Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2024, Vol. 16 Issue (8): 1147-1162    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0081-4     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-024-0081-4
Research article     
Threshold friction velocity influenced by soil particle size within the Columbia Plateau, northwestern United States
MENG Ruibing1,2,3, MENG Zhongju1,2,3,*(), Brenton SHARRATT4, ZHANG Jianguo5, CAI Jiale1,2,3, CHEN Xiaoyan6
1College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
2Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
3Key Laboratory of Desert Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration, State Forestry and Grassland Administration of China, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
4USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Washington State University, Washington 99164, USA
5College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
6Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Academy of Social Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1425KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Wind erosion is a geomorphic process in arid and semi-arid areas and has substantial implications for regional climate and desertification. In the Columbia Plateau of northwestern United States, the emissions from fine particles of loessial soils often contribute to the exceedance of inhalable particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm or less (PM10) according to the air quality standards. However, little is known about the threshold friction velocity (TFV) for particles of different sizes that comprise these soils. In this study, soil samples of two representative soil types (Warden sandy loam and Ritzville silt loam) collected from the Columbia Plateau were sieved to seven particle size fractions, and an experiment was then conducted to determine the relationship between TFV and particle size fraction. The results revealed that soil particle size significantly affected the initiation of soil movement and TFV; TFV ranged 0.304-0.844 and 0.249-0.739 m/s for different particle size fractions of Ritzville silt loam and Warden sandy loam, respectively. PM10 and total suspended particulates (TSP) emissions from a bed of 63-90 μm soil particles were markedly higher for Warden sandy loam than for Ritzville silt loam. Together with the lower TFV of Warden sandy loam, dust emissions from fine particles (<100 μm in diameter) of Warden sandy loam thus may be a main contributor to dust in the region's atmosphere, since the PM10 emissions from the soil erosion surfaces and its ensuing suspension within the atmosphere constitute an essential process of soil erosion in the Columbia Plateau. Developing and implementing strategic land management practices on sandy loam soils is therefore necessary to control dust emissions in the Columbia Plateau.

Key words： particle size      threshold friction velocity      inhalable particulate matter      total suspended particles      Warden sandy loam      Ritzville silt loam      Columbia Plateau     
Received: 08 March 2024      Published: 31 August 2024
Corresponding Authors: *MENG Zhongju (E-mail: mengzj@imau.edu.cn)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
MENG Ruibing
MENG Zhongju
Brenton SHARRATT
ZHANG Jianguo
CAI Jiale
CHEN Xiaoyan
Cite this article:

MENG Ruibing, MENG Zhongju, Brenton SHARRATT, ZHANG Jianguo, CAI Jiale, CHEN Xiaoyan. Threshold friction velocity influenced by soil particle size within the Columbia Plateau, northwestern United States. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1147-1162.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0081-4     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I8/1147

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of soil tray position in the wind tunnel
Fig. 2 Variations in wind speed (a1-a7) and PM10 (b1-b7) and TSP (c1-c7) concentrations at various heights above the soil surface of Warden sandy loam in different particle size fractions over time in the wind tunnel. u, wind speed; PM10, inhalable particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm or less; TSP, total suspended particulates. Data presented are in soil particle size fractions of <45, 45-63, 63-90, 90-125, 125-150, 150-250, and 250-500 μm only for wind speed measured at heights of 5 and 100 mm and PM10 and TSP concentrations monitored at heights of 5 and 10 mm. Arrows define when TSP and PM10 concentrations are above background concentrations at multiple heights.
Fig. 3 Variations in wind speed (a1-a7) and PM10 (b1-b7) and TSP (c1-c7) concentrations at various heights above the soil surface of Ritzville silt loam in different particle size fractions over time in the wind tunnel. Data presented are in soil particle size fractions of <45, 45-63, 63-90, 90-125, 125-150, 150-250, and 250-500 μm only for wind speed monitored at heights of 5 and 100 mm and PM10 and TSP concentrations monitored at heights of 5 and 10 mm. Arrows defined when TSP and PM10 concentrations are above background concentrations at multiple heights.
Particle size fraction (μm) Warden sandy loam Ritzville silt loam
Water potential (MPa) Rate of change (%) Water potential (MPa) Rate of change (%)
Before After Before After
<45 -159.82 -136.44 -14.63 -164.37 -158.88 -3.34
45-63 -187.34 -137.79 -26.45 -163.78 -158.98 -2.93
63-90 -146.59 -125.92 -14.10 -238.16 -160.14 -32.76
90-125 -200.22 -145.03 -27.56 -225.64 -181.38 -19.62
125-150 -173.22 -136.05 -21.46 -233.01 -185.51 -20.39
150-250 -216.80 -154.71 -28.64 -232.59 -175.45 -24.57
250-500 -204.99 -122.03 -40.47 -231.29 -170.76 -26.17
Table 1 Water potential for the seven particle size fractions of the two representative soil types determined in the wind tunnel
Fig. 4 Graphical representation of PM10 emissions for different particle size fractions of Warden sandy loam (a) and Ritzville silt loam (b)
Fig. 5 Regression analysis between uz and ln(z) at 20, 30, and 50 mm above the soil surface of the two representative soil types in different particle size fractions. (a), <45 μm; (b), 45-63 μm; (c), 63-90 μm; (d), 90-125 μm; (e), 125-150 μm; (f), 150-250 μm; (g), 250-500 μm. uz is the wind speed at height z.
Fig. 6 Variation in threshold friction velocity (TFV) with particle size fraction for Warden sandy loam (a) and Ritzville silt loam (b)
Fig. 7 Variation in aerodynamic roughness length (z0) with particle size fraction for Warden sandy loam (a) and Ritzville silt loam (b)
Fig. 8 Relationship between TFV and ln(z0) for Warden sandy loam (a) and Ritzville silt loam (b)
[1]   ASTM D5298-10. 2010. Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
[2]   Avecilla F, Panebianco J E, Buschiazzo D E. 2016. A wind-tunnel study on saltation and PM10 emission from agricultural soils. Aeolian Research, 22: 73-83.
[3]   Bagnold R A. 1941. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. London: Methuen, 91-96.
[4]   Borrelli P, Alewell C, Alvarez P, et al. 2021. Soil erosion modelling: A global review and statistical analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 780: 146494, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146494.
[5]   Chandler D G, Blaesing-Thompson S, Busacca A. 2004. Geospatial assessment of agricultural lands critical to air quality on the Columbia Plateau, Washington State. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 59(4): 184-189.
[6]   Chang T T, Feng G, Paul V, et al. 2023. Soil health assessment for different tillage and cropping systems to determine sustainable management practices in a humid region. Soil and Tillage Research, 233: 105796, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2023.105796.
[7]   Colazo J C, Buschiazzo D E. 2010. Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina. Geoderma, 159(1-2): 228-236.
[8]   Colazo J C, Buschiazzo D E. 2015. The impact of agriculture on soil texture due to wind erosion. Land Degradation and Development, 26(1): 62-70.
[9]   Copeland N S, Sharratt B S, Wu J Q, et al. 2009. A wood-strand material for wind erosion control: Effects on total sediment loss, PM10 vertical flux, and PM10 loss. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38(1): 139-148.
doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0115 pmid: 19141803
[10]   Dong Z B, Liu X P, Wang X M. 2002. Aerodynamic roughness of gravel surfaces. Geomorphology, 43(1-2): 17-31.
[11]   Ebrahimi-Khusfi Z,Soleimani Sardoo M. 2021. Recent changes in physical properties of the land surface and their effects on dust events in different climatic regions of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14: 287, doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-06664-9.
[12]   Etyemezian V, Gillies J A, Mastin L G. 2019. Laboratory experiments of volcanic ash resuspension by wind. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 124(16): 9534-9560.
[13]   Fawcett R G, Collis-George N. 1967. A fiter-paper method for determining the moisture characteristics of soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 7: 162-167.
[14]   Feng G L, Sharratt B S. 2007. Validation of WEPS for soil and PM 10 loss from agricultural fields within the Columbia Plateau of the United States. Earth Surface Processes and Landform, 32(5): 743-753.
[15]   Feng G L, Sharratt B S. 2009. Evaluation of the SWEEP model during high winds on the Columbia Plateau. Earth Surface Processes and Landform, 34(11): 1461-1468.
[16]   Feng G L, Sharratt B S, Young F. 2011. Soil properties governing soil erosion affected by cropping systems in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Soil and Tillage Research, 111(2): 168-174.
[17]   Field J P, Belnap J, Breshears D D. 2010. The ecology of dust. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(8): 423-430.
[18]   Funk R, Reuter H I, Hoffmann C, et al. 2008. Effect of moisture on fine dust emission from tillage operations on agricultural soils. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33(12): 1851-1863.
[19]   Gao Q Q, Zhu X J, Wang Q H, et al. 2023. Enrichment and transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) through dust aerosol generation from soil to the air. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering. 17: 10, doi: 10.1007/s11783-023-1610-7.
[20]   Gillette D A, Passi R. 1988. Modeling dust emission caused by wind erosion. Journal of geophysical Research, 93(D11): 14233-14242.
[21]   Goudie A S, Middleton N J. 2006. Desert Dust in the Global System. Heidelberg: Springer, 13-31.
[22]   Greeley R, Iversen J D. 1985. Wind as a Geological Process on Earth, Mars, Venus and Titan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 33-61.
[23]   Hwang S H, Lee J Y, Yi S M, et al. 2017. Associations of particulate matter and its components with emergency room visits for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. PLoS ONE, 12(8): e0183224, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183224.
[24]   Ishizuka M, Mikami M, Leys J, et al. 2008. Effects of soil moisture and dried raindroplet crust on saltation and dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres: Atmospheres, 113(D24): D24212, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009955.
[25]   Kawai K, Matsui H, Kimura R, et al. 2021. High sensitivity of Asian dust emission, transport, and climate impacts to threshold friction velocity. Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, 17: 239-245.
[26]   Kheirabadi H, Mahmoodabadi M, Jalali V, et al. 2018. Sediment flux, wind erosion and net erosion influenced by soil bed length, wind velocity and aggregate size distribution. Geoderma, 323: 22-30.
[27]   Kjelgaard J, Sharratt B, Sundram I, et al. 2004. PM 10 emission from agricultural soils on the Columbia Plateau: Comparison of dynamic and time-integrated field-scale measurements and entrainment mechanisms. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 125(3-4): 259-277.
[28]   Kok J F, Ward D S, Mahowald N M. 2018. Global and regional importance of the direct dust-climate feedback. Nature Communications, 9(1): 241, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02620-y.
pmid: 29339783
[29]   Kouchami-Sardoo I, Shirani H, Esfandiarpour-Boroujeni I, et al. 2019. Optimal feature selection for prediction of wind erosion threshold friction velocity using a modified evolution algorithm. Geoderma, 354: 113873, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.031.
[30]   Marticorena B, Bergametti G, Gillette D, et al. 1997. Factors controlling threshold friction velocity in semiarid and arid areas of the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D19): 23277-23287.
[31]   McDonald E V, Sweeney M R, Busacca A J. 2012. Glacial outburst floods and loess sedimentation documented during Oxygen Isotope Stage 4 on the Columbia Plateau, Washington State. Quaternary Science Reviews, 45: 18-30.
[32]   Miller M C, Komar P D. 1977. The development of sediment threshold curves for unusual environments (Mars) and for inadequately studied materials (froam sand). Sedimentology, 24(5): 709-721.
[33]   Pi H W, Sharratt B, Schillinger W F, et al. 2018. Wind erosion potential of a winter wheat-summer fallow rotation after land application of biosolids. Aeolian Research, 32: 53-59.
[34]   Pi H W, Huggins D R, Abatzoglou J T, et al. 2020a. Modeling soil wind erosion from agro-ecological classes of the Pacific Northwest in response to current climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(2): e2019JD031104, doi: 10.1029/2019JD031104.
[35]   Pi H W, Huggins D R, Sharratt B. 2020b. Influence of clay amendment on soil physical properties and threshold friction velocity within a disturbed crust cover in the inland Pacific Northwest. Soil and Tillage Research, 202: 104659, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104659.
[36]   Pi H W, Webb N P, Lei J, et al. 2022. Soil loss and PM 10 emissions from agricultural fields in the Junggar Basin over the past six decades. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 77(2): 113-125.
[37]   Pi H W, Webb N P, Huggins D R, et al. 2023. Effects of secondary soil aggregates on threshold friction velocity and wind erosion. Land Degradation and Development, 34(1): 16-27.
[38]   Pietersma D, Stetler L D, Saxton K E. 1996. Design and aerodynamics of a portable wind tunnel for soil erosion and fugitive dust research. Transactions of the Asae American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 39(6): 2075-2083.
[39]   Ravi S, Sharratt B S, Li J R, et al. 2016. Particulate matter emissions from biochar-amended soils as a potential tradeoff to the negative emission potential. Scientific Reports, 6: 35984, doi: 10.1038/srep35984.
pmid: 27782159
[40]   Roney J A, White B R. 2006. Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Atmospheric Environment, 40(40): 7668-7685.
[41]   Shao Y P. 2000. Physics and Modeling of Wind Erosion. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 211-245.
[42]   Shao Y P. 2001. A model for mineral dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D17): 20239-20254.
[43]   Shao Y P. 2008. Physics and Modelling of Wind Erosion. Berlin: Springer, 1-11.
[44]   Shao Y P, Klose M. 2016. A note on the stochastic nature of particle cohesive force and implications to threshold friction velocity for aerodynamic dust entrainment. Aeolian Research, 22: 123-125.
[45]   Sharratt B S. 2007. Instrumentation to quantify soil and PM10 flux using a portable wind tunnel. International Symposium on Air Quality and Waste Management for Agriculture, Broomfield, Colorado.
[46]   Sharratt B S, Feng G L. 2009. Windblown dust influenced by conventional and undercutter tillage within the Columbia Plateau, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(10): 1323-1332.
[47]   Sharratt B S. 2011. Size distribution of windblown sediment emitted from agricultural fields in the Columbia Plateau. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(3): 1054-1060.
[48]   Sharratt B S, Vaddella V K. 2012. Threshold friction velocity of soils within the Columbia Plateau. Aeolian Research, 6: 13-20.
[49]   Sharratt B S, Vaddella V K, Feng G L. 2013. Threshold friction velocity influenced by wetness of soils within the Columbia Plateau. Aeolian Research, 9: 175-182.
[50]   Sharratt B S, Vaddella V K. 2014. Threshold friction velocity of crusted windblown soils in the Columbia Plateau. Aeolian Research, 15: 227-234.
[51]   Sundram I, Claiborn C, Strand T. 2004. Numerical modeling of windblown dust in the Pacific Northwest with improved meteorology and dust emission models. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 109(D24): D24208, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004794.
[52]   Tanner S, Katra I, Argaman E, et al. 2018. Erodibility of waste (Loess) soils from construction sites under water and wind erosional forces. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617: 1524-1532.
[53]   Tanner S, Ben-Hur M, Argaman E, et al. 2023. The effects of soil properties and aggregation on sensitivity to erosion by water and wind in two Mediterranean soils. Catena, 221: 106787, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106787.
[54]   Tominaga Y, Okuyama T. 2022. Investigating threshold wind velocity for movement of sparsely distributed gravels in a wind tunnel: Effect of surface coarseness. Aeolian Research, 54: 100775, doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2022:100775.
[55]   Van Pelt R S, Peters P, Visser S. 2009. Laboratory wind tunnel testing of three commonly used saltation impact sensors. Aeolian Research, 1(1-2): 55-62.
[56]   Wang R D, Zhou N, Li Q, et al. 2008. Difference in wind erosion characteristics between loamy and sandy farmlands and the implications for soil dust emission potential. Land Degradation and Development, 29(12): 4362-4372.
[57]   Wang R D, Li Q, Zhou N, et al. 2019. Effect of wind speed on aggregate size distribution of windblown sediment. Aeolian Research, 36: 1-8.
[58]   Xing M, Guo L J. 2008. Research on dust emission low in soil wind erosion process. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 38 (8): 984-998. (in Chinese)
[59]   Yang M N, Tian X, Guo Z L, et al. 2022. Effect of dry soil aggregate size on microplastic distribution and its implications for microplastic emissions induced by wind erosion. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 9(7): 618-624.
[60]   Yue G W, Jia H N, Lin H X. 2012. Release mechanism of soil particles in soil wind erosion. Arid Land Geography, 35(2): 248-253. (in Chinese)
[61]   Zamani S, Mathmoodabadi M. 2013. Effect of particle-size distribution on wind erosion rate and soil erodibility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(12): 1743-1753.
[62]   Zhang H T, Tian P F, Kang C L, et al. 2022. Regional organic matter and mineral dust are the main components of atmospheric aerosols over the Nam Co station on the central Tibetan Plateau in summer. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1055673.
[63]   Zhang J, Amonette J E, Flury M. 2021a. Effect of biochar and biochar particle size on plant-available water of sand, silt loam, and clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 212: 104992, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104992.
[64]   Zhang Z C, Dong Z B, Qian G Q, et al. 2021b. Gravel-desert surface properties and their influences on the wind-erosion threshold friction velocity in North-West China. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 179: 117-131.
[65]   Zhu X A, Liu W J, Yuan X, et al. 2022. Aggregate stability and size distribution regulate rainsplash erosion: Evidence from a humid tropical soil under different land-use regimes. Geoderma, 420: 115880, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115880.
[1] NAN Weige, DONG Zhibao, ZHOU Zhengchao, LI Qiang, CHEN Guoxiang. Ecological effect of the plantation of Sabina vulgaris in the Mu Us Sandy Land, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 14-28.
[2] Batjargal BUYANTOGTOKH, Yasunori KUROSAKI, Atsushi TSUNEKAWA, Mitsuru TSUBO, Batdelger GANTSETSEG, Amarsaikhan DAVAADORJ, Masahide ISHIZUKA, Tsuyoshi T SEKIYAMA, Taichu Y TANAKA, Takashi MAKI. Effect of stones on the sand saltation threshold during natural sand and dust storms in a stony desert in Tsogt-Ovoo in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(7): 653-673.
[3] Huimin YANG, Xueyong ZOU, Jing'ai WANG, Peijun SHI. An experimental study on the influences of water erosion on wind erosion in arid and semi-arid regions[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(2): 208-216.
[4] Ling NAN, Zhibao DONG, Weiqiang XIAO, Chao LI, Nan XIAO, Shaopeng SONG, Fengjun XIAO, Lingtong DU. A field investigation of wind erosion in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China using a portable wind tunnel: a case study in Yanchi County[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(1): 27-38.
[5] Huimin YANG, Yuan GAO, Degen LIN, Xueyong ZOU, Jing’ai WANG, Peijun SHI. An experimental study on the influences of wind erosion on water erosion[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(4): 580-590.
[6] HAN Huige, LI Xudong, NIU Decao, Sharon J HALL, GUO Ding, WAN Changgui, Jennifer K LEARNED, FU Hua. Conventional tillage improves the storage of soil organic carbon in heavy fractions in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(5): 636-643.
[7] Qing HE, XingHua YANG, Ali Mamtimin, ShiHao TANG. Impact factors of soil wind erosion in the center of Taklimakan Desert[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2011, 3(1): 9-14.