phragmites australis in sub-tropical Australia. Water Research, 46: 345–354.Hodge A. 2004. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist, 162: 9–24.Hook P B, Burke I C, Lauenroth W K. 1991. Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe. Plant and Soil, 138: 247–256.Huston M A. 1993. Biological diversity, soils, and economics. Science, 262: 1676–1680.Jobbágy E G, Jackson R B. 2004. The uplift of soil nutrients by plants: biogeochemical consequences across scales. Ecology, 85: 2380–2389.Leishman M R, Thomson V P. 2005. Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury Sandstone soils, Sydney. Australia Journal of Ecology, 93: 38–49.Lisamarie W, Richard G L. 1999. Effects of Phragmites australis (common reed) invasion on aboveground biomass and soil properties in brackish tidal marsh of the Mullica River. New Jersey. Estuaries, 22: 927–935.Li X Y, Lin L S, Zhao Q, et al. 2010. Influence of groundwater depth on species composition and community structure in the transition zone of Cele oasis. Journal of Arid Land, 2: 235−242.Majken P, Claudia B, Hans B. 2005. Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. Aquatic Botany, 81: 285–299.Manning P, Morrison S A, Bonkowski M, et al. 2008. Nitrogen enrichment modi?es plant community structure via changes to plant-soil feedback. Oecologia, 157: 661–673.Marty V, Catherine G P, Michael J W. 2007. Biodiversity, exotic plant species, and herbivory: The good, the bad, and the ungulate. Forest Ecology and Management, 246: 66–72.Matamala R, Gonzalez-Meler M A, Jastrow J D, et al. 2003. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential. Science, 302: 1385–1387.Matsushita N, Matoh T. 1991. Characterization of Na exclusion mechanisms of salt-tolerant reed plant in comparison with salt-sensitive rice plant. Physiologia Plantarum, 83: 170–176.Meekins J F, McCarthy B C. 2001. Effect of environmental variation on the invasive success of a nonindigenous forest herb. Ecological Applications, 11: 1336–1348. Meyerson L A, Saltonstal K, Windham L, et al. 2000. A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 8: 89–103.Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25: 239–250.Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 651–681.Niklas K J. 2007. Maximum plant height and the biophysical factors that limit it. Tree Physiology, 27: 433–440.Qian Y B, Wu Z N, Yang Q, et al. 2007. Ground-surface conditions of sand-dust event occurrences in the southern Junggar Basin of Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 70: 49–62.Reynolds H L, Packer A, Bever J D, et al. 2003. Grassroots ecology: plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology, 84(9): 2281–2291.Roberts J. 2000. Changes in Phragmites australis in south-eastern Australia: A habitat assessment. Folia Geobotanica, 35: 353–362.Robertson G P, Crum J R, Ellis B G. 1993. The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia, 96: 451–456.Robinson D. 1994. The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist, 127: 635–674.Sonmez S, Buyuktas D, Okturen F, et al. 2008. Assessment of different soil to water ratios (1:1, 1:2.5, 1:5) in soil salinity studies. Geoderma, 144: 361–369.Thevs N S, Gahlert Z F, Succow M M. 2007. Productivity of reed (Phragmites australis Trin. ex Steud.) in continental-arid NW China in relation to soil, groundwater, and land-use. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 81: 62–68. Tilman D, Wedin D. 1991. Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology, 72: 685-700.Turnbull L C. 2009. Changes to nutrient and carbon cycling, soil properties, and ecosystem processes by the invasive plants Phalaris arundinacea and Zostera japonica. PhD Dissertation. Eugene: University of Oregon.Valerie T E, Christine V H. 2008. Embracing variability in the application of plant–soil interactions to the restoration of communities and ecosystems. Restoration Ecology, 16: 713–729.Vasquez E A, Glenn E P, Brown J J, et al. 2005. Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 298: 1–8. Vinton M A, Burke I C. 1995. Interactions between individual plant species and soil nutrient status in short-grass steppe. Ecology, 76: 1116–1133.Weis J S, Weis P. 2003. Is the invasion of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into tidal marshes of the eastern US an ecological disaster? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46: 816–820.Yadav S, Irfan M, Ahmad A, et al. 2011. Causes of salinity and plant manifestations to salt stress: a review. Journal of Environmental Bi-ology, 32: 667–685.Zhao Y, Xia X H, Yang Z F. 2013. Growth and nutrient accumulation of Phragmites australis in relation to water level variation and nutrient loadings in a shallow lake. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25: 16–25.Zhu H W, Xia J, Cao G D, et al. 2013. Dynamic change of soil salinity in salinization abandoned farmland and affecting factors. Soils, 45: 339–345. Zhu J K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 53: 247–273.
2014, Vol. 6 
