Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2016, Vol. 8 Issue (2): 207-220    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-015-0091-3     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-015-0091-3
Research Articles     
Dynamics of ecosystem carbon stocks during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China
WANG Kaibo1, DENG Lei2, REN Zongping2,3*, SHI Weiyu1, CHEN Yiping1, SHANG-GUAN Zhouping2
1 State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710075, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China;
3 State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-Hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
Download:   PDF(1562KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  In the last few decades, the Loess Plateau had experienced an extensive vegetation restoration to reduce soil erosion and to improve the degraded ecosystems. However, the dynamics of ecosystem carbon stocks with vegetation restoration in this region are poorly understood. This study examined the changes of carbon stocks in mineral soil (0–100 cm), plant biomass and the ecosystem (plant and soil) following vegetation restoration with different models and ages. Our results indicated that cultivated land returned to native vegetation (natural restoration) or artificial forest increased ecosystem carbon sequestration. Tree plantation sequestered more carbon than natural vegetation succession over decades scale due to the rapid increase in biomass carbon pool. Restoration ages had different effects on the dynamics of biomass and soil carbon stocks. Biomass carbon stocks increased with vegetation restoration age, while the dynamics of soil carbon stocks were affected by sampling depth. Ecosystem carbon stocks consistently increased after tree plantation regardless of the soil depth; but an initial decrease and then increase trend was observed in natural restoration chronosequences with the soil sampling depth of 0–100 cm. Moreover, there was a time lag of about 15–30 years between biomass production and soil carbon sequestration in 0–100 cm, which indicated a long-term effect of vegetation restoration on deeper soil carbon sequestration.

Key wordsminimum ecological flow      minimum ecological water level      wetted perimeter method      physical habitat simulation method      in-undated forest width method      lake surface area method     
Received: 20 April 2015      Published: 01 April 2016
Fund:  

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301610, 41501094, 41330858), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZZD-EW-04), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2014JQ5170) and the open foundation of State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau (A318009902-1510).

Corresponding Authors:
Cite this article:

WANG Kaibo, DENG Lei, REN Zongping, SHI Weiyu, CHEN Yiping, SHANG-GUAN Zhouping. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon stocks during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 207-220.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-015-0091-3     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2016/V8/I2/207

China’s State Forestry Administration. 2011. Carbon sink metering and monitoring guidelines of afforestation projects. http://www.xjlyt.gov.cn/get/zwgk/20110324.doc. (in Chinese)

Deng L, Wang K B, Chen M L, et al. 2013b. Soil organic carbon storage capacity positively related to forest succession on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 110: 1–7.

Deng L, Liu G B, Shangguan Z P. 2014. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China's ‘Grain-for-Green’ Program: a synthesis. Global Change Biology, 20(11): 3544–3556.

Don A, Rebmann C, Kolle O, et al. 2009. Impact of afforestation-associated management changes on the carbon balance of grassland. Global Change Biology, 15(8): 1990–2002.

Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A. 2011. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks-a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 17(4): 1658–1670.

Dou X L, Deng Q, Li M, et al. 2013. Reforestation of Pinus massoniana alters soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in eroded soil in south China. Ecological Engineering, 52: 154–160.

Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, et al. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Hayama, Japan. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.

Feng X M, Fu B J, Lu N, et al. 2013. How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China’s Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 3: 2846.

Foote R L, Grogan P. 2010. Soil carbon accumulation during temperate forest succession on abandoned low productivity agricultural lands. Ecosystems, 13(6): 795–812.

Guidi C, Vesterdal L, Gianelle D, et al. 2014. Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen following forest expansion on grassland in the Southern Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 328: 103–116.

Guo L B, Gifford R M. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology, 8(4): 345–360.

Hiltbrunner D, Zimmermann S, Hagedorn F. 2013. Afforestation with Norway spruce on a subalpine pasture alters carbon dynamics but only moderately affects soil carbon storage. Biogeochemistry, 115(1): 251–266.

Jandl R, Rodeghiero M, Martinez C, et al. 2014. Current status, uncertainty and future needs in soil organic carbon monitoring. Science of the Total Environment, 468–469: 376–383.

Jia X X, Wei X R, Shao M A, et al. 2012. Distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen along a revegetational succession on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 95: 160–168.

Jin Z, Dong Y S, Wang Y Q, et al. 2014. Natural vegetation restoration is more beneficial to soil surface organic and inorganic carbon sequestration than tree plantation on the Loess Plateau of China. Science of the Total Environment, 485–486: 615–623.

Kalembasa S J, Jenkinson D S. 1973. A comparative study of titrimetric and gravimetric methods for the determination of organic carbon in soil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 24(9): 1085–1090.

Kalinina O, Chertov O, Dolgikh A V, et al. 2013. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Albeluvisols: Soil development, carbon stocks and dynamics of carbon pools. Geoderma, 207: 221–233.

Kirschbaum M U F, Guo L B, Gifford R M. 2008. Observed and modelled soil carbon and nitrogen changes after planting a Pinus radiata stand onto former pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(1): 247–257.

Laganière J, Angers D A, Paré D. 2010. Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 16(1): 439–453.

Li D J, Niu S L, Luo Y Q. 2012. Global patterns of the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation: a meta-analysis. New Phytologist, 195(1): 172–181.

Li Y Q, Xu M, Zou X M, et al. 2005. Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in plantation and secondary forest in wet tropics in Puerto Rico. Global Change Biology, 11(2): 239–248.

Liu Z P, Shao M A, Wang Y Q. 2011. Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 142(3–4): 184–194.

Lorenz K, Lal R, Shipitalo M J. 2011. Stabilized soil organic carbon pools in subsoils under forest are potential sinks for atmospheric CO2. Forest Science, 57(1): 19–25.

Lu N, Liski J, Chang R Y, et al. 2013. Soil organic carbon dynamics of black locust plantations in the middle Loess Plateau area of China. Biogeosciences, 10(11): 7053–7063.

Marín-Spiotta E, Sharma S. 2013. Carbon storage in successional and plantation forest soils: a tropical analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22(1): 105–117.

Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168(1–3): 241–257.

Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, et al. 2011. Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone-carbon response functions as a model approach. Global Change Biology, 17(7): 2415–2427.

Richter D D, Markewitz D, Trumbore S E, et al. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature, 400(6739): 56–58.

Ritter E. 2007. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in volcanic soils following afforestation with native birch (Betula pubescens) and introduced larch (Larix sibirica) in Iceland. Plant and Soil, 295(1–2): 239–251.

Sartori F, Lal R, Ebinger M H, et al. 2007. Changes in soil carbon and nutrient pools along a chronosequence of poplar plantations in the Columbia Plateau, Oregon, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 122(3): 325–339.

Shi S W, Zhang W, Zhang P, et al. 2013. A synthesis of change in deep soil organic carbon stores with afforestation of agricultural soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 296: 53–63.

Tremblay S, Ouimet R. 2013. White spruce plantations on abandoned agricultural land: Are they more effective as c sinks than natural succession? Forests, 4(4): 1141–1157.

Wang Y F, Fu B J, Lü Y H, et al. 2011. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil organic carbon sequestration at multiple scales in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 85(1): 58–66.

Wang F M, Xu X, Zou B, et al. 2013. Biomass accumulation and carbon sequestration in four different aged Casuarina equisetifolia coastal shelterbelt plantations in south China. PLoS ONE, 8(10): e77449.  

Wei J, Cheng J M, Li W J, et al. 2012. Comparing the effect of naturally restored forest and grassland on carbon sequestration and its vertical distribution in the Chinese loess plateau. PLoS ONE, 7(7): e40123.

Wei X R, Qiu L P, Shao M A, et al. 2012. The accumulation of organic carbon in mineral soils by afforestation of abandoned farmland. PLoS ONE, 7(3): e32054.

Yang Y H, Luo Y Q, Finzi A C. 2011. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics during forest stand development: a global synthesis. New Phytologist, 190(4): 977–989.

Zhang C, Liu G B, Xue S, et al. 2013. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 54: 16–24.