Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2025, Vol. 17 Issue (9): 1252-1269    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-025-0109-4     CSTR: 32276.14.JAL.02501094
Research article     
Intra-annual stem radial growth of four plantation species with different water use strategies and life types on the Loess Plateau, China
YANG Xindong1,2, XIANG Yuxiao1,2, Muhammad Saddique AFZAL1,2, ZHAO Zhiguang2,3, ZHAO Changming1,2,*()
1State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2Yuzhong Mountain Ecosystems Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
3Gansu Key Laboratory of Biomonitoring and Bioremediation for Environmental Pollution, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1635KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Tree growth is extremely vulnerable to climate change, especially in semi-arid areas. Although the response of stem radial growth (SRG) to climate change has been extensively studied, the intra-annual regulatory mechanisms of SRG in trees with different water use strategies and life types remain poorly understood. This study calculated the SRG of four native species in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau, China, including two isohydric species (Pinus tabuliformis Carrière and Populus × hopeiensis Hu & Chow) and two anisohydric species (Prunus sibirica L. and Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco). The results revealed that the intra-annual SRG of all the four tree species exhibited a single peak, and greater SRG was found in anisohydric species. Principal component analysis and structural equation model revealed that atmospheric water, particularly relative humidity, was the main factor affecting the SRG of coniferous species (P. tabuliformis and P. orientalis), whereas the SRG was mainly affected by soil water content in broadleaf species (P. sibirica and P. × hopeiensis). These findings suggested that water use strategies and life types play important roles in SRG and environmental response of trees in semi-arid area. Considering the high climate sensitivity of wood formation in trees, our results highlight the importance of water use strategies and life types of trees in SRG prediction in the context of future climate change in arid and semi-arid areas.



Key wordssemi-arid area      plantations      water use strategy      stem radial growth      tree water deficit      environmental factor     
Received: 15 May 2025      Published: 30 September 2025
Corresponding Authors: *ZHAO Changming (E-mail: zhaochm@lzu.edu.cn)
About author: The first and second authors contributed equally to this work.
Cite this article:

YANG Xindong, XIANG Yuxiao, Muhammad Saddique AFZAL, ZHAO Zhiguang, ZHAO Changming. Intra-annual stem radial growth of four plantation species with different water use strategies and life types on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(9): 1252-1269.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-025-0109-4     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2025/V17/I9/1252

Parameter P. tabuliformis P. sibirica P. orientalis P. × hopeiensis
Stand age (a) 53 53 53 53
Altitude (m) 2136.57 2134.33 2168.83 2125.67
Slope (°) 18 15 25 25
Aspect West Southeast Southeast Northwest
DBH (cm) 10.02±2.69 13.05±3.72 11.35±4.63 10.61±3.84
Height (m) 5.97±0.79 3.36±0.37 3.66±1.10 3.50±0.36
Crown width at east-west direction (cm) 335.00±109.13 321.66±109.43 303.33±88.47 170.00±20.00
Crown width at south-north direction (cm) 285.00±108.95 313.33±108.01 303.33±88.02 173.33±5.77
Table 1 Basic information of the sample plots and trees used for stem radial growth (SRG) monitoring
Fig. 1 Landscape of P. tabuliformis (a), P. sibirica (b), P. orientalis (c), and P. × hopeiensis (d). P. tabuliformis, Pinus tabuliformis Carrière; P. sibirica, Prunus sibirica L.; P. orientalis, Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco; P. × hopeiensis, Populus × hopeiensis Hu & Chow.
Fig. 2 Variation in environmental factors in the sample plots on the Loess Plateau from 2022 to 2023. (a), mean (Ta), maximum (Tmax), and minimum (Tmin) air temperature; (b), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and net radiation (RA); (c), relative humidity (RH); (d), vapor pressure deficit (VPD); (e), soil water content (SWC) and precipitation (P); (f), soil temperature (ST).
Fig. 3 Gompertz growth function fitting for the daily cumulative stem radial growth (SRG) and daily SRG rate of the four plantation species during the growing season in 2022 (a and b) and 2023 (c and d). DOY, day of year.
Tree species Year Growth start (DOY) Growth end (DOY) Growth duration (d) Peak SRG rate (μm/d) Average daily SRG rate (μm/d)
P. tabuliformis 2022 180±5 254±7 74±6 8.5±2.3 5.2±1.4
2023 134±4 234±6 100±5 12.2±3.4 7.4±2.1
P. sibirica 2022 189±7 269±3 80±5 17.2±4.8 10.5±2.9
2023 168±9 212±5 44±7 32.6±7.4 19.9±4.5
P. orientalis 2022 172±3 270±2 99±2 22.4±2.9 13.7±2.2
2023 171±3 219±4 49±2 25.6±3.4 15.6±2.7
P. × hopeiensis 2023 120±2 161±3 42±2 4.9±0.9 3.0±0.5
Table 2 SRG data of the four plantation species on the Loess Plateau in 2022 and 2023
Fig. 4 Daily relative SRG and tree water deficit (TWD) of the four plantation species during the growth season in 2022 (a and b) and 2023 (c and d)
Fig. 5 Principal component analysis (PCA) of the daily SRG of the four plantation species in response to environmental factors. (a), P. tabuliformis; (b), P. sibirica; (c), P. orientalis; (d), P. × hopeiensis. PC, principal component.
Fig. 6 Scatter plot of PCA results for the daily SRG of the four plantation species in response to environmental factors. (a), P. tabuliformis; (b), P. orientalis; (c), P. sibirica; (d), P. × hopeiensis.
Fig. 7 Ranking of importance between daily SRG and environmental factors for the four plantation species. (a), P. tabuliformis; (b), P. sibirica; (c), P. orientalis; (d), P. × hopeiensis. Feature values refer collectively to the input data of meteorological and soil factors in the model. A positive SHAP value indicates that the feature value contributes positively to the model's prediction, while a negative value suggests a negative contribution.
Fig. 8 Correlation between daily TWD and environmental factors for the four plantation species. The positive correlation coefficient represents a positive association between daily TWD and environmental factor, while the negative coefficient represents a negative association. *, significance at P<0.050 level; **, significance at P<0.010 level; ***, significance at P<0.001 level.
Fig. 9 Environmental factors driving the SRG of the four plantation species based on structural equation model (SEM) analysis. (a), P. tabuliformis; (b), P. sibirica; (c), P. orientalis; (d), P. × hopeiensis. The values above the lines indicate path coefficients (λ), of which positive values represent positive effect; negative values represent negative effect. The yellow lines indicate positive paths, and the blue lines indicate negative paths. The solid lines represent significant paths, whereas the dashed lines represent insignificant paths. A solid arrow between two variables indicates a significant direct effect, whereas a significant indirect effect is inferred when variables are connected through one or more mediating variables via two or more solid arrows without a direct solid arrow between them. The P-value indicates the overall model fit and the model is accepted as having good fit to the data when P>0.050. RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CFI, comparative fit index; AIC, Akaike information criterion; ns, non-significance; *, significance at P<0.050 level; **, significance at P<0.010 level; ***, significance at P<0.001 level.
[1]   Babst F, Bouriaud O, Poulter B, et al. 2019. Twentieth century redistribution in climatic drivers of global tree growth. Science Advances, 5(1): eaat4313, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4313.
[2]   Battipaglia G, de Micco V, Brand W A, et al. 2014. Drought impact on water use efficiency and intra-annual density fluctuations in Erica arborea on Elba (Italy). Plant, Cell & Environment, 37(2): 382-391.
[3]   Bouriaud O, Leban J M, Bert D, et al. 2005. Intra-annual variations in climate influence growth and wood density of Norway spruce. Tree Physiology, 25(6): 651-660.
pmid: 15805085
[4]   Breshears D D, Adams H D, Eamus D, et al. 2013. The critical amplifying role of increasing atmospheric moisture demand on tree mortality and associated regional die-off. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 266, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00266.
pmid: 23935600
[5]   Campelo F, Gutiérrez E, Ribas M, et al. 2018. The facultative bimodal growth pattern in Quercus ilex - A simple model to predict sub-seasonal and inter-annual growth. Dendrochronologia, 49: 77-88.
[6]   Choat B, Brodribb T J, Brodersen C R, et al. 2018. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 558: 531-539.
[7]   Churkina G, Running S W. 1998. Contrasting climatic controls on the estimated productivity of global terrestrial biomes. Ecosystems, 1: 206-215.
[8]   Cui M H, Jiang Y, Xue F, et al. 2025. Soil temperature explains radial growth of coniferous trees more effectively than air temperature in mountainous cold temperate habitat. Ecological Indicators, 176: 113667, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113667.
[9]   Cuny H E, Rathgeber C B K, Lebourgeois F, et al. 2012. Life strategies in intra-annual dynamics of wood formation: example of three conifer species in a temperate forest in North-east France. Tree Physiology, 32(5): 612-625.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps039 pmid: 22543476
[10]   Deslauriers A, Morin H, Urbinati C, et al. 2003. Daily weather response of balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) stem radius increment from dendrometer analysis in the boreal forests of Quebec (Canada). Trees, 17: 477-484.
[11]   Duchesne L, Houle D, D'Orangeville L. 2012. Influence of climate on seasonal patterns of stem increment of balsam fir in a boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 162-163: 108-114.
[12]   Etzold S, Sterck F, Bose A K, et al. 2022. Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees. Ecology Letters, 25(2): 427-439.
[13]   FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2019. Trees, forests and land use in drylands: the first global assessment. Forestry Paper 184. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[14]   Furze M E, Huggett B A, Aubrecht D M, et al. 2019. Whole-tree nonstructural carbohydrate storage and seasonal dynamics in five temperate species. New Phytologist, 221(3): 1466-1477.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15462 pmid: 30368825
[15]   Gao J N, Yang B, He M H, et al. 2019. Intra-annual stem radial increment patterns of Chinese pine, Helan Mountains, northern central China. Trees, 33: 751-763.
[16]   Grossiord C, Buckley T N, Cernusak L A, et al. 2020. Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. New Phytologist, 226(6): 1550-1566.
doi: 10.1111/nph.16485 pmid: 32064613
[17]   Gruber A, Baumgartner D, Zimmermann J, et al. 2009. Temporal dynamic of wood formation in Pinus cembra along the alpine treeline ecotone and the effect of climate variables. Trees, 23: 623-635.
[18]   Hao Z B, Li W B, Hao X M. 2021. Variations of electric potential in the xylem of tree trunks associated with water content rhythms. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(4): 1321-1335.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa492 pmid: 33098428
[19]   Hari P, Nöjd P. 2009. The effect of temperature and PAR on the annual photosynthetic production of Scots pine in northern Finland during 1906-2002. Boreal Environment Research, 14: 5-18.
[20]   He M N, Wang Y Q, Wang L, et al. 2022. Spatial-temporal dynamics and recovery mechanisms of dried soil layers under Robinia pseudoacacia forest based on in-situ field data from 2017 to 2020. Land Degradation & Development, 33(14): 2500-2511.
[21]   Hisano M, Searle E B, Chen H Y H. 2018. Biodiversity as a solution to mitigate climate change impacts on the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biological Reviews, 93(1): 439-456.
[22]   Katz C, Oren R, Schulze E D, et al. 1989. Uptake of water and solutes through twigs of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Trees, 3: 33-37.
[23]   Knüsel S, Peters R L, Haeni M, et al. 2021. Processing and extraction of seasonal tree physiological parameters from stem radius time series. Forests, 12(6): 765, doi: 10.3390/f12060765.
[24]   Lawlor D W, Cornic G. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25(2): 275-294.
[25]   Liu Y Y, Wang A Y, An Y N, et al. 2018. Hydraulics play an important role in causing low growth rate and dieback of aging Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trees in plantations of Northeast China. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41(7): 1500-1511.
[26]   Man Z H, Zhang J Z, Liu J J, et al. 2024. Process-based modeling of phenology and radial growth in Pinus tabuliformis in response to climate factors over a cold and semi-arid region. Plants, 13(7): 980, doi: 10.3390/plants13070980.
[27]   Mcdowell N, Pockman W T, Allen C D, et al. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, 178(4): 719-739.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x pmid: 18422905
[28]   Meinzer F C, Woodruff D R, Marias D E, et al. 2016. Mapping 'hydroscapes' along the iso- to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status. Ecology Letters, 19(11): 1343-1352.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12670 pmid: 27604411
[29]   Morino K, Minor R L, Barron-Gafford G A, et al. 2021. Bimodal cambial activity and false-ring formation in conifers under a monsoon climate. Tree Physiology, 41(10): 1893-1905.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab045 pmid: 33823053
[30]   Niccoli F, Kabala J P, Pacheco-Solana A, et al. 2024. Impact of intra-annual wood density fluctuation on tree hydraulic function: insights from a continuous monitoring approach. Tree Physiology, 44(1): tpad145, doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad145.
[31]   Peng X M, Xiao S C, Yang B, et al. 2022. Water allocation and climate-impacted riparian forest dynamics in the Ejina Oasis, Northwest China. Dendrochronologia, 76: 126001, doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2022.126001.
[32]   Pérez-de-Lis G, Rossi S, Vázquez-Ruiz R A, et al. 2016. Do changes in spring phenology affect earlywood vessels? Perspective from the xylogenesis monitoring of two sympatric ring-porous oaks. New Phytologist, 209(2): 521-530.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13610 pmid: 26295692
[33]   Prislan P, Gricar J, de Luis M, et al. 2013. Phenological variation in xylem and phloem formation in Fagus sylvatica from two contrasting sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 180: 142-151.
[34]   Qian N P, Gao H X, Xu Z Z, et al. 2023. Cambial phenology and wood formation of Korean pine in response to climate change in Changbai Mountain, Northeast China. Dendrochronologia, 77: 126045, doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2022.126045.
[35]   Rajput K S, Gondaliya A D, Lekhak M M, et al. 2018. Structure and ontogeny of intraxylary secondary xylem and phloem development by the internal vascular cambium in Campsis radicans (L.) seem. (Bignoniaceae). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 37: 755-767.
[36]   Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Gricar J, et al. 2008. Critical temperatures for xylogenesis in conifers of cold climates. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17(6): 696-707.
[37]   Rossi S, Anfodillo T, Cufar K, et al. 2016. Pattern of xylem phenology in conifers of cold ecosystems at the northern hemisphere. Global Change Biology, 22(11): 3804-3813.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13317 pmid: 27082838
[38]   Safriel U, Adeel Z, Niemeijer D, et al. 2005. Dryland Systems, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 625-656.
[39]   Shi D P, Tan H B, Rao W B, et al. 2020. Variations in water content of soil in apricot orchards in the western hilly regions of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Vadose Zone Journal, 19(1): e20034, doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20034.
[40]   Sperry J S, Meinzer F C, Mcculloh K A. 2008. Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31(5): 632-645.
[41]   Szatniewska J, Zavadilova I, Nezval O, et al. 2022. Species-specific growth and transpiration response to changing environmental conditions in floodplain forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 516: 120248, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120248.
[42]   Tumajer J, Scharnweber T, Smiljanic M, et al. 2022. Limitation by vapour pressure deficit shapes different intra-annual growth patterns of diffuse- and ring-porous temperate broadleaves. New Phytologist, 233(6): 2429-2441.
doi: 10.1111/nph.17952 pmid: 35000201
[43]   Valeriano C, Gutiérrez E, Colangelo M, et al. 2023. Seasonal precipitation and continentality drive bimodal growth in Mediterranean forests. Dendrochronologia, 78: 126057, doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126057.
[44]   van der Maaten E, Pape J, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, et al. 2018. Distinct growth phenology but similar daily stem dynamics in three co-occurring broadleaved tree species. Tree Physiology, 38(12): 1820-1828.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy042 pmid: 29718395
[45]   Walthert L, Ganthaler A, Mayr S, et al. 2021. From the comfort zone to crown dieback: Sequence of physiological stress thresholds in mature European beech trees across progressive drought. Science of the Total Environment, 753: 141792, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141792.
[46]   Wang A, Gao X R, Zhou Z Y, et al. 2022. Dynamic responses of tree-ring growth to drought over Loess Plateau in the past three decades. Ecological Indicators, 143: 109423, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109423.
[47]   Wang F, Zhang F, Gou X H, et al. 2021. Seasonal variations in leaf-level photosynthesis and water use efficiency of three isohydric to anisohydric conifers on the Tibetan Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 308-309: 108581, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108581.
[48]   Wu X T, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. 2019. Socio-ecological changes on the Loess Plateau of China after Grain to Green Program. Science of the Total Environment, 678: 565-573.
[49]   Xiao S C, Xiao H L, Peng X M, et al. 2014. Intra-annual stem diameter growth of Tamarix ramosissima and association with hydroclimatic factors in the lower reaches of China's Heihe River. Journal of Arid Land, 6: 498-510.
[50]   Xue F, Jiang Y, Dong M Y, et al. 2022. Seasonal and daily variations in stem water relations between co-occurring Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea meyeri at different elevations. Forest Ecology and Management, 504: 119821, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119821.
[51]   Yang S J, Zhang Y J, Goldstein G, et al. 2015. Determinants of water circulation in a woody bamboo species: afternoon use and night-time recharge of culm water storage. Tree Physiology, 35(9): 964-974.
[52]   Zhang J Z, Gou X H, Wang Y T, et al. 2024. Impacts of site aridity on intra-annual radial variation of two alpine coniferous species in cold and dry ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 158: 111420, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111420.
[53]   Zhang X L, Li X, Manzanedo R D, et al. 2021. High risk of growth cessation of planted larch under extreme drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1): 014040, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd214.
[54]   Zhang X P, Zhang L, Zhao J, et al. 2008. Responses of streamflow to changes in climate and land use/cover in the Loess Plateau, China. Water Resources Research, 44(7): W00A07, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006711.
[55]   Zhang Y P, Jiang Y, Wang B, et al. 2018. Seasonal water use by Larix principis-rupprechtii in an alpine habitat. Forest Ecology and Management, 409: 47-55.
[56]   Zhou B, Sterck F, Kruijt B, et al. 2023. Diel and seasonal stem growth responses to climatic variation are consistent across species in a subtropical tree community. New Phytologist, 240(6): 2253-2264.
doi: 10.1111/nph.19275 pmid: 37737019
[57]   Ziaco E, Truettner C, Biondi F, et al. 2018. Moisture-driven xylogenesis in Pinus ponderosa from a Mojave Desert mountain reveals high phenological plasticity. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41(4): 823-836.
[58]   Zweifel R, Item H, Häsler R. 2001. Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. Tree Physiology, 21(12-13): 869-877.
pmid: 11498334
[59]   Zweifel R, Haeni M, Buchmann N, et al. 2016. Are trees able to grow in periods of stem shrinkage? New Phytologist, 211(3): 839-849.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13995 pmid: 27189708
[60]   Zweifel R, Sterck F, Braun S, et al. 2021. Why trees grow at night. New Phytologist, 231(6): 2174-2185.
doi: 10.1111/nph.17552 pmid: 34118158
[1] DING Rongrong, HE Zeshuai, ZHANG Dazhi, CHEN Liangyue, ZHAO Fuqiang, WANG Yuan, YUAN Peng, YU Xiaoqian. Effects of soil desertification on the occurrence of Kytorhinus immixtus Motschulsky[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(9): 1270-1281.
[2] NIU Jiqiang, LIU Zijian, CHEN Feiyan, LIU Gangjun, ZHOU Junli, ZHOU Peng, LI Hongrui, LI Mengyang. Variations of soil moisture and its influencing factors in arid and semi-arid areas, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(5): 624-643.
[3] YANG Qianqian, WU Xue, Bota BAHETHAN, TIAN Cuiping, YANG Xianyao, WANG Xiantao. Variations of soil bacterial community structure and function under different habitats of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. in the upper reaches of the Tarim River, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(4): 560-574.
[4] Mohammed SOUDDI, Haroun CHENCHOUNI, M'hammed BOUALLALA. Thriving green havens in baking deserts: Plant diversity and species composition of urban plantations in the Sahara Desert[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1270-1287.
[5] LU Haitian, ZHAO Ruifeng, ZHAO Liu, LIU Jiaxin, LYU Binyang, YANG Xinyue. Impact of climate change and human activities on the spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water area in Gansu Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 798-815.
[6] ZHANG Wensheng, AN Chengbang, LI Yuecong, ZHANG Yong, LU Chao, LIU Luyu, ZHANG Yanzhen, ZHENG Liyuan, LI Bing, FU Yang, DING Guoqiang. Modern pollen assemblages and their relationships with vegetation and climate on the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(3): 327-343.
[7] LI Feng, LI Yaoming, ZHOU Xuewen, YIN Zun, LIU Tie, XIN Qinchuan. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 115-138.
[8] ZHANG Yongkun, HUANG Mingbin. Spatial variability and temporal stability of actual evapotranspiration on a hillslope of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(2): 189-204.
[9] XU Lili, YU Guangming, ZHANG Wenjie, TU Zhenfa, TAN Wenxia. Change features of time-series climate variables from 1962 to 2016 in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(1): 58-72.
[10] Lei DONG, Cunzhu LIANG, Frank Yonghong LI, Liqing ZHAO, Wenhong MA, Lixin WANG, Lu WEN, Ying ZHENG, Zijing LI, Chenguang ZHAO, IndreeTUVSHINTOGTOKH. Community phylogenetic structure of grasslandsand its relationship with environmental factors on the Mongolian Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(4): 595-607.
[11] Pingping XUE, Xuelai ZHAO, Yubao GAO, Xingdong HE. Phenotypic plasticity of Artemisia ordosica seedlings in response to different levels of calcium carbonate in soil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(1): 58-65.
[12] Cai REN, Tian YU, Guanghang QU, Shuang WANG, Ze WANG, MIJITI Abudoukeyumu, Hua ZHANG, Lin MA, Xiaoling HE, Hao MA. aloxylon ammodendron (Amaranthaceae) fruit development delay caused by post-flowering non-inductive photoperiod[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(3): 408-418.
[13] Pingping ZHANG, Ming’an SHAO, Xingchang ZHANG. Spatial pattern of plant species diversity and the influencing factors in a Gobi Desert within the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(3): 379-393.
[14] WU Guilin, JIANG Shaowei, LIU Weiyang, ZHAO Chengyi, LI Jun. Competition between Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima seedlings under simulated high groundwater availability[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 293-303.
[15] ZHOU Zhengchao, ZHANG Xiaoyan, GAN Zhuoting. Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen after 26 years of farmland management on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(6): 806-813.