Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2022, Vol. 14 Issue (10): 1109-1123    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-022-0028-6     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-022-0028-6
Research article     
Manipulated precipitation regulated carbon and phosphorus limitations of microbial metabolisms in a temperate grassland on the Loess Plateau, China
HAI Xuying1, LI Jiwei2, LIU Yulin2, WU Jianzhao1, LI Jianping3, SHANGGUAN Zhouping2, DENG Lei1,2,*()
1State Key Laboratory for Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China
3School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
Download: HTML     PDF(3183KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Manipulated precipitation patterns can profoundly influence the metabolism of soil microorganisms. However, the responses of soil organic carbon (SOC) and nutrient turnover to microbial metabolic limitation under changing precipitation conditions remain unclear in semi-arid ecosystems. This study measured the potential activities of enzymes associated with carbon (C: β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) and β-D-cellobiosidase (CBH)), nitrogen (N: β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG) and L-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP)) and phosphorus (P: alkaline phosphatase (AP)) acquisition, to quantify soil microbial metabolic limitations using enzymatic stoichiometry, and then identify the implications for soil microbial metabolic limitations and carbon use efficiency (CUE) under decreased precipitation by 50% (DP) and increased precipitation by 50% (IP) in a temperate grassland. The results showed that soil C and P were the major elements limiting soil microbial metabolism in temperate grasslands. There was a strong positive dependence between microbial C and P limitations under manipulated precipitation. Microbial metabolism limitation was promoted by DP treatment but reversed by IP treatment. Moreover, CUE was inhibited by DP treatment but promoted by IP treatment. Soil microbial metabolism limitation was mainly regulated by soil moisture and soil C, N, and P stoichiometry, followed by available nutrients (i.e., NO- 3, NH+ 4, and dissolved organic C) and microbial biomass (i.e., MBC and MBN). Overall, these findings highlight the potential role of changing precipitation in regulating ecosystem C turnover by limiting microbial metabolism and CUE in temperate grassland ecosystems.

Key words： carbon use efficiency      ecoenzymatic stoichiometry      microbial metabolic limitations      semi-arid ecosystems      soil organic carbon     
Received: 15 July 2022      Published: 31 October 2022
Fund:  National Natural Science Foundation of China(41730638);Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China(2021ZDLSF05-02);Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shaanxi Forestry Academy of Sciences, China(SXLK2021-0206);Funding of Special Support Plan of Young Talents Project in China(2021)
Corresponding Authors: *DENG Lei (E-mail: leideng@ms.iswc.ac.cn)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HAI Xuying
LI Jiwei
LIU Yulin
WU Jianzhao
LI Jianping
SHANGGUAN Zhouping
DENG Lei
Cite this article:

HAI Xuying, LI Jiwei, LIU Yulin, WU Jianzhao, LI Jianping, SHANGGUAN Zhouping, DENG Lei. Manipulated precipitation regulated carbon and phosphorus limitations of microbial metabolisms in a temperate grassland on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(10): 1109-1123.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-022-0028-6     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2022/V14/I10/1109

Fig. 1 Experimental design (a) and monthly precipitation of the study area (b)
Factor CUE BG+CBH NAG+LAP AP (BG+CBH)/
(LAP+NAG)		 (BG+CBH)/
AP		 (NAG+LAP)/
AP
Growth stage 0.018* 0.646 0.937 0.005** 0.040* 0.000*** 0.829
Precipitation 0.167 0.231 0.017* 0.802 0.158 0.088 0.014*
Growth stage× Precipitation 0.790 0.001** 0.871 0.058 0.479 0.183 0.598
Table 1 Results of ANOVA of the effects of growth stages and precipitation manipulation on soil extracellular enzymes and their stoichiometric characteristics
Fig. 2 Variations of soil enzymatic activity (a-c) and enzymatic stoichiometry (d-f) under manipulated precipitation at different growth stages. CK, ambient precipitation; DP, decreasing precipitation by 50%; IP, increasing precipitation by 50%. BG, β-1,4-glucosidase; CBH, β-D-cellobiosidase; LAP, L-leucine aminopeptidase; NAG, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase; AP, alkaline phosphatase. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different treatments within the same growth stage at P<0.05 level. Different uppercase letters indicate significant difference among different growth stages within the same treatment at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 3 Enzymatic stoichiometry of relative proportions of C to N acquisition versus C to P acquisition (a), the variation of vector length and angle (b and c) and their relationships (d). CK, ambient precipitation; DP, decreasing precipitation by 50%; IP, increasing precipitation by 50%. BG, β-1,4-glucosidase; CBH, β-D-cellobiosidase; LAP, L-leucine aminopeptidase; NAG, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase; AP, alkaline phosphatase. In the box plot, black boxes show 25% and 75% quantiles, yellow point is the mean value, and yellow horizontal line is the median. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different treatments within the same growth stage at P<0.05 level. Different uppercase letters indicate significant difference among different growth stages within the same treatment at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 4 Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) under manipulated precipitation in different growth stages. CK, ambient precipitation; DP, decreasing precipitation by 50%; IP, increasing precipitation by 50%. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different treatments within the same growth stage at P<0.05 level. Different uppercase letters indicate significant difference among different growth tages within the same treatment at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 5 Correlation analysis of factors affecting microbial C limitation and P limitation under precipitation manipulation. SM, soil moisture; ST, soil temperature; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; DON, dissolved organic N; DOP, dissolved organic P; SAP, soil available phosphorus content; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen; MBP, microbial biomass phosphorus; *. P<0.05 level.
Indicator Equation r P
C limitation y=1.80-0.002SM-0.14TN-0.15TN:TP-0.02NO- 3-N 0.45 0.001**
P limitation y=104.54-0.25SM-0.59SOC-1.34SOC:TN-0.11SOC:TP-0.004MBC-0.03MBC:MBP 0.26 0.040*
Table 2 Multiple regression equation of microbial C limitation and P limitation with influencing factors
Fig. 6 Conceptual model of the effects of soil microbial properties on microbial C (a and b) and P (c and d) limitations under manipulated precipitation. SM, soil moisture; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen. MBP, microbial biomass phosphorus. Numbers at arrows are standardized path coefficients. *, P<0.05 level; **, P<0.01 level; ***, P<0.001 level.
Table 3 Response of soil properties and microbial biomass ecological stoichiometry characteristics to precipitation manipulation in different growth stages
[1]   Bell C, McIntyre N, Cox S, et al. 2008. Soil microbial responses to temporal variations of moisture and temperature in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Microbial Ecology, 56(1): 153-167.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9333-z pmid: 18246293
[2]   Borken W, Savage K, Davidson E A, et al. 2006. Effects of experimental drought on soil respiration and radiocarbon efflux from a temperate forest soil. Global Change Biology, 12(2): 177-193.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001058.x
[3]   Borken W, Matzner E. 2009. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Global Change Biology, 15(4): 808-824.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x
[4]   Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 17(6): 837-842.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0
[5]   Chen H, Li D J, Xiao K C, et al. 2018. Soil microbial processes and resource limitation in Karst and non‐Karst forests. Functional Ecology, 32(5): 1400-1409.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13069
[6]   Collins S L, Sinsabaugh R L, Crenshaw C, et al. 2008. Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in arid land ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 96(3): 413-420.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01362.x
[7]   Cregger M A, Schadt C W, McDowell N G, et al. 2012. Response of the soil microbial community to changes in precipitation in a semi-arid ecosystem. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(24): 8587-8594.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02050-12
[8]   Cui Y X, Fang L C, Guo X B, et al. 2018. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation in rhizosphere soil in the arid area of the northern Loess Plateau, China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 116: 11-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.025
[9]   Cui Y X, Fang L C, Deng L, et al. 2019. Patterns of soil microbial nutrient limitations and their roles in the variation of soil organic carbon across a precipitation gradient in an arid and semi-arid region. Science of the Total Environment, 658: 1440-1451.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.289
[10]   Cui Y X, Wang X, Zhang X C, et al. 2020. Soil moisture mediates microbial carbon and phosphorus metabolism during vegetation succession in a semi-arid region. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 147: 107814, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107814.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107814
[11]   Deng L, Kim D G, Peng C H, et al. 2018. Controls of soil and aggregate‐associated organic carbon variations following natural vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau in China. Land Degradation Development, 29(11): 3974-3984.
doi: 10.1002/ldr.3142
[12]   Deng L, Peng C H, Huang C B, et al. 2019. Drivers of soil microbial metabolic limitation changes along a vegetation restoration gradient on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 353: 188-200.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.037
[13]   Deng L, Peng C H, Kim D G, et al. 2021. Drought effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in global natural ecosystems. Earth-Science Reviews, 214: 103501, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103501.
doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103501
[14]   Ehrlich E, Becks L, Gaedke U. 2017. Trait-fitness relationships determine how trade-off shapes affect species coexistence. Ecology, 98(12): 3188-3198.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2047 pmid: 29034456
[15]   Exbrayat J F, Pitman A J, Zhang Q, et al. 2013. Examining soil carbon uncertainty in a global model: response of microbial decomposition to temperature, moisture and nutrient limitation. Biogeosciences, 10: 7095-7108.
doi: 10.5194/bg-10-7095-2013
[16]   Feng J, Wei K, Chen Z H, et al. 2019. Coupling and decoupling of soil carbon and nutrient cycles across an aridity gradient in the drylands of northern China: Evidence from ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 33(5): 559-569.
[17]   Galhardo C X, Masini J C. 2000. Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate and silicate by sequential injection using molybdenum blue chemistry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 417(2):191-200.
doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00933-8
[18]   Hai X Y, Li J P, Li J W, et al. 2022. Variations in plant water use efficiency response to manipulated precipitation in a temperate grassland. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 881282, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.881282.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.881282
[19]   Huang W, Hall S J. 2017. Elevated moisture stimulates carbon loss from mineral soils by releasing protected organic matter. Nature Communications, 8: 1774, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01998-z.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01998-z pmid: 29176688
[20]   IPCC. 2014. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
[21]   Jia X X, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. 2017. Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, 546: 113-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.011
[22]   Jing X, Chen X, Xiao W, et al. 2018. Soil enzymatic responses to multiple environmental drivers in the Tibetan grasslands: Insights from two manipulative field experiments and a meta-analysis. Pedobiologia, 71: 50-58.
doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.10.001
[23]   Jing X, Chen, X, Fang J Y, et al. 2020. Soil microbial carbon and nutrient constraints are driven more by climate and soil physicochemical properties than by nutrient addition in forest ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 141: 107657, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107657.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107657
[24]   Li J W, Liu Y L, Hai X Y, et al. 2019. Dynamics of soil microbial C:N:P stoichiometry and its driving mechanisms following natural vegetation restoration after farmland abandonment. Science of the Total Environment, 693: 133613, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133613.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133613
[25]   Li J W, Dong L B, Liu Y L, et al. 2022. Soil organic carbon variation determined by biogeographic patterns of microbial carbon and nutrient limitations across a 3,000-km humidity gradient in China. CATENA, 209: 105849, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105849.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105849
[26]   Li Z W, Xiao H B, Tang Z H, et al. 2015. Microbial responses to erosion-induced soil physico-chemical property changes in the hilly red soil region of southern China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 71: 37-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.10.003
[27]   Liao H J, Sheng M H, Liu J, et al. 2021. Soil N availability drives the shifts of enzyme activity and microbial phosphorus limitation in the artificial soil on cut slope in southwestern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25): 33307-33319.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13012-7
[28]   Liu, H F, Xu, H W, Wu Y, et al. 2021. Effects of natural vegetation restoration on dissolved organic matter (DOM) biodegradability and its temperature sensitivity. Water Research, 191: 116792, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116792.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116792
[29]   Liu Z P, Shao M A, Wang Y Q. 2013. Spatial patterns of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus across the entire Loess Plateau region of China. Geoderma, 197-198: 67-78.
[30]   Luo L, Zhu L Y, Hong W, et al. 2021. Microbial resource limitation and regulation of soil carbon cycle in Zoige Plateau peatland soils. CATENA, 205(51): 105478, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105478.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105478
[31]   Malik A A, Martiny J B H, Brodie E L, et al. 2020. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. The ISME Journal, 14: 1-9.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0
[32]   Manzoni S. 2017. Flexible carbon-use efficiency across litter types and during decomposition partly compensates nutrient imbalances-results from analytical stoichiometric models. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8: 661, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00661.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00661 pmid: 28491054
[33]   Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, et al. 2012. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytologist, 196(1): 79-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x pmid: 22924405
[34]   Marklein A R, Houlton B Z. 2012. Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 193(3): 696-704.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03967.x pmid: 22122515
[35]   Moorhead D L, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh R L. 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 53: 133-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.011
[36]   Moorhead D L, Sinsabaugh R L, Hill B H, et al. 2016. Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 93: 1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.019
[37]   Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 539-579.
[38]   Nielsen U N, Ball B A. 2015. Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 21(4): 1407-1421.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12789 pmid: 25363193
[39]   Olsen S R, Sommers L E. 1982. Phosphorus:phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 421-422.
[40]   Peng X Q, Wang W. 2016. Stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzyme activity along a climatic transect in temperate grasslands of northern China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 98: 74-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.008
[41]   Peters W, van der Velde I R, van Schaik E, et al. 2018. Increased water-use efficiency and reduced CO2 uptake by plants during droughts at a continental-scale. Nature Geoscience, 11: 744-748.
doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0212-7
[42]   Ru J Y, Zhou Y Q, Hui D F, et al. 2018. Shifts of growing‐season precipitation peaks decrease soil respiration in a semiarid grassland. Global Change Biology, 24(3): 1001-1011.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13941
[43]   Sinsabaugh R L, Lauber C L, Weintraub M N, et al. 2008. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale: Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity. Ecology Letters, 11(11): 1252-1264.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x pmid: 18823393
[44]   Sinsabaugh R L, Hill B H, Follstad Shah J J. 2009. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature, 462: 795-798.
doi: 10.1038/nature08632
[45]   Sinsabaugh R L, Follstad Shah J J. 2012. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43: 313-343.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-071112-124414
[46]   Sinsabaugh R L, Manzoni S, Moorhead D L, et al. 2013. Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling. Ecology Letters, 16(7): 930-939.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12113 pmid: 23627730
[47]   Sistla S A, Schimel J P. 2012. Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change. New Phytologist, 196(1): 68-78.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x pmid: 22924404
[48]   Takriti M, Wild B, Schnecker J, et al. 2018. Soil organic matter quality exerts a stronger control than stoichiometry on microbial substrate use efficiency along a latitudinal transect. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 121: 212-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.022
[49]   Tiemann L K, Billings S A. 2011. Changes in variability of soil moisture alter microbial community C and N resource use. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(9): 1837-1847.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.020
[50]   Vance E D, Brooke P C, Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 19(6): 703-707.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
[51]   Waring B G, Weintraub S R, Sinsabaugh R L, et al. 2014. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils. Biogeochemistry, 117: 101-113.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-013-9849-x
[52]   Xu X F, Schimel J P, Thornton P E, et al. 2014. Substrate and environmental controls on microbial assimilation of soil organic carbon: A framework for Earth system models. Ecology Letters, 17(5): 547-555.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12254 pmid: 24529215
[53]   Xu Y, Seshadri B, Sarkar B, et al. 2018. Microbial control of soil carbon turnover. In: Garcia C, Nannipieri P, Hernandez T. The Future of Soil Carbon. New York: Academy Press, 165-194.
[54]   Xu Z W, Yu G R, Zhang X Y, et al. 2017. Soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry in forest ecosystems along the NorthSouth Transect in eastern China (NSTEC). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 104: 152-163.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.10.020
[55]   Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger K M, Mooshammer M, et al. 2015. The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant-microbial-soil organic matter transformations. Ecological Monographs, 85(2): 133-155.
doi: 10.1890/14-0777.1
[56]   Zhang W, Qiao W J, Gao D X, et al. 2018. Relationship between soil nutrient properties and biological activities along a restoration chronosequence of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation forests in the Ziwuling Mountains, China. CATENA, 161: 85-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.021
[1] MA Xinxin, ZHAO Yunge, YANG Kai, MING Jiao, QIAO Yu, XU Mingxiang, PAN Xinghui. Long-term light grazing does not change soil organic carbon stability and stock in biocrust layer in the hilly regions of drylands[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(8): 940-959.
[2] YANG Yuxin, GONG Lu, TANG Junhu. Reclamation during oasification is conducive to the accumulation of the soil organic carbon pool in arid land[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(3): 344-358.
[3] Batande Sinovuyo NDZELU, DOU Sen, ZHANG Xiaowei. Corn straw return can increase labile soil organic carbon fractions and improve water-stable aggregates in Haplic Cambisol[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(6): 1018-1030.
[4] LIU Xiaoju, PAN Cunde. Effects of recovery time after fire and fire severity on stand structure and soil of larch forest in the Kanas National Nature Reserve, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(6): 811-823.
[5] SUN Lipeng, HE Lirong, WANG Guoliang, JING Hang, LIU Guobin. Natural vegetation restoration of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis Koidz.) forests rapidly increased the content and ratio of inert carbon in soil macroaggregates[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(6): 928-938.
[6] Jun WU, STEPHEN Yeboah, Liqun CAI, Renzhi ZHANG, Peng QI, Zhuzhu LUO, Lingling LI, Junhong XIE, Bo DONG. Effects of different tillage and straw retention practices on soil aggregates and carbon and nitrogen sequestration in soils of the northwestern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(4): 567-578.
[7] Shaofei JIN, Xiaohong TIAN, Hesong WANG. Hierarchical responses of soil organic and inorganic carbon dynamics to soil acidification in a dryland agroecosystem, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(5): 726-736.
[8] Xu BI, Bo LI, Bo NAN, Yao FAN, Qi FU, Xinshi ZHANG. Characteristics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen under various grassland types along a transect in a mountain-basin system in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(4): 612-627.
[9] Dongyan JIN, J MURRAY Phil, Xiaoping XIN, Yifei QIN, Baorui CHEN, Gele QING, Zhao ZHANG, Ruirui YAN. Attribution of explanatory factors for change in soil organic carbon density in the native grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(3): 375-387.
[10] Xiaobo GU, Yuannong LI, Yadan DU. Film-mulched continuous ridge-furrow planting improves soil temperature, nutrient content and enzymatic activity in a winter oilseed rape field, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(3): 362-374.
[11] Quanlin MA, Yaolin WANG, Yinke LI, Tao SUN, MILNE Eleanor. Carbon storage in a wolfberry plantation chronosequence established on a secondary saline land in an arid irrigated area of Gansu Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(2): 202-216.
[12] Wen SHANG, Yuqiang LI, Xueyong ZHAO, Tonghui ZHANG, Quanlin MA, Jinnian TANG, Jing FENG, Na SU. Effects of Caragana microphylla plantations on organic carbon sequestration in total and labile soil organic carbon fractions in the Horqin Sandy Land, northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(5): 688-700.
[13] Jinling LYU, Hua LIU, Xihe WANG, OLAVE Rodrigo, Changyan TIAN, Xuejun LIU. Crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics in a long-term fertilization experiment in an extremely arid region of northern Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(3): 345-354.
[14] Shufang GUO, Yuchun QI, Qin PENG, Yunshe DONG, Yunlong HE, Zhongqing YAN, Liqin WANG. Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(2): 222-233.
[15] WANG Haiming, SUN Jian, LI Weipeng, WU Jianbo, CHEN Youjun, LIU Wenhui. Effects of soil nutrients and climate factors on belowground biomass in an alpine meadow in the source region of the Yangtze-Yellow rivers, Tibetan Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(6): 881-889.