| Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation of an erosion-sediment transport model for a hillslope using laboratory flume data |
| Anya Catherine C ARGUELLES1, MinJae JUNG2, Kristine Joy B MALLARI2, GiJung PAK1, Hafzullah AKSOY3, Levent M KAVVAS4, Ebru ERIS5, JaeYoung YOON1,2*, YoungJoon LEE6, SeonHwa HONG6 |
1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Korea University, Sejong 339-700, Korea;
2 Program in Environmental Technology and Policy, Korea University, Sejong 339-700, Korea;
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey;
4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;
5 Department of Civil Engineering, Ege University, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey;
6 Geum-River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research, Okcheon, Chungbuk 373-804, Korea |
|
|
|
Abstract Climate change can escalate rainfall intensity and cause further increase in sediment transport in arid lands which in turn can adversely affect water quality. Hence, there is a strong need to predict the fate of sediments in order to provide measures for sound erosion control and water quality management. The presence of micro-topography on hillslopes influences processes of runoff generation and erosion, which should be taken into account to achieve more accurate modelling results. This study presents a physically based mathematical model for erosion and sediment transport coupled to one-dimensional overland flow equations that simulate rainfall-runoff generation on the rill and interrill areas of a bare hillslope. Modelling effort at such a fine resolution considering the flow con-nection between interrill areas and rills is rarely verified. The developed model was applied on a set of data gath-ered from an experimental setup where a 650 cm×136 cm erosion flume was pre-formed with a longitudinal rill and interrill having a plane geometry and was equipped with a rainfall simulator that reproduces natural rainfall char-acteristics. The flume can be given both longitudinal and lateral slope directions. For calibration and validation, the model was applied on the experimental results obtained from the setup of the flume having 5% lateral and 10% longitudinal slope directions under rainfall intensities of 105 and 45 mm/h, respectively. Calibration showed that the model was able to produce good results based on the R2 (0.84) and NSE (0.80) values. The model performance was further tested through validation which also produced good statistics (R2=0.83, NSE=0.72). Results in terms of the sedigraphs, cumulative mass curves and performance statistics suggest that the model can be a useful and an important step towards verifying and improving mathematical models of erosion and sediment transport.
|
|
Received: 24 March 2013
Published: 10 December 2014
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
|
| Cite this article:
Anya Catherine C ARGUELLES, MinJae JUNG, Kristine Joy B MALLARI, GiJung PAK, Hafzullah AKSOY, Levent M KAVVAS, Ebru ERIS, JaeYoung YOON, YoungJoon LEE, SeonHwa HONG. Evaluation of an erosion-sediment transport model for a hillslope using laboratory flume data. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(6): 647-655.
URL:
http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-014-0066-9 OR http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2014/V6/I6/647
|
|
|
| Abrahams A D, Li G, Krishnan C, et al. 1998. Predicting sediment transport by interrill overland flow on rough surfaces. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23: 1087–1099.Aksoy H, Kavvas M L. 2001. A physically based erosion and sediment transport component for watershed hydrologic models. Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental En-gineering, University of California, Davis, California. Aksoy H, Erdem Unal N, Cokgor S, et al. 2012. A rainfall simulator for laboratory-scale assessment of rainfall-runoff-sediment transport processes over a two-dimensional flume. Catena, 98: 63–72.Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, et al. 2012. Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16: 591–601. An Y, Liu Q Q. 2009. Two-dimensional hillslope scale soil erosion model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14: 690–697. Arguelles A C C, Jung M, Pak G, et al. 2013. Evaluation of overland flow model for a hillslope using laboratory flume data. Water Sci-ence and Technology, 68(5): 1188–1194. Chaplot V, Le Bissonnais Y. 2000. Field measurements of interrill erosion under different slopes and plot sizes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25: 145–153.Chow V T, Maidment D R, Mays L W. 1988. Applied Hydrology. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 109.Deng Z Q, De Lima J L M P, Jung H S. 2008. Sediment transport rate-based model for rainfall-induced soil erosion. Catena, 76(1): 54–62.Everaert W. 1991. Empirical relations for the sediment transport capac-ity of interrill flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16: 513–532.Foster G R. 1982. Modeling the erosion process. In: Haan C T, Johnson H P, Brakensiek D L. Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE Monograph no. 5, 297–380.Govers G. 1990. Empirical relationships on the transporting capacity of overland flow. In: Walling D E, Yair A, Berkowicz S. Erosion, Transport and Deposition Processes. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Pub-lication, 45–63.Govers G. 1992. Evaluation of transporting capacity formulae for overland flow. In: Overland Flow Hydraulics and Erosion Mechan-ics. London: University College London Press, 243–273.Govindaraju R S, Kavvas M L. 1991. Modeling the erosion process over steep slopes: approximate analytical solutions. Journal of Hydrology, 127(1–4): 279–305.Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S, Emori S, et al. 2008. Global projections of changing risks of floods and droughts in a changing climate. Hy-drological Sciences Journal, 53(4): 754–772.Krause P, Boyle D P, Base F. 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5: 89–97.Liu Q Q, Xiang H, Singh V P. 2006. A simulation model for unified interrill erosion and rill erosion on hillslopes. Hydrological Proc-esses, 20(3): 469–486.Lopes V L. 1987. A numerical model of watershed erosion and sediment yield. PhD Dissertation. Tucson, AZ, USA: The University of Arizona.Ma L, Wu J L, Abuduwaili J. 2011. The climatic and hydrological changes and environmental responses recorded in lake sediments of Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Land, 3(1), 1–8.Mailhot A, Duchesne S. 2010. Design criteria of urban drainage infra-structures under climate change. Journal of Water Resources Plan-ning and Management, 136(2): 201–208.Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. 1998. The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23: 527–544.Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, et al. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3): 885–900.Mudgal A, Baffaut C, Anderson S H, et al. 2010. Apex model assessment of variable landscapes on runoff and dissolved herbicides. Transac-tions of the ASABE, 53(4): 1047–1058.Sharaiha R K, Ziadat F M. 2007. Alternative cropping systems to con-trol soil erosion in arid to semi-arid areas of Jordan. African Crop Science Society, 8: 1559–1565.Shaw H, Reisinger A, Larsen H, et al. 2005. Incorporating Climate Change Into Stormwater Design – Why and How? In: 4th South Pa-cific Conference on Stormwater and Aquatic Resource Protection. Auckland, New Zealand.Smith R E. 1981. A kinematic model for surface mine sediment yield. Transactions of the ASABE, 24(6): 1508–1514.Storm B, Jorgensen G H, Styczen M. 1987. Simulation of Water Flow and Soil Erosion Processes with a Distributed Physically-based Modeling System. Wallingford: IAHS Publications, 167: 595–608.Strikwerda J C. 1989. Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations. Pacific Grove, California: Wadsworth & Brooks.Tayfur G. 2001. Modeling two-dimensional erosion process over infil-trating surfaces. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6(3): 259–262.Tayfur G. 2007. Modelling sediment transport from bare rilled hillslopes by areally averaged transport equations. Catena, 70(1): 25–38.Thomaz E L, Vestena L R. 2012. Measurement of runoff and soil loss from two differently sized plots in a subtropical environment (Brazil). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37: 363–373.Toy T J, Foster G R, Renard K G. 2002. Soil Erosion: Processes, Pre-diction, Measurement, and Control. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Wicks J M. 1988. Physically–based mathematical modelling of catch-ment sediment yield. PhD Dissertation. University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Wicks J M, Bathurst J C. 1996. SHESED: A physically based, distrib-uted erosion and sediment yield component for the SHE hydrological modelling system. Journal of Hydrology, 175: 213–238. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
