Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2024, Vol. 16 Issue (2): 298-313    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0006-2     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-024-0006-2
Research article     
Formation and ecological response of sand patches in the protection system of Shapotou section of the Baotou-Lanzhou railway, China
DUN Yaoquan1,2, QU Jianjun1,3,*(), KANG Wenyan4, LI Minlan1,2, LIU Bin4, WANG Tao1, SHAO Mei1,2
1Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710100, China
4Zhongwei Works Section of China Railway Lanzhou Bureau Group Company Limited, Zhongwei 755000, China
Download: HTML     PDF(3913KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

The development of bare patches typically signifies a process of ecosystem degradation. Within the protection system of Shapotou section of the Baotou-Lanzhou railway, the extensive emergence of bare sand patches poses a threat to both stability and sustainability. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the morphology, dynamic changes, and ecological responses associated with these sand patches. Therefore, we analyzed the formation and development process of sand patches within the protection system and its effects on herbaceous vegetation growth and soil nutrients through field observation, survey, and indoor analysis methods. The results showed that sand patch development can be divided into three stages, i.e., formation, expansion, and stabilization, which correspond to the initial, actively developing, and semi-fixed sand patches, respectively. The average dimensions of all sand patch erosional areas were found to be 7.72 m in length, 3.91 m in width, and 0.32 m in depth. The actively developing sand patches were the largest, and the initial sand patches were the smallest. Throughout the stage of formation and expansion, the herbaceous community composition changed, and the plant density decreased by more than 50.95%. Moreover, the coverage and height of herbaceous plants decreased in the erosional area and slightly increased in the depositional lobe; and the fine particles and nutrients of soils in the erosional area and depositional lobe showed a decreasing trend. In the stabilization phases of sand patches, the area from the inlet to the bottom of sand patches becomes initially covered with crusts. Vegetation and 0-2 cm surface soil condition improved in the erosional area, but this improvement was not yet evident in the depositional lobe. Factors such as disturbance, climate change, and surface resistance to erosion exert notable influences on the formation and dynamics of sand patches. The results can provide evidence for the future treatment of sand patches and the management of the protection system of Shapotou section of the Baotou-Lanzhou railway.

Key words： railway protection system      sand patch      morphology      vegetation characteristic      soil property     
Received: 31 August 2023      Published: 29 February 2024
Corresponding Authors: *QU Jianjun (E-mail: qujianj@lzb.ac.cn)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
DUN Yaoquan
QU Jianjun
KANG Wenyan
LI Minlan
LIU Bin
WANG Tao
SHAO Mei
Cite this article:

DUN Yaoquan, QU Jianjun, KANG Wenyan, LI Minlan, LIU Bin, WANG Tao, SHAO Mei. Formation and ecological response of sand patches in the protection system of Shapotou section of the Baotou-Lanzhou railway, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(2): 298-313.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0006-2     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I2/298

Fig. 1 Overview of the study area. (a), location of the study area and sampling sites; (b), protection system composition; (c), distribution of sampling sites in 2021; (d) sand patches; (e) sand patches treated with straw checkerboard barriers.
Fig. 2 Images of three types of sand patches. (a), initial sand patches; (b), actively developing sand patches; (c), semi-fixed sand patches. The solid black line is the boundary of the sand patch erosional area, and the dotted black line is the boundary of sand patch depositional lobe. IN, initial sand patches; IC, initial sand patch control area; AE, actively developing sand patch erosional area; AD, actively developing sand patch depositional lobe; AC, actively developing sand patch control area; SE, semi-fixed sand patch erosional area; SD, semi-fixed sand patch depositional lobe; SC, semi-fixed sand patch control area. The abbreviations are the same as in the following figures.
Type of sand patch Number Length (m) Width (m) Depth (m)
Max Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Mean
Initial 20 6.60 2.7 4.07 3.13 1.30 1.95 0.32 0.06 0.18
Actively developing 66 26.04 3.2 9.16 16.60 1.27 4.63 0.97 0.14 0.37
Semi-fixed 14 11.90 2.5 6.19 6.80 1.60 3.30 0.46 0.17 0.28
Total 100 26.04 2.2 7.72 16.60 1.27 3.91 0.97 0.06 0.32
Table 1 Morphological parameters of different types of sand patches
Fig. 3 Relationships among length, width, and depth of the erosion zones of different types of sand patches
Fig. 4 Plant community density (a), height (b), coverage (c), and diversity (d-f) in different groups of sand patches. Bars represent standard errors. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different groups of sand patches at P<0.05 level.
Species IN IC AE AD AC SE SD SC
Setaria viridis (Linn.) Beauv. 30.78 24.31 17.38 25.74 21.16 19.00 37.11 21.14
Chloris virgata Sw. 0.31 20.54 - 0.27 13.31 - - 21.46
Eragrostis minor Host 10.63 10.07 4.37 3.91 31.79 1.29 5.53 11.71
Psammochloa villosa (Trin.) Bor 3.02 6.67 5.96 7.38 8.01 9.29 6.53 7.91
Salsola ruthenica Iljin 19.00 16.49 5.02 6.01 4.74 6.18 7.14 13.97
Bassia dasyphyll (Fisch. et C. A. Mey.) Kuntze 14.17 11.57 5.11 9.38 7.31 9.25 9.34 8.81
Corispermum patelliforme Iljin 2.38 - 38.11 16.28 0.17 28.00 14.59 1.89
Agriophyllum squarrosum (Linn.) Moq. - - 10.77 6.72 - - - -
Echinops gmelina Turcz. 14.72 7.64 4.27 14.94 3.64 11.32 12.88 6.50
Artemisia blepharolepis Bge. 4.99 2.46 9.00 2.76 3.55 15.68 6.88 6.60
Potentilla bifurca Linn. - 0.24 - - 0.93 - - -
Allium mongolicum Regel - - - 6.60 5.40 - - -
Table 2 Importance values of each species in different groups of sand patches
Fig. 5 Soil particle size distribution at 0‒2 (a), 2‒5 (b), and 5‒10 (c) cm depths in different groups of sand patches
Fig. 6 Soil nutrient content in different groups of sand patches at 0‒2, 2‒5, and 5‒10 cm depths. (a), SOC (soil organic carbon); (b), TN (total nitrogen); (c), TP (total phosphorus); (d), TK, (total potassium); (e), AN (available nitrogen); (f), AP (available phosphorus); (g), (d), AK, (available potassium). Bars represent standard errors. Different lowercase letters within the same soil depth indicate significant differences among different groups of sand patches at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 7 Comparison of soil water content between actively developing sand patches and crust area. (a), soil water content in the actively developing sand patches and daily precipitation; (b), soil water content under crust area; (c), soil water content at 0‒5, 5‒10, and 10‒20 cm depths in the actively developing sand patches and crust area in September 2019. Different lowercase letters within the same soil depth indicate significant difference between sand patches and crust area at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 8 Crust breakage under different types of disturbance. (a), crust destruction under heavy precipitation, forming small erosion trench; (b and c), mechanical damage to crusts caused by digging of rabbits and rats; (d), cracks in crust and topsoil layers by gravity; (e), crust destruction by human trampling; (f), surface disturbance by vehicle transportation.
Observation period
(dd/mm/yyyy‒dd/mm/yyyy)		 Maximum depth of erosion (cm) Minimum depth of accumulation (cm) Average depth of erosion (cm) Average depth of accumulation (cm)
28/11/2020‒01/06/2021 9.7 4.0 2.3 1.5
01/06/2021‒14/09/2021 6.3 3.5 2.2 1.5
14/09/2021‒25/12/2021 1.6 5.2 0.8 1.4
28/11/2020‒25/12/2021 13.3 6.2 4.0 3.2
Table 3 Surface changes in an actively developing sand patch
[1]   Bekker R M, Bakker J P, Grandin U, et al. 1998. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: Indicators of seed longevity. Functional Ecology, 12(5): 834-842.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00252.x
[2]   Bochet E. 2015. The fate of seeds in the soil: A review of the influence of overland flow on seed removal and its consequences for the vegetation of arid and semiarid patchy ecosystems. Soil, 1(1): 131-146.
doi: 10.5194/soil-1-131-2015
[3]   Certini G, Vestgarden L S, Forte C, et al. 2015. Litter decomposition rate and soil organic matter quality in a patchwork heathland of southern Norway. Soil, 1(1): 207-216.
doi: 10.5194/soil-1-207-2015
[4]   Chen N, Wang X P, Zhang Y F, et al. 2018. Ecohydrological effects of biological soil crust on the vegetation dynamics of restoration in a dryland ecosystem. Journal of Hydrology, 563: 1068-1077.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.076
[5]   Chen Y W, Li X R. 2012. Spatio-temporal distribution of nests and influence of ant (Formica cunicularia Lat.) activity on soil property and seed bank after revegetation in the Tengger Desert. Arid Land Research and Management, 26(4): 365-378.
doi: 10.1080/15324982.2012.694393
[6]   de Soyza A G, Whitford W G, Herrick J E, et al. 1998. Early warning indicators of desertification: examples of tests in the Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Arid Environments, 39(2): 101-112.
doi: 10.1006/jare.1998.0391
[7]   Fearnehough W, Fullen M A, Mitchell D J, et al. 1998. Aeolian deposition and its effect on soil and vegetation changes on stabilised desert dunes in northern China. Geomorphology, 23(2-4): 171-182.
doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00111-6
[8]   Feng L Q, Guo M M, Wang W L, et al. 2023. Evaluation of the effects of long-term natural and artificial restoration on vegetation characteristics, soil properties and their coupling coordinations. Science of the Total Environment, 884: 163828, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163828.
[9]   Feng X, Qu J J, Tan L H, et al. 2020. Fractal features of sandy soil particle-size distributions during the rangeland desertification process on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 20(1): 472-485.
doi: 10.1007/s11368-019-02392-6
[10]   Fu T, Li X. 2023. Evaluating the stability of artificial sand-binding vegetation by combining statistical methods and a neural network model. Scientific Reports, 13: 6544, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33879-5.
pmid: 37085568
[11]   Guan C, Hasi E, Yang Y, et al. 2022. Determinants and dynamics of blowouts in Hulun Buir sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, china from 1959 to 2018. Earth Surf Processes Landf, 47(11): 2676-2694.
doi: 10.1002/esp.v47.11
[12]   He M Z, Hu R, Jia R L. 2019. Biological soil crusts enhance the recovery of nutrient levels of surface dune soil in arid desert regions. Ecological Indicators, 106: 105497, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105497.
[13]   Hu S, Qiu H J, Wang N L, et al. 2022. Movement process, geomorphological changes, and influencing factors of a reactivated loess landslide on the right bank of the middle of the Yellow River, China. Landslides, 19(6): 1265-1295.
doi: 10.1007/s10346-022-01856-0
[14]   Hu Y G, Zhang Z S, Huang L, et al. 2019. Shifts in soil microbial community functional gene structure across a 61-year desert revegetation chronosequence. Geoderma, 347: 126-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.046
[15]   Huang L, Zhang Z S. 2015. The stability of revegetated ecosystems in sandy areas: An assessment and prediction index. Water, 7(5): 1969-1990.
doi: 10.3390/w7051969
[16]   Li S Z, Xiao H L, Cheng G D, et al. 2006a. Mechanical disturbance of microbiotic crusts affects ecohydrological processes in a region of revegetation-fixed sand dunes. Arid Land Research and Management, 20(1): 61-77.
doi: 10.1080/15324980500369467
[17]   Li X R, Xiao H L, Zhang J G, et al. 2004. Long-term ecosystem effects of sand-binding vegetation in the Tengger Desert, northern China. Restoration Ecology, 12(3): 376-390.
doi: 10.1111/rec.2004.12.issue-3
[18]   Li X R, Chen Y W, Su Y G, et al. 2006b. Effects of biological soil crust on desert insect diversity: Evidence from the Tengger Desert of northern China. Arid Land Research and Management, 20(4): 263-280.
doi: 10.1080/15324980600940985
[19]   Li X R, Zhang Z S, Tan H J, et al. 2014. Ecological restoration and recovery in the wind-blown sand hazard areas of northern China: Relationship between soil water and carrying capacity for vegetation in the Tengger Desert. Science China-Life Sciences, 57(5): 539-548.
doi: 10.1007/s11427-014-4633-2 pmid: 24699917
[20]   Li X Y, Yao Z Y, Dong Z B, et al. 2016. Causes and processes of sandy desertification in Guinan County, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(8): 650, doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5481-0.
[21]   Li Y L, Cui J Y, Zhang T H, et al. 2009. Effectiveness of sand-fixing measures on desert land restoration in Kerqin Sandy Land, northern China. Ecological Engineering, 35(1): 118-127.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.09.013
[22]   Liu Y M, Xing Z S, Yang H Y. 2017. Effect of biological soil crusts on microbial activity in soils of the Tengger Desert (China). Journal of Arid Environments, 144: 201-211.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.04.003
[23]   Liu Z M, Zhu J L, Deng X. 2012. Arrival vs. retention of seeds in bare patches in the semi-arid desertified grassland of Inner Mongolia, northeastern China. Ecological Engineering, 49: 153-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.030
[24]   Pang X P, Yu C Q, Zhang J, et al. 2020. Effect of disturbance by plateau pika on soil nitrogen stocks in alpine meadows. Geoderma, 372: 114392, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114392.
[25]   Pluis J L A, van Boxel J H. 1993. Wind velocity and algal crusts in dune blowouts. Catena, 20(6): 581-594.
doi: 10.1016/0341-8162(93)90018-K
[26]   Schwarz C, Brinkkemper J, Ruessink G. 2019. Feedbacks between biotic and abiotic processes governing the development of foredune blowouts: A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(1): 2, doi: 10.3390/jmse7010002.
[27]   Sevink J, Wallinga J, Reimann T, et al. 2023. A multi-staged drift sand geo-archive from the Netherlands: New evidence for the impact of prehistoric land use on the geomorphic stability, soils, and vegetation of aeolian sand landscapes. Catena, 224: 106969, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.106969.
[28]   Sloey T M, Willis J M, Hester M W. 2015. Hydrologic and edaphic constraints on Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus californicus, and Typha latifolia in tidal marsh restoration. Restoration Ecology, 23(4): 430-438.
doi: 10.1111/rec.2015.23.issue-4
[29]   Song M H, Cornelissen J H C, Li Y K, et al. 2020. Small-scale switch in cover-perimeter relationships of patches indicates shift of dominant species during grassland degradation. Journal of Plant Ecology, 13(6): 704-712.
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa057
[30]   Tang Z S, An H, Deng L, et al. 2016. Effect of desertification on productivity in a desert steppe. Scientific Reports, 6: 27839, doi: 10.1038/srep27839.
pmid: 27297202
[31]   Visser N, Botha J C, Hardy M B. 2004. Re-establishing vegetation on bare patches in the Nama Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 57(2): 155-177.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00101-0
[32]   Vleeshouwers L M. 1997. Modelling the effect of temperature, soil penetration resistance, burial depth and seed weight on pre-emergence growth of weeds. Annals of Botany, 79(5): 553-563.
doi: 10.1006/anbo/79.5.553
[33]   Vogel C, Heister K, Buegger F, et al. 2015. Clay mineral composition modifies decomposition and sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen in fine soil fractions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51(4): 427-442.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0987-7
[34]   Wang C, Schepers L, Kirwan M L, et al. 2021. Different coastal marsh sites reflect similar topographic conditions under which bare patches and vegetation recovery occur. Earth Surface Dynamics, 9(1): 71-88.
doi: 10.5194/esurf-9-71-2021
[35]   Wang J, Zhang P, Bao J T, et al. 2020. Comparison of cyanobacterial communities in temperate deserts: A cue for artificial inoculation of biological soil crusts. Science of the Total Environment, 745: 140970, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140970.
[36]   Wang Q, Shao D, Cui B, et al. 2022a. Artificial modifications lead to the formation of persistent bare patches in saltmarshes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9: 1026736, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1026736.
[37]   Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al. 2007. Effects of surface characteristics on infiltration patterns in an arid shrub desert. Hydrological Processes, 21(1): 72-79.
doi: 10.1002/hyp.v21:1
[38]   Wang Y, Chu L, Liu Z, et al. 2022b. The feasibility of using soil seed bank for natural regeneration of degraded sandy grasslands. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 10(3): 414-421.
doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.11.001
[39]   Wei X H, Li S, Yang P, et al. 2007. Soil erosion and vegetation succession in alpine Kobresia steppe meadow caused by plateau pika-a case study of Nagqu County, Tibet. Chinese Geographical Science, 17(1): 75-81.
doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0075-0
[40]   Wu Y Z, Lin Q G, Huang L, et al. 2018. Spatial distribution of sandy patches in fixed dunes in the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Journal of Lanzhou University. Natural Science, 54(6): 776-782. (in Chinese)
[41]   Xiao H L, Ren J, Li X R. 2009. Effects of soil-plant system change on ecohydrology during revegetation for mobile dune stabilization, Chinese arid desert. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 1(3): 230-237.
[42]   Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Xiao P Q, et al. 2015. Gravity erosion on the steep loess slope: Behavior, trigger and sensitivity. Catena, 135: 231-239.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.005
[43]   Yan Q L, Liu Z M, Zhu J J, et al. 2005. Structure, pattern and mechanisms of formation of seed banks in sand dune systems in northeastern Inner Mongolia, China. Plant and Soil, 277(1-2): 175-184.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-6836-6
[44]   Yao X, Wang H R, Zhang S Q, et al. 2022. Impact of plateau pika burrowing activity on the grass/sedge ratio in alpine sedge meadows in China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 1036438, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1036438.
[45]   Yu F H, Chen Y F, Dong M. 2001. Clonal integration enhances survival and performance of Potentilla anserina, suffering from partial sand burial on Ordos Plateau, China. Evolutionary Ecology, 15(4-6): 303-318.
doi: 10.1023/A:1016032831038
[46]   Yu Y J, Lin Q G, Shi Q H, et al. 2002. Changes of habitat and vegetation in man-made vegetation area of Shapotou section along Baotou-Lanzhou railway. Acta Ecological Sinica, 22(3): 433-439. (in Chinese)
[47]   Zhang J G, Liu D W, Meng B P, et al. 2021. Using UAVS to assess the relationship between alpine meadow bare patches and disturbance by pikas in the source region of Yellow River on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26: e01517, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01517.
[48]   Zhang J Q, Zhang C L, Ma X J, et al. 2014. Dust fall and biological soil crust distribution as indicators of the aeolian environment in China's Shapotou railway protective system. Catena, 114: 107-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.11.004
[49]   Zhao H L, Zhang T H, Zhao X Y, et al. 2002. Sand desertification processes of over-grazing pasture in Inner Mongolia. Arid Zone Research, 19(4): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[50]   Zhao Y, Jia R L, Wang J. 2019. Towards stopping land degradation in drylands: Water-saving techniques for cultivating biocrusts in situ. Land Degradation & Development, 30(18): 2336-2346.
doi: 10.1002/ldr.v30.18
[51]   Zhao Y, Wang J. 2019. Mechanical sand fixing is more beneficial than chemical sand fixing for artificial cyanobacteria crust colonization and development in a sand desert. Applied Soil Ecology, 140: 115-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.008
[52]   Zhao Y G, Qin N Q, Weber B, et al. 2014. Response of biological soil crusts to raindrop erosivity and underlying influences in the hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(7): 1669-1686.
doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0680-z
[53]   Zhou Y G, Hasi E, Wang Z R, et al. 2022. Dynamics of blowouts indicating the process of grassland desertification. Land Degradation & Development, 33(15): 2885-2897.
doi: 10.1002/ldr.v33.15
[1] WU Yuechen, ZHU Haili, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Hailong, LIU Guosong, LIU Yabin, LI Guorong, HU Xiasong. Characterization of alpine meadow surface crack and its correlation with root-soil properties[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 834-851.
[2] ZHANG Jian, GUO Xiaoqun, SHAN Yujie, LU Xin, CAO Jianjun. Effects of land-use patterns on soil microbial diversity and composition in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 415-430.
[3] WU Wangyang, ZHANG Dengshan, TIAN Lihui, SHEN Tingting, GAO Bin, YANG Dehui. Morphological change and migration of revegetated dunes in the Ketu Sandy Land of the Qinghai Lake, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(7): 827-841.
[4] LI Xiu, ZHAI Juntuan, LI Zhijun. Morphological and physiological differences in heteromorphic leaves of male and female Populus euphratica Oliv.[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(12): 1456-1469.
[5] JING Hang, MENG Min, WANG Guoliang, LIU Guobin. Aggregate binding agents improve soil aggregate stability in Robinia pseudoacacia forests along a climatic gradient on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(2): 165-174.
[6] XIANG Yanling, WANG Zhongke, LYU Xinhua, HE Yaling, LI Yuxia, ZHUANG Li, ZHAO Wenqin. Effects of rodent-induced disturbance on eco-physiological traits of Haloxylon ammodendron in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 508-521.
[7] Weimin ZHANG, Lihai TAN, Zhishan AN, Kecun ZHANG, Yang GAO, Qinghe NIU. Morphological variation of star dune and implications for dune management: a case study at the Crescent Moon Spring scenic spot of Dunhuang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(3): 357-370.
[8] Qingxue LI, Zhiqing JIA, Tao LIU, Lili FENG, Lingxianzi HE. Effects of different plantation types on soil properties after vegetation restoration in an alpine sandy land on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(2): 200-209.
[9] ZHU Yangchun, ZHAO Xueyong, LIAN Jie, CHEN Min. Variation of Zn content in soils under different land-use types in the Hetao oasis, Inner Mongolia of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(6): 861-870.
[10] WEN Qing, DONG Zhibao. Geomorphologic patterns of dune networks in the Tengger Desert, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(5): 660-669.
[11] Ibrahim YAHIAOUI, AbdelKader DOUAOUI, ZHANG Qiang, Ahmed ZIANE. Soil salinity prediction in the Lower Cheliff plain (Algeria) based on remote sensing and topographic feature analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(6): 794-805.
[12] Sinkyu KANG, Gyoungbin LEE, Chuluun TOGTOKH, Keunchang JANG. Characterizing regional precipitation-driven lake area change in Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(2): 146-158.
[13] ManHou XU, Fei PENG, QuanGang YOU, Jian GUO, XiaFei TIAN, Min LIU, Xian XUE. Effects of warming and clipping on plant and soil properties of an alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(2): 189-204.
[14] JianHua XIAO, JianJun QU, ZhengYi YAO, YingJun PANG KeCun ZHANG. Morphology and formation mechanism of sand shadow dunes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(1): 10-26.
[15] ZhiBao DONG, Ping LV, ZhengCai ZHANG, JunFeng LU. Aeolian transport over a developing transverse dune[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(3): 243-254.