Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2024, Vol. 16 Issue (1): 1-13    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0002-6     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-024-0002-6
Research article     
Parkland trees on smallholder farms ameliorate soil physical-chemical properties in the semi-arid area of Tigray, Ethiopia
Selam LJALEM1, Emiru BIRHANE1,2,3, Kassa TEKA1, Daniel H BERHE4,*()
1Department of Land Resources Management and Environmental Protection, College of Dryland Agriculture and Natural Resources, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia
2Institute of Climate and Society, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia
3Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), ?s 1432, Norway
4Department of Natural Resources Management, Adigrat University, Adigrat 50, Ethiopia
Download: HTML     PDF(583KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Proposed agroforestry options should begin with the species that farmers are most familiar with, which would be the native multipurpose trees that have evolved under smallholder farms and socioeconomic conditions. The African birch (Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr.) and pink jacaranda (Stereospermum kunthianum Cham.) trees are the dominant species in the agroforestry parkland system in the drylands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Smallholder farmers highly value these trees for their multifunctional uses including timber, firewood, charcoal, medicine, etc. These trees also could improve soil fertility. However, the amount of soil physical and chemical properties enhanced by the two species must be determined to maintain the sustainable conservation of the species in the parklands and to scale up to similar agro- ecological systems. Hence, we selected twelve isolated trees, six from each species that had similar dendrometric characteristics and were growing in similar environmental conditions. We divided the canopy cover of each tree into three radial distances: mid-canopy, canopy edge, and canopy gap (control). At each distance, we took soil samples from three different depths. We collected 216 soil samples (half disturbed and the other half undisturbed) from each canopy position and soil depth. Bulk density (BD), soil moisture content (SMC), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were analysed. Results revealed that soil physical and chemical properties significantly improved except for soil texture and EC under both species, CEC under A. leiocarpus, and soil pH under S. kunthianum, all the studied soils were improved under both species canopy as compared with canopy gap. SMC, TN, AP, and AK under canopy of these trees were respectively 24.1%, 11.1%, 55.0%, and 9.3% higher than those soils under control. The two parkland agroforestry species significantly enhanced soil fertility near the canopy of topsoil through improving soil physical and chemical properties. These two species were recommended in the drylands with similar agro-ecological systems.

Key words： agroforestry      bulk density      carbon stock      dispersed tree      soil texture      tree canopy     
Received: 23 August 2023      Published: 31 January 2024
Corresponding Authors: *Daniel H BERHE (E-mail: danielhgs829@gmail.com)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Selam LJALEM
Emiru BIRHANE
Kassa TEKA
Daniel H BERHE
Cite this article:

Selam LJALEM, Emiru BIRHANE, Kassa TEKA, Daniel H BERHE. Parkland trees on smallholder farms ameliorate soil physical-chemical properties in the semi-arid area of Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 1-13.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0002-6     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I1/1

Tree
species		 Radial distance Soil physical property
Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Texture
class		 Bulk density (g/cm3) Soil moisture content (%)
A. leiocarpus Mid-canopy 33.50±2.1a 18.00±1.3a 48.50±1.6a Clay 1.35±0.006a 21.09±0.81a
Canopy edge 35.83±2.0a 16.83±2.0a 47.33±0.6a Clay 1.37±0.006ab 19.36±1.06ab
Canopy gap 36.83±0.7a 17.00±0.8a 46.00±0.7a Clay 1.38±0.006b 16.99±0.85b
P value 0.409 0.827 0.297 0.013 0.022
S. kunthianum Mid-canopy 15.83±0.6a 19.83±0.7 a 64.33±0.7a Clay 1.23±0.006a 33.75±0.37a
Canopy edge 17.00±1.0a 19.50±0.9 a 63.50±0.8a Clay 1.24±0.005ab 32.83±0.41ab
Canopy gap 16.17±0.5a 21.67±0.6 a 62.17±0.3a Clay 1.25±0.007b 31.76±0.55b
P value 0.547 0.136 0.099 0.013 0.024
Table 1 Effect of Anogeissus leiocarpa and Stereospermum kunthianum on soil physical properties
Tree species Radial distance Soil chemical property
TN
(%)		 AP (mg/kg) AK
(mg/kg)		 pH EC
(dS/m)		 CEC (cmol/kg)
A. leiocarpus Mid-canopy 0.196±0.0060a 8.34±0.26a 64.74±2.449a 5.84±0.05a 0.13±0.008a 37.05±0.58a
Canopy edge 0.193±0.0007b 7.28±0.32b 52.55±1.368b 5.59±0.05b 0.11±0.009a 35.85±0.53a
Canopy gap 0.193±0.0005b 6.13±0.24c 51.16±0.863b 5.57±0.10b 0.10±0.006a 35.21±0.43a
P value 0.004 <0.001 <0.001 0.029 0.096 0.070
S. kunthianum Mid-canopy 0.210±0.0020a 6.51±0.32a 69.77±1.82a 7.25±0.19a 0.15±0.001a 36.01±1.36a
Canopy edge 0.190±0.0030b 5.74±0.28ab 66.47±0.76ab 6.61±0.26a 0.15±0.001a 32.36±1.70a
Canopy gap 0.180±0.0020b 4.20±0.21b 64.03±1.13b 6.38±0.32a 0.15±0.001a 27.40±0.84b
P value <0.001 <0.001 0.024 0.080 0.087 0.002
Table 2 Effects of A. leiocarpus and S. kunthianum on soil chemical properties
Tree species Factor Index Soil fertility parameter
SOC (%) SOCS (t/hm2)
A. leiocarpus Radial distance Mid-canopy 1.35±0.0057a 55.64±0.40a
Canopy edge 1.34±0.0085a 54.96±0.29a
Canopy gap 1.32±0.0050b 53.89±0.36b
P value <0.001 <0.001
Soil depth 0-30 1.37±0.0060a 56.31±0.28a
30-60 1.32±0.0070b 54.56±0.32b
60-90 1.30±0.0085c 53.61±0.27c
P value <0.001 <0.001
Radial distance×soil depth P value 0.584 0.706
S. kunthianum Radial distance Mid-canopy 1.67±0.0090a 61.97±0.27a
Canopy edge 1.66±0.0080a 61.65±0.37a
Canopy gap 1.62±0.0120b 61.17±0.39a
P value <0.001 0.196
Soil depth 0-30 61.97±0.2690a 62.54±0.286a
30-60 61.65±0.3740a 61.56±0.36b
60-90 61.17±0.3910a 60.69±0.28b
P value 0.196 0.001
Radial distance×soil depth P value 0.584 0.706
Table 3 Soil organic carbon (SOC) and SOC stock (SOCS) under A. leiocarpus and S. kunthianum
Fig. 1 Comparison of soil physical and chemical properties between Anogeissus leiocarpa and Stereospermum kunthianum. BD, bulk density; SMC, soil moisture content; TN, total nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium; EC, electrical conductivity; CEC, cation exchange capacity; SOM, soil organic matter; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; SOC, soil organic carbon; SOCS, SOC stock. Bars are standard errors.
[1]   Abdella M, Nigatu L. 2021. Effects of scattered Faidherbia albida and Cordia africana tree on soil properties under their canopies in Fedis District, Easte Hararghe Zone, Oromia. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 33(20): 38-53.
[2]   Ajayi O C, Akinnifesi F K, Sileshi G, et al. 2007. Adoption of renewable soil fertility replenishment technologies in the southern African region: Lessons learnt and the way forward. Natural Resources Forum, 31: 306-317.
doi: 10.1111/narf.2007.31.issue-4
[3]   Amare T, Amede T, Abewa A, et al. 2022. Remediation of acid soils and soil property amelioration via Acacia decurrens-based agroforestry system. Agroforestry Systems, 96: 329-342.
doi: 10.1007/s10457-021-00721-8
[4]   An Z, Pokharel P, Plante A F, et al. 2023. Soil organic matter stability in forest and cropland components of two agroforestry systems in western Canada. Geoderma, 433: 116463, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116463.
[5]   Arbab A H. 2014. Review on Anogeissus leiocarpus a potent African traditional drug. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy & Chemistry, 4: 496-500.
[6]   Aweto A O, Dikinya O. 2003. The beneficial effects of two tree species on soil properties in a semi-arid savanna rangeland in Botswana. Land Contamination & Reclamation, 11: 339-344.
[7]   Bayala J, Sanou J, Teklehaimanot Z, et al. 2014. Parklands for buffering climate risk and sustaining agricultural production in the Sahel of West Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6: 28-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.004
[8]   Bein E, Habte B, Jaber A, et al. 1996. Useful Trees and Shrubs in Eritrea: Identification, Propagation and Management for Agricultural and Pastoral Communities. Nairobi: Regional Soil Conservation Unit.
[9]   Berhe D H, Anjulo A. 2013. Nutritional evaluation of Ficus thonningii Blume leaves as ruminant livestock feed in the Ahferom District of Tigray, Ethiopia. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 30(3): 149-154.
[10]   Berhe D H, Anjulo A, Abdelkadir A, et al. 2013. Evaluation of the effect of Ficus thonningii (blume) on soil physicochemical properties in Ahferom District of Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science & Environmental Management, 4(2): 34-44.
[11]   Berhe D H, Retta A N. 2015. Soil improvement by trees and crop production under tropical agroforestry systems. Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science & Soil Sciences, 3: 18-28.
[12]   Bhojvaiw E P, Timmer V R, Singh G. 1996. Reclaiming sodic soils for wheat production by Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC afforestation in India. Agroforestry Systems, 34: 139-150.
doi: 10.1007/BF00148158
[13]   Birhane E, Teklay R, Gebrehiwet K, et al. 2019. Maintaining Acacia polyacantha trees in farmlands enhances soil fertility and income of farmers in North Western Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems, 93: 2135-2149.
doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0328-1
[14]   Bouyoucos G J G. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5): 464-465.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
[15]   Broos K, Baldock J. 2008. Building soil carbon for productivity and implications for carbon accounting in South Australian GRDC grains research update. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 61:143-158.
doi: 10.1023/A:1013386710419
[16]   Buresh R J, Tian G. 1997. Soil improvement by trees in sub-Saharan Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 38: 51-76.
doi: 10.1023/A:1005948326499
[17]   Chapman D. 1965. Cation-exchange capacity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison: American Association of Agronomy, 891-901.
[18]   Darcha G. 2015. Biomass and carbon sequestration potential of Oxytenanthera abyssinica in the homestead agroforestry system of Tigray. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 5: 69-78.
[19]   Davis B, Di Giuseppe S, Zezza A. 2017. Are African households (not) leaving agriculture? Patterns of households' income sources in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 67: 153-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.018 pmid: 28413253
[20]   Esmaeilzadeh J, Ahangar A G. 2014. Influence of soil organic matter content on soil physical, chemical and biological properties. International Journal of Plant, Animal & Environmental Sciences, 4: 244-252.
[21]   Estefan G, Sommer R, Ryan J. 2013. Methods of Soil, Plant, and Water Analysis: A Manual for the West Asia and North Africa Region (3rd ed.). Beirut: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.
[22]   Faleyimu O I, Akinyemi O. 2010. The role of trees in soil and nutrient conservation. African Journal of General Agriculture, 6: 77-82.
[23]   Felton M, Jones P, Tranter R, et al. 2023. Farmers' attitudes towards, and intentions to adopt, agroforestry on farms in lowland South-East and East England. Land Use Policy, 131: 106668, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106668.
[24]   Frouz J, Livečková M, Albrechtová J, et al. 2013. Is the effect of trees on soil properties mediated by soil fauna? A case study from post-mining sites. Forest Ecology & Management, 309: 87-95.
[25]   Gebrehiwot K. 2004. Dryland Agroforestry Strategy for Ethiopia. Nairobi: ICRAF Headquarters, 1-34.
[26]   Gebrewahid Y, Teka K, Tewolde-berhan S, et al. 2019. Dispersed trees on smallholder farms enhance soil fertility in semi-arid Ethiopia. Ecological Processes, 8(1): 8, doi: 10.1186/s13717-019-0190-8.
[27]   Gebrtsadkan G, Assefa D. 2015. Evaluating the effect of integrated use of farm yard manure and urea on the yield and yield components tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in the low land irrigated areas of north-western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture & Healthcare, 5: 75-84.
[28]   Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L. 2005. Trees on farms and their contribution to soil fertility parameters in Badessa, eastern Ethiopia. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 42: 66-71.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-005-0859-2
[29]   Hadgu K M, Kooistra L, Rossing W A H, et al. 2009. Assessing the effect of Faidherbia albida based land use system on barley yield at field and regional scale in the high lands of Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Food Security, 1(3): 337-350.
doi: 10.1007/s12571-009-0030-2
[30]   Hailu T, Negash L, Olsson M. 2000. Millettia ferruginea from southern Ethiopia: Impacts on soil fertility and growth of maize. Agroforest System, 48: 9-24.
doi: 10.1023/A:1006274912762
[31]   Hanlon E, Bartos J. 1993. Soil pH and electrical conductivity: A country extension soil laboratory manual. [2023-01-08]. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/ss118.
[32]   Horneck D A, Sullivan D M, Owen J S, et al. 2011. Soil Test Interpretation Guide. [2023-02-11]. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
[33]   Jackson M. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
[34]   Kahsay A, Haile M, Gebresamuel G, et al. 2023. Assessing land use type impacts on soil quality: Application of multivariate statistical and expert opinion-followed indicator screening approaches. CATENA, 231: 107351, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023. 107351.
[35]   Kassa H, Gebrehiwet K, Yamoah C. 2010. Balanites aegyptiaca, a potential tree for parkland agroforestry systems with sorghum in Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science & Environmental Management, 1(6): 107-114.
[36]   Kewessa G, Tiki L, Molla A. 2015. Effects of Hypericum revolutum (Vahl) tree on major soil nutrients and selected soil Physico-chemical properties in Goba District, Oromia, Ethiopia. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(1): 6-13.
[37]   Kuyah S, Whitney C W, Jonsson M, et al. 2019. Agroforestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39: 47, doi: 10.1007/s13593-019-0589-8.
[38]   Kuyah S, Buleti S, Dimobe K, et al. 2023. Farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa:Evidence for climate change mitigation and adaptation in drylands. In: Dagar J C, Gupta S R, Sileshi G W. Agroforestry for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa. Singapore: Springer, 53-88.
[39]   Loch D S. 2006. Soil nutrient testing:How to get meaningful results. In:Healthy Soils for Great Turf: Proceedings of a Workshop held at Cleveland, Queensland. Cleveland: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 13-22.
[40]   Mafongoya P L, Bationo A, Kihara J, et al. 2006. Appropriate technologies to replenish soil fertility in southern Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 76: 137-151.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9049-3
[41]   Mamo D. 2017. Status of selected soil properties under Croton macrostachyus tree at Gemechis District, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture & Healthcare, 7(8): 36-43.
[42]   Manjur B, Abebe T, Abdulkadir A. 2014. Effects of scattered F. albida (Del) and C. macrostachyus (Lam) tree species on key soil physicochemical properties and grain yield of Maize (Zea mays): A case study at umbulo Wacho watershed, southern Ethiopia. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(3): 63-73.
[43]   Marín-Spiotta E, Sharma S. 2013. Carbon storage in successional and plantation forest soils: A tropical analysis. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 22: 105-117.
[44]   Melaku A, Amdemariam T, Alemayehu B. 2022. Croton macrostachyus (Hochst. ex Delile) and Triticum aestivum yield interface in a parkland agroforestry system. Trees, Forests & People, 8: 100240, doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100240.
[45]   Mesfin S, Haileselassie H. 2022. Evaluation of soil physico-chemical properties as affected by canopies of scattered agroforestry trees on croplands. South African Journal of Plant & Soil, 39(2): 153-162.
[46]   Molla A, Linger E. 2017. Effects of Acacia decurrens (Green wattle) tree on selected soil physico-chemical properties north- western Ethiopia. Research Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Management, 6: 95-103.
[47]   Mueller K E, Eissenstat D M, Hobbie S E, et al 2012. Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment. Biogeochemistry, 111: 601-614.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9695-7
[48]   Neba N. 2009. Management of woody plants in indigenous land use systems of the Sahel: Example of north Cameroon. International NGO Journal, 4(11): 480-490.
[49]   Noumi Z, Chaieb M. 2012. Dynamics of Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) Hayne subsp. raddiana (Savi) Brenan in arid zones of Tunisia. Acta Botanica Gallica, 159(1): 121-126.
doi: 10.1080/12538078.2012.671665
[50]   Nsabimana D, Klemedtson L, Kaplin B A, et al. 2008. Soil carbon and nutrient accumulation under forest plantations in southern Rwanda. African Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2(6): 142-149.
[51]   Olsen S, Sommers L, Page A. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties of Phosphorus. ASA Monograph, 9: 403-430.
[52]   Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, et al 2009. Database: A Tree Reference and Selection Guide. Kenya: World Agroforestry Center.
[53]   Pandey C, Singh A, Sharma D. 2000. Soil properties under Acacia nilotica trees in a traditional agroforestry system in central India. Agroforestry Systems, 49: 53-61.
doi: 10.1023/A:1006314411454
[54]   Pearson T R, Brown S L, Birdsey R A. 2007. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. In: Technical Report NRS-18. US Department of Agriculture, New York, USA.
[55]   Redda A, Abay F. 2015. Agronomic performance of integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Tselemti District of North-Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Environment & Earth Science, 5(9): 30-42.
[56]   Rhoades C C. 1996. Single-tree influences on soil properties in agroforestry: Lessons from natural forest and savanna ecosystems. Agroforestry Systems, 35: 71-94.
doi: 10.1007/BF02345330
[57]   Schroth G, Sinclair F L. 2003. Trees, Crops, and Soil Fertility:Concepts and Research Methods. New York: CABI Publishing.
[58]   Tegegne E D. 2008. Importance of Ficus thonningii Blume in soil fertility improvement and animal nutrition in Gondar Zuria, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Science.
[59]   Tiruneh Z A. 2017. Effects of scattered Acacia tortilis (Forssk) Hayne on soil properties in different land uses in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(2): 164-176.
doi: 10.1080/10549811.2016.1270835
[60]   Walkley A, Black I. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29-38.
doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
[61]   Weil R R, Brady N C. 2017. The Nature and Properties of Soils (15th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
[62]   Woldu M, Haile M, Sogn T A, et al. 2021. Yield, nutrient uptake, and economic return of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in calcareous soil as affected by compost types. Journal of Agriculture & Food Research, 6: 100237, doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100237.
[63]   Zoungrana A, De Cannière C, Cissè M, et al. 2023. Does the social status of farmers determine the sustainable management of agroforestry parklands located near protected areas in Burkina Faso (West Africa)? Global Ecology and Conservation, 44: e02476, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02476.
[1] André L CARVALHO, Renato A ARAÚJO-NETO, Guilherme B LYRA, Carlos E P CERRI, Stoécio M F MAIA. Impact of rainfed and irrigated agriculture systems on soil carbon stock under different climate scenarios in the semi-arid region of Brazil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 359-373.
[2] ZHANG Yongkun, HUANG Mingbin. Spatial variability and temporal stability of actual evapotranspiration on a hillslope of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(2): 189-204.
[3] PEI Yanwu, HUANG Laiming, SHAO Ming'an, ZHANG Yinglong. Responses of Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. in the sandy and loamy soils to water stress[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 791-805.
[4] Ali MAHDAVI, Soghra SAIDI, Yaghob IRANMANESH, Mostafa NADERI. Biomass and carbon stocks in three types of Persian oak (Quercus brantii var. persica) of Zagros forests in a semi-arid area, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 766-774.
[5] GONG Yidan, XING Xuguang, WANG Weihua. Factors determining soil water heterogeneity on the Chinese Loess Plateau as based on an empirical mode decomposition method[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 462-472.
[6] Shunjun HU, Yongde GAN, Yongbao CHEN. Comparing phreatic evaporation at zero water table depth with water surface evaporation[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(6): 968-976.
[7] Dongyan JIN, J MURRAY Phil, Xiaoping XIN, Yifei QIN, Baorui CHEN, Gele QING, Zhao ZHANG, Ruirui YAN. Attribution of explanatory factors for change in soil organic carbon density in the native grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(3): 375-387.
[8] WANG Zhongyuan, XIE Jiangbo, LI Yan. Safety-efficiency trade-offs in the cotton xylem: acclimatization to different soil textures[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(3): 443-452.
[9] WANG Kaibo, DENG Lei, REN Zongping, SHI Weiyu, CHEN Yiping, SHANG-GUAN Zhouping. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon stocks during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 207-220.
[10] ZhengYang YAO, JianJun LIU, XiaoWen ZHAO, DongFeng LONG, Li WANG. Spatial dynamics of aboveground carbon stock in urban green space: a case study of Xi’an, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(3): 350-360.