Research article |
|
|
|
|
Non-negligible factors in low-pressure sprinkler irrigation: droplet impact angle and shear stress |
HUI Xin1, ZHENG Yudong1, MUHAMMAD Rizwan Shoukat1, TAN Haibin2, YAN Haijun1,3,*() |
1College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China 2Semi-arid Agriculture Engineering & Technology Research Center of China, Shijiazhuang 050051, China 3Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Water-Saving and Water Resources, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract Droplet shear stress is considered as an important indicator that reflects soil erosion in sprinkler irrigation more accurately than kinetic energy, and the effect of droplet impact angle on the shear stress cannot be ignored. In this study, radial distribution of droplet impact angles, velocities, and shear stresses were investigated using a two-dimensional video disdrometer with three types of low-pressure sprinkler (Nelson D3000, R3000, and Komet KPT) under two operating pressures (103 and 138 kPa) and three nozzle diameters (3.97, 5.95, and 7.94 mm). Furthermore, the relationships among these characteristical parameters of droplet were analyzed, and their influencing factors were comprehensively evaluated. For various types of sprinkler, operating pressures, and nozzle diameters, the smaller impact angles and larger velocities of droplets were found to occur closer to the sprinkler, resulting in relatively low droplet shear stresses. The increase in distance from the sprinkler caused the droplet impact angle to decrease and velocity to increase, which contributed to a significant increase in the shear stress that reached the peak value at the end of the jet. Therefore, the end of the jet was the most prone to soil erosion in the radial direction, and the soil erosion in sprinkler irrigation could not only be attributed to the droplet kinetic energy, but also needed to be combined with the analysis of its shear stress. Through comparing the radial distributions of average droplet shear stresses among the three types of sprinklers, D3000 exhibited the largest value (26.94-3313.51 N/m2), followed by R3000 (33.34-2650.80 N/m2), and KPT (16.15-2485.69 N/m2). From the perspective of minimizing the risk of soil erosion, KPT sprinkler was more suitable for low-pressure sprinkler irrigation than D3000 and R3000 sprinklers. In addition to selecting the appropriate sprinkler type to reduce the droplet shear stress, a suitable sprinkler spacing could also provide acceptable results, because the distance from the sprinkler exhibited a highly significant (P<0.01) effect on the shear stress. This study results provide a new reference for the design of low-pressure sprinkler irrigation system.
|
Received: 13 May 2022
Published: 30 November 2022
|
Corresponding Authors:
*YAN Haijun (E-mail: yanhj@cau.edu.cn)
|
|
|
[1] |
Al-Kayssi A W, Mustafa S H. 2016. Modeling gypsifereous soil infiltration rate under different sprinkler application rates and successive irrigation events. Agricultural Water Management, 163: 66-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.006
|
|
|
[2] |
Baiamonte G, Provenzano G, Iovino M, et al. 2021. Hydraulic design of the center-pivot irrigation system for gradually decreasing sprinkler spacing. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 147(7): 04021027, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001568.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001568
|
|
|
[3] |
Bautista-Capetillo C, Zavala M, Playán E. 2012. Kinetic energy in sprinkler irrigation: different sources of drop diameter and velocity. Irrigation Science, 30(1): 29-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00271-010-0259-8
|
|
|
[4] |
Carrión P, Tarjuelo J, Montero J. 2001. SIRIAS: a simulation model for sprinkler irrigation. Irrigation Science, 20(2): 73-84.
doi: 10.1007/s002710000031
|
|
|
[5] |
Chang W J, Hills D J. 1993a. Sprinkler droplet effects on infiltration. II: laboratory study. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119(1): 157-169.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:1(157)
|
|
|
[6] |
Chang W J, Hills D J. 1993b. Sprinkler droplet effects on infiltration. I: impact simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119(1): 142-156.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:1(142)
|
|
|
[7] |
Chen R, Li H, Wang J, et al. 2020. Effects of pressure and nozzle size on the spray characteristics of low-pressure rotating sprinklers. Water, 12(10): 2904, doi: 10.3390/w12102904.
doi: 10.3390/w12102904
|
|
|
[8] |
De Jong S M, Addink E A, Van Beek L P H, et al. 2011. Physical characterization, spectral response and remotely sensed mapping of Mediterranean soil surface crusts. CATENA, 86(1): 24-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.018
|
|
|
[9] |
Etikala B, Adimalla N, Madhav S, et al. 2021. Salinity problems in groundwater and management strategies in arid and semi‐arid regions. Groundwater Geochemistry: Pollution and Remediation Methods, 42-56.
|
|
|
[10] |
Faci J M, Salvador R, Playán E, et al. 2001. Comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(4): 224-233.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:4(224)
|
|
|
[11] |
Ferreira A G, Larock B E, Singer M J. 1985. Computer simulation of water drop impact in a 9.6-mm deep pool. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49(6): 1502-1507.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900060034x
|
|
|
[12] |
Ge M, Wu P, Zhu D, et al. 2015. Effect of jets interaction on spray characteristics between adjacent sprinklers. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 31(9): 100-106. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[13] |
Ge M, Wu P, Zhu D, et al. 2018. Analysis of kinetic energy distribution of big gun sprinkler applied to continuous moving horse-drawn traveler. Agricultural Water Management, 201: 118-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.009
|
|
|
[14] |
Ge M, Wu P, Zhu D, et al. 2020. Comparisons of spray characteristics between vertical impact and turbine drive sprinklers-A case study of the 50PYC and HY 50 big gun-type sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 228: 105847, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.009
|
|
|
[15] |
Ghadiri H, Payne D. 1986. The risk of leaving the soil surface unprotected against falling rain. Soil & Tillage Research, 8: 119-130.
|
|
|
[16] |
Ghadiri H, Payne D. 2010. The formation and characteristics of splash following raindrop impact on soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 39(4): 563-575.
|
|
|
[17] |
Huang C, Bradford J M, Cushman J H. 1982. A numerical study of raindrop impact phenomena: the rigid case1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46(1): 14-19.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600010003x
|
|
|
[18] |
Huang G, Bringi V N, Cifelli R, et al. 2010. A methodology to derive radar reflectivity-liquid equivalent snow rate relations using C-band radar and a 2D video disdrometer. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 27(4): 637-651.
|
|
|
[19] |
Hui X, Lin X, Zhao Y, et al. 2022a. Assessing water distribution characteristics of a variable-rate irrigation system. Agricultural Water Management, 260: 107276, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107276.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107276
|
|
|
[20] |
Hui X, Zheng Y, Meng F, et al. 2022b. Comprehensively evaluating and modelling droplet diameters and kinetic energies of low‐pressure sprinklers. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(4): 829-854.
doi: 10.1002/ird.2706
|
|
|
[21] |
Hui X, Zheng Y, Yan H. 2021b. Water distributions of low-pressure sprinklers as affected by the maize canopy under a centre pivot irrigation system. Agricultural Water Management, 245: 106646, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106646.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106646
|
|
|
[22] |
Jiang Y, Liu J, Li H, et al. 2021. Droplet distribution characteristics of impact sprinklers with circular and noncircular nozzles: Effect of nozzle aspect ratios and equivalent diameters. Biosystems Engineering, 212: 200-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.10.013
|
|
|
[23] |
King B A, Bjorneberg D L. 2011. Evaluation of potential runoff and erosion of four center pivot irrigation sprinklers. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27(1): 75-85.
doi: 10.13031/2013.36226
|
|
|
[24] |
King B A, Bjorneberg D L. 2012a. Transient soil surface sealing and infiltration model for bare soil under droplet impact. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(3): 937-945.
doi: 10.13031/2013.41525
|
|
|
[25] |
King B A, Bjorneberg D L. 2012b. Droplet kinetic energy of moving spray-plate center-pivot irrigation sprinklers. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(2): 505-512.
doi: 10.13031/2013.41386
|
|
|
[26] |
Kruger A, Krajewski W F. 2002. Two-dimensional video disdrometer: A description. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 19(5): 602-617.
|
|
|
[27] |
Lu J, Zheng F, Li G, et al. 2016. The effects of raindrop impact and runoff detachment on hillslope soil erosion and soil aggregate loss in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 161: 79-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.04.002
|
|
|
[28] |
Manke E B, Norenberg B G, Faria L C, et al. 2019. Wind drift and evaporation losses of a mechanical lateral-move irrigation system: oscillating plate versus fixed spray plate sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 225: 105759, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105759.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105759
|
|
|
[29] |
Osman M, Hassan S B, Yusof K. 2015. Effect of combination factors of operating pressure, nozzle diameter and riser height on sprinkler irrigation uniformity. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 695: 380-383.
|
|
|
[30] |
Robles O,. Playán E, Cavero J, et al. 2017. Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize. Agricultural Water Management, 191: 37-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.001
|
|
|
[31] |
Robles O, Zapata N, Burguete J, et al. 2019. Characterization and simulation of a low-pressure rotator spray plate sprinkler used in center pivot irrigation systems. Water, 11(8): 1684, doi: 10.3390/w11081684.
doi: 10.3390/w11081684
|
|
|
[32] |
Sayyadi H, Nazemi A H, Sadraddini A A, et al. 2014. Characterising droplets and precipitation profiles of a fixed spray-plate sprinkler. Biosystems Engineering, 119: 13-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.12.011
|
|
|
[33] |
Silva L L. 2006. The effect of spray head sprinklers with different deflector plates on irrigation uniformity, runoff and sediment yield in a Mediterranean soil. Agricultural Water Management, 85(3): 243-252.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.006
|
|
|
[34] |
Silva L L. 2007. Fitting infiltration equations to centre-pivot irrigation data in a Mediterranean soil. Agricultural Water Management, 94(1-3): 83-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.003
|
|
|
[35] |
Stambouli T, Martínez-Cob A, Faci J M, et al. 2013. Sprinkler evaporation losses in alfalfa during solid-set sprinkler irrigation in semiarid areas. Irrigation science, 31(5): 1075-1089.
doi: 10.1007/s00271-012-0389-2
|
|
|
[36] |
Vaezi A R, Ahmadi M, Cerdà A. 2017. Contribution of raindrop impact to the change of soil physical properties and water erosion under semi-arid rainfalls. Science of the Total Environment, 583: 382-392.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.078
|
|
|
[37] |
Yan H, Jin H, Qian Y. 2010. Characterizing center pivot irrigation with fixed spray plate sprinklers. Science China Technological Sciences, 53(5): 1398-1405.
doi: 10.1007/s11431-010-0090-8
|
|
|
[38] |
Yan H, Bai G, He J, et al. 2011. Influence of droplet kinetic energy flux density from fixed spray-plate sprinklers on soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield. Biosystems Engineering, 110(2): 213-221.
doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.08.010
|
|
|
[39] |
Yan H, Hui X, Li M, et al. 2020. Development in sprinkler irrigation technology in China. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(52): 78-87.
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|