Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2019, Vol. 11 Issue (5): 652-663    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-019-0064-z
Orginal Article     
Mapping desertification potential using life cycle assessment method: a case study in Lorestan Province, Iran
RANJBAR Abolfazl1,*(), HEYDARNEJAD Somayeh1, H MOUSAVI Sayed2, MIRZAEI Roohallah3
1 Department of Desert Studies, University of Kashan, Kashan 8731753153, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Ecotourism, University of Kashan, Kashan 8731753153, Iran
3 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan 8731753153, Iran
Download: HTML     PDF(1119KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In recent year, desertification has become one of the most important environmental hazards all over the world, especially in developing countries such as Iran. Understanding the factors impactingon desertification and identifying the regionswith high desertification potential are essential to control this phenomenon (i.e., desertification). The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is essential in assessing the desertification of ecosystems, especially for susceptible ecosystems with high degradationrisks. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the desertification potential of Lorestan Province, Iran, based on the LCA method. We selected aridity, fire and dust as three indicators of desertification and collected data from 2000 to 2015. We divided the study area into 6 types of ecoregionsaccording to the climate types (arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid) and dominant species (Quercus brantii and Astragalusadscendens), and calculated the characteristic factor (CF) of eachindicator (aridity, fire and dust) by combining the indicator layers and ecoregion layer of the study area. In a given ecoregion, the sum of CF values of aridity, dust and fire indicators represents the life cycle inventory (LCI) desertification value (the higher the LCI value, the greater the desertification potential).Then, we obtained the desertification potential map by combining and overlapping the ecoregions and the normalized indicators based on the LCA method. Aridity and fire exhibit significant impacts on desertification in the study area compared with dust. In the study area, semi-arid ecoregion with Quercus brantiias the dominant species is the largest ecoregion, while arid ecoregion withQuercus brantiias the dominant species is the smallest ecoregion.Arid ecoregion withAstragalusadscendensas the dominant species (LCI desertificationvalue of 1.99) and dry sub-humid ecoregion withQuercus brantiias the dominant species (LCI desertification value of0.79)show the highest and lowest desertification potentials, respectively. Furthermore, arid ecoregion with Quercus brantii as the dominant species also has a higher LCI desertification value (1.89), showing a high desertification potential. These results suggest the necessity of proper management and appropriate utilization in these ecoregions. In general, assessing desertification potential using the LCA method on a local and regional scale can possibly provide a new methodology for identifying and protecting areas with high degradation risks.

Key words： life cycle assessment      characterization factor      desertification potential      aridity index      fire risk      dusty days      Lorestan Province     
Received: 04 August 2018      Published: 10 October 2019
Corresponding Authors:
About author:

The first and second authors contributed equally to this work.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
RANJBAR Abolfazl
HEYDARNEJAD Somayeh
H MOUSAVI Sayed
MIRZAEI Roohallah
Cite this article:

RANJBAR Abolfazl, HEYDARNEJAD Somayeh, H MOUSAVI Sayed, MIRZAEI Roohallah. Mapping desertification potential using life cycle assessment method: a case study in Lorestan Province, Iran. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 652-663.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-019-0064-z     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2019/V11/I5/652

[1] Ait L A, Saber H, Pradhan B.2018. Quantitative assessment of desertification in an arid oasis using remote sensing data and spectral index techniques. Remote Sensing, 10(2): 1862, .
[2] Akbari M, Ownegh M, Asgari H R, et al.2016. Desertification risk assessment and management program. Global Journal of EnvironmentalScience and Management, 2(4): 365-380.
[3] Aref I M, Atta H A, Ghamade A R.2011. Effect of forest fires on tree diversity and some soil properties. International Journal of Agricultura and Biology, 13(5): 659-664.
[4] Attarod P, Sadeghi S M M, Pypker T G, et al.2017. Oak trees decline; a sign of climate variability impacts in the west of Iran. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 15(4): 373-384.
[5] Bailey R G.1996.Ecosystem Geography. New York: Springer Verlag Press, 1-251.
[6] Bailey R G.2014. Ecoregions. New York: Springer Verlag Press,1-180.
[7] Bauer C, Dubreuil A, Gaillard G J.2007. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Asssessment, 12(1): 2, .12.296.
[8] Bayat R, Jafari-Ardakani A, Shah-Karami A A, 2011. Study status erosion in Lorestan Province using RS and GIS. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Natural Ecosystems, 2: 44-37.(in Persian)
[9] Clark M, Tilman D.2017. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice, Environmental. Research Letters, 12: 064016, .
[10] Cochrane M A.2003. Fire science for rainforests. Nature, 421: 913-919.
[11] Cowell S J, Clift R.2000. A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8(4): 321-331.
[12] De Rosa M.2018.Land use and Land-use changes in life cycle assessment: green modelling or black boxing? Ecological Economics, 144: 73-81.
[13] Fuchs C.2008.UNconvention to combat desertification: recent developments. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 12: 287-300.
[14] Guinée J, van Oers L, de Koning A, et al. 2006. Life Cycle Approaches for Conservation Agriculture. Leiden: Leiden University Press,1-156.
[15] Haavik L J, Billings S A, Guldin J M, et al.2015. Emergent insects, pathogens and drought shape changing patterns in oak decline in North America and Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 354: 190-205.
[16] Heydari M, Rostamy A, Najafi F, et al.2017. Effect of fire severity on physical and biochemical soil properties in Zagros oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) forests in Iran. Journal of Forest Research, 28(1): 95-104.
[17] Hosseini A, Hosseini S M, Linares J C.2017. Site factors and stand conditions associated with Persian oak decline in Zagros mountain forests. Forest Systems, 26(3): 2-14.
[18] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2006. 14044 international standard: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO.
[19] Khosh-Kish A, Alijani B, Hejazizadeh Z.2010. Analysis of dust synoptic systems in Lorestan Province. Journal of Applied Research of Geographic Sciences, 18(2): 91-110. (in Persian)
[20] Klöpffer W, Curran M A.2014. LCA Compendium-The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment, Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag Press, 271.
[21] Koellner T, Baan L D, Beck T, et al.2013. UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(6): 1188-1202.
[22] Mainguet M, Da Silva G G.1997. Desertification and drylands development: what can be done? Journal of Land Degradation and Development, 9: 375-382.
[23] Mirzaei J.2016. Impacts of two spatially and temporally isolated anthropogenic fire events on soils of oak-dominated Zagros forests of Iran. TurkishJournal of Agriculture and Forestry, 40: 109-119.
[24] Moradi A, Taheri A K, Afshar M M, et al.2017. Effects of dust on forest tree health in Zagros oak forests. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(11): 549, .
[25] Nunez M, Civit B, Muñoz P, et al.2010. Assessing potential desertification environmental impact in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(1): 67-78.
[26] Pahlavani R, Mohammad GM, Ghader DG.2017. Dynamic comparative advantage analysis of rural and pastoral systems of small ruminant husbandry. The International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(11): 81-87.
[27] Pavan A L R, Ometto A R.2016. Regionalization of land use impact models for life cycle assessment: Recommendations for their use on the global scale and their applicability to Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 60: 148-155.
[28] Prabhat K R, Lalita LS P.2014. Leaf dust deposition and its impact on biochemical aspect of some roadside plants of Aizawl, Mizoram, North-East India. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 3(11): 14-19.
[29] Rafiei F, Jangjou M, Ejtehadi H.2015. Investigation of resistant, compatible and susceptible plant traits to periodic fires in a semi-arid rangeland. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 22(1): 73-85. (in Persian)
[30] Schmidta J H, Weidema B P, Brandão M, 2015. A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99: 230-238.
[31] Scholz R W.2007. Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 1: an analytical framework for pure land occupation and land use change. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(1): 16-23.
[32] Shiravi M, Sepehr A, Mosaedi A.2016. Sensitivity of ecoregions in Khorasan-Razavi to desertification based on life cycle assessment. Natural Geography Research, 48(20): 305-320. (in Persian)
[33] Shiravi M, Sepehr A.2017. Fuzzy based detection of desertification-prone areas: a case study in Khorasan-Razavi Province, Iran. Natural Resources and Conservation, 5(1): 1-12.
[34] Soheili F, Naji H R.2017. Slow death of oak trees in Zagros: reasons, damage, and solutions. Journal Forest Strategy, 2(5): 37-49. (in Persian)
[35] Tang L L, Hayashi K, Kohyama K, et al.2018. Reconciling life cycle environmental impacts with ecosystem services: amanagement perspective on agricultural land use. Sustainability, 10(3): 630, .
[36] Thornthwaite C W.1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38(1): 55-94.
[37] Transeau E N.1905. Forest centers of eastern America. The American Naturalist, 39(468): 875-889.
[38] UN (United Nations). 1994. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa. Document A/AC. 241/27, 12. 09. 1994 with Annexes. New York: UN.
[39] VidalLegaz B, De Souza D M, Teixeira R F M, et al.2017. Soil quality, properties, and functions in life cycle assessment: an evaluation of models. Journal of Cleaner Production,140(2): 502-515.
[40] Xu J X.2006. Sand-dust storms in and around the Ordos Plateau of China as influenced by land use change and desertification. Catena, 65(3): 279-284.
[1] MU Le, LU Yixiao, LIU Minguo, YANG Huimin, FENG Qisheng. Characterizing the spatiotemporal variations of evapotranspiration and aridity index in mid-western China from 2001 to 2016[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(12): 1230-1243.