Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2022, Vol. 14 Issue (7): 811-823    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-022-0023-y     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-022-0023-y
Research article     
Characteristics of root pullout resistance of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China
LIU Yabin1,2,*(), SHI Chuan1, YU Dongmei3,4, WANG Shu1, PANG Jinghao1, ZHU Haili1,2, LI Guorong1,2, HU Xiasong1,2,*()
1Department of Geological Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
2Key Laboratory of Genozoic Resource & Environment in North Margin of the Tibetan Plateau, Xining 810016, China
3Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China
4Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Geology and Environment of Salt Lakes, Xining 810008, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1562KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Roots exert pullout resistance under pullout force, allowing plants to resist uprooting. However, the pullout resistance characteristics of taproot-type shrub species of different ages remain unclear. In this study, in order to improve our knowledge of pullout resistance characteristics of taproot systems of shrub species, we selected the shrub species Caragana korshinskii Kom. in different growth periods as the research plant and conducted in situ root pullout test. The relationships among the maximum pullout resistance, peak root displacement, shrub growth period, and aboveground growth indices (plant height and plant crown breadth) were analyzed, as well as the mechanical process of uprooting. Pullout resistance of 4-15 year-old C. korshinskii ranged from 2.49 (±0.25) to 14.71 (±4.96) kN, and the peak displacement ranged from 11.77 (±8.61) to 26.50 (±16.09) cm. The maximum pullout resistance and the peak displacement of roots increased as a power function (R2=0.9038) and a linear function (R2=0.8242) with increasing age, respectively. The maximum pullout resistance and the peak displacement increased with increasing plant height; however, this relationship was not significant. The maximum pullout resistance increased exponentially (R2=0.5522) as the crown breadth increased. There was no significant relationship between the peak displacement and crown breadth. The pullout resistance and displacement curve were divided into three stages: the initial nonlinear growth, linear growth, and nonlinear stages. Two modes of failure of a single root occurred when the roots were subjected to vertical loading forces: the synchronous breakage mode and the periderm preferential breakage mode. These findings provide a foundation for further investigation of the soil reinforcement and slope protection mechanisms of this shrub species in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China.



Key wordsloess area      Qinghai-Tibet Plateau      pullout resistance      growth period      aboveground growth indices      pullout test      Caragana korshinskii     
Received: 30 March 2022      Published: 31 July 2022
Corresponding Authors: * LIU Yabin (E-mail: liuyabincug@163.com);HU Xiasong (E-mail: huxiasong@sina.com)
Cite this article:

LIU Yabin, SHI Chuan, YU Dongmei, WANG Shu, PANG Jinghao, ZHU Haili, LI Guorong, HU Xiasong. Characteristics of root pullout resistance of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(7): 811-823.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-022-0023-y     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2022/V14/I7/811

Fig. 1 (a), study site in the Dayou Mountains in the northern Xining City, China; (b), Caragana korshinskii.
Depth (cm) Dry density (g/cm3) Moisture content (%) Liquid
limit (%)
Plastic
limit (%)
Grain composition (%) Non-uniform coefficient Soil type
0.250-
0.075 mm
0.075-
0.005 mm
<0.005 mm
0-30 1.28±0.10 18.61±4.10 24.08±0.66 17.34±0.38 35.16±16.04 61.88±14.76 2.97±2.12 4.73±2.58 Silt
Table 1 Soil physical properties in the study site
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the instrument for in situ pullout test
Age (a) Plant height (cm) Plant crown breadth (cm) Sample number
4 236.00±36.11b 223.50±35.52c 5
5 235.00±47.64b 211.50±5.83c 5
6 237.10±29.01b 232.14±34.32c 7
7 269.17±72.88ab 260.00±23.76bc 6
9 281.33±34.09ab 273.75±28.05b 6
12 304.40±34.46a 280.50±21.30ab 5
15 321.75±46.88a 309.69±30.88a 8
Table 2 Sample numbers and aboveground growth indices of C. korshinskii
|r|<0.3 0.3≤|r|≤0.5 0.5≤|r|≤0.8 |r|≥0.8
Weak correlation Low correlation Moderate correlation High correlation
Table 3 Classification of correlation strength during correlation analysis
Fig. 3 Relationships of the maximum root pullout resistance (a) and peak displacement (b) with growth period of C. korshinskii. Different lowercase letters indicate significant different among different plant growth periods at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Relationships of the maximum root pullout resistance (a) and peak displacement (b) with height of C. korshinskii
Fig. 5 Relationships of the maximum root pullout resistance (a) and peak displacement (b) with crown breath of C. korshinskii
Fig. 6 Relationship between height and crown breadth of C. korshinskii
Fig. 7 Characteristics of pullout resistance and displacement curves of C. korshinskii (a-c), and typical failure modes of a single root of C. korshinskii (d). (a), Curve I; (b), Curve II; (c), Curve III.
[1]   Ali F, Osman R, Kamil S S S M, et al. 2013. The influences of root branching patterns on pullout resistance. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18: 3967-3977.
[2]   Bailey P H J, Currey J D, Fitter A H. 2002. The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53(367): 333-340.
pmid: 11807137
[3]   Boldrin D, Leung A K, Bengough A G. 2017. Root biomechanical properties during establishment of woody perennials. Ecological Engineering, 109: 196-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.002
[4]   Burylo M, Rey F, Roumet C, et al. 2009. Linking plant morphological traits to uprooting resistance in eroded marly lands (Southern Alps, France). Plant and Soil, 324: 31-42.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9920-5
[5]   Cheng J M, Wan H E, Wang J, et al. 2005. Growth of Caragana korshinskii and depletion process of soil water in semi-arid region. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 41(2): 37-41. (in Chinese)
[6]   Commandeur P R, Pyles M R. 1991. Modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of douglas-fir roots. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21(1): 48-52.
doi: 10.1139/x91-007
[7]   Crook M J, Ennos A R. 1996. The anchorage mechanics of deep rooted larch, Larix europea×L. japonica. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47(10): 1509-1517.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/47.10.1509
[8]   Cucchi V, Meredieu C, Stokes A, et al. 2004. Root anchorage of inner and edge trees in stands of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) growing in different podzolic soil conditions. Trees, 18(4): 460-466.
[9]   Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A. 2005. A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil, 278(1-2): 119-134.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2
[10]   Edmaier K, Crouzy B, Ennos R, et al. 2014. Influence of root characteristics and soil variables on the uprooting mechanics of Avena sativa and Medicago sativa seedlings. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(10): 1354-1364.
doi: 10.1002/esp.3587
[11]   Ennos A R. 1989. The mechanics of anchorage in seedlings of sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. New Phytologist, 113(2): 185-192.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb04705.x
[12]   Ennos A R. 1990. The anchorage of leek seedlings: the effect of root length and soil strength. Annals of Botany, 65(4): 409-416.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087951
[13]   Fourcaud T, Ji J N, Zhang Z Q, et al. 2008. Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: a modelling approach. Annals of Botany, 101(8): 1267-1280.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm245 pmid: 17942593
[14]   Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, et al. 2005. The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots. Plant and Soil, 278(1-2): 1-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-8768-6
[15]   Hu C L. 1985. Preliminary study on resistance physiology of several shrub species in arid and semi-arid areas of Qinghai Plateau. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, (4): 24-31. (in Chinese)
[16]   Hu X S, Brierley G., Zhu H L, et al. 2013. An exploratory analysis of vegetation strategies to reduce shallow landslide activity on loess hillslopes, Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 10(4): 668-686.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-013-2584-x
[17]   Ji X D, Chen L H, Zhang A. 2016. Anchorage properties at the interface between soil and roots with branches. Journal of Forestry Research, 28(1): 83-93.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-016-0294-2
[18]   Köstler J N, Bruckner E, Bibelriether H. 1968. The Roots of Forest Trees. Investigations of Root Morphology of Forest Trees in Central Europa. Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey, 284. (in German)
[19]   Liu Y, Jia Z, Gu L, et al. 2013. Vertical and lateral uprooting resistance of Salix matsudana Koidz in a riparian area. Forestry Chronicle, 89(2): 162-168.
doi: 10.5558/tfc2013-033
[20]   Liu Y B, Hu X S, Yu D M, et al. 2021. Influence of the roots of mixed-planting species on the shear strength of saline loess soil. Journal of Mountain Science, 18(3): 806-818.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6169-1
[21]   Mickovski S B, Ennos A R. 2003. Anchorage and asymmetry in the root system of Pinus peuce. Silva Fennica, 37(2): 161-173.
[22]   Mickovski S B, Beek L, Salin F. 2005. Uprooting of vetiver uprooting resistance of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides). Plant and Soil, 278(1-2): 33-41.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-2379-0
[23]   Mickovski S B, Bengough A G, Bransby M F, et al. 2007. Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. European Journal of Soil Science, 58(6): 1471-1481.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00953.x
[24]   Norris J E. 2005. Root reinforcement by hawthorn and oak roots on a highway cut-slope in Southern England. Plant and Soil, 278(1-2): 43-53.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-1301-0
[25]   Niu X W, Ding Y C, Zhang Q, et al. 2003. Studies on the characteristics of Caragana root development and some relevant physiology. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23(5): 860-865. (in Chinese)
[26]   Rahardjo H, Harnas F R, Indrawan I, et al. 2014. Understanding the stability of Samanea saman trees through tree pulling, analytical calculations and numerical models. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13(2): 355-364.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.002
[27]   Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. 2010. Root-soil mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: F04035, doi: 10.1029/2009JF001603.
doi: 10.1029/2009JF001603
[28]   Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. 2011. Pullout tests of root analogs and natural root bundles in soil: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116: F02007, doi: 10.1029/2010JF001753.
doi: 10.1029/2010JF001753
[29]   Scippa G S, Michele M D, Iorio A D, et al. 2006. The response of Spartium junceum roots to slope: anchorage and gene factors. Annals of Botany, 97(5): 857-866.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj603
[30]   Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter A H, et al. 1996. An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Annals of Botany, 78(4): 415-421.
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0137
[31]   Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough A G, et al. 2009. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides. Plant and Soil, 324(1-2): 1-30.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0159-y
[32]   Su L J, Hu B L, Xie Q J, et al. 2020. Experimental and theoretical study of mechanical properties of root-soil interface for slope protection. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(11): 2784-2795.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6077-4
[33]   Stubbs C J, Cook D D, Niklas J K. 2019. A general review of the biomechanics of root anchorage. Journal of Experimental Botany, 70(14): 3439-3451.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery451
[34]   Tan H B, Ma H Z, Zhang X Y, et al. 2006. Typical geochemical elements in loess deposit in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and its paleoclimatic implication. Acta Geologica Sinica, 80(1): 110-117.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2006.tb00800.x
[35]   Tanaka N, Samarakoon M B, Yagisawa J. 2011. Effects of root architecture, physical tree characteristics, and soil shear strength on maximum resistive bending moment for overturning Salix babylonica and Juglans ailanthifolia. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 8(1): 69-79.
doi: 10.1007/s11355-011-0151-6
[36]   Tian J, Cao B, Ji J N, et al. 2014. Biomechanical characteristics of root systems of Hedysarum scoparium and Salix psammophila. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(23): 192-198. (in Chinese)
[37]   van Beek L P H, Wint J, Cammeraat L H. 2005. Observation and simulation of root reinforcement on abandoned Mediterranean slopes. Plant and Soil, 278(1-2): 55-74.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-7247-4
[38]   Waldron L J, Dakessian S. 1981. Soil reinforcement by roots: calculation of increased soil shear resistance from root properties. Soil Science, 132(6): 427-435.
doi: 10.1097/00010694-198112000-00007
[39]   Wang G Y, Hu S H, Zhang Y J. 2017. An outdoor drawing test study of the root soil interaction force for a small tree root system. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 44(6): 64-69. (in Chinese)
[40]   Wang X, Zhang J X, Lv W, et al. 2021. Infiltration response of deep dry soil to rainfall in the loess hilly region. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 39(4): 29-38. (in Chinese)
[41]   Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Zhang C C, et al. 2015. Choosing an optimal land-use pattern for restoring eco-environments in a semiarid region of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 74(74): 213-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.001
[42]   Wu T H, Mckinnell W P, Swanston D N. 1979. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 16(1): 19-33.
doi: 10.1139/t79-003
[43]   Xie L L, Sang Z G, He X H. 2013. SPSS Guide to Data analysis. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 130. (in Chinese)
[44]   Yang M, Défossez P, Danjon F, et al. 2017. Which root architectural elements contribute the best to anchorage of Pinus species? Insights from in silico experiments. Plant and Soil, 411(1-2): 275-291.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2992-0
[45]   Yang M, Défossez P, Danjon F, et al. 2018. Analyzing key factors of roots and soil contributing to tree anchorage of Pinus species. Trees, 32: 703-712.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-018-1665-4
[46]   Yang Q H, Zhang C B, Liu P C, et al. 2021. The role of root morphology and pulling direction in pullout resistance of alfalfa roots. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 580825, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.580825.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.580825
[47]   Zhang C B, Zhou X, Jiang J, et al. 2019. Root moisture content influence on root tensile tests of herbaceous plants. CATENA, 172: 140-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.012
[48]   Zhang C B, Liu Y T, Liu P C, et al. 2020. Untangling the influence of soil moisture on root pullout property of alfafa plant. Journal of Arid Land, 12(4): 666-675.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-020-0017-6
[49]   Zhang X L, Hu X S, Li G R, et al. 2012. Time effect of young shrub roots on slope protection of loess area in Northeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(4): 136-141. (in Chinese)
[50]   Zhou Y, Watts D, Li Y H, et al. 1998. A case study of effect of lateral roots of Pinus yunnanensis on shallow soil reinforcement. Forest Ecology and Management, 103(2-3): 107-120.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00216-8
[51]   Zhuang J Q, Peng J B, Wang G H, et al. 2016. Prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the Loess Plateau, Yan'an, China, using the TRIGRS model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(6): 915-927.
doi: 10.1002/esp.4050
[1] SHEN Jianxiang, WANG Xin, WANG Lei, WANG Jiahui, QU Wenjie, ZHANG Xue, CHANG Xuanxuan, YANG Xinguo, CHEN Lin, QIN Weichun, ZHANG Bo, NIU Jinshuai. Spatiotemporal characteristics of seed rain and soil seed bank of artificial Caragana korshinskii Kom. forest in the Tengger Desert, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(4): 550-566.
[2] PAN Yaqing, KANG Peng, QU Xuan, RAN Yichao, LI Xinrong. Effects of long-term fencing on soil microbial community structure and function in the desert steppe, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 431-446.
[3] LIANG Shen, WANG Shu, LIU Yabin, PANG Jinghao, ZHU Haili, LI Guorong, HU Xiasong. Mechanism underlying the uprooting of taproot-type shrub species in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai- Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(10): 1426-1443.
[4] ZHANG Chaobo, LI Rong, JIANG Jing, YANG Qihong. Effects of loading rate on root pullout performance of two plants in the eastern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(9): 1129-1142.
[5] JIA Wei, SHI Peijun, WANG Jing'ai, MA Weidong, XIA Xingsheng, ZHOU Yuantao. Monitoring rock desert formation caused by two different origins (ice-snow melting and drying) in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China by considering topographic and meteorological elements[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 849-866.
[6] ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Mingjun, QU Deye, WANG Shengjie, Athanassios A ARGIRIOU, WANG Jiaxin, YANG Ye. Water use characteristics of different pioneer shrubs at different ages in western Chinese Loess Plateau: Evidence from δ2H offset correction[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(6): 653-672.
[7] LUO Jing, XIN Liangjie, LIU Fenggui, CHEN Qiong, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Yili. Study of the intensity and driving factors of land use/cover change in the Yarlung Zangbo River, Nyang Qu River, and Lhasa River region, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 411-425.
[8] LI Leiming, WU Jun, LU Jian, ZHANG Xiying, XU Juan. Geochemical signatures and human health risk evaluation of rare earth elements in soils and plants of the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(11): 1258-1273.
[9] MA Gailing, GOU Qianqian, WANG Guohua, QU Jianjun. Succession of soil bacterial and fungal communities of Caragana korshinskii plantation in a typical agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China over a 50-a period[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(10): 1071-1086.
[10] GUO Bing, ZANG Wenqian, YANG Fei, HAN Baomin, CHEN Shuting, LIU Yue, YANG Xiao, HE Tianli, CHEN Xi, LIU Chunting, GONG Rui. Spatial and temporal change patterns of net primary productivity and its response to climate change in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China from 2000 to 2015[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(1): 1-17.
[11] XIAO Dengpan, ZHAO Yanxi, BAI Huizi, HU Yukun, CAO Jiansheng. Impacts of climate warming and crop management on maize phenology in northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(6): 892-903.
[12] Qinli XIONG, Yang XIAO, Waseem A HALMY Marwa, A DAKHIL Mohammed, Pinghan LIANG, Chenggang LIU, Lin ZHANG, PANDEY Bikram, Kaiwen PAN, B EL KAFRAWAY Sameh, Jun CHEN. Monitoring the impact of climate change andhuman activities on grassland vegetation dynamics in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateauof China during 2000-2015[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 637-651.
[13] Zhengyi YAO, Xiaoying LI, Jianhua XIAO. Characteristics of daily extreme wind gusts on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(5): 673-685.
[14] JianHua XIAO, JianJun QU, ZhengYi YAO, YingJun PANG KeCun ZHANG. Morphology and formation mechanism of sand shadow dunes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(1): 10-26.