Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2025, Vol. 17 Issue (8): 1084-1102    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-025-0027-5    
Research article     
Probability and spatiotemporal dynamics of active fire occurrence in Inner Mongolia, China from 2000 to 2022
JIA Xu1, WEI Baocheng2,3,*(), ZHANG Zhijie4, CHEN Lulu2, LIU Mengna2, ZHAO Yiming2, WANG Jing1
1College of Resources and Environmental Economics, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China
2College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
3Key Laboratory of Mongolian Plateau's Climate System at Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
4Hohhot Meteorological Observatory, Hohhot 010020, China
Download: HTML     PDF(2755KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Fires are one of the most destructive natural disasters and have serious long-term effects on the environment, economy, and human health. In Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, frequent fire disturbance occurs due to the intensification of climate change and human activities. It is crucial to understand the fire regime and estimate the probability of regional fire occurrence and reducing fire losses. However, most studies have primarily focused on the dynamic changes, probability of occurrence, and driving mechanisms of wildfires in the grassland and forest land ecosystems in Inner Mongolia, while insufficient research has been conducted on the spatiotemporal variations in active fires and their impact on the wildfire risk in forest land and grassland. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the active fire regime based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) thermal anomalies and burned area products from 2000 to 2022. Combined with climate, topographic, landscape, anthropogenic, and vegetation datasets, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN) models were chosen to estimate the probability of active fire occurrence at the seasonal timescale. The results revealed that: (1) a total of 100,343 active fires occurred in Inner Mongolia and the burned area reached 6.59×104 km². The number of ignition point exhibited a significant increasing trend, while the burned area exhibited a nonsignificant decreasing trend; (2) four active fire belts were detected, namely, the Hetao-Tumochuan Plain fire belt, Xiliao River Plain fire belt, Songnen Plain fire belt, and Hailar River Eroded Plain fire belt. The centroid of the active fires has shifted 456.4 km toward the southwest; (3) RF model achieved the highest accuracy in estimating the probability of active fire occurrence, followed by CNN, and LR and SVM models had lower accuracies; and (4) the distribution of the high and extremely high fire risk areas largely aligned with the four fire belts. The probability of active fire occurrence was the highest in spring, followed by that in autumn, and it gradually decreased in summer and winter. Our results revealed active fires migrated to the southwest and ignition sources increased, despite reduction of the burned area was not significant. The RF model outperformed the other models in predicting the probability of active fire occurrence. These findings contribute to future fire prevention and prediction in Inner Mongolia.



Key wordsactive fire regime      probability prediction      machine learning      Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)      random forest model     
Received: 01 March 2025      Published: 31 August 2025
Corresponding Authors: *WEI Baocheng (E-mail: nsdwbc@126.com)
Cite this article:

JIA Xu, WEI Baocheng, ZHANG Zhijie, CHEN Lulu, LIU Mengna, ZHAO Yiming, WANG Jing. Probability and spatiotemporal dynamics of active fire occurrence in Inner Mongolia, China from 2000 to 2022. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(8): 1084-1102.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-025-0027-5     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2025/V17/I8/1084

Type of data Parameter Dataset name Data format Resolution Data access
Active fire Ignition point MOD14A1/MYD14A1 Raster 1 km https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/
Burned area MCD64A1 Raster 500 m
Explanatory variable Climate CHN_GMO_MON Shapefile point - https://data.cma.cn/
Topography SRTM Raster 1 km https://www.resdc.cn/
Landscape Land cover Raster 30 m https://zenodo.org/
Anthropogenic Population Raster 1 km https://www.resdc.cn/
Gross domestic product Raster 1 km https://www.resdc.cn/
Road Shapefile line - http://www.openstreetmap.ch/
Settlement Shapefile point -
Vegetation NDVI Raster 250 m https://www.resdc.cn/
Table 1 Detailed descriptions of data
Type Input parameter Output parameter Abbreviation Variable type
Climate Maximum wind speed Fire danger index FDI Continuous
Maximum air temperature
Relatively humidity
Topography Slope Slope map Slo Continuous
Elevation Elevation map Ele Continuous
Aspect Aspect map Asp Categorical
Landscape Land cover Land cover map LC Categorical
Anthropogenic Population Population density Pop Continuous
Gross domestic product GDP density GDP Continuous
Road Distance to roads D-road Continuous
Settlement Distance to settlements D-set Continuous
Vegetation NDVI NDVI NDVI Continuous
Table 2 List of explanatory variables
Aspect Direction Classification
Flat -1.0° 0
Shady slope North (0.0°-22.5°), northeast (22.5°-67.5°) 1
Semi-shady slope East (67.5°-112.5°), northwest (292.5°-337.5°) 2
Sunny slope South (157.5°-202.5°), southwest (202.5°-247.5°) 3
Semi-sunny slope Southeast (202.5°-247.5°), west (247.5°-292.5°) 4
Table 3 Specific information about the aspect classification
Fig. 1 Annual dynamics (a) and Manner-Kendall (M-K) test results (b) of ignition point and burned area. UF and UB stand for the forward sequence statistic and backward sequence statistic, respectively.
Season Seasonal contribution rate (%) Month Monthly contribution rate (%)
Ignition point Burned area Ignition point Burned area
Spring 49.65 67.88 Mar 49.08 57.94
Apr 37.53 27.91
May 13.39 14.14
Summer 12.23 9.77 Jun 29.02 22.76
Jul 27.97 19.55
Aug 43.01 57.68
Autumn 31.61 18.09 Sep 31.65 60.91
Oct 49.51 22.79
Nov 18.84 16.29
Winter 6.51 4.26 Jan 14.23 4.89
Feb 72.31 94.23
Dec 13.46 0.88
Table 4 Contribution rates of ignition point and burned area at the seasonal and monthly scales
Index Forest land Grassland Cropland Urban land
Ignition point (%) 1.76 48.55 40.09 9.60
Burned area (%) 5.31 56.35 37.25 1.09
Table 5 Proportions of ignition point and burned area in different land use types
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of active fires from 2000 to 2022. (a), kernel density; (b), standard deviational ellipse (SDE) and centroid migration trajectory. The figures are based on the standard map (蒙S(2023)027) of Department of Natural Resources of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (https://zrzy.nmg.gov.cn/bsfw/bzdt/nmgzzqbzdt/), and the boundary of the standard map has not been modified.
Model Data type Spring Summer Autumn Winter
Accuracy (%) AUC Accuracy (%) AUC Accuracy (%) AUC Accuracy (%) AUC
LR Minimum 86.00 0.912 83.90 0.906 84.90 0.895 83.30 0.922
Maximum 92.50 0.968 92.30 0.969 91.60 0.962 98.60 0.994
Average 89.80 0.944 89.00 0.940 89.30 0.940 91.60 0.960
RF Minimum 91.70 0.964 90.50 0.943 93.60 0.971 83.30 0.948
Maximum 96.80 0.991 95.70 0.990 96.10 0.991 99.30 0.981
Average 94.30 0.980 94.00 0.976 95.00 0.984 94.80 0.983
SVM Minimum 85.40 0.906 84.70 0.896 84.30 0.864 83.30 0.883
Maximum 92.70 0.969 93.60 0.973 91.50 0.962 96.40 0.997
Average 89.50 0.943 89.30 0.939 89.30 0.936 91.70 0.959
CNN Minimum 90.30 0.950 85.70 0.918 89.30 0.938 83.30 0.870
Maximum 94.40 0.980 93.60 0.967 94.30 0.981 98.60 0.993
Average 92.20 0.966 90.50 0.954 92.20 0.966 92.80 0.968
Table 6 Performance metrics of the four fire prediction models at the seasonal scale
Table 7 Ranking of variables' importance in LR,RF,SVM, and CNN models at the seasonal scale
Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on random forest (RF) from 2000 to 2022
Fig. 4 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on RF model at the seasonal scale. (a), spring; (b), summer; (c), autumn; (d), winter.
Fig. S1 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on logistic regression (LR) model from 2000 to 2022
Fig. S2 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on LR model at the seasonal scale. (a), spring; (b), summer; (c), autumn; (d), winter.
Fig. S3 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on support vector machine (SVM) model from 2000 to 2022
Fig. S4 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on SVM model at the seasonal scale. (a), spring; (b), summer; (c), autumn; (d), winter.
Fig. S5 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on convolutional neural network (CNN) model from 2000 to 2022
Fig. S6 Spatial distribution of fire risk level based on CNN model at the seasonal scale. (a), spring; (b), summer; (c), autumn; (d), winter.
[1]   Aldersley A, Murray S J, Cornell S E. 2011. Global and regional analysis of climate and human drivers of wildfire. Science of the Total Environment, 409(18): 3472-3481.
[2]   Andela N, Morton D, Giglio L, et al. 2017. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science, 356(6345): 1356-1362.
doi: 10.1126/science.aal4108 pmid: 28663495
[3]   Belarbi F, Hassini A, Benamara N K. 2024. A novel approach based on convolutional neural networks ensemble for fire detection. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 18: 8805-8818.
[4]   Chang C, Chang Y, Xiong Z P, et al. 2023. Predicting grassland fire-occurrence probability in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Remote Sensing, 15(12): 2999, doi: 10.3390/rs15122999.
[5]   Chao L M, Bao Y L, Zhang J Q, et al. 2023. Quantitative assessment of fire occurrence dead fuel index threshold and spatio-temporal variation in different grassland types of China-Mongolia border area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(8): 1631-1659.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-023-2146-2
[6]   Chao Y, Luo C F, Shu L F, et al. 2020. A review on wildfire studies in the context of global change. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(2): 385-401. (in Chinese)
[7]   Chen K, Ge G, Bao G, et al. 2022. Impact of extreme climate on the NDVI of different steppe areas in Inner Mongolia, China. Remote Sensing, 14(7): 1530, doi: 10.3390/rs14071530.
[8]   Chen X T, Kang S C, Hu Y L, et al. 2023. Temporal and spatial analysis of vegetation fire activity in the circum-Arctic during 2001-2020. Research in Cold and Arid Regions, 15(1): 48-56.
[9]   Duan Q, Liu R G, Chen J L, et al. 2024. Burned area detection from a single satellite image using an adaptive thresholds algorithm. International Journal of Digital Earth, 17(1): 2376275, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2024.2376275.
[10]   Earl N, Simmonds I. 2018. Spatial and temporal variability and trends in 2001-2016 global fire activity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(5): 2524-2536.
[11]   Elia M, D'Este M, Ascoli D, et al. 2020. Estimating the probability of wildfire occurrence in Mediterranean landscapes using Artificial Neural Networks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 85: 106474, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106474.
[12]   Ellis T M, Bowman D M J S, Jain P, et al. 2021. Global increase in wildfire risk due to climate-driven declines in fuel moisture. Global Change Biology, 28(4): 1544-1559.
[13]   Fawagreh K, Gaber M M, Elyan E. 2014. Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 2(1): 602-609.
[14]   Gao B, Shan Y L, Liu X Y, et al. 2024. Prediction and driving factors of forest fire occurrence in Jilin Province, China. Journal of Forestry Research, 35(1): 21, doi: 10.1007/s11676-023-01663-w.
[15]   Giglio L, Humber M, Hall J V, et al. 2022. Collection 6.1 MODIS burned area product user's guide version 1.1. In: NASA Technical Report. University of Maryland, Maryland, USA.
[16]   Giglio L, Schroeder W, Hall J V, et al. 2021. MODIS collection 6 and collection 6.1 active fire product user's guide version 1.0. In: NASA Technical Report. University of Maryland. Maryland, USA.
[17]   Guan R H, Jiao K W, Chang Y, et al. 2025. Spatiotemporal dynamics of wildland urban interface distribution patterns and high fire occurrence areas in Heilongjiang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(13): 1-11. (in Chinese)
[18]   Haas O, Prentice I C, Harrison S P. 2022. Global environmental controls on wildfire burnt area, size, and intensity. Environmental Research Letters, 17(6): 065004, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6a69.
[19]   Hayes J P. 2020. Fire suppression and the wildfire paradox in contemporary china: Policies, resilience, and effects in Chinese fire regimes. Human Ecology, 49(1): 19-32.
[20]   He R, Lu H, Jin Z Z, et al. 2023. Construction of forest fire prediction model and driving factors analysis based on random forests algorithm in Southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(22): 9356-9370. (in Chinese)
[21]   Jain P, Barber Q E, Taylor S W, et al. 2024. Drivers and impacts of the record breaking 2023 wildfire season in Canada. Nature Communications, 15(1): 6764, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51154-7.
[22]   Jia X, Gao Y, Wei B C, et al. 2019. Risk assessment and regionalization of fire disaster based on analytic hierarchy process and MODIS data: A case study of Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability, 11(22): 6263-6279.
[23]   Jones M W, Kelley D I, Burton C A, et al. 2024. State of wildfires 2023-2024. Earth System Science Data, 16(8): 3601-3685.
[24]   Kiely L, Neyestani S E, Binte-Shahid S, et al. 2024. California case study of wildfires and prescribed burns: PM2.5 emissions, concentrations, and implications for human health. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(12): 5210-5219.
[25]   Li M L, Wu Y D, Liu Y L, et al. 2024. Study on the driving factors of the spatiotemporal pattern in forest lightning fires and 3D fire simulation based on cellular automata. Forests, 15(11): 1857, doi: 10.3390/f15111857.
[26]   Li S X, Zhang F Q, Lin H F. 2023. Research on forest fire risk evaluation based on machine learning algorithm. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 47(5): 49-56. (in Chinese)
[27]   Li Y P, Zhao J J, Guo X Y, et al. 2017. The influence of land use on the grassland fire occurrence in the northeastern Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Sensors, 17(3): 437, doi: 10.3390/s17030437.
[28]   Liu H X, Qian Y L, Kong J J, et al. 2023a. Temporal and spatial variations of vegetation fires in Inner Mongolia from 2003 to 2019 based on FIRMS_MODIS. Forestry Science and Technology Information, 55(1): 1-8. (in Chinese)
[29]   Liu L Y, Miao Z L, Wu L X. 2022. Spatial-temporal variability of amazon tropical rainforest fire based on MODIS data. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 37(3): 721-730. (in Chinese)
[30]   Liu W J, Guan H D, Hesp P A, et al. 2023b. Remote sensing delineation of wildfire spatial extents and post-fire recovery along a semi-arid climate gradient. Ecological Informatics, 78: 102304, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102304.
[31]   MacCarthy J, Tyukavina A, Weisse M J, et al. 2024. Extreme wildfires in Canada and their contribution to global loss in tree cover and carbon emissions in 2023. Global Change Biology, 30(6): e17392, doi: 10.1111/gcb.17392.
[32]   McNorton J R, Di Giuseppe F. 2024. A global fuel characteristic model and dataset for wildfire prediction. Biogeosciences, 21(1): 279-300.
[33]   Milanović S, Marković N, Pamučar D, et al. 2020. Forest fire probability mapping in eastern Serbia: Logistic regression versus random forest method. Forests, 12(1): 5, doi: 10.3390/f12010005.
[34]   Monjaras-Vega N A, Briones-Herrera C I, Vega-Nieva D J, et al. 2020. Predicting forest fire kernel density at multiple scales with geographically weighted regression in Mexico. Science of the Total Environment, 718: 137313, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137313.
[35]   Pang Y Q, Li Y D, Feng Z K, et al. 2022. Forest fire occurrence prediction in China based on machine learning methods. Remote Sensing, 14(21): 5546, doi: 10.3390/rs14215546.
[36]   Pausas J G, Keeley J E. 2021. Wildfires and global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(7): 387-395.
doi: 10.1002/fee.2359
[37]   Qarallah B, Othman Y A, Al-Ajlouni M, et al. 2022. Assessment of small-extent forest fires in semi-arid environment in Jordan using Sentinel-2 and Landsat sensors data. Forests, 14(1): 41, doi: 10.3390/f14010041.
[38]   Qin X L, Li X T, Liu S C, et al. 2020. Forest fire early warning and monitoring techniques using satellite remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(5): 511-520. (in Chinese)
[39]   Ren X H, Yu R H, Liu X Y, et al. 2022. Spatial changes and driving factors of lake water quality in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Land, 15(2): 164-179.
[40]   Senande-Rivera M, Insua-Costa D, Miguez-Macho G. 2022. Spatial and temporal expansion of global wildland fire activity in response to climate change. Nature Communications, 13(1): 1208, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28835-2.
pmid: 35260561
[41]   Sharples J J, McRae R H D, Weber R O, et al. 2009. A simple index for assessing fire danger rating. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(6): 764-774.
[42]   Sun H C, Wang W J, Liu Z H, et al. 2021. The relative importance of driving factors of wildfire occurrence across climatic gradients in the Inner Mongolia, China. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108249, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108249.
[43]   Touge Y, Shi K, Nishino T, et al. 2024. Spatial temporal characteristics of more than 50,000 wildfires in Japan from 1995 to 2020. Fire Safety Journal, 142: 104025, doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.104025.
[44]   Vouzoglanis C K, Reinke K J, Berelov S M, et al. 2024. Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 127: 103673, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2024.103673.
[45]   Wang W J, Qian C, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Multi-time scale features of fire weather in two major forests in China during 1961-2020. Climatic and Environmental Research, 27(5): 559-577. (in Chinese)
[46]   Wei X K, Wang G J, Chen T X, et al. 2020. A spatiotemporal analysis of active fires over China during 2003-2016. Remote Sensing, 12(11): 1787, doi: 10.3390/rs12111787.
[47]   Yang J, Huang X. 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data, 13(8): 3907-3925.
doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021
[48]   Zhai J X, Li Y, Zhang B, et al. 2022. Analysis of forest fires and lightning fires in representative fire-prone countries over the world. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 17(4): 72-79. (in Chinese)
[49]   Zhang H, Jia W F, Wang Y N. 2024a. The spatiotemporal dynamics of wildfires in Inner Mongolia based on global fire atlas remote sensing data. Journal of Wildland Fire Science, 42(3): 9-15. (in Chinese)
[50]   Zhang H, Li H, Zhao P W. 2024b. Risk of forest fire occurrence in Inner Mongolia and the impact of its drivers. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(13): 5669-5683. (in Chinese)
[51]   Zhang H, Zhou Z D, Wang Y X. 2024c. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of forest fires caused by 3 main fire sources in Daxing'an Mountains, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 44(3): 166-174. (in Chinese)
[52]   Zhang H, Liang Y S, Ren H Y, et al. 2025. Comparing grassland fire drivers and models in Inner Mongolia using field and remote sensing data. Fire, 8(3): 93, doi: 10.3390/fire8030093.
[53]   Zhang J Y, Peng D L, Zhan C J, et al. 2024d. Deep learning based forest fire prediction model research in the Daxing'anling Mountains, Inner Mongolia. Forest Research, 37(1): 31-40. (in Chinese)
[54]   Zheng X X, Sun N, Luo F. 2024. Spatiotemporal feature of active fire occurrence on the Loess Plateau from 2001 to 2020 based on MODIS. Quaternary Sciences, 44(1): 191-200. (in Chinese)
[1] JIA Shichao, SUN Wen, WEI Sihao, SUN Rui. Efficient soil moisture estimation on the Qinghai- Xizang Plateau via machine learning and optimized feature selection[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(8): 1147-1167.
[2] JIN Zizhen, QIN Xiang, LI Xiaoying, ZHAO Qiudong, ZHANG Jingtian, MA Xinxin, WANG Chunlin, HE Rui, WANG Renjun. Quantitative analysis of factors driving the variations in snow cover fraction in the Qilian Mountains, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(7): 888-911.
[3] Mashael MAASHI, Nada ALZABEN, Noha NEGM, Venkatesan VEERAMANI, Sabarunisha Sheik BEGUM, Geetha PALANIAPPAN. Forecasting land use changes in crop classification and drought using remote sensing[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(5): 575-589.
[4] Komeh ZINAT, Hamzeh SAEID, Memarian HADI, Attarchi SARA, LU Linlin, Naboureh AMIN, Alavipanah KAZEM SEYED. Impact of urban sprawl on land surface temperature in the Mashhad City, Iran: A deep learning and cloud- based remote sensing analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(3): 285-303.
[5] WANG Xiaochen, LI Zhi, CHEN Yaning, ZHU Jianyu, WANG Chuan, WANG Jiayou, ZHANG Xueqi, FENG Meiqing, LIANG Qixiang. Impact of extreme weather and climate events on crop yields in the Tarim River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(2): 200-223.
[6] LIU Yuke, HUANG Chenlu, YANG Chun, CHEN Chen. Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors of vegetation net primary productivity in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China from 2001 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(1): 74-92.
[7] ZHANG Lanhui, TU Jiahao, AN Qi, LIU Yu, XU Jiaxin, ZHANG Haixin. Understanding and simulating of three-dimensional subsurface hydrological partitioning in an alpine mountainous area, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(11): 1463-1483.
[8] ZHOU Qian, DING Jianli, GE Xiangyu, LI Ke, ZHANG Zipeng, GU Yongsheng. Estimation of soil organic matter in the Ogan-Kuqa River Oasis, Northwest China, based on visible and near-infrared spectroscopy and machine learning[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(2): 191-204.
[9] Omobayo G ZOFFOUN, Chabi A M S DJAGOUN, Etotépé A SOGBOHOSSOU. Distribution patterns of fire regime in the Pendjari Biosphere Reserve, West Africa[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(10): 1160-1173.
[10] FENG Ting, HUANG Farong, ZHU Shuzhen, BU Lingjie, QI Zhiming, LI Lanhai. Dew amount and its long-term variation in the Kunes River Valley, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(7): 753-770.
[11] WANG Jie, LIU Dongwei, MA Jiali, CHENG Yingnan, WANG Lixin. Development of a large-scale remote sensing ecological index in arid areas and its application in the Aral Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(1): 40-55.
[12] Mehdi GHOLAMI ROSTAM, Seyyed Javad SADATINEJAD, Arash MALEKIAN. Precipitation forecasting by large-scale climate indices and machine learning techniques[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 854-864.