| Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
| Transdisciplinary research for supporting the integration of ecosystem services into land and water management in the Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang, China |
| Tuck-Fatt SIEW, Petra DÖLL |
| Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Altenhöferallee 1, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany |
|
|
|
Abstract There is a growing need for both science and practice domains to collaboratively and systematically seek knowledge-based strategies for sustainable development. In recent years, transdisciplinary research has emerged as a new approach that enables joint problem solving among scientists and stakeholders in various fields. In this paper, we aim to introduce transdisciplinary research for supporting the integration of the concept of ecosystem services into land and water management in the Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang, Northwest China. While a large number of ecosystem service studies have helped to raise the awareness for the value of nature in China, a number of challenges remain, including an improved understanding of the relationships between ecosystem structure, functions and services, and the interaction of the various ecosystem services. A meaningful valuation of ecosystem services also requires the consideration of their strong spatial heterogeneity. In addition, ways to introduce the concept of ecosystem services into decision-making in China need to be explored. Thus, successful integration of the concept of ecosystem services into actual land and water management requires a broad knowledge base that only a number of scientific disciplines and stakeholders can provide jointly, via a transdisciplinary research process. We regard transdisciplinary research as a recursive process to support adaptive management that includes joint knowledge generation and integration among scientists and stakeholders. System, target, and transformation knowledge are generated and integrated during the process of (1) problem (re)definition, (2) problem analysis and strategy development, and (3) evaluation of the impact of the derived strategy. Methods to support transdisciplinary research comprise participatory modelling (actor-based modelling and Bayesian Networks modelling) and partici-patory scenario development. Actor-based modelling is a semi-quantitative method that is based on the analysis of problem perspectives of individual stakeholders as depicted in perception graphs. With Bayesian Networks, complex problem fields are modelled probabilistically in a simplified manner, using both quantitative data and qualitative expert judgments. These participatory methods serve to integrate diverse scientific and stakeholder knowledge and to support the generation of actually implementable management strategies for sustainable development. For the purpose of integrating ecosystem services in land and water management in the Tarim River Basin through trans-disciplinary research, collaboration among scientists and institutional stakeholders from different sectors including water, agriculture, forestry, and nature conservation is required. The challenge is to adapt methods of transdisciplinary research to socio-cultural conditions in China, particularly regarding ways of communication and decision-making.
|
|
Received: 31 October 2011
Published: 06 June 2012
|
| Fund: The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
|
|
|
| Bammer G. 2005. Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecology and Society, 10(2): 6. Beierle T C. 2002. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Analysis, 22: 739–749.Bishop P, Hines A, Collins T. 2007. The current state of scenario de-velopment: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1): 5–25.Bots P W G. 2007. Analysis of multi-actor policy contexts using per-ception graphs. In: Lin T Y. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Confer-ence on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT'07). Los Alamos: IEEE Press, 160–167.Bromley J, Jackson N A, Clymer O J, et al. 2005. The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20(2): 231–242.Cain J D, Jinapala K, Makin I W, et al. 2003. Participatory decision support for agricultural management. a case study from Sri Lanka. Agricultural Systems, 76(2): 457–482.CASS/ProClim. 1997. Researchers Visions. Research on Sustainability and Global Change. Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers. ProClim-, Forum für Klima und Global Change, Schweizerische Akademie der Naturwissenschaften SANW, Bern. Cronin K. 2008. Transdisciplinary research (TDR) and sustainabil-ity. [2011-08-21]. http://learningforsustainability.net/pubs/Trans-disciplinary_Research_and_Sustainability.pdf.Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253–260.De Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 260–272.Döll C, Döll P. 2008. Modelling of problem perceptions and actions of actors in the field of mobile organic substances in surface waters. Salzburg geographical work, 43: 59-75.Döll P, Hauschild M. 2002. Model-based scenarios of water use in two semi-arid Brazilian states. Regional Environmental Change, 2(4): 150–162.Döll P, Krol M. 2002. Integrated scenarios of regional development in two semi-arid states of Northeastern Brazil. Integrated Assessment, 3(4): 308–320.EEA. 2001. Environmental Signals 2001. Copenhagen: European En-vironment Agency.Gaiser T, Krol M, Frischkorn H, et al. 2003. Global Change and Re-gional Impacts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Hare M, Deadman P. 2004. Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64: 25–40.Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, et al. 2006. Implications of trans-disciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60: 119–128.Huang X, Chen Y N, Ma J X, et al. 2010. Study on change in value of ecosystem service function of Tarim River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30: 67–75.Jahn T. 2008. Transdisciplinarity in research practice. In: Bergmann M, Schramm E. Transdiscplinary Research. Understanding and Assess-ing Integrative Research Processes. Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 21–37.Jakeman A, Giupponi C, Karssenberg D, et al. 2006. Integrated man-agement of water resources: concepts, approaches and challenges. In: Carraro C, Jakeman A, Karssenberg D, et al. Sustainable Manage-ment of Water Resources: An Integrated Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 3–26.Jiang L W, Tong Y F, Zhao Z J, et al. 2005. Water resources, land ex-ploration and population dynamics in arid areas–the case of the Tarim River Basin in Xinjiang of China. Population and Environ-ment, 26(6): 471–503.Jiang Y M. 2009. Transdisciplinarity as a new form of research. Zhe jiang Social Sciences, 1: 8–15.Keil F, Stieß I. 2007. Knowing What We Don’t Know: Environmental Research as Societal Learning Process. GAIA 16/3, 193–199.Lamers M, Ottow B, Francois G, et al. 2010. Beyond dry feet? Experi-ences from a participatory water management planning case in the Netherlands. Ecology and Society, 5(1): 14.Lu Z H, Zhao L X, Dai J. 2010. A study of water resource management in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67(2): 245–255.Luks F, Siebenhüner B. 2007. Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological Economics, 63: 418–426.Lynam T, de Jong W, Shel D, et al. 2007. A review of tools for incor-porating community knowledge, preferences, and values into deci-sion making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(1): 5.Max-Neef M A. 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53: 5–16.Medema W, McIntosh B S, Jeffrey P J. 2008. From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecology and Society, 13(2): 29.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.Millington P. 2000. River basin management: its role in major water infra-structure projects. Thematic Review V.3. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams. [2011-09-22]. http://oldwww.wii.gov.in/eianew/eia/ dams%20and%20development/kbase/thematic/tr53main.pdf.Mobjörk M. 2010. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42: 866–873.Oehlmann J, Schulte-Oehlmann U, Bachmann J, et al. 2006. Bisphenol A induces superfeminization in the ramshorn snail Marisa cornu-arietis (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) at environmentally relevant concentrations. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(1): 127–133.Pahl-Wostl C. 2005. Actor based analysis and modeling approaches. The Integrated Assessment Journal, 5(1): 97–118.Petts G E, Nestler J, Kennedy R. 2006. Advancing science for water resources management. Hydrobiologia, 565: 277–288. Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G. 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisci-plinary Research. Oekom: Munich.Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G. 2008. Methodological challenges of transdis-ciplinary research. Natures Sciences Societes, 16: 111–121.Pohl C, von Kerkhoff L, Hirsch Hadorn G, et al. 2008. Core terms in transdisciplinary research. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, et al. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 427–432.Pohl C. 2010. From transdisciplinarity to transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1): 74–83.Reed M S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental manage-ment: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141: 2417–2431.Reyers B, Roux D J, Cowling R M. 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conservation Biology, 24(4): 657–965.Schwartz P. 1998. The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. Chichester: John Wiley & Son.Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V, et al. 2011a. A quantitative re-view of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 630–636.Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, et al. 2011b. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Journal of Ecological Indicators (Available online 7 October 2011). Shen Y L, Lein H. 2005. Land and water resources management prob-lems in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norwegian Journal of Geography, 59(3): 237–245.Steward-Koster B, Bunn S E, Mackay S J, et al. 2010. The use of Bayesian Networks to guide investments in flow and catchment res-toration for impaired river ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 55: 243–260.Steventon J D. 2008. Conservation of marbled murrelets in British Columbia. In: Pourret O, Naim P, Marcot B. Bayesian Networks: A Practical Guide to Applications. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 127–148.Stokols D. 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38: 63–77.Sultana P, Abeyasekera S. 2007. Effectiveness of participatory planning for community management of fisheries in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 86: 201– 213.Tang D S, Deng M J. 2010. On the Management of Water Rights in the Tarim River Basin. Beijing: China Water Power Press.TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Main-streaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Mriehel (Malta): Pro-gress Press.Thevs N. 2011. Water scarcity and allocation in the Tarim Basin: Deci-sion structures and adaptations on the local level. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 40: 113–137.Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansury W, Häberli R, et al. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-solving Among Science, Tech-nology and Society. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.Tian Y L. 2008. Overview of the studies on ecosystem services. Journal of EMCC, 18: 46–50.Titz A, Döll P. 2009. Actor modelling and its contribution to the devel-opment of integrative strategies for management of pharmaceuticals in drinking water. Social Science & Medicine, 68: 672–681.UNESCO. 2009. IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level: Part 1 Prin-ciples. [2011-03-30]. http://www.unesco.org/water.Vandermeulen V, Van Huylenbroeck G. 2008. Designing transdiscipli-nary research to support policy formulation for sustainable agricul-tural development. Ecological Economics, 67: 352–361.Wiek A, Walter A I. 2009. A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. Euro-pean Journal of Operational Research, 197: 360–370.Wiesmann U, Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, et al. 2008. En-hancing transdisciplinary research: a synthesis in fifteen propositions. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, et al. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 433–441.World Bank. 2006. Integrated River Basin Management: From Con-cepts to Good Practice. Case Study 3: Tarim River Basin and the Tarim Basin Water Resources Commission, People’s Republic of China. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.Wu Z T, Zhang H J, Krause C M, et al. 2010. Climate change and hu-man activities: a case study in Xinjiang, China. Climatic Change, 99: 457–472.Xu H L, Ye M, Song, Y D. 2005. The dynamic variation of water re-sources and its tendency in the Tarim River Basin. Journal of Geo-graphical Sciences, 15(4): 467–474.Xu H L, Ye M, Li J M. 2008. The water transfer effects on agricultural development in the lower Tarim River, Xinjiang of China. Agricul-tural Water Management, 95(1): 59–68.Zhang B, Li W H, Xie G D. 2010a. Ecosystem services research in China: progress and perspective. Ecological Economics, 69: 1389–1395. Zhang J B, Wu G H, Wang Q M, et al. 2010b. Restoring environmental flows and improving riparian ecosystem of Tarim River. Journal of Arid Land, 2(1): 43–50. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
