Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
Non-growing season soil CO2 efflux and its changes in an alpine meadow ecosystem of the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China |
ZongQiang CHANG1,2*, XiaoQing LIU1,2, Qi FENG1,2, ZongXi CHE3, HaiYang XI1,2, YongHong SU1,2, JianHua SI1,2 |
1 Alashan Desert Eco-hydrology Experimental Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2 Gansu Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering Center, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3 Academy of Water Resource Conservation Forests in Qilian Mountains of Gansu Province, Zhangye 734000, China |
|
|
Abstract Most soil respiration measurements are conducted during the growing season. In tundra and boreal forest ecosystems, cumulative, non-growing season soil CO2 fluxes are reported to be a significant component of these systems’ annual carbon budgets. However, little information exists on soil CO2 efflux during the non-growing season from alpine ecosystems. Therefore, comparing measurements of soil respiration taken annually versus during the growing season will improve the accuracy of estimating ecosystem carbon budgets, as well as predicting the response of soil CO2 efflux to climate changes. In this study, we measured soil CO2 efflux and its spatial and temporal changes for different altitudes during the non-growing season in an alpine meadow located in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Field experiments on the soil CO2 efflux of alpine meadow from the Qilian Mountains were conducted along an elevation gradient from October 2010 to April 2011. We measured the soil CO2 efflux, and analyzed the effects of soil water content and soil temperature on this measure. The results show that soil CO2 efflux gradually decreased along the elevation gradient during the non-growing season. The daily variation of soil CO2 efflux appeared as a single-peak curve. The soil CO2 efflux was low at night, with the lowest value occurring between 02:00–06:00. Then, values started to rise rapidly between 07:00–08:30, and then descend again between 16:00–18:30. The peak soil CO2 efflux appeared from 11:00 to 16:00. The soil CO2 efflux values gradually decreased from October to February of the next year and started to increase in March. Non-growing season Q10 (the multiplier to the respiration rate for a 10ºC increase in temperature) was increased with raising altitude and average Q10 of the Qilian Mountains was generally higher than the average growing season Q10 of the Heihe River Basin. Seasonally, non-growing season soil CO2 efflux was relatively high in October and early spring and low in the winter. The soil CO2 efflux was positively correlated with soil temperature and soil water content. Our results indicate that in alpine ecosystems, soil CO2 efflux continues throughout the non-growing season, and soil respiration is an impor-tant component of annual soil CO2 efflux.
|
Received: 14 September 2012
Published: 06 December 2013
|
Fund: The National Natural Science Foun¬dation of China (31270482, 41101026, 91025002), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (1107RJZA089), the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Key Technology R & D Program (2012BAC08B05). |
Corresponding Authors:
|
|
|
Aiken R M, Jawson M D, Grahammer K, et al. 1991. Positional, spatially correlated and random components of variability in carbon-dioxide efflux. Journal of Environmental Quality, 20: 301–308. Atkin O K, Tjoelker M G. 2003. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends in Plant Science, 8: 343–351.Brooks P D, Schmidt S K, Williams M W. 1997. Winter production of CO2 and N2O from alpine tundra: environmental controls and relationship to inter-system C and N fluxes. Oecologia, 110: 403–413. Brooks P D, McKnight D, Elder K. 2004. Carbon limitation of soil respiration under winter snowpacks: potential feedbacks between growing season and winter carbon fluxes. Global Change Biology, 11: 231–238.Buchmann N. 2000. Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 32: 1625–1635.Cao G M, Li Y N, Zhang J X, et al. 2001. Values of carbon dioxide emission from different land-use patterns of alpine meadow. Environmental Science, 22(6): 14–19.Chang Z Q, Shi Z M, Feng Q. 2005a. Effect of temperature in different communities on soil respiration in Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 26(2): 85–89.Chang Z Q, Shi Z M, Feng Q, et al. 2005b. Temporal variation of soil respiration on sloping pasture of Heihe River basin and effects of temperature and soil moisture on it. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(9): 1603–1606.Chapin F S, Zimov S A, Shaver G R, et al. 1996. CO2 fluctuation at high latitudes. Nature, 383: 585–586.Cui X Y, Chen Z Z, Chen S Q. 2001. Progress in research on soil respi-ration of grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(2): 315–325. Davidson E A, Belk E, Boone R D. 1998. Soil water content and tem-perature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Bi-ology, 4: 217–227.Davidson E A, Janssens I A, 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440: 165–173.Fahnestock J T, Jones M H, Brooks P D, et al. 1998. Winter and early spring CO2 efflux from tundra communities of northern Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103: 29023–29027. Fahnestock J T, Jones M H, Welker J M. 1999. Wintertime CO2 efflux from arctic soils: implications for annual carbon budgets. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13: 775–779.Fang C, Moncrieff J B, Gholz H L, et al. 1998. Soil CO2 efflux and its spatial variation in a Florida slash pine plantation. Plant and Soil, 205: 135–146.Fang C, Moncrieff J B. 2001. The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33: 155–165.Frank A B, Liebig M A, Hanson J D. 2002. Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in northern semiarid grassland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34: 1235–1241.Gansu Forest Department. 1998. Gansu Forest. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 158.Giardina C P, Ryan M G. 2000. Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature, 404: 858–861.Groffman P M, Hardy J P, Driscoll C T, et al. 2006. Snowdepth, soil freezing, and fluxes of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide andmethane in a northern hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 12: 1748–1760. Hanson P J, Edwards N T, Garten C T, et al. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48: 115–146.Hanson P J, O'Neill E G, Chambers M L S, et al. 2003. Soil respiration and litter decomposition. In: Hanson P J, Wullschleger S D. North American Temperate Deciduous Forest Responses to Changing Precipitation Regimes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 163–189.IPCC. 2007. Summary for policy makers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Man-ning M, et al. Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press, 1–18.Jia B R, Zhou G S, Wang F Y, et al. 2005. Soil respiration and its influencing factors at grazing and fenced typical Leymus chinensis Steppe, Nei Monggol. Environmental Science, 26(6): 1–7. Keith H, Jacobsen K L, Raison R J. 1997. Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperature and moisture on soil respiration in Euca-lyptus pauciflora forest. Plant and Soil, 190: 127–141.Kirschbaum M U F. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 27: 753–760.Kirschbaum M U F. 2006. The temperature dependence of organic-matter decomposition—still a topic of debate. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 2510–2518.Li L H, Wang Q B, Bai Y F, et al. 2000. Soil respiration of a Leymus Chinensis grassland stand in the Xilin River Basin as affected by over-grazing and climate. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24(6): 680–686. Ludwig B, Teepe R, de Gerenyu V L, et al. 2006. CO2 and N2O emissions from gleyic soils in the Russian tundra and a German forest during freeze–thaw periods—a microcosm study. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 3516–3519.Mariko S, Nishimura N, Mo W H, et al. 2000. Winter CO2 flux from soil and snow surfaces in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecological Research, 15: 363–372.Maxwell B. 1997. Recent climate patterns in the Arctic. In: Oechel W C, Callaghan T, Gilmanov T, et al. Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems. New York: Springer, 21–46.Mikan C J, Schimel J P, Doyle A P. 2002. Temperature controls of microbial respiration above and below freezing in Arctic tundra soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34: 1785–1795.Monson R K, Sparks J P, Rosenstiel T N, et al. 2005. Climatic influences on net ecosystem CO2 exchange during the transition from winter-time carbon source to springtime carbon sink in a high-elevation, subalpine forest. Oecologia, 146: 130–147.Monson R K, Lipson D L, Burns S P, et al. 2006. Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature, 439: 711–714.Nobrega S, Grogan P. 2007. Deeper snow enhances winter respiration from both plant-associated and bulk soil carbon pools in Birch Hummock tundra. Ecosystems, 10: 419–431.Nordstroem C, Soegaard H, Christensen T R, et al. 2001. Seasonal carbon dioxide balance and respiration of a High Arctic fen ecosystem in NE-Greenland. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 70: 149–166.Oechel W C, Hastings S J, Vourlitis G, et al. 1993. Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature, 361: 520–523. Ostroumov V E, Siegert C. 1996. Exobiological aspects of mass transfer in microzones of permafrost deposits. Advances in Space Research, 18: 79–86.Panikov N S, Flanagan P W, Oechel W C, et al. 2006. Microbial activity in soils frozen to below –39ºC. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 785–794.Pendall E, Bridgham S, Hanson P J, et al. 2004. Below-ground process responses to elevated CO2 and temperature: a discussion of observations, measurement methods, and models. New Phytologist, 162: 311–322.Post W M, Emanual W R, Zinke P J, et al. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 298: 156–159.Raich J W. 1998. Aboveground productivity and soil respiration in three Hawaiian rain forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 107: 309–318.Rayment M B. 2000. Closed chamber systems underestimate soil CO2 efflux. European Journal of Soil Science, 51: 107–110.Romanovsky V E, Osterkamp T E. 2000. Effects of unfrozen water on heat and mass transport processes in the active layer and permafrost. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 11: 219–239.Russell C A, Voroney R P. 1998. Carbon dioxide efflux from the floor of a boreal aspen forest. I. Relationship to environmental variables and estimates of C respired. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 78: 301–310.Schimel J P, Clein J S. 1996. Microbial response to freeze-thaw cycles in tundra and taiga soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28: 1061–1066.Schmidt S K, Lipson D A. 2004. Microbial growth under the snow: implications for nutrient and allelochemical availability in temperate soils. Plant and Soil, 259: 1–7.Sommerfeld R A, Mosier A R, Musselman R C. 1993. CO2, CH4 and N2O flux through a Wyoming snowpack and implications for global budgets. Nature, 361: 140–142.Uchida M, Mo W H, Nakatsubo T. 2005. Microbial activity and litter decomposition under snow cover in a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 134: 102–109.Wang C K, Yang J Y, Zhang Q Z. 2006. Soil respiration in six temperate forests in China. Global Change Biology, 12: 2103–2114. Wang W, Peng S S, Wang T, et al. 2010. Winter soil CO2 efflux and its contribution to annual soil respiration in different ecosystems of a forest-steppe ecotone, north China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42: 451–458.Xu M, Qi Y. 2001. Soil-surface CO2 efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Global Change Biology, 7: 667–677. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|