Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
Physiological responses of Populus euphratica Oliv. to groundwater table variations in the lower reaches of Heihe River, Northwest China |
Yang ZHAO1, ChuanYan ZHAO1, ZhongLin XU2, YiYue LIU1, Yao WANG1, Chao WANG3, HuanHua PENG3, XiangLin ZHENG1 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Pastoral Agricultural Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2 MOE Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, College of Resource and Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China;
3 Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environment Systems MOE, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China |
|
|
Abstract Riparian vegetation in the lower reaches of Heihe River serves important ecological functions. However, the riparian ecosystems have been constantly deteriorating in the past 30 years simply due to water interception for oasis agricultural irrigation in the middle reaches of the river. This study pays a particular attention to Populus euphratica Oliv. forest because it is a dominant component of the riparian ecosystem in the lower reaches of Heihe River where the depth of groundwater table is the controlling factor in sustaining riparian ecosystems. To reveal leaf-related physiological responses of Populus euphratica Oliv. forest to groundwater table variations, we analyzed the relationships between the depth of groundwater table (DG) and three leaf-related parameters, i.e. leaf stomatal density (SD), specific leaf area (SLA), and stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13C). Our results show that the relationship between DG and leaf SD is a bi-mode one shaped by both salt stress and water stress. That is, salt stress appeared in shallow groundwater conditions and water stress happened in deep groundwater conditions, and the thin layer around 2.7 m of DG is a stress-free layer. Leaf SD fluctuated according to the DG variation, first decreased with increasing DG, then increased at depths ranging 2.7–3.7 m, and after a relatively stable plateau of SD at depths ranging 3.7–5.2 m, decreased again with increasing DG. Our results also show that SLA decreased exponentially with increasing DG and foliar δ13C values are also strongly dependent on DG, further demonstrating that these two parameters are sensitive indicators of water stress. The exponential curve suggests that SLA is more sensitive to DG when groundwater table is shallow and 3 m seems to be a threshold beyond which SLA becomes less sensitive to DG. Foliar δ13C becomes more sensitive when the groundwater table is deep and 7 m seems to be a threshold below which the δ13C signature becomes more sensitive to DG. These findings should be helpful in monitoring the growth and development of Populus euphratica Oliv. forests and also in providing protection measures (i.e. DG related) for Heihe River riparian forests.
|
Received: 16 October 2011
Published: 03 September 2012
|
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China (91025015, 30770387) |
Corresponding Authors:
|
Cite this article:
Yang ZHAO, ChuanYan ZHAO, ZhongLin XU, YiYue LIU, Yao WANG, Chao WANG, HuanHua PENG, XiangLin ZHENG. Physiological responses of Populus euphratica Oliv. to groundwater table variations in the lower reaches of Heihe River, Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 2012, 4(3): 281-291.
URL:
http://jal.xjegi.com/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2012.00281 OR http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2012/V4/I3/281
|
|
|
Aguirrezabal L, Bouchier-Combaud S, Radziejwoski A, et al. 2006. Plasticity to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana: dissection of leaf development into underlying growth dynamic and cellular variables reveals invisible phenotypes. Plant, Cell and Environment, 29(12): 2216–2227.Anyia A O, Herzog H. 2004. Water-use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(4): 327–339.Battaglia M, Sands P, White D, et al. 2004. CABALA: a linked carbon, water and nitrogen model of forest growth for silvicultural decision support. Forest Ecology and Management, 193(1): 251–282.Bowling D R, McDowell N G, Bond J R, et al. 2002. δ13C content of ecosystem respiration is linked to precipitation and vapor pressure deficit. Oecologia, 131(1): 113–124.Ceulemans R, Van Praet L, Jiang X N. 1995. Effects of CO2 enrichment, leaf position and clone on stomatal index and epidermal cell density in poplar (Populus). New Phytologist, 131(1): 99–107.Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30(3): 239–264.Chen S P, Bai Y F, Han X G. 2002. Variation of water-use efficiency of Leymus chinensis and Cleistogenes squarrosa in different plant communities in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Acta Botanica Sinica, 44(12): 1484–1490.Chen Y N, Chen Y P, Li W H, et al. 2003. Proline accumulation responses of Populus euphratica to groundwater table variations in Tarim River. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48(9): 958–961.Corbeels M, McMurtrie R E, Pepper D A, et al. 2005. Long-term changes in productivity of eucalypt plantations under different harvest residue and nitrogen management practices: a modeling analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 217(1): 1–18.Davi H, Barbaroux C, Dufrêne E, et al. 2008. Modelling leaf mass per area in forest canopy as affected by prevailing radiation conditions. Ecological Modelling, 211(3): 339–349.Elias P. 1995. Stomatal density and size of apple tree growing under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Biologia, 50(1): 115–118.Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R, Hubick K T. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 40(1): 503–537.Feng Z D, Wang L X, Ji Y H, et al. 2008. Climatic dependency of soil organic carbon isotopic composition along the S-N transect from 34°N to 52°N in central-east Asia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 257(3): 335–343.Gazanchian A, Hajheidari M, Sima N K, et al. 2007. Proteome response of Elymus elongatum to severe water stress and recovery. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2): 291–300.Ji X B, Kang E S, Chen R S, et al. 2006. Analysis of water resources supply and demand and security of water resources development in irrigation regions of the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Agricultural Sciences in China, 5(2): 130–140.Kitajima K, Poorter L. 2010. Tissue-level leaf toughness, but not lamina thickness, predicts sapling leaf lifespan and shade tolerance of tropical tree species. New Phytologist, 186(3): 708–721.Klich M G. 2000. Leaf variations in Elaeagnus angustifolia related to environmental heterogeneity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 44(3): 171–183.Landsberg J J, Waring R H. 1997. A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management, 95(3): 209–228.Lee X W, Feng Z D, Guo L L, et al. 2005. Soil and plant-δ13C variations along a N-S (32–55°N) transect in east central Asia. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19(3): 1–8.Li C, Berninger F, Koskela J, et al. 2000. Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27(3): 231–238.Li Q, Feng Q, Zhai L. 2010. Study of the height growth dynamic based on tree-ring data in Populus euphratica from the lower reach of the Heihe River, China. Dendrochronologia, 28(1): 49–64.Liu F, Stüzel H. 2004. Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 102(1): 15–27.Liu S P, Liu J M, Cao J Y, et al. 2006. Stomatal distribution and character analysis of leaf epidermis of Jujube under drought stress. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 34(7): 1315–1318.Liu Y, Ma L, Leavitt S W, et al. 2004. A preliminary seasonal precipitation reconstruction from tree-ring stable carbon isotopes at Mt. Helan, China, since AD 1804. Global and Planetary Change, 41(3): 229–239.Ma H C, Fung L, Wang S S, et al. 1997. Photosynthetic response of Populus euphratica to salt stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 93(1): 55–61.Ma J Y, Chen K, Xia D S, et al. 2007. Variation in foliar stable carbon isotope among populations of a desert plant, Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. in different environments. Journal of Arid Environments, 69(3): 365–374.Marcelis L F M, Heuvelink E, Goudriaan J. 1997. Modelling of biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 74(1): 83–112.Martínez J P, Silva H, Ledent J F, et al. 2007. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 26(1): 30–38.Medhurst J L, Battaglia M, Cherry M L, et al. 1999. Allometric relationships for Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden plantations. Trees-Structure and Function, 14(2): 91–101.Naiman R J, Décamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28: 621–658.Nautiyal P C, Rachaputi N R, Joshi Y C. 2002. Moisture-deficit-induced changes in leaf-water content, leaf carbon exchange rate and biomass production in groundnut cultivars differing in specific leaf area. Field Crops Research, 74(1): 67–79.Nilsson C, Jansson R, Zinko U. 1997. Long-term responses of river-margin vegetation to water-level regulation. Science, 276: 798–800.Pierce L L, Running S W, Walker J. 1994. Regional scale relationships of leaf area index to specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen content. Ecological Applications, 4(2): 313–321.Pinkard E A, Battaglia M, Mohammed C L. 2007. Defoliation and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis and growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Tree physiology, 27(7): 1053–1063.Retuerto R, Woodward F I. 1993. The influences of increased CO2 and water supply on growth, biomass allocation and water use efficiency of Sinapisalba L. grown under different wind speeds. Oecologia, 94(3): 415–427.Roderick M L, Berry S L, Noble I R. 2000. A framework for understanding the relationship between environment and vegetation based on the surface area to volume ratio of leaves. Functional Ecology, 14(4): 423–437.Royer D L. 2001. Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 114(1): 1–28.Sands P J, Landsberg J J. 2002. Parameterisation of 3–PG for plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus. Forest Ecology and Management, 163(1): 273–292.Säumel I, Ziche D, Yu R, et al. 2011. Grazing as a driver for Populus euphratica woodland degradation in the semi-arid Aibi River region, northwestern China. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(3): 265–269.Sidle W C. 2004. Predicting sustainable ground water to constructed riparian wetlands: shaker trace, Ohio, USA. The Environmentalist, 24(3): 179–186.Spence R D, Wu H, Sharpe P J H. et al. 1986. Water stress effects on guard cell anatomy and the mechanical advantage of the epidermal cells. Plant, Cell and Environment, 9(3): 197–202.Tardieu F, Granier C, Muller B. 1999. Modelling leaf expansion in a fluctuating environment: are changes in specific leaf area a consequence of changes in expansion rate? New Phytologist, 143(1): 33–43.Tichá I. 1982. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves. 7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica, 16(2): 375–471.Turner N C, Schulze E D, Nicolle D, et al. 2008. Annual rainfall does not directly determine the carbon isotope ratio of leaves of Eucalyptus species. Physiologia Plantarum, 132(4): 440–445.Vitousek P M, Field C B, Matson P A. 1990. Variation in foliar δ13C in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha: a case of internal resistance? Oecologia, 84(3): 362–370.Wang Y, Chen X, Xiang C B. 2007. Stomatal density and bio-water saving. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 49(10): 1435–1444.Whitehead D, Beadle C L. 2004. Physiological regulation of productivity and water use in Eucalyptus: a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 193(1–2): 113–140.White J D, Scott N A. 2006. Specific leaf area and nitrogen distribution in New Zealand forest species independently respond to intercepted light. Forest Ecology and Management, 226(1–3): 319–329.Williams D G, Ehleringer J R. 1996. Carbon isotope discrimination in three semi-arid woodland species along a monsoon gradient. Oecologia, 106(4): 455–460.Xu Z, Zhou G. 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59(12): 3317–3325.Yadollahi A, Arzani K, Ebadi A, et al. 2011. The response of different almond genotypes to moderate and severe water stress in order to screen for drought tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(3): 403–413.Yang H M, Wang G X. 2001. Leaf stomatal densities and distribution in Triticum aestivum under drought and CO2 enrichment. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25(3): 312–316.Yang L M, Han M, Zhou G S, et al. 2007. The changes in water-use efficiency and stoma density of Leymus chinensis along Northeast China transect. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(1): 16–23.Zhang L, Dong Z C, Huang X L. 2004. Modeling on relation between major plants growth and groundwater depth in arid area. Journal of Desert Research, 24(1): 110–113.Zhang W W, Shi S S. 2002. Study on the relation between groundwater dynamics and vegetation degeneration in Erjina Oasis. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24(4): 421–425.Zheng D, Li W H, Chen Y P, et al. 2005. Relations between groundwater and natural vegetation in the arid zone. Resources Science, 27(4): 160–167.Zheng S X, Shangguan Z P. 2007. Foliar δ13C values of nine dominant species in the Loess Plateau of China. Photosynthetica, 45(1): 110–119. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|