Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2015, Vol. 7 Issue (1): 101-109    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-014-0035-3
Research Articles     
Responses of microbial activities and soil physical-chemical properties to the successional process of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang
BingChang ZHANG, XiaoBing ZHOU, YuanMing ZHANG*
Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresources in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
Download:   PDF(175KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Biological soil crusts (BSCs) are capable of modifying nutrient availability to favor the estab-lishment of biogeochemical cycles. Microbial activities serve as critical roles for both carbon and nutrient transformation in BSCs. However, little is known about microbial activities and physical-chemical properties of BSCs in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang, China. In the present research, a sampling line with 1-m wide and 20-m long was set up in each of five typical interdune areas selected randomly in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Within each sampling line, samples of bare sand sheet, algal crusts, lichen crusts and moss crusts were randomly collected at the depth of 0–2 cm. Variations of microalgal biomass, microbial biomass, enzyme activities and soil physical-chemical properties in different succession of BSCs were analyzed. The relationships between microalgal biomass, microbial biomass, enzymatic activities and soil physical-chemical properties were explored by stepwise regression. Our results indicate that microalgal biomass, microbial biomass and most of enzyme activities increased as the BSCs developed and their highest values occurred in lichen or moss crusts. Except for total K, the contents of most soil nutrients (organic C, total N, total P, available N, available P and available K) were the lowest in the bare sand sheet and significantly increased with the BSCs development, reaching their highest values in moss crusts. However, pH values significantly de-creased as the BSCs developed. Significant and positive correlations were observed between chlorophyll a and microbial biomass C. Total P and N were positively associated with chlorophyll a and microbial biomass C, whereas there was a significant and negative correlation between microbial biomass and available P. The growth of cyanobacteria and microorganism contributed C and N in the soil, which offered substrates for enzyme activities thus increasing enzyme activities. Probably, improvement in enzyme activities increased soil fertility and promoted the growth of cyanobacteria, eukaryotic algae and heterotrophic microorganism, with the accelerating succession of BSCs. The present research found that microalgal-microbial biomass and enzyme activities played important roles on the contents of nutrients in the successional stages of BSCs and helped us to understand developmental mechanism in the succession of BSCs.

Key wordsdrought assessment      drought index      dekad time scale      rainfed agriculture     
Received: 09 December 2013      Published: 10 February 2015
Fund:  

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41071041; U1203301) and the West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (RCPY201101).

Corresponding Authors:
Cite this article:

BingChang ZHANG, XiaoBing ZHOU, YuanMing ZHANG. Responses of microbial activities and soil physical-chemical properties to the successional process of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(1): 101-109.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-014-0035-3     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2015/V7/I1/101

Ajwa H A, Dell C J, Rice C W. 1999. Changes in enzyme activities and microbial biomass of tallgrass prairie soil as related to burning and nitrogen fertilization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 31: 769–777.

Allison S D, Jastrow J D. 2006. Activities of extracellular enzymes in physically isolated fractions of restored grassland soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 3245–3256.

Baldrian P, Merhautova V, Petrankova M T, et al. 2010. Distribution of microbial biomass and activity of extracellular enzymes in a hardwood forest soil reflect soil moisture content. Applied Soil Ecology, 46: 177–182.

Banfield J F, Barker W W, Welch S A, et al. 1999. Biological impact on mineral dissolution: Application of the lichen model to understanding mineral weathering in the rhizosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96.

Belnap J, Gillette D A. 1997. Disturbance of biological soil crusts: Impacts on potential wind erodibility of sandy desert soils in southeastern Utah. Land Degradation and Development, 8: 355–362.

Belnap J. 2002. Nitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts from southeast Utah, USA. Biology and Fertility of Soil, 35: 128–135.

Belnap J, Phillips S L. 2002. Biological soil crusts: Effects of global change on ecosystem roles and restoration. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts, 87: 9.

Belnap J, Lange O L. 2003. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. Berlin: Springer, 3–30.

Brotoff W N. 2002. Cryptobiotic crusts of a seasonally inundated Dune-Pan system at Edwards Air Force Base, Western Mojave Desert, California. Journal of Arid Environments, 51: 339–361.

Catford J A, Walsh C J, Beardall J. 2007. Catchment urbanization increases benthic microalgal biomass in streams under controller light conditions. Aquatic Sciences, 69: 511–522.

Chamizo S, Canton Y, Lazaro R, et al. 2012a. Crust composition and disturbance drive infiltration through biological soil crusts in semiarid ecosystems. Ecosystems, 15: 148–161.

Chamizo S, Canton Y, Miralles I, et al. 2012b. Biological soil crust development affects physicochemical characteristics of soil surface in semiarid ecosystems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 49: 96–105.

Chen L Z, Xie Z M, Hu C X, et al. 2006. Man-made desert algal crusts as affected by environmental factors in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 67: 521–527.

Chen Y N, Wang Q, Li W H, et al. 2007. Microbiotic crusts and their interrelations with environmental factors in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Western China. Environmental Geology, 52: 691–700.

Dick R P. 1994. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In: Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D F, et al. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 107–124.

Eldridge D J, Greene R S B. 1994. Microbiotic soil crusts–a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 32: 389–415.

Evans R D, Johansen J R. 1999. Microbiotic crusts and ecosystem processes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18: 183–225.

Evans R, Lange O. 2003. Biological soil crusts and ecosystem nitrogen and carbon dynamics. In: Belnap J, Lange O L. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. New York: Springer, 263–279.

Glaciela K, Odair A, Mariangela H. 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: Lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42: 1–13.

Grote E E, Belnap J, Housman D C, et al. 2010. Carbon exchange in biological soil crust communities under differential temperatures and soil water contents: implications for global change. Global Change Biology, 16: 2763–2774.

Guo Y R, Zhao H L, Zuo X A, et al. 2008. Biological soil crust development and its topsoil properties in the process of dune stabilization, Inner Mongolia, China. Environmental Geology, 54: 653–662.

Harper K T, Belnap J. 2001. The influence of biological soil crusts on mineral uptake by associated vascular plants. Journal of Arid Environments, 47: 347–357.

Harel Y, Ohad I, Kaplan A. 2004. Activation of photosynthesis and resistance to photoinhibition in cyanobacteria within biological desert crust. Plant Physiology, 136: 3070–3079.

Hawkes C V, Flechtner V R. 2002. Biological soil crusts in a xeric Florida shrubland: composition, abundance, and spatial heterogeneity of crusts with different disturbance histories. Microbial Ecology, 43: 1–12.

Hernandez D L, Hobbie S E. 2010. The effects of substrate composition, quantity, and diversity on microbial activity. Plant and Soil, 335: 397–411.

Housman D C, Powers H H, Collins A D, et al. 2006. Carbon and nitrogen fixation differ between successional stages of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Arid Environments, 66: 620–634.

Kandeler E, Mosier A R, Morgan J A, et al. 2006. Response of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to the transient elevation of carbon dioxide in a semi-arid grassland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 2448–2460.

Katsalirou E, Deng S P, Nofziger D L, et al. 2010. Long-term management effects on organic C and N pools and activities of C–transforming enzymes in prairie soils. European Journal of Soil Biology, 46: 335–341.

Killham K. 1994. Soil Ecology. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 40–61.

Lan S B, Wu L, Zhang D L, et al. 2012a. Successional stages of biological soil crusts and their microstructure variability in Shapotou region (China). Environmental Earth Sciences, 65: 77–88.

Lan S B, Wu L, Zhang D L, et al. 2012b. Composition of photosynthetic organisms and diurnal changes of photosynthetic efficiency in algae and moss crusts. Plant and Soil, 351: 325–336.

Li X R, Jia X H, Long L Q, et al. 2005. Effects of biological soil crusts on seed bank, germination and establishment of two annual plant species in the Tengger Desert (N China). Plant and Soil, 277: 375–385.

Mager D M, Thomas A D. 2011. Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial soil crusts: a review of their role in dryland soil processes. Journal of Arid Environments, 75: 91–97.

Miralles I, Domingo F, Canton Y, et al. 2012. Hydrolase enzyme activities in a successional gradient of biological soil crusts in arid and semi-arid zones. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 53: 124–132.

Rao B Q, Liu Y D, Wang W B, et al. 2009. Influence of dew on biomass and photosystem II activity of cyanobacterial crusts in the Hopq Desert, northwest China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41: 2387–2393.

Redfield E, Barns S M, Belnap J, et al. 2002. Comparative diversity and composition of cyanobacteria in three predominant soil crusts of the Colorado Plateau. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 40: 55–63.

Rose C, Axler R P. 1998. Uses of alkaline phosphatase activity in evaluating phytoplankton community phosphorus deficiency. Hydrobiologia, 361: 145–156.

Singer M J, Munns D N. 2006. Soils–An Introduction. Ohio: Pearson Prentic Hall, 158–189.

Su Y G, Zhao X, Li A X, et al. 2011. Nitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts from the Tengger desert, northern China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 47: 182–187.

Su Y G, Wu L, Zhou Z B, et al. 2013. Carbon flux in deserts deponds on soil cover type: A case study in the Gurbantunggut Desert, North China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 58: 332–340.

Vance E D, Brookes P C, Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 19: 703–707.

Wu N, Zhang Y M, Downing A. 2009. Comparative study of nitrogenase activity in different types of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China. Journal of Arid Environments, 73: 828–833.

Yeager C M, Kornoshy J L, Housman D C, et al. 2004. Diazotrophic community structure and function in two stages of biological soil crusts from the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70: 973–983.

Yu J, Kidron G J, Pen-Mouratov S, et al. 2012. Do development stages of biological soil crusts determine activity and functional diversity in a sand-dune ecosystem? Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 51: 66–72.

Zeng X Q, Hou Y J, Yang Z C, et al. 2013. Chlorophyll fluorescence of desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterial crusts of sub-tropical inselberg rocks in southern China: 2. Rehydration at different light intensities and temperatures. Nova Hedwigia, 96: 511–524.

Zhang B C, Zhang Y M, Zhao J C, et al. 2009. Microalgal species variation at different successional stages in biological soil crusts of the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45: 539–547.

Zhang B C, Zhang Y M, Downing A, et al. 2011. Distribution and composition of cyanobacteria and microalgae associated with biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. Arid Land Research and Management, 25: 275–293.

Zhang B C, Zhang Y M, Su Y G, et al. 2013. Responses of microalgal-microbial biomass and enzyme activities of biological soil crusts to moisture and inoculated Microcoleus vaginatus gradients. Arid Land Research and Management, 27: 216–230.

Zhang Y M. 2005. The microstructure and formation of biological soil crusts in their early developmental stage. Chinese Science Bulletin, 50: 117–121.

Zhang Y M, Chen J, Wang L, et al. 2007. The spatial distribution patterns of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northern Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 68: 599–610.

Zhang Y M, Wu N, Zhang B C, et al. 2010. Species composition, distribution patterns and ecological functions of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Journal of Arid Land, 2: 180–189.

Zhou X B, Zhang Y M, Downing A. 2012. Non-linear response of microbial activity across a gradient of nitrogen addition to a soil from the Gurbantunggut Desert, northwestern China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 47: 67–77.
[1] GAO Liming, ZHANG Yaonan. Spatio-temporal variation of hydrological drought under climate change during the period 1960–2013 in the Hexi Corridor, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 157-171.
[2] Rui LI, Atsushi TSUNEKAWA, Mitsuru TSUBO. Index-based assessment of agricultural drought in a semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(1): 3-15.