Effects of different ridge-furrow mulching systems on yield and water use efficiency of summer maize in the Loess Plateau of China

doi:10.1007/s40333-021-0081-6

Journal of Arid Land

2021, Vol. 13

Issue (9): 947-961 DOI: 10.1007/s40333-021-0081-6 CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-021-0081-6

Research article

Effects of different ridge-furrow mulching systems on yield and water use efficiency of summer maize in the Loess Plateau of China

CHEN Pengpeng¹, GU Xiaobo¹^,^*(

), LI Yuannong¹^,^*(

), QIAO Linran², LI Yupeng¹, FANG Heng¹, YIN Minhua³, ZHOU Changming⁴

¹Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
²College of Art and Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30341, USA
³College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
⁴College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China

Download:

HTML

PDF(950KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Ridge-furrow film mulching has been proven to be an effective water-saving and yield-improving planting pattern in arid and semi-arid regions. Drought is the main factor limiting the local agricultural production in the Loess Plateau of China. In this study, we tried to select a suitable ridge-furrow mulching system to improve this situation. A two-year field experiment of summer maize (Zea mays L.) during the growing seasons of 2017 and 2018 was conducted to systematically analyze the effects of flat planting with no film mulching (CK), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching and furrows bare (RFM), and double ridges and furrows full mulching (DRFFM) on soil temperature, soil water storage (SWS), root growth, aboveground dry matter, water use efficiency (WUE), and grain yield. Both RFM and DRFFM significantly increased soil temperature in ridges, while soil temperature in furrows for RFM and DRFFM was similar to that for CK. The largest SWS was observed in DRFFM, followed by RFM and CK, with significant differences among them. SWS was lower in ridges than in furrows for RFM. DRFFM treatment kept soil water in ridges, resulting in higher SWS in ridges than in furrows after a period of no water input. Across the two growing seasons, compared with CK, RFM increased root mass by 10.2% and 19.3% at the jointing and filling stages, respectively, and DRFFM increased root mass by 7.9% at the jointing stage but decreased root mass by 6.0% at the filling stage. Over the two growing seasons, root length at the jointing and filling stages was respectively increased by 75.4% and 58.7% in DRFFM, and 20.6% and 30.2% in RFM. Relative to the jointing stage, the increased proportions of root mass and length at the filling stage were respectively 42.8% and 94.9% in DRFFM, 63.2% and 115.1% in CK, and 76.7% and 132.1% in RFM, over the two growing seasons, showing that DRFFM slowed down root growth while RFM promoted root growth at the later growth stages. DRFFM treatment increased root mass and root length in ridges and decreased them in 0-30 cm soil layer, while RFM increased them in 0-30 cm soil layer. Compared with CK, DRFFM decreased aboveground dry matter while RFM increased it. Evapotranspiration was reduced by 9.8% and 7.1% in DRFFM and RFM, respectively, across the two growing seasons. Grain yield was decreased by 14.3% in DRFFM and increased by 13.6% in RFM compared with CK over the two growing seasons. WUE in CK was non-significantly 6.8% higher than that in DRFFM and significantly 22.5% lower than that in RFM across the two growing seasons. Thus, RFM planting pattern is recommended as a viable water-saving option for summer maize in the Loess Plateau of China.

Key words： ridge-furrow mulching summer maize soil water storage soil temperature root mass root length

Received: 03 February 2021 Published: 10 September 2021

Corresponding Authors: * GU Xiaobo (E-mail: guxiaobo@nwafu.edu.cn);LI Yuannong (Email: liyuannong@163.com)

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Pengpeng
	GU Xiaobo
	LI Yuannong
	QIAO Linran
	LI Yupeng
	FANG Heng
	YIN Minhua
	ZHOU Changming

Cite this article:

CHEN Pengpeng, GU Xiaobo, LI Yuannong, QIAO Linran, LI Yupeng, FANG Heng, YIN Minhua, ZHOU Changming. Effects of different ridge-furrow mulching systems on yield and water use efficiency of summer maize in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(9): 947-961.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-021-0081-6 OR http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2021/V13/I9/947

Fig. 1 Meteorological data (average air temperature and precipitation) and irrigation volume during the summer maize growing seasons in 2017 (a) and 2018 (b). SS, seedling stage; JS, jointing stage; TS, tasseling stage; FS, filling stage; MS, maturity stage.

Fig. 2 Schematic diagrams of three planting patterns (a, b, and c) and root sampling (d). CK, flat planting with no mulching; RFM, ridge-furrow with ridges mulching and furrows bare; DRFFM, double ridges and furrows full mulching.

Fig. 3 Average soil temperature at depth of 5-25 cm for different treatments during the growing seasons in 2017 (a) and 2018 (b). DAS, days after sowing. The furrow of DRFFM (or RFM) represents the average soil temperature in furrows of DRFFM (or RFM); the ridge of DRFFM (or RFM) represents the average soil temperature in ridges of DRFFM (or RFM). Different lowercase letters at the same time indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars mean standard errors.

Fig. 4 Diurnal variations of average soil temperature at 5-25 cm depth at the jointing (a, c) and filling stages (b, d) in 2017 and 2018 for different treatments. Bars represent the standard errors.

Fig. 5 Dynamics of soil water storage (SWS) at depth of 0-100 cm for CK, DRFFM, and RFM treatments in 2017 (a) and 2018 (b). Different lowercase letters at the same time indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars represent the standard errors.

Fig. 6 Dynamics of SWS at 0-100 cm depth in furrows and ridges on the first and the seventh day after the rainfall event for DRFFM and RFM at the jointing and filling stages in 2017 (a, b, e, f) and 2018 (c, d, g, h). The first and the seventh day after the rainfall event was 12 July and 3 August at the jointing stage, respectively, and was 17 September and 23 September at the filling stage, respectively, in 2017. The first and the seventh day after the rainfall event was 13 July and 20 July at the jointing stage, respectively, and was 23 August and 30 August at the filling stage, respectively, in 2018. Bars represent the standard errors.

Table 1 Root mass and root length under different planting patterns at the jointing and filling stages in 2017 and 2018

Fig. 7 Vertical distribution of root mass at the jointing and filling stages for CK, DRFFM, and RFM treatments in 2017 (a, b) and 2018 (c, d). Different lowercase letters within the same soil depth indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars mean standard errors.

Fig. 8 Vertical distribution of root length at the jointing and filling stages for CK, DRFFM, and RFM treatments in 2017 (a, b) and 2018 (c, d). Different lowercase letters within the same soil depth indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars mean standard errors.

Fig. 9 Dry matter of stem, leaf, ear, and aboveground part for CK, DRFFM, and RFM treatments in 2017 (a, c, e, g) and 2018 (b, d, f, h). Different lowercase letters within the same growth stage indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars mean standard errors.

Table 2 Yield components, grain yield, ET, and WUE for CK, DRFFM and RFM treatments in 2017 and 2018


[1]	Böhm W. 2012. Methods of Studying Root Systems. Cham: Springer Nature, 188.

[2]	Bu L D, Zhu L, Liu J L, et al. 2013. Source-sink capacity responsible for higher maize yield with removal of plastic ﬁlm. Crop Economics, Production & Management, 105(3):591-598.

[3]	Chen X L, Wu P T, Ren X N, et al. 2012. Rainfall harvesting and mulches combination for corn production in the subhumid areas prone to drought of China. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 198(4):304-313. doi: 10.1111/jac.2012.198.issue-4

[4]	Chen Y L, Liu T, Tian X H, et al. 2015. Effects of plastic film combined with straw mulch on grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in Loess Plateau. Field Crops Research, 172:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.016

[5]	Eldoma I M, Li M, Zhang F, et al. 2016. Alternate or equal ridge-furrow pattern: which is better for maize production in the rain-fed semi-arid Loess Plateau of China? Field Crops Research, 191:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.024

[6]	Fan J L, McConkey B, Wang H, et al. 2016. Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops. Field Crops Research, 189:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.013

[7]	Feng J, Zhao L D, Zhang Y B, et al. 2020. Can climate change influence agricultural GTFP in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China? Journal of Arid Land, 12(5):837-853. doi: 10.1007/s40333-020-0073-y

[8]	Feng W, Lu H W, Yao T C, et al. 2020. Drought characteristics and its elevation dependence in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during the last half‑century. Scientific Reports, 10:14323, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71295-1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71295-1

[9]	Gao H H, Yan C R, Liu Q, et al. 2019. Effects of plastic mulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: a meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 651:484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.105

[10]	Gao Y H, Xie Y P, Jiang H Y, et al. 2014. Soil water status and root distribution across the rooting zone in maize with plastic film mulching. Field Crops Research, 156:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.016

[11]	Gu X B, Li Y N, Du Y D. 2016. Continuous ridges with film mulching improve soil water content, root growth, seed yield and water use efficiency of winter oilseed rape. Industrial Crops and Products, 85:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.056

[12]	Gu X B, Li Y N, Du Y D. 2018. Film-mulched continuous ridge-furrow planting improves soil temperature, nutrient content and enzymatic activity in a winter oilseed rape field, Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 10(3):362-374. doi: 10.1007/s40333-018-0055-5

[13]	Gu X B, Cai H J, Zhang Z T, et al. 2019. Ridge-furrow full ﬁlm mulching: an adaptive management strategy to reduce irrigation of dryland winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in northwest China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 266- 267:112-128.

[14]	Gu X B, Cai H J, Fang H, et al. 2020. Eﬀects of degradable ﬁlm mulching on crop yield and water use eﬃciency in China: a meta-analysis. Soil & Tillage Research, 202:104676, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104676. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104676

[15]	Han J, Jia Z K, Wu W, et al. 2014. Modeling impacts of film mulching on rainfed crop yield in Northern China with DNDC. Field Crops Research, 155:202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.004

[16]	He H J, Wang Z H, Guo L, et al. 2018. Distribution characteristics of residual film over a cotton field under long-term film mulching and drip irrigation in an oasis agroecosystem. Soil and Tillage Research, 180:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.03.013

[17]	He Q J, Zhou G S, Lü X M, et al. 2019. Climatic suitability and spatial distribution for summer maize cultivation in China at 1.5 and 2.0°C global warming. Science Bulletin, 64(10):690-697. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.03.030

[18]	Li R, Hou X Q, Jia Z K, et al. 2013. Effects on soil temperature, moisture, and maize yield of cultivation with ridge and furrow mulching in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 116:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.001

[19]	Liu C A, Zhou L M, Jia J J, et al. 2014. Maize yield and water balance is affected by nitrogen application in a film-mulching ridge-furrow system in a semiarid region of China. European Journal of Agronomy, 52:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.10.001

[20]	Lobell D B, Hammer G L, McLean G, et al. 2013. The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nature Climate Change, 3:497-510. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1832

[21]	Mo F, Wang J Y, Xiong Y C, et al. 2016. Ridge-furrow mulching system in semiarid Kenya: a promising solution to improve soil water availability and maize productivity. European Journal of Agronomy, 80:124-136. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.07.005

[22]	Morales D, Rodríguez P, Dell'Amico J, et al. 2003. High-temperature preconditioning and thermal shock imposition affects water relations, gas exchange and root hydraulic conductivity in tomato. Biologia Plantarum, 46:203-208. doi: 10.1023/B:BIOP.0000022252.70836.fc

[23]	Qi D L, Hu T T, Wu X, et al. 2015. Rational irrigation and nitrogen supply methods improving root growth and yield of maize. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(11):144-149. (in Chinese)

[24]	Qin X L, Li Y Z, Han Y L, et al. 2018. Ridge-furrow mulching with black plastic film improves maize yield more than white plastic film in dry areas with adequate accumulated temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 262:206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.018

[25]	Ren X L, Zhang P, Chen X L, et al. 2016. Effect of different mulches under rainfall concentration system on corn production in the semi-arid areas of the Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 6:19019, doi: 10.1038/srep19019. doi: 10.1038/srep19019

[26]	Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90:480-494. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00682.x

[27]	Thidar M, Gong D Z, Mei X R, et al. 2020. Mulching improved soil water, root distribution and yield of maize in the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 241:106340, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106340. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106340

[28]	Wang H D, Wu L F, Cheng M H, et al. 2018. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigated cotton in northern Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Research, 219:169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.002

[29]	Wang L, Li X G, Guan Z H, et al. 2018. The effects of plastic-film mulch on the grain yield and root biomass of maize vary with cultivar in a cold semiarid environment. Field Crops Research, 216:89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.010

[30]	Wang Q, Ren X, Song X Y, et al. 2015. The optimum ridge-furrow ratio and suitable ridge-covering material in rainwater harvesting for oats production in semiarid regions of China. Field Crops Research, 172:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.015

[31]	Wang X L, Li F M, Jia Y, et al. 2005. Increasing potato yields with additional water and increased soil temperature. Agricultural Water Management, 78(3):181-194. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.02.006

[32]	Wang Y P, Li X G, Zhu J, et al. 2016. Multi-site assessment of the effects of plastic-film mulch on dryland maize productivity in semiarid areas in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 220:160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.142

[33]	Wu Y, Huang F Y, Jia Z K, et al. 2017. Response of soil water, temperature, and maize (Zea may L.) production to different plastic film mulching patterns in semi-arid areas of northwest China. Soil and Tillage Research, 166:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.10.012

[34]	Xiao D P, Zhao Y X, Bai H Z, et al. 2019. Impacts of climate warming and crop management on maize phenology in northern China. Journal of Arid Land, 11(6):892-903. doi: 10.1007/s40333-019-0028-3

[35]	Yin M H, Li Y N, Li H, et al. 2015. Ridge-furrow planting with black ﬁlm mulching over ridge and corn straw mulching over furrow enhancing summer maize's growth and nutrient absorption. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(22):122-130. (in Chinese)

[36]	Yin M H, Li Y N, Xu Y B, et al. 2018. Effects of mulches on water use in a winter wheat/summer maize rotation system in Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 10(2):277-291. doi: 10.1007/s40333-018-0092-0

[37]	Yin M H, Li Y N, Fang H, et al. 2019. Biodegradable mulching film with an optimum degradation rate improves soil environment and enhances maize growth. Agricultural Water Management, 216:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.004

[38]	Yu Y Y, Turner N C, Gong Y H, et al. 2018. Benefits and limitations to straw- and plastic-film mulch on maize yield and water use efficiency: a meta-analysis across hydrothermal gradients. European Journal of Agronomy, 99:138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.005

[39]	Zhang F, Li M, Qi J H, et al. 2015. Plastic film mulching increases soil respiration in ridge-furrow maize management. Arid Land Research and Management, 29(4):432-453. doi: 10.1080/15324982.2015.1018456

[40]	Zhang F, Zhang W J, Qi J G, et al. 2018. A regional evaluation of plastic film mulching for improving crop yields on the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 248:458-468. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.030

[41]	Zhang X D, Yang L C, Xue X K, et al. 2019a. Plastic film mulching stimulates soil wet-dry alternation and stomatal behavior to improve maize yield and resource use efficiency in a semi-arid region. Field Crops Research, 233:101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.002

[42]	Zhang X D, Zhao J, Yang L C, et al. 2019b. Ridge-furrow mulching system regulates diurnal temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation behavior in soil to promote maize growth and water use in a semiarid region. Field Crops Research, 233:121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.009

[43]	Zhao H, Wang R Y, Ma B L, et al. 2014. Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rainfed ecosystem. Field Crops Research, 161:137-148. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.013

[44]	Zhao J S, Bodner G, Rewald B, et al. 2017. Root architecture simulation improves the inference from seedling root phenotyping towards mature root systems. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(5):965-982. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw494

[45]	Zheng J, Fan J L, Zou Y F, et al. 2020. Ridge-furrow plastic mulching with a suitable planting density enhances rainwater productivity, grain yield and economic benefit of rainfed maize. Journal of Arid Land, 12(2):181-198. doi: 10.1007/s40333-020-0001-1

[46]	Zhou C M, Li Y N, Chen P P. 2020. Effects of single application of fertilizer on yield and nitrogen utilization of mulching summer maize. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 51(10):329-337. (in Chinese)

[47]	Zhou L M, Li F M, Jin S L, et al. 2009. How two ridges and the furrow mulched with plastic film affect soil water, soil temperature and yield of maize on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Research, 113(1):41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.005

[48]	Zhou L M, Jin S L, Liu C A, et al. 2012. Ridge-furrow and plastic-mulching tillage enhances maize-soil interactions: opportunities and challenges in a semiarid agroecosystem. Field Crops Research, 126:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.10.010

[1]	WU Yuechen, ZHU Haili, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Hailong, LIU Guosong, LIU Yabin, LI Guorong, HU Xiasong. Characterization of alpine meadow surface crack and its correlation with root-soil properties[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 834-851.

[2]	HAN Mengxue, ZHANG Lin, LIU Xiaoqiang. Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters improves wolfberry yield and economic benefits on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(11): 1376-1390.

[3]	WANG Yuxia, ZHANG Jing, YU Xiaojun. *Effects of mulch and planting methods on Medicago ruthenica* seed yield and soil physical-chemical properties**[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 894-909.

[4]	ZHENG Jing, FAN Junliang, ZOU Yufeng, Henry Wai CHAU, ZHANG Fucang. Ridge-furrow plastic mulching with a suitable planting density enhances rainwater productivity, grain yield and economic benefit of rainfed maize[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 181-198.

[5]	Jun ZHANG, Peng DONG, Haoyu ZHANG, Chaoran MENG, Xinjiang ZHANG, Jianwei HOU, Changzhou WEI. Low soil temperature reducing the yield of drip irrigated rice in arid area by influencing anther development and pollination[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(3): 419-430.

[6]	Xiaobo GU, Yuannong LI, Yadan DU. Film-mulched continuous ridge-furrow planting improves soil temperature, nutrient content and enzymatic activity in a winter oilseed rape field, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(3): 362-374.

[7]	Minhua YIN, Yuannong LI, Yuanbo XU, Changming ZHOU. Effects of mulches on water use in a winter wheat/summer maize rotation systemin Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(2): 277-291.

[8]	Hui TIAN, IQBAL Mudassar. Utilizing a new soil effective temperature scheme and archived satellite microwave brightness temperature data to estimate surface soil moisture in the Nagqu region, Tibetan Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(1): 84-100.

[9]	Rangjian QIU, Taisheng DU, Shaozhong KANG. Root length density distribution and associated soil water dynamics for tomato plants under furrow irrigation in a solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(5): 637-650.

[10]	Fan YANG, Mamtimin ALI, Xinqian ZHENG, Qing HE, Xinghua YANG, Wen HUO, Fengchao LIANG, Shaoming WANG. Diurnal dynamics of soil respiration and the influencing factors for three land-cover types in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(4): 568-579.

[11]	HUANG Jin, GAO Zhijuan, CHEN Ji, ZHANG He, XU Bingcheng. Diurnal and seasonal variations of soil respiration rate under different row-spacing in a Panicum virgatum L. field on semi-arid Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(3): 341-349.

[12]	HU Guojie, ZHAO Lin, WU Xiaodong, LI Ren, WU Tonghua, XIE Changwei, QIAO Yongping, SHI Jianzong, CHENG Guodong. An analytical model for estimating soil temperature profiles on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(2): 232-240.

[13]	Yue LI, YingHui LIU, YaLin WANG, Lei NIU, Xia XU, YuQiang TIAN. *Interactive effects of soil temperature and moisture on soil N mineralization in the Stipa krylovii* grassland in Inner Mongolia, China**[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(5): 571-580.

[14]	HaiNa ZHANG, PeiXi SU, ShanJia LI, ZiJuan ZHOU, TingTing XIE. *Response of root traits of Reaumuria soongorica* and Salsola passerina to facilitation**[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(5): 628-636.

[15]	Chao WANG, ChuanYan ZHAO, ZhongLin XU, Yang WANG, HuanHua PENG. Effect of vegetation on soil water retention and storage in a semi-arid alpine forest catchment[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(2): 207-219.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed