摘要 Quantitative information on the fate and efficiency of nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied to coarse textured calcareous soils in arid farming systems is scarce but, as systems intensify, is essential to support sustainable agronomic management decisions. A mesh house study was undertaken to trace the fate of N fertilizer applied to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv., Huiyuan701) growing on a reconstructed profile (0–100 cm) of a calcareous (>15% CaCO3) sandy loam soil. Two irrigation methods (drip irrigation, DI; and furrow irrigation, FI) and four N application rates (0, 240, 360 and 480 kg/hm2, abbreviated as N0, N240, N360, and N480, respectively) were applied. 15N-labelled urea fertilizer was applied in a split application. DI enhanced the biomass of whole plant and all parts of the plant, except for root; more fertilizer N was taken up and mostly stored in vegetative parts; N utilization efficiency (NUE) was significantly greater than in FI. N utilization efficiency (NUE) decreased from 52.59% in N240 to 36.44% in N480. N residue in soil and plant N uptake increased with increased N dosage, but recovery rate decreased consistently both in DI and FI. Plant N uptake and soil N residue were greater in DI than in FI. N residue mainly stayed within 0–40 cm depth in DI but within 40–80 cm depth in FI. FI showed 17.89% of N leached out, but no N leaching occurred in DI. N recovery rate in the soil-plant system was 75.82% in DI, which was markedly greater than the 55.97% in FI. DI exhibited greater NUE, greater residual N in the soil profile and therefore greater N recovery rate than in FI; also, N distribution in soil profile shallowed in DI, resulting in a reduced risk of N leaching compared to FI; and enhanced shoot growth and reduced root growth in DI is beneficial for more economic yield formation. Compared to furrow irrigation, drip irrigation is an irrigation method where N movement favors the prevention of N from being lost in the plant-soil system and benefits a more efficient use of N.
Abstract: Quantitative information on the fate and efficiency of nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied to coarse textured calcareous soils in arid farming systems is scarce but, as systems intensify, is essential to support sustainable agronomic management decisions. A mesh house study was undertaken to trace the fate of N fertilizer applied to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv., Huiyuan701) growing on a reconstructed profile (0–100 cm) of a calcareous (>15% CaCO3) sandy loam soil. Two irrigation methods (drip irrigation, DI; and furrow irrigation, FI) and four N application rates (0, 240, 360 and 480 kg/hm2, abbreviated as N0, N240, N360, and N480, respectively) were applied. 15N-labelled urea fertilizer was applied in a split application. DI enhanced the biomass of whole plant and all parts of the plant, except for root; more fertilizer N was taken up and mostly stored in vegetative parts; N utilization efficiency (NUE) was significantly greater than in FI. N utilization efficiency (NUE) decreased from 52.59% in N240 to 36.44% in N480. N residue in soil and plant N uptake increased with increased N dosage, but recovery rate decreased consistently both in DI and FI. Plant N uptake and soil N residue were greater in DI than in FI. N residue mainly stayed within 0–40 cm depth in DI but within 40–80 cm depth in FI. FI showed 17.89% of N leached out, but no N leaching occurred in DI. N recovery rate in the soil-plant system was 75.82% in DI, which was markedly greater than the 55.97% in FI. DI exhibited greater NUE, greater residual N in the soil profile and therefore greater N recovery rate than in FI; also, N distribution in soil profile shallowed in DI, resulting in a reduced risk of N leaching compared to FI; and enhanced shoot growth and reduced root growth in DI is beneficial for more economic yield formation. Compared to furrow irrigation, drip irrigation is an irrigation method where N movement favors the prevention of N from being lost in the plant-soil system and benefits a more efficient use of N.
Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201103003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31060276), and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011AA100508)
ChangZhou WEI, TengFei MA, XiaoJuan WANG, Juan WANG. The fate of fertilizer N applied to cotton in relation to irrigation methods and N dosage in arid area[J]. 干旱区科学, 2012, 4(3): 320-329.
ChangZhou WEI, TengFei MA, XiaoJuan WANG, Juan WANG. The fate of fertilizer N applied to cotton in relation to irrigation methods and N dosage in arid area. Journal of Arid Land, 2012, 4(3): 320-329.
Allen S C, Jose S, Nair P K R, et al. 2004. Competition for 15N-labeled fertilizer in apecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Plant and Soil, 263: 151–164.Badr M A, Abou Hussein S D, El-Tohamy W A, et al. 2010. Nutrient uptake and yield of tomato under various methods of fertilizer application and levels of fertigation in arid lands. Healthy Plants, 62(1): 11–19.Barber L D, Joern B C, Volenec J J, et al. 1996. Supplemental nitrogen effects on alfalfa regrowth and nitrogen mobilization from roots. Crop Science, 36: 1217–1223.Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M. 2001. Canopy photosynthesis, specific leaf weight, and yield components of cotton under varying nitrogen supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 24: 469–477. Chua T T, Bronson K F, Booker J D, et al. 2003. In-season nitrogen status sensing in irrigated cotton: I. yields and nitrogen-15 recovery. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67: 1428–1438.Clawson E L, Cothren J T, Blouin D C, et al. 2008. Timing of maturity in ultra narrow and conventional row cotton as affected by nitrogen fertilizer rate. Agronomy Journal, 100: 421–431.Cui Z L, Chen X P, Zhang F S. 2010. Current nitrogen management status and measures to improve the intensive wheat–maize system in China. Ambio, 39: 376–384.Davidson R L. 1969. Effects of soil nutrients and moisture on root/shoot ratios in Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. Annals of Botany, 33(3): 571–577.Freney J R, Chen D L, Mosier A R, et al. 1993. Use of nitrification inhibitors to increase fertilizer nitrogen recovery and lint yield in irrigated cotton. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 34: 37–44.Hagin J, Lowengart A. 1996. Fertigation for minimizing environmental pollution by fertilizers. Fertilizer Research, 43: 5–7.Hancock J M, McNeill A M, McDonald G K, et al. 2011. Fate of fertiliser N applied to wheat on a coarse textured highly calcareous soil under simulated semi-arid conditions. Plant and Soil, 348: 139–153.Hou Z A, Li P F, Li B G, et al. 2007. Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton. Plant and Soil, 290: 115–126.Mackay A D, Barber S A. 1985. Soil moisture effects on root growth and phosphorus uptake by corn. Agronomy Journal, 77(4): 519–523.Mahmood T, Ali R, Sajjad M I, et al. 2000. Denitrification and total fertilizer-N losses from an irrigated cotton field. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 31: 270–278.Mmolawa K, Or D. 2000. Root zone solute dynamics under drip irrigation: a review. Plant and Soil, 222: 163–190.Mohammad M J, Zuraiqi S, Quasmeh W, et al. 1999. Yield response and nitrogen utilization efficiency by drip irrigated potato. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 54: 243–249.Mohammad M J. 2004. Utilization of applied fertilizer nitrogen and irrigation water by drip-fertigated squash as determined by nuclear and traditional techniques. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 68: 1–11.Norton E R, Silvertooth J C. 2007. Evaluation of added nitrogen interaction effects on recovery efficiency in irrigated cotton. Soil Science, 172: 983–991.Papadopoulos I. 1988. N fertigation of trickle-irrigated potato. Fertilizer Research, 16: 157–167.Phene C J. 1995. The most economical method of irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage, 14(1): 50–52.Quiñones A, Bañuls J, Primo-Millo E, et al. 2005. Recovery of the 15N-labelled fertiliser in citrus trees in relation with timing of application and irrigation system. Plant and Soil, 268: 367–376.Sammis T W. 1980. Comparison of sprinkler, trickle, subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agronomy Journal, 72: 701–704.Sharmasarkar F C, Sharmasarkar S, Miller S D, et al. 2001. Assessment of drip and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugarbeets. Agricultural Water Management, 46: 241–251.Starck J, McCann C, Westermann I R, et al. 1993. Potato response to split N timing with varying amount of excessive irrigation. American Potato Journal, 70: 765–777.Stikic R, Popovic S, Srdic M, et al. 2003. Partial root drying (PRD): a new technique for growing plants that saves water and improves the quality of fruit. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology (Special issue): 164–171.Thompson T L, Doerge T A, Godin R E. 2000. Nitrogen and water interactions in subsurface drip-irrigated cauliflower: II. Agronomic, economic, and environmental outcomes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64: 412–418. Wang C, Isoda A, Wang P. 2004. Growth and yield performance of some cotton cultivars in Xinjiang, China, an arid area with short growing period. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190: 177–183.Wienhold B J, Trooien T P, Reichman G A. 1995. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated corn in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 87: 842–846.Xing G X, Gao Y C, Shi S L. 2001. N pollution sources and denitrification in water bodies in Taihu Lake region. Science in China: Series B, 44(3): 304–314.Xu W L, Liu H, Zhang Y S, et al. 2009. In situ monitoring of ammonia volatilization from grey desert soil under different fertilizers in Xinjiang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(8): 4565–4571.Zapata F. 1990. Isotope techniques in soil fertility and plant nutrition studies. In: Hardarson G. Use of Nuclear Techniques in Studies of Soil–Plant Relationships. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 61–128.Zhang L, Spiertz J H J, Zhang S, et al. 2008. Nitrogen economy in relay intercropping systems of wheat and cotton. Plant and Soil, 303: 55–68.Zhu Z L, Chen D L. 2002. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China – contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 63: 117–127.
2012, Vol. 4 
