Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2019, Vol. 11 Issue (5): 785-794    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-019-0014-9
Orginal Article     
Physiological and biochemical appraisal for mulching and partial rhizosphere drying of cotton
IQBAL Rashid1, A S RAZA Muhammad1,*(), F SALEEM Muhammad2, H KHAN Imran3, AHMAD Salman1, S ZAHEER Muhammad1, U ASLAM Muhammad1, HAIDER Imran1
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
2 Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
3 Department of Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210000, China
Download: HTML     PDF(287KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Water is the main factor for the healthy life of plant. One of the main negative effects of climate change is the increasing scarcity of water that is lethal for plant. Globally, for water deficit regions (arid and semi-arid), drought is the main factor responsible for low production of agriculture, especially for cotton. Great efforts have been and are being made to find alternatives to water saving practices. This study aimed to examine the effects of partial rhizosphere drying (PRD, half of the root system irrigated at one event, and the other half irrigated in the next event, and so on) with and/or without various mulching treatments on physiological and biochemical traits of cotton. To explore this objective, we laid out experiments in completely randomized design with factorial arrangement in the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan in 2016. Two factors included were four mulching treatments (M0, no mulching; M1, black plastic mulching; M2, wheat straw mulching; and M3, cotton sticks mulching) and two irrigation levels (I0, control (full irrigation); and I1, PRD). Fisher's analysis of variance among means of treatments was compared using least significant difference test at 5% probability level. Results revealed that the maximum plant height, leaf area, leaf gas exchange (photosynthetic rate and stomata conductance), chlorophyll, proline and total sugar contents, and enzyme activities were higher under M2 than under other three mulching treatments. As for irrigation levels, higher values of plant height, photosynthesis and water related parameters (leaf water potential, leaf osmotic potential, leaf turgor potential, etc.) were recorded. Contents of total sugar and proline and activities of antioxidant enzymes were significantly higher in PRD-treated plants than in control plants. It was concluded that combined application of PRD and mulching was more effective than the rest of the treatments used in the experiment. Similar study can be conducted in the field by applying irrigation water in alternate rows in semi-arid regions.



Key wordsantioxidant enzymes      mulching      partial rhizosphere drying      photosynthetic rate      stomatal conductance     
Received: 18 April 2018      Published: 10 October 2019
Corresponding Authors:
About author:

The first and second authors contributed equally to this work.

Cite this article:

IQBAL Rashid, A S RAZA Muhammad, F SALEEM Muhammad, H KHAN Imran, AHMAD Salman, S ZAHEER Muhammad, U ASLAM Muhammad, HAIDER Imran. Physiological and biochemical appraisal for mulching and partial rhizosphere drying of cotton. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 785-794.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-019-0014-9     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2019/V11/I5/785

[1] Ahmad S, Raza M A S, Saleem M F, et al.2015. Mulching strategies for weeds control and water conservation in cotton. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 10(8): 299-306.
[2] Ahmadi S H, Andersen M N, Plauborg F, et al.2010. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field-grown potatoes: Gas exchange and xylem (ABA). Agricultural Water Management, 97(10): 1486-1494.
[3] Ai Z, Yang Y, Wang Q, et al.2018. Characteristics and influencing factors of crop coefficient for drip-irrigated cotton under plastic-mulched condition in arid environment. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 74(1): 1-8.
[4] Ali R A M, Radwan E A.2008. Effect of organic and synthetic mulches of some fresh strawberry cultivars. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Alex University, 7(3): 167-200.
[5] Alkhaldi A, Aldarir A N, Janat M, et al.2012. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying on some quantitative indicators and the efficiency of adding nitrogen fertilizer to (Zea mays L.) by using N15 isotope. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 12(9): 1223-1235.
[6] Anderson J V, Chevone B I, Hess J L.1992. Seasonal variation in the antioxidant system of eastern white pine needles. Journal of Plant Physiology, 98(2): 501-508.
[7] Arin L, Ankara S.2001. Effect of low-tunnel, mulch and pruning on the yield and earliness of tomato in unheated glasshouse. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 3(1): 23-27.
[8] Ashraf M, Foolad M R.2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59(2): 206-216.
[9] Baloch M J, Dunwell J, Khan N U, et al.2012. Profiling dehydrin gene sequence and physiological parameters in drought tolerant and susceptible spring wheat cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(2): 801-806.
[10] Bates L S, Walden R P, Teare I D.1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1): 205-207.
[11] Baver L D, Gardner W H, Gardner W R.1972. Soil Physics (4th ed.). New York: Wiley, 282.
[12] Beers R F, Sizer I W.1952. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 195(1): 133-140.
[13] Bozorov T A, Usmanov R M, Yang H, et al.2018. Effect of water deficiency on relationships between metabolism, physiology, biomass, and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Arid Land, 10(3): 441-456.
[14] Bradford M N.1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1-2): 248-254.
[15] Chaves M M, Oliveira M M.2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(407): 2365-2384.
[16] Chen K, Ali S, Chen Y, et al.2018. Effect of ridge-covering mulching materials on hormonal changes, antioxidative enzyme activities and production of maize in semi-arid regions of China. Agricultural Water Management, 204: 281-291.
[17] Chutia J, Borah S P.2012. Water stress effects on leaf growth and chlorophyll content but not the grain yield in traditional rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) genotypes of Assam, India II. Protein and proline status in seedlings under PEG induced water stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(7): 971-980.
[18] Dias M C, Pinto G, Santos C.2011. Acclimatization of micropropagated plantlets induces an antioxidative burst: a case study with Ulmus minor Mill. Photosynthetica, 49(2): 259-266.
[19] Dry P R, Loveys B R, Düring H.2000. Partial drying of the root-zone of grape. II. Changes in the pattern of root development. Vitis, 39(1): 9-12.
[20] Ghosh P K, Dayal D, Bandyopadhyay K K, et al.2006. Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3): 76-86.
[21] Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K.1977. Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 59(2): 309-314.
[22] GOP.2015-2016. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2015-2016. Pakistan: Economic Advisory Wing Islamabad, 26-27.
[23] Gu X, Li Y, Du Y.2018. Film-mulched continuous ridge-furrow planting improves soil temperature, nutrient content and enzymatic activity in a winter oilseed rape field, Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 10(3): 362-374.
[24] Hugar A Y, Halemani H L, Aladakatti Y R, et al.2009. Studies on the effect of polyethylene mulching on rain-fed cotton genotypes: II. Influence on status of soil moisture, microbial population in soil and uptake of nutrients. Karnatka Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 22: 284-288.
[25] Izanloo A, Condon A G, Langridge P, et al.2008. Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59(12): 3327-3346.
[26] Jovanovic Z, Stikic R.2018. Partial root-zone drying technique: from water saving to the improvement of a fruit quality. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 1: 1-9.
[27] Khan S U, Bano A, Dinand J, et al.2012. Abscisic acid and salicylic acid seed treatment as potent inducer of drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44: 43-49.
[28] Maehly P C, Chance M.1954. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. In: Gluck D. Methods of Biochemical Analysis. New York: Interscience Publishers, 357-424.
[29] Meloni D A, Oliva M A, Martinez C A, et al.2003. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 49(1): 69-76.
[30] Mutlu S, Atici O, Esim N, et al.2011. Essential oils of catmint (Nepeta meyeri Benth.) induce oxidative stress in early seedlings of various weed species. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33(3): 943-951.
[31] Nasrullah H M, Khan M B, Ahmad R, et al.2011. Sustainable cotton production and water economy through different planting methods and mulching techniques. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(4): 1971-1983.
[32] Nelson N.1944. A photomorphic adaptation of the somogyi's methods for the determination of reducing sugar. Annals of Chemistry, 31: 426-428.
[33] Ngouajio M, McGiffen M E.2004. Sustainable vegetable production: effects of cropping systems on weed and insect population dynamics. Acta Horticultrae, 638: 77-83.
[34] Parida A K, Dagaonkar V S, Phalak M S, et al.2007. Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short-term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnology Report, 1(1): 37-48.
[35] Patil M D, Biradar D P, Patil V C, et al.2011. Response of cotton genotypes to drought mitigation practices. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture andEnvironmental Sciences, 11(3): 360-364.
[36] Raza M A S, Saleem M F, Ashraf M Y.2012a. Glycinebetaine applied under drought improved the physiological efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant. Plant Soil and Environment, 31(1): 67-71.
[37] Raza M A S, Saleem M F, Anjum S A.2012b. Foliar application of potassium under water deficit conditions improved the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 22(2): 431-437.
[38] Raza M A S, Ahmad S, Saleem M F, et al.2017. Physiological and biochemical assisted screening of wheat varieties under partial rhizosphere drying. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 116: 150-166.
[39] Rizwan M, Ali S, Ibrahim M, et al.2015. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(20): 15416-15431.
[40] Saleem M F, Raza S A M, Ahmad S, et al.2016. Understanding and mitigating the impacts of drought stress in cotton-a review. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53(3): 609-623.
[41] Saleh B.2012. Salt stress alters physiological indicators in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Soil and Environment, 2: 113-118.
[42] Steel R G D, Torrie J H, Dickey D.1997. Principles and Procedure of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., 352-358.
[43] Stikic R, Popovic S, Srdic M, et al.2003. Partial root drying (PRD): a new technique for growing plants that saves water and improves the quality of fruit. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 29: 164-171. (in Bulgarian)
[44] Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P.2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial root zone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(350): 1627-1634.
[45] Sumithra K, Jutur P P, Carmel B D, et al.2006. Salinity-induced changes in two cultivars of Vigna radiata: responses of antioxidative and proline metabolism. Plant Growth Regulation, 50(1): 11-22.
[46] Tang L S, Li Y, Zhang J.2005. Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial root zone irrigation. Field Crops Research, 94(2-3): 214-223.
[47] Ullah A, Sun H, Yang X, et al.2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(3): 271-284.
[48] Wang H, Liu F, Andersen M N, et al.2009. Comparative effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen uptake in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Irrigation Science, 27(6): 443-448.
[49] Wang L, De Kroon H, Bögemann G M, et al.2005. Partial root drying effects on biomass production in Brassica napus and the significance of root responses. Journal of Plant and Soil, 276(1-2): 313-326.
[1] Khouloud ZAGOUB, Khouloud KRICHEN, Mohamed CHAIEB, Lobna F MNIF. Morphological and physiological responses to drought stress of carob trees in Mediterranean ecosystems[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(5): 562-577.
[2] YANG Ye, ZHANG Mingjun, ZHANG Yu, WANG Shengjie, WANG Jiaxin. Evaluating the soil evaporation loss rate in a gravel-sand mulching environment based on stable isotopes data[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 925-939.
[3] CHEN Pengpeng, GU Xiaobo, LI Yuannong, QIAO Linran, LI Yupeng, FANG Heng, YIN Minhua, ZHOU Changming. Effects of different ridge-furrow mulching systems on yield and water use efficiency of summer maize in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(9): 947-961.
[4] Xiaobo GU, Yuannong LI, Yadan DU. Film-mulched continuous ridge-furrow planting improves soil temperature, nutrient content and enzymatic activity in a winter oilseed rape field, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(3): 362-374.
[5] ZHAO Wenzhi, JI Xibin. Spatio-temporal variation in transpiration responses of maize plants to vapor pressure deficit under an arid climatic condition[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(3): 409-421.
[6] WU Guilin, JIANG Shaowei, LIU Weiyang, ZHAO Chengyi, LI Jun. Competition between Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima seedlings under simulated high groundwater availability[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 293-303.
[7] SI Jianhua, FENG Qi, YU Tengfei, ZHAO Chunyan. Nighttime sap flow and its driving forces for Populus euphratica in a desert riparian forest, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(5): 665-674.
[8] Yang QIU, ZhongKui XIE, YaJun WANG, Sukhdev S MALHI, JiLong REN. Long-term effects of gravel―sand mulch on soil orga¬nic carbon and nitrogen in the Loess Plateau of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(1): 46-53.
[9] Dieter OVERDIECK, Daniel ZICHE, RuiDe YU. Gas exchange of Populus euphratica leaves in a riparian zone[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(4): 531-541.
[10] Yuan FAN, PinFang LI, ZhenAn HOU, TuSheng REN, ChunLian XIONG, Biao ZHANG. Water adaptive traits of deep-rooted C3 halophyte (Karelinia caspica (Pall.) Less.) and shallow-rooted C4 halophyte (Atriplex tatarica L.) in an arid region, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2012, 4(4): 469-478.
[11] GuiQing XU, Yan LI, Ting ZOU. Hydraulic resistance partitioning between shoot and root system and plant water status of Haloxyolon ammodendron growing at sites of contrasting soil texture[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2010, 2(2): 98-106.