Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2022, Vol. 14 Issue (11): 1274-1292    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-022-0035-7     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-022-0035-7
Research article     
Interactive effects of deficit irrigation and vermicompost on yield, quality, and irrigation water use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber
Halimeh PIRI1,*(), Amir NASERIN2, Ammar A ALBALASMEH3
1Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of College of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol 9861335856, Iran
2Department of Water Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani 6341773637, Iran
3Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Download: HTML     PDF(1501KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Water scarcity is the most significant barrier to agricultural development in arid and semi-arid regions. Deficit irrigation is an effective solution for managing agricultural water in these regions. The use of additives such as vermicompost (VC) to improve soil characteristics and increase yield is a popular practice. Despite this, there is still a lack of understanding of the interaction between irrigation water and VC on various crops. This study aimed to investigate the interaction effect of irrigation water and VC on greenhouse cucumber yield, yield components, quality, and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE). The trials were done in a split-plot design in three replicates in a semi-arid region of southeastern Iran in 2018 and 2019. Three levels of VC in the experiments, i.e., 10 (V1), 15 (V2), and 20 t/hm2 (V3), and three levels of irrigation water, i.e., 50% (I1), 75% (I2), and 100% (I3) of crop water requirement were used. The results showed that the amount of irrigation water, VC, and their interaction significantly affected cucumber yield, yield components, quality, and IWUE in both years. Reducing the amount of irrigation water and VC application rates reduced the weight, diameter, length, and cucumber yield. The maximum yield (175 t/hm2) was recorded in full irrigation using 20 t/hm2 of VC, while the minimum yield (98 t/hm2) was found in I1V1 treatment. The maximum and minimum values of IWUE were recorded for I1V3 and I3V1 treatments as 36.07 and 19.93 kg/(m3?hm2), respectively. Moreover, reducing irrigation amount decreased chlorophyll a and b, but increased vitamin C. However, the maximum carbohydrate and protein contents were obtained in mild water-stressed conditions (I2). Although adding VC positively influenced the value of quality traits, no significant difference was observed between V2 and V3 treatments. Based on the results, adding VC under full irrigation conditions leads to enhanced yield and IWUE. However, in the case of applying deficit irrigation, adding VC up to a certain level (15 t/hm2) increases yield and IWUE, after which the yield begins to decline. Because of the salinity of VC, using a suitable amount of it is a key point to maximize IWUE and yield when applying a deficit irrigation regime.

Key words： irrigation water use efficiency      greenhouse      size and weight of fruit      soil amendment      semi-arid region     
Received: 31 May 2022      Published: 30 November 2022
Corresponding Authors: *Halimeh PIRI (E-mail: H_piri2880@uoz.ac.ir)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Halimeh PIRI
Amir NASERIN
Ammar A ALBALASMEH
Cite this article:

Halimeh PIRI, Amir NASERIN, Ammar A ALBALASMEH. Interactive effects of deficit irrigation and vermicompost on yield, quality, and irrigation water use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(11): 1274-1292.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-022-0035-7     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2022/V14/I11/1274

Year and month Temperature Relative
humidity (%)		 Evaporation
(mm/d)
Maximum Mean Minimum
2018-2019
September 32.6 23.9 15.2 23 11.2
October 31.4 15.4 11.6 29 7.2
November 24.6 10.3 4.7 42 5.5
December 18.4 8.9 1.5 43 4.5
January 16.8 13.5 3.8 53 4.2
February 14.3 11.7 4.6 54 3.8
2019-2020
September 34.2 24.7 16.3 24 12.6
October 32.6 16.5 12.7 29 8.4
November 26.1 11.3 4.8 43 5.7
December 20.4 9.4 2.4 44 4.9
January 17.7 14.6 4.3 54 4.8
February 15.8 12.5 4.1 53 4.1
Table 1 Average monthly maximum, minimum, mean temperature, relative humidity, and evaporation in two growing seasons
Available
phosphorus (mg/kg)		 Available
potassium (mg/kg)		 Total nitrogen (%) Organic
carbon (%)		 EC (dS/m) pH Soil texture Year
25.4 314 0.98 2.6 0.65 7.1 Loam sand 2018-2019
28.2 298 1.10 2.4 0.71 6.9 Loam sand 2019-2020
Table 2 Soil physical and chemical characteristics
Iron
(mg/kg)		 Manganese
(mg/kg)		 Zinc
(mg/kg)		 Copper
(mg/kg)		 Total potassium (%) Total calcium (%) Total sodium (%) Total phosphorus (%) Total nitrogen (%) Organic carbon (%) Year
2015 84.6 289 25 1.1 3.9 0.54 0.34 3.45 30.26 2018-2019
2018 82.3 276 27 1.3 4.1 0.58 0.29 3.24 29.31 2019-2020
Table 3 Physical and chemical characteristics of applied vermicompost
Sources of variation df Fruit weight (g) Fruit diame-
ter (cm)		 Fruit length (cm) Plant height (cm) Cucumber yield (t/hm2) IWUE
(kg/
(m3•hm2))		 Chloro-phyll a (mg/g) Chloro-
phyll b (mg/g)		 Vitamin C (mg/100g) Carbo-
hydrates (mg/g)		 Protein (%)
Year (Y) 1 231.41 5.340 1.160 18.95 1.36 1.83 0.19 0.08 0.39 0.27 0.38
Replication (R) 2 2307.33 0.018 0.073 282.15 2.55 2.29 0.12 0.18 0.43 0.64 0.05
Irrigation water (I) 2 3364.06* 2.180** 253.480** 10263.28* 21,812.00** 491.09** 1.23** 1.90** 163.36** 16.19** 32.61*
Y×I 4 23,048.85 0.033 0.160 319.55 0.24 1.31 0.19 0.08 0.95 1.23 1.67
Vermi-
compost (V)		 2 26,984.30* 0.800** 31.120** 2668.69* 3136.00** 105.66** 3.15** 2.62** 245.18** 34.15** 72.14*
Y×V 2 145.03 2.120 4.230 21.15 1.67 2.06 113.03 3.50 3.33 26.23 2.17
I×V 4 21,393.48* 1.570* 24.920** 2351.85* 1763.56** 60.29** 2.07* 2.08* 31.64* 7.21** 2.52*
I×V×Y 4 1563.50 1.150 4.360 7.74 3.56 3.08 263.42 2.58 4.12 7.84 3.42
R×V×I 12 20,120.01 0.008 0.075 371.56 1.22 1.13 0.08 0.16 1.16 1.32 2.48
CV (%) 10.10 4.250 2.040 11.96 2.70 3.59 5.23 4.50 6.35 3.54 6.67
SD 14.60 0.150 0.300 18.50 3.70 1.10 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.01 3.30
Table 4 Analysis of variance of the effect of quantity of irrigation water and vermicompost on the studied traits of cucumber and IWUE in two growing seasons
Treat-
ment		 Fruit weight (g) Fruit
diameter (cm)		 Fruit
length (cm)		 Plant height
(cm)		 Cucumber yield (t/hm2) IWUE
(kg/(m3•hm2))
2018-2019 2019-
2020		 2018-2019 2019-
2020		 2018-2019 2019-2020 2018-2019 2019-
2020		 2018-2019 2019-2020 2018-2019 2019-2020
I3 167.9a 166.3a 3.8a 3.6a 16.9a 17.1a 169.5a 168.5a 155.0 156.2a 25.0b 25.6b
I2 155.1a 156.0a 3.5b 3.6b 14.8a 15.9a 157.0b 156.4b 149.9a 150.1a 31.8a 31.8a
I1 117.1b 118.2b 3.3c 3.3c 10.9b 11.2b 134.6c 133.3c 101.9b 102.6b 32.9a 32.9a
V3 169.8a 168.2a 3.7a 3.6a 14.9a 15.6a 167.1a 166.5a 141.4a 141.9a 31.1a 31.3a
V2 146.7ab 145.3ab 3.6a 3.5a 14.8a 15.6a 156.8ab 155.4ab 140.5a 140.1a 30.9a 31.1a
V1 123.5b 124.4b 3.3b 3.2b 13.0b 13.2b 147.3b 146.6b 121.9b 122.3b 27.6b 27.9b
Treat-
ment		 Chlorophyll a (mg/g) Chlorophyll b (mg/g) Vitamin C (mg/100g) Carbohydrates (mg/g) Protein (%)
2018-2019 2019-
20		 2018-2019 2019-
2020		 2018-2019 2019-2020 2018-2019 2019-
2020		 2018-2019 2019-2020
I3 0.45a 0.47a 0.21a 0.22a 3.22b 3.26b 0.28ab 0.26ab 48.2b 48.6b
I2 0.38a 0.39a 0.17a 0.17a 3.92a 3.85a 0.36a 0.37a 52.3a 52.5a
I1 0.26b 0.27b 0.12c 0.12c 4.19a 4.21a 0.20b 0.23b 45.7c 45.2c
V3 0.43a 0.44a 0.23a 0.24a 4.16a 4.15a 0.32a 0.32a 55.3a 54.9a
V2 0.37ab 0.38ab 0.19ab 0.20ab 3.95a 3.87a 0.28ab 0.30a 50.6ab 50.8ab
V1 0.25b 0.26b 0.14b 0.15b 3.17b 3.19b 0.19b 0.20a 45.7c 45.2c
Table 5 Comparison of yield, yield components, quality traits, and IWUE of cucumber in two growing seasons
Fig. 1 Interactive effect of irrigation water amounts and VC (vermicompost) levels on soil salinity. Treatment followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. V1, V2, and V3 are 10, 15, and 20 t/hm2 VC, respectively. I1, I2, and I3 are 50%, 75%, and 100% of the plant's water requirements, respectively.
Fig. 2 Interactive effect of irrigation water amounts and VC (vermicompost) levels on cucumber yield in two growing seasons. Treatment followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. V1, V2, and V3 are 10, 15, and 20 t/hm2 VC, respectively. I1, I2, and I3 are 50%, 75%, and 100% of the plant's water requirements, respectively.
Fig. 3 Interactive effect of irrigation water amount and VC (vermicompost) levels on yield components of cucumber in two growing seasons. Treatment followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. V1, V2, and V3 are 10, 15, and 20 t/hm2 VC, respectively. I1, I2, and I3 are 50%, 75%, and 100% of the plant's water requirements, respectively. (a), fruit length; (b), fruit diameter; (c), fruit weight; (d), plant height.
Fig. 4 Interactive effects of irrigation water amount and VC (vermicompost) levels on quality traits of cucumber in two growing seasons. Treatment followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. V1, V2, and V3 are 10, 15, and 20 t/hm2 VC, respectively. I1, I2, and I3 are 50%, 75%, and 100% of the plant's water requirements, respectively. (a), carbohydrates; (b), protein; (c), vitamin C; (d), chlorophyll b; (e), chlorophyll a.
Fig. 5 Interactive effect of irrigation water amounts and VC (vermicompost) levels on IWUE (irrigation water use efficiency) in two growing seasons. Treatment followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. V1, V2, and V3 are 10, 15, and 20 t/hm2 VC, respectively. I1, I2, and I3 are 50%, 75%, and 100% of the plant's water requirements, respectively.
[1]   Afshar R K, Chaichi M R, Assareh M H, et al. 2014. Interactive effect of deficit irrigation and soil organic amendments on seed yield and flavonolignan production of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn.). Industrial Crops and Production, 58: 166-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.043
[2]   Aksakal E L, Sari S, Angin I. 2016. Effects of vermicompost application on soil aggregation and certain physical properties. Land Degradation and Development, 27(4): 983-995.
doi: 10.1002/ldr.2350
[3]   Alinejad S, Sarabi V, Bakhtvari A R S, et al. 2020. Variation in physiological traits, yield and secondary metabolites of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.) under different irrigation regimes and nutrition systems. Industrial Crops and Products, 143: 111916, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111916.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111916
[4]   Allen R, Pereira L, Raes D, et al. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[5]   Amiri H, Ismaili A, Hosseinzadeh S R. 2017. Influence of vermicompost fertilizer and water deficit stress on morpho-physiological features of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. karaj). Compost Science and Utilization, 25(3): 152-163.
doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2016.1249313
[6]   Anderson C M, Kohorn B D. 2001. Inactivation of Arabidopsis SIP1 leads to reduced levels of sugars and drought tolerance. Plant Physiology, 158(9): 1215-1219.
[7]   Arnon D I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1): 1-15.
doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 pmid: 16654194
[8]   Asli S, Neumann P M. 2010. Rhizosphere humic acid interacts with root cell walls to reduce hydraulic conductivity and plant development. Plant and Soil, 336: 313-322.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0483-2
[9]   Atiyeh R M, Arancon N, Edwards C A, et al. 2001a. The influence of earthworm processed pig manure on the growth and productivity of marigolds. Bioresource Technology, 81(2): 103-108.
doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00122-5
[10]   Atiyeh R M, Edwards C A, Edwards C, et al. 2001b. Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant medium: Effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresource Technology, 78(1): 11-20.
doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00172-3
[11]   Atiyeh R M, Arancon N, Edwards C A, et al. 2002. The influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and productivity of marigolds. Bioresource Technology, 81(2): 103-108.
pmid: 11762902
[12]   Azarmi R, Giglou M T, Hajieghrari B, et al. 2009. The effect of sheep-manure vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in the greenhouse. African Journal of Biotechnolgy, 8(19): 4953-4957.
[13]   Bayoumi T Y, Eid M, Metwali E M, et al. 2008. Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Biotechnology, 7(14): 2341-2352.
[14]   Çakir R, Kanburoglu-Çebi U, Altintas S, et al. 2017. Irrigation scheduling and water use efficiency of cucumber grown as a spring-summer cycle crop in solar greenhouse. Agricultural Water Management, 180: 78-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.023
[15]   Celestina C, Hunt J R, Sale P W, et al. 2019. Attribution of crop yield responses to application of organic amendments: A critical review. Soil and Tillage Research, 186: 135-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.10.002
[16]   Chalmers D J. 1989. A physiological examination of regulated deficit irrigation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Science, 23: 44-48.
[17]   Chaves M M, Pereira J S, Maroco J, et al. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany, 89(7): 907-916.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf105
[18]   Connor D J, Loomis R S, Cassman K G. 2011. Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 562.
[19]   Demir Z. 2019. Effects of vermicompost on soil physicochemical properties and lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. Crispa) yield in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(17): 2151-2168.
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1654508
[20]   Dorji K, Behboudian M H, Zegbe-Dominguez J A, et al. 2005. Water relations, growth, yield, and fruit quality of hot pepper under deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying. Scientia Horticulturae, 104(2): 137-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.08.015
[21]   Edwards C A, Arancon N Q, Shelman R L. 2010. Vermiculture Technology:Earthworms, Organic Wastes, and Environmental Management. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 623.
[22]   El-Mageed T A A, Semida W M. 2015. Effect of deficit irrigation and growing seasons on plant water status, fruit yield and water use efficiency of squash under saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae, 186: 89-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.013
[23]   El-Mageed T A A, Semida W M, Taha R S, et al. 2018. Effect of summer-fall deficit irrigation on morpho-physiological, anatomical responses, fruit yield and water use efficiency of cucumber under salt affected soil. Scientia Horticulturae, 237: 148-155.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.014
[24]   El-Mageed T A A, El-Sherif A M. 2019. A novel compost alleviate drought stress for sugar beet production grown in Cd-contaminated saline soil. Agricultural Water Management, 226: 805-831.
[25]   FAOSTAT. 2017. Cucumber Production. [2020-11-11]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
[26]   Favati F, Lovelli S, Galgano F, et al. 2009. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae, 122(4): 562-571.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.026
[27]   Fritz J I, Franke-Whittle I H, Haindl S, et al. 2012. Microbiological community analysis of vermicompost tea and its influence on the growth of vegetables and cereals. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 58(7): 836-847.
doi: 10.1139/w2012-061 pmid: 22712623
[28]   Geerts S, Raes D. 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agricultural Water Management, 96(9): 1275-1284.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.009
[29]   Ghosh P K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Manna M C, et al. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresourrce Technology, 95(1): 85-93.
[30]   Glenn D M, Carey A, Bolton F E, et al. 1985. Effect of N fertilizer on protein content of grain, straw, and chaff tissues in soft white winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 77(2): 229-232.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700020013x
[31]   Gonzalez M, Gomez E, Comese R, et al. 2010. Influence of organic amendments on soil quality potential indicators in an urban horticultural system. Bioresource Technology, 101(22): 8897-901.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.095 pmid: 20630748
[32]   Grewal H S, Maheshwari B, Parks S E, et al. 2011. Water and nutrient use efficiency of a low cost hydroponic greenhouse for a cucumber crop: An Australian case study. Agricultural Water Management, 98(5): 841-846.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.010
[33]   Gutiérrez-Miceli F A, Santiago-Borraz J, Molina J A M, et al. 2007. Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Bioresource Technology, 98(15): 2781-2786.
pmid: 17400447
[34]   Hijbeek R, Pronk A A, van Ittersum M K, et al. 2018. What drives farmers to increase soil organic matter? Insights from the Netherlands. Soil Use and Management, 34(1): 85-100.
doi: 10.1111/sum.12401
[35]   Hoekstra F, Golovia A, Buitink J, et al. 2001. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 6(9): 431-438.
pmid: 11544133
[36]   Hosseinzadeh S R, Amiri H, Ismaili A, et al. 2017. Nutrition and biochemical responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to vermicompost fertilizer and water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40(16): 2259-2268.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1262412
[37]   Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi S A, et al. 2015. Vermicomposting eliminates the toxicity of lantana (Lantana camara) and turns it into a plant friendly organic fertilizer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 298: 46-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.073 pmid: 26073377
[38]   Hussain N, Abbasi S A. 2018. Efficacy of the vermicomposts of different organic wastes as "clean" fertilizers: state-of-the-art. Sustainability, 10(4): 1205.
doi: 10.3390/su10041205
[39]   Hussain S, Sharif M, Ahmad W, et al. 2018. Soil and plants nutrient status and wheat growth after mycorrhiza inoculation with and without vermicompost. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(12): 1534-1546.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2018.1459687
[40]   Ievinsh G. 2011. Vermicompost treatment differentially affects seed germination, seedling growth and physiological status of vegetable crop species. Plant Growth Regulation, 65(1): 169-181.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-011-9586-x
[41]   Irigoyen J J, Einerich D W, Sánchez‐Díaz M, et al. 1992. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago satida) plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 84(1): 55-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb08764.x
[42]   Javed S, Panwar A. 2013. Effect of biofertilizer, vermicompost and chemical fertilizer on different biochemical parameters of Glycine max and Vigna mungo. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 5: 40-44.
[43]   Joshi R, Vig A P, Singh J, et al. 2013. Vermicompost as soil supplement to enhance growth, yield and quality of Triticum aestivum L.: A field study. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2(1): 1-7.
doi: 10.1186/2251-7715-2-1
[44]   Jouquet P, Plumere T, Thu T D, et al. 2010. The rehabilitation of tropical soils using compost and vermicompost is affected by the presence of endogeic earthworms. Applied Soil Ecology, 46(1): 125-133.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.07.002
[45]   Justes E, Meynard J M, Mary B, et al. 1997. Management of N nutrition: diagnosis using stem base extract:JUBIL method. In: Lemaire G. Diagnosis of the Nitrogen Status in Crops. Berlin: Spinger Verlag, 163-187.
[46]   Kashem A, Sarker A, Hossain I, et al. 2015. Comparison of the effect of vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers on vegetative growth and fruit production of tomato (Solanumly copersicum L.). Open Journal of Soil Science, 5: 53-65.
doi: 10.4236/ojss.2015.52006
[47]   Khosravi Shakib A, Rezaei Nejad A, Khandan Mirkohi A, et al. 2019. Vermicompost and manure compost reduce water-deficit stress in pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L. cv. Candyman Orange). Compost Science & Utilization, 27(1): 61-68.
[48]   Kumar Srivastava P, Singh P C, Gupta M, et al. 2011. Influence of earthworm culture on fertilization potential and biological activities of vermicomposts prepared from different plant wastes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 174(3): 420-429.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201000174
[49]   Li S, Xue X, Guo W, et al. 2010. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and water use efficiency in greenhouse potted cucumber. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 16(2): 376-381. (in Chinese)
[50]   Liu H, Li H, Ning H, et al. 2019. Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount to balance yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato. Agricultural Water Management, 226: 105787, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105787.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105787
[51]   Liu H, Yin C, Gao Z, et al. 2021. Evaluation of cucumber yield, economic benefit and water productivity under different soil matric potentials in solar greenhouses in North China. Agricultural Water Management, 243: 106442, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106442.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106442
[52]   Maji D, Misra P, Singh S, et al. 2017. Humic acid rich vermicompost promotes plant growth by improving microbial community structure of soil as well as root nodulation and mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of Pisum sativum. Applied Soil Ecology, 110: 97-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.008
[53]   Manivaannan P, Abdul Jaleel C, Sanka B, et al. 2007. Growth biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 59(2): 141-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.002
[54]   Mao X, Liu M, Wang X, et al. 2003. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and water use of greenhouse grown cucumber in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 61(3): 219-228.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00022-2
[55]   Meyer-Kohlstock D, Schmitz T, Kraft E, et al. 2015. Organic waste for compost and biochar in the EU: Mobilizing the potential. Resources, 4(3): 457-475.
doi: 10.3390/resources4030457
[56]   Muhammad Z, Hussain F. 2010. Effect of NaCl salinity on the germination and seedling growth of some medicinal plants. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(2): 889-897.
[57]   Nazarideljou M J, Heidari Z. 2014. Effects of vermicompost on growth parameters, water use efficiency and quality of zinnia bedding plants (Zinnia elegance 'dreamland red') under different irrigation regimes. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 1(2): 141-150.
[58]   Nelson D W, Sommers L P. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter, In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.). Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 225-246.
[59]   Nelson P N, Oades J M. 1998. Organic matter, sodicity, and soil structure. In: Sumner M E, Naidu R. Sodic Soils. New York: Oxford University Press, 51-75.
[60]   Olsen S R, Sommers L E. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.). Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 403-430.
[61]   Payero J O, Tarkalson D D, Irmak S, et al. 2009. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management, 96(10): 1387-1397.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.022
[62]   Pelah D, Wang W, Altman A, et al. 1997. Differential accumulation of water stress-related proteins, sucrose synthase and soluble sugars in Populus species that differ in their water stress response. Physiologia Plantarum, 99(1): 153-159.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03443.x
[63]   Piri H, Naserin A. 2020. Effect of different levels of water, applied nitrogen and irrigation methods on yield, yield components and IWUE of onion. Scientia Horticulturae, 268: 109361, doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109361.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109361
[64]   Piri H, Naserin A. 2022. Comparison of different irrigation methods for onion by means of water and nitrogen response functions. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 97(1): 122-136.
doi: 10.1080/14620316.2021.1966322
[65]   Rouphael Y, Colla G. 2005. Radiation and water use efficiencies of greenhouse zucchini squash in relation to different climate parameters. European Journal of Agronomy, 23(2): 183-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2004.10.003
[66]   Salehi A, Tasdighi H, Gholamhoseini M, et al. 2016. Evaluation of proline, chlorophyll, soluble sugar content and uptake of nutrients in the German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) under drought stress and organic fertilizer treatments. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 6(10): 886-891.
doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.08.009
[67]   Shabala S, Munns R. 2017. Salinity stress:physiological constraints and adaptive mechanisms. In: Shabala S. Plant Stress Physiology (2nd ed.). Wallingford: CABI, 24-63.
[68]   Soleimani A, Ahmadikhah A, Soleimani S, et al. 2009. Performance of different greenhouse cucumber cultivars (Cucumis sativus L.) in southern Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(17): 4077-4083.
[69]   Ting S, Rouseff L. 1986. Citrus Fruits and their Products:Analysis, Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 293.
[70]   Wang D, Shi Q, Wang X, et al. 2010. Influence of cow manure vermicompost on the growth, metabolite contents, and antioxidant activities of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis). Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46(7): 689-696.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0473-9
[71]   Wang F, Kang S, Du T, et al. 2011. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments. Agricultural Water Management, 98(8): 1228-1238.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.03.004
[72]   Wang H, Li J, Cheng M, et al. 2019. Optimal drip fertigation management improves yield, quality, water and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber. Scientia Horticulturae, 243: 357-366.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.050
[73]   Wang X X, Zhao F, Zhang G, et al. 2017. Vermicompost improves tomato yield and quality and the biochemical properties of soils with different tomato planting history in a greenhouse study. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 1978, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01978.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01978
[74]   Wang Z, Liu Z, Zhang Z, et al. 2009. Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20 cm standard pan evaporation in Northeast China. Scientia Horticulturae, 123: 51-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.020
[75]   Warman P R, AngLopez M J. 2010. Vermicompost derived from different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresource Technology, 101(2): 4479-4483.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.098
[76]   Wei Z, Liang Y, Yamada S, et al. 2009. Relation of soil microbial diversity to tomato yield and quality under different soil water conditions and fertilizations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33(3): 580-586. (in Chinese)
[77]   Xu C, Leskovar D I. 2014. Growth, physiology and yield responses of cabbage to deficit irrigation. Horticultural Science, 41(3): 138-146.
doi: 10.17221/208/2013-HORTSCI
[78]   Xu C, Mou B. 2016. Vermicompost affects soil properties and spinach growth, physiology, and nutritional value. HortScience, 51(7): 847-855.
doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.7.847
[79]   Xue G, Lynne McIntyre C, Glassop D, et al. 2008. Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Molecular Biology, 67(3): 197-214.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9311-y
[80]   Yadav L P, Malhotra S K, Singh A, et al. 2017. Effect of intercropping, crop geometry and organic manures on growth and yield of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var italica). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(3): 318-324.
[81]   Yang L, Zhao F, Chang Q, et al. 2015. Effects of vermicomposts on tomato yield and quality and soil fertility in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Agricultural Water Management, 160: 98-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.002
[82]   Zaller J G. 2007. Vermicompost as a substitute for peat in potting media, effects on germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit quality of three tomato varieties. Scientia Horticulturae, 112(2): 191-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.023
[83]   Zhang N, Ren Y, Shi Q, et al. 2011. Effects of vermicompost on quality and yield of watermelon. China Vegetables, (6): 76-79.
[84]   Zhao H T, Luo J, Shan Y H, et al. 2010. Effects of vermicompost organic-inorganic mixed fertilizer on yield and quality components of cucumber cultivated in greenhouse. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 16: 1288-1293. (in Chinese)
[85]   Zhao H T, Li T P, Zhang Y, et al. 2017. Effects of vermicompost amendment as a basal fertilizer on soil properties and cucumber yield and quality under continuous cropping conditions in a greenhouse. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 17(12): 2718-2730.
doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1744-y
[1] Ayesha ALAM, Elke GABRIEL-NEUMANN. Prospects and limitations of soil amendment and irrigation techniques for the water-saving public urban greenery and ephemeral weed management in the sandy soils of the United Arab Emirates[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1288-1302.
[2] ZHANG Wenwen, PAN Yue, WEN Fuqi, FU Juanjuan, HAO Yanbin, HU Tianming, YANG Peizhi. Extreme drought with seasonal timing consistently promotes CH4 uptake through inconsistent pathways in a temperate grassland, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 768-778.
[3] WANG Kun, WANG Xiaoxia, FEI Hongyan, WAN Chuanyu, HAN Fengpeng. Changes in diversity, composition and assembly processes of soil microbial communities during Robinia pseudoacacia L. restoration on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(5): 561-575.
[4] WANG Bo, LI Yuwei, BAO Yuhai. Grazing alters sandy soil greenhouse gas emissions in a sand-binding area of the Hobq Desert, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(5): 576-588.
[5] André L CARVALHO, Renato A ARAÚJO-NETO, Guilherme B LYRA, Carlos E P CERRI, Stoécio M F MAIA. Impact of rainfed and irrigated agriculture systems on soil carbon stock under different climate scenarios in the semi-arid region of Brazil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 359-373.
[6] WU Jun, DENG Guoning, ZHOU Dongmei, ZHU Xiaoyan, MA Jing, CEN Guozhang, JIN Yinli, ZHANG Jun. Effects of climate change and land-use changes on spatiotemporal distributions of blue water and green water in Ningxia, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(7): 674-687.
[7] JIA Wuhui, YIN Lihe, ZHANG Maosheng, ZHANG Xinxin, ZHANG Jun, TANG Xiaoping, DONG Jiaqiu. Quantification of groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration along a semi-arid wetland transect using diurnal water table fluctuations[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(5): 455-469.
[8] LANG Man, LI Ping, WEI Wei. Gross nitrogen transformations and N2O emission sources in sandy loam and silt loam soils[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(5): 487-499.
[9] Tahani K BAIT SUWAILAM, Abdulrahim M AL-ISMAILI, Nasser A AL-AZRI, L H Janitha JEEWANTHA, Hemesiri KOTAGAMA. Enhancement of freshwater production of the seawater greenhouse condenser[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 397-412.
[10] Abdulrahim M AL-ISMAILI, Moustafa A FADEL, Hemantha JAYASURIYA, L H Janitha JEEWANTHA, Adel AL-MAHDOURI, Talal AL-SHUKEILI. Potential reduction in water consumption of greenhouse evaporative coolers in arid areas via earth-tube heat exchangers[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 388-396.
[11] Ibtihal AL-MANTHRIA, Abdulrahim M AL-ISMAILIA, Hemesiri KOTAGAMAB, Mumtaz KHANC, L H Janitha JEEWANTHAD. Water, land, and energy use efficiencies and financial evaluation of air conditioner cooled greenhouses based on field experiments[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 375-387.
[12] Mahsa MIRDASHTVAN, Mohsen MOHSENI SARAVI. Influence of non-stationarity and auto-correlation of climatic records on spatio-temporal trend and seasonality analysis in a region with prevailing arid and semi-arid climate, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(6): 964-983.
[13] FENG Jian, ZHAO Lingdi, ZHANG Yibo, SUN Lingxiao, YU Xiang, YU Yang. Can climate change influence agricultural GTFP in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China?[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 837-853.
[14] LYU Changhe, XU Zhiyuan. Crop production changes and the impact of Grain for Green program in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(1): 18-28.
[15] BELALA Fahima, HIRCHE Azziz, D MULLER Serge, TOURKI Mahmoud, SALAMANI Mostefa, GRANDI Mohamed, AIT HAMOUDA Tahar, BOUGHANI Madjid. Rainfall patterns of Algerian steppes and the impacts on natural vegetation in the 20th century[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(4): 561-573.