Orginal Article |
|
|
|
|
Applicability of five models to simulate water infiltration into soil with added biochar |
Tongtong WANG1,2, E STEWART Catherine3, Jiangbo MA1,2, Jiyong ZHENG1,*(), Xingchang ZHANG1 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China 2 College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China 3 Soil-Plant-Nutrient Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Fort Collins CO 80526-8119, USA |
|
|
Abstract As a soil amendment, biochar can reduce soil bulk density, increase soil porosity, and alter soil aggregates and thus affect the infiltration. Researchers have proposed and revised several theoretical models to describe the process of soil infiltration. Although these models have been successfully used to evaluate the soil infiltration in different scenarios in agricultural fields, little effort has been devoted to assess their performances in arid and semi-arid soils after the addition of biochar. A laboratory experiment was performed to study the infiltration characteristics of two typical Loess Plateau soils at three particle sizes (2-1, 1-0.25, and <0.25 mm) and five biochar application amounts (0, 10, 50, 100, and 150 g/kg). The performance of five models (i.e., the Philip model, Kostiakov model, Mezencev model, USDA-NRCS model, and Horton model) in simulating the infiltration process was then evaluated based on the adjusted coefficient of determination and a reduced Chi-Square test. Results indicated that the Horton model best simulated the water-infiltration process in an aeolian sandy soil with added biochar. However, the Mezencev model best simulated the infiltration process in a loamy clay soil (Eum-Orthic Anthrosol). The three-parameter model, i.e., Mezencev and Horton models can better describe the relationship between cumulative infiltration and infiltration time. In conclusion, biochar reduced the soil infiltration capacity of the aeolian sandy soil and increased that of the Eum-Orthic Anthrosol.
|
Received: 06 September 2016
Published: 22 August 2017
|
Corresponding Authors:
|
|
|
[1] | Agegnehu G, Bass A M, Nelson P N, et al.2015. Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 213: 72-85. | [2] | Akhtar S S, Li G T, Andersen M N, et al.2014. Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 138: 37-44. | [3] | Al-Azawi S A.1985. Experimental evaluation of infiltration models. Journal of Hydrology, 24(2): 77-88. | [4] | Asai H, Samson B K, Stephan H M, et al.2009. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research, 111(1-2): 81-84. | [5] | Brodowski S, John B, Flessa H, et al.2006. Aggregate-occluded black carbon in soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 57(4): 539-546. | [6] | Chen Y, Shinogi Y, Taira M.2010. Influence of biochar use on sugarcane growth, soil parameters, and groundwater quality. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 48(7): 526-530. | [7] | Dashtaki S G, Homaee M, Mahdian M H, et al.2009. Site-dependence performance of infiltration models. Water Resources Management, 23(13): 2777-2790. | [8] | Duan R B, Fedler C B, Borrelli J.2011. Field evaluation of infiltration models in lawn soils. Irrigation Science, 29(5): 379-389. | [9] | Gao H Y, He X S, Geng Z C, et al.2011. Effects of biochar and biochar-based nitrogen fertilizer on soil water-holding capacity. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 27(24): 207-213. (in Chinese). | [10] | Green W H, Ampt G A.1911. Studies of soil physics. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(1): 1-24. | [11] | Herath H M S K, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M.2013. Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: An Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma, 210: 188-197. | [12] | Hillel D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Environmental Considerations. San Diego: Academic Press, 56-64. | [13] | Horton R E.1940. An approach towards a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Proceedings of Soil Science Society of America Journal, 5: 399-417. | [14] | Kostiakov A N. 1932. On the dynamics of the coefficient of water percolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it from a dynamic point of view for purpose of amelioration. In: Transactions of 6th Congress of International Soil Science Society. Moscow: Society of Soil Science, 17-21. | [15] | Lehmann J, Joseph S.2009. Biochar for Environmental. London: London Press, 1-12. | [16] | Lehmann J.2007. A handful of carbon. Nature, 447(7141): 143-144. | [17] | Li Z, Wu P T, Feng H, et al.2009. Simulated experiment on effect of soil bulk density on soil infiltration capacity. Transactions of the CSAE, 25(6): 40-45. (in Chinese) | [18] | Liu C C, Li Y, Ren X, et al.2011. Applicability of four infiltration models to infiltration characteristics of water repellent soils. Transactions of the CASE, 27(5): 62-67. (in Chinese) | [19] | Liu H J, Liu J H, Yu J, et al.2012. Effects of soil amendment on soil physical and chemical properties in oat field. Advanced Materials Research, 610-613: 2937-2943. | [20] | Liu J L, Ma X Y, Zhang Z H.2010. Applicability of explicit functions on cumulative infiltration of Green-Ampt model under different conditions. Journal Basic Science and Engineering, 18(1): 11-19. (in Chinese) | [21] | Mao L L, Lei T W, Bralts V F.2011. An analytical approximation method for the linear source soil infiltrability measurement and its application. Journal of Hydrology, 411(3): 169-177. | [22] | Marris E.2006. Putting the carbon back: black is the new green. Nature, 442(7103): 624-626. | [23] | Mezencev V J.1948. Theory of formation of the surface runoff. Meteorologia. I Gidrologia, 3: 33-46. (in Russian) | [24] | Mishra S K, Tyagi J V, Singh V P.2003. Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrological Processes, 17(13): 2629-2652. | [25] | Moore I D, Larson C L, Slack D C, et al.1981. Modelling infiltration: a measurable parameter approach. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 26(1): 21-32. | [26] | Parchami-Araghi F, Mirlatifi S M, Dashtaki S G, et al.2013. Point estimation of soil water infiltration process using Artificial Neural Networks for some calcareous soils. Journal of Hydrology, 481: 35-47. | [27] | Parhi P K, Mishra S K, Singh R.2007. A modification to Kostiakov and modified Kostiakov infiltration models. Water Resources Management, 21(11): 1973-1989. | [28] | Philip J R.1957. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83(5): 345-358. | [29] | Qi R P, Zhang L, Yan Y H, et al.2014. Effects of biochar addition into soils in semiarid land on water infiltration under the condition of the same bulk density. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(8): 2281-2288. (in Chinese) | [30] | Rashidi M, Seyfi K.2007. Field comparison of different infiltration models to determine the soil infiltration for border irrigation method. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2(6): 628-632. | [31] | Shukla M K, Lal R, Unkefer P.2003. Experimental evaluation of infiltration models for different land use and soil management systems. Soil Science, 168(3): 178-191. | [32] | Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, et al.2009. Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report, 17-31. | [33] | US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Conservation Service.1974. National Engineering Handbook. Section 15. Border Irrigation. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service. | [34] | Valiantzas J D.2010. New linearized two-parameter infiltration equation for direct determination of conductivity and sorptivity. Journal of Hydrology, 384(1-2): 1-13. | [35] | Van de Genachte G, Mallants D, Ramos J, et al.1996. Estimating infiltration parameters from basic soil properties. Hydrological Processes 10(5): 687-701. | [36] | Wang T T, Ma J B, Qu D, et al.2017. Characteristics and mechanism of copper adsorption from aqueous solutions on biochar produced from sawdust and apple branch. Environmental Science, 38(5): 2161-2171. (in Chinese) | [37] | Yan Y H, Zheng J Y, Zhang X C, et al.2013. Impact of biochar addition into typical soils on field capacity in Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(4): 120-124. (in Chinese) | [38] | Zhao X N, Wu F Q.2004. Developments and reviews of soil infiltration research. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 19(1): 42-45. (in Chinese) | [39] | Zheng J Y, Stewart C E, Cotrufo M F.2012. Biochar and nitrogen fertilizer alters soil nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas fluxes from two temperate soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(5): 1361-1370. |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|