Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2025, Vol. 17 Issue (8): 1147-1167    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-025-0084-9    
Research article     
Efficient soil moisture estimation on the Qinghai- Xizang Plateau via machine learning and optimized feature selection
JIA Shichao1,2, SUN Wen3,*(), WEI Sihao4, SUN Rui1
1School of Geomatics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2Institute of Land Surveying and Spatial Geographic Information, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
3Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
4School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, and Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean System, Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1846KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Soil moisture is a key parameter in the exchange of energy and water between the land surface and the atmosphere. This parameter plays an important role in the dynamics of permafrost on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China, as well as in the related ecological and hydrological processes. However, the region's complex terrain and extreme climatic conditions result in low-accuracy soil moisture estimations using traditional remote sensing techniques. Thus, this study considered parameters of the backscatter coefficient of Sentinel-1A ground range detected (GRD) data, the polarization decomposition parameters of Sentinel-1A single-look complex (SLC) data, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) based on Sentinel-2B data, and the topographic factors based on digital elevation model (DEM) data. By combining these parameters with a machine learning model, we established a feature selection rule. A cumulative importance threshold was derived for feature variables, and those variables that failed to meet the threshold were eliminated based on variations in the coefficient of determination (R2) and the unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE). The eight most influential variables were selected and combined with the CatBoost model for soil moisture inversion, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to analyze the importance of these variables. The results demonstrated that the optimized model significantly improved the accuracy of soil moisture inversion. Compared to the unfiltered model, the optimal feature combination led to a 0.09 increase in R2 and a 0.7% reduction in ubRMSE. Ultimately, the optimized model achieved a R² of 0.87 and an ubRMSE of 5.6%. Analysis revealed that soil particle size had significant impact on soil water retention capacity. The impact of vegetation on the estimated soil moisture on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau was considerable, demonstrating a significant positive correlation. Moreover, the microtopographical features of hummocks interfered with soil moisture estimation, indicating that such terrain effects warrant increased attention in future studies within the permafrost regions. The developed method not only enhances the accuracy of soil moisture retrieval in the complex terrain of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, but also exhibits high computational efficiency (with a relative time reduction of 18.5%), striking an excellent balance between accuracy and efficiency. This approach provides a robust framework for efficient soil moisture monitoring in remote areas with limited ground data, offering critical insights for ecological conservation, water resource management, and climate change adaptation on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau.



Key wordssoil moisture      machine learning      feature selection      radar and optical remote sensing      polarization decomposition      CatBoost model      Qinghai-Xizang Plateau     
Received: 17 December 2024      Published: 31 August 2025
Corresponding Authors: *SUN Wen (E-mail: wensun@itpcas.ac.cn)
Cite this article:

JIA Shichao, SUN Wen, WEI Sihao, SUN Rui. Efficient soil moisture estimation on the Qinghai- Xizang Plateau via machine learning and optimized feature selection. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(8): 1147-1167.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-025-0084-9     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2025/V17/I8/1147

Fig. 1 Overview of the location of the study area on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau (a) and overall distribution of in-situ measurement sites (b) as well as the local distribution of in-situ measurement sites (c and d). The base imagery was provided by LocaSpace Viewer (https://www.tuxingis.com). TDR, time-domain reflectometry; CR, cutting ring.
Fig. 2 Comparison of TDR-based soil moisture (SMTDR) and CR-based soil moisture (SMCR). R2, coefficient of determination; ubRMSE, unbiased root mean square error.
Fig. 3 Surface roughness investigations in the Beilu River area (a) and Tuotuo River area (b)
Satellite Data product Resolution Purpose
Sentinel-1A GRD 5 m×20 m To extract the backscattering coefficients
Sentinel-1A SLC 5 m×20 m To extract different polarization parameters
Sentinel-2B MSIL2A 10 m To extract the NDVI
Table 1 Specific parameter information of satellite data used in this study
Fig. 4 Flowchart of the CatBoost model driven by source remote sensing datasets. GRD, ground range detected; SLC, single-look complex; MSIL2A, MultiSpectral Instrument Level-2A; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; DEM, digital elevation model; SHAP, SHapley Additive exPlanations.
Fig. 5 Prediction scores given by eight different machine learning models over five independent runs. PR, polynomial regression; RR, ridge regression; LR, lasso regression; DTR, decision tree regression; SVR, support vector machine; KNN, K-nearest neighbors; RF, random forest.
Fig. 6 Importance of 32 feature variables for inverting soil moisture based on the CatBoost model. TWI, topographic wetness index. Interpretations for other variables can be found in Table S1.
Filtering round Removed variable number Remaining variable number R2 ubRMSE (%) Elapsed time (s)
Not conducted 0 32 0.78 6.3 9.7
1st 10 22 0.78 6.4 8.9
2nd 6 16 0.78 6.4 8.6
3rd 4 12 0.80 6.0 8.4
4th 2 10 0.85 5.6 8.1
5th 2 8 0.87 5.6 7.9
6th 1 7 0.80 6.0 7.7
Table 2 Feature variable filtering and verification information
Fig. 7 Variable importance and SHAP values after five rounds of filtering (a) and verification of final model using the optimal combination (b)
Fig. 8 Inversion distribution map of surface soil moisture in the study area
Fig. 9 Correlations of soil particle size with soil moisture (a) and NDVI (b) and particle size distribution of samples from the Beilu River and Tuotuo River areas (c). BLH-14 and TTH-2 represent the 14th measured sample and the 2nd measured sample in the Beilu River area and Tuotuo River area, respectively. The light blue area (symmetric on both sides of the fitting line) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 10 Soil moisture statistics of different vegetation types on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. The purple box plot represents soil moisture, and the green box plot represents NDVI. The dot represents the mean and the solid line within the box represent the median. The lower and upper boxes represent the first quartile (Q1, 25th percentile) and third quartile (Q3, 75th percentile), respectively, indicating the interquartile range (IQR) that encompasses the middle 50.0% of the data. The whiskers extend from the edges of the box and indicate the overall spread of the data.
Feature variable Interpretation Physical significance
H Scattering entropy, indicating the randomness of the scattering process and ranging from 0 to 1 Measuring target heterogeneity (0=homogeneous, 1=random)
α Average angle of the polarization scattering mechanism, indicating the dominant scattering type and ranging from 0° to 90° Indicating dominant scattering mechanism type (surface/volume)
Anisotropy Representing the relative importance of secondary scattering mechanism and ranging from 0 to 1 Measuring relative importance of secondary scattering components
c_1mH1mA Combination of entropy (H) and anisotropy (A), defined as (1-H)×(1-A) Enhancing separation of surface types
c_1mHA Defined as 1-(H×A) Improving vegetation masking capability
c_H1mA Defined as H×(1-A) Assisting in mixed scattering characterization
c_HA Defined as H×A Supporting land cover classification
l1 Largest eigenvalue (λ1) from eigenvalue decomposition Representing dominant scattering power
l2 Second-largest eigenvalue (λ2) Representing secondary scattering power
delta Scattering mechanism type Distinguishing odd/even bounce scattering
delta1 Scattering symmetry Identifying directional scattering patterns
delta2 Scattering randomness Evaluating surface/volume scattering mix
lambda Eigenvalue set Characterizing scattering energy distribution
p1 First eigenvector parameter Containing dominant scattering phase information
p2 Second eigenvector parameter Containing secondary scattering phase information
span Total scattered power Measuring overall backscatter intensity
C11 Representing VV polarization channel power or intensity Directly reflecting the surface dielectric constant (higher C11 in moist soil)
C22 Representing VH polarization channel power or intensity Characterization of depolarization effect (higher C22 in vegetation or rough terrain)
zdr_11_22 Polarization ratio (ZDR), C11/C22, representing the ratio of VV to VH polarization intensities Surface roughness indicator
zdr_22_11 Inverse polarization ratio, C22/C11, reciprocal of zdr_11_22 Vegetation structure indicator
Stokes_cont Stokes continuity parameter Polarimetric continuity indicator
Stokes_DoLP Degree of linear polarization Measuring polarization purity
Stokes_g0 Stokes vector element 0 Fundamental polarization intensity
Stokes_g1 Stokes vector element 1 Linear polarization component
Stokes_phi Stokes phase angle Changes in surface scattering mechanisms
Stokes_tau Stokes ellipticity angle Polarization ellipse parameter
Table S1 Polarimetric parameter information from Sentinel-1A dual-polarization data
[1]   Acar E, Özerdem M S. 2020. On a yearly basis prediction of soil water content utilizing SAR data: a machine learning and feature selection approach. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 28(4): 2316-2330.
[2]   Ahmad S, Kalra A, Stephen H. 2010. Estimating soil moisture using remote sensing data: A machine learning approach. Advances in Water Resources, 33(1): 69-80.
[3]   Arora V. 2002. Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(2): 3-1-3-26.
[4]   Ayehu G, Tadesse T, Gessesse B, et al. 2020. Combined use of Sentinel-1 SAR and Landsat sensors products for residual soil moisture retrieval over agricultural fields in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Sensors, 20(11): 3282, doi: 10.3390/s20113282.
[5]   Baghdadi N, Dubois-Fernandez P, Dupuis X, et al. 2012. Sensitivity of main polarimetric parameters of multifrequency polarimetric SAR data to soil moisture and surface roughness over bare agricultural soils. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(4): 731-735.
[6]   Banerjee K S, Carr R N. 1971. A comment on Ridge Regression. Biased estimation for non-orthogonal problems. Technometrics, 13(4): 895-898.
[7]   Biau G. 2012. Analysis of a random forests model. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(1): 1063-1095.
[8]   Bourgeau-Chavez L L, Leblon B, Charbonneau F, et al. 2013. Evaluation of polarimetric Radarsat-2 SAR data for development of soil moisture retrieval algorithms over a chronosequence of black spruce boreal forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 132: 71-85.
[9]   Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, et al. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group, 37(15): 237-251.
[10]   Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45: 5-32.
[11]   Brekke C, Anfinsen S N. 2010. Ship detection in ice-infested waters based on dual-polarization SAR imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(3): 391-395.
[12]   Cao B, Gruber S, Zhang T J, et al. 2017a. Spatial variability of active layer thickness detected by ground-penetrating radar in the Qilian Mountains, western China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 122(3): 574-591.
[13]   Cao B, Quan X J, Brown N, et al. 2019a. GlobSim (v1.0): deriving meteorological time series for point locations from multiple global reanalyses. Geoscientific Model Development, 12(11): 4661-4679.
[14]   Cao B, Zhang T J, Wu Q B, et al. 2019b. Permafrost zonation index map and statistics over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on field evidence. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 30(3): 178-194.
[15]   Cao B, Gruber S, Zheng D H, et al. 2020. The ERA5-Land soil temperature bias in permafrost regions. The Cryosphere, 14(8): 2581-2595.
[16]   Cao W, Sheng Y, Wu J C, et al. 2017b. Spatial variability and its main controlling factors of the permafrost soil-moisture on the northern-slope of Bayan Har Mountains in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 14(12): 2406-2419.
[17]   Chen Y Y, Yang K, Qin J, et al. 2017. Evaluation of SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2 soil moisture retrievals against observations from two networks on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(11): 5780-5792.
[18]   Cloude S R, Pottier E. 1997. An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 35(1): 68-78.
[19]   Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3): 273-297.
[20]   Cover T, Hart P. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1): 21-27.
[21]   Dente L, Vekerdy Z, Wen J, et al. 2012. Maqu network for validation of satellite-derived soil moisture products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 17: 55-65.
[22]   Dramsch J S. 2020. 70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review. Advances in geophysics, 61: 1-55.
[23]   Drucker H, Burges C J, Kaufman L, et al. 1997. Support vector regression machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9: 155-161.
[24]   Feng W, Lu H W, Yao T C, et al. 2020. Drought characteristics and its elevation dependence in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau during the last half-century. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 14323, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71295-1.
pmid: 32868800
[25]   Freitas A A. 2014. Comprehensible classification models: a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 15(1): 1-10.
[26]   Gao T G, Zhang T J, Wan X D, et al. 2016. Influence of microtopography on active layer thaw depths in Qilian Mountain, northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75: 1-12.
[27]   Guyon I, Elisseeff A. 2003. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3: 1157-1182.
[28]   Günther M, Kasirzadeh A. 2022. Algorithmic and human decision making: for a double standard of transparency. AI & SOCIETY, 37(1): 375-381.
[29]   He L, Cheng Y, Li Y X, et al. 2021. An improved method for soil moisture monitoring with ensemble learning methods over the Tibetan plateau. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14: 2833-2844.
[30]   Huang Z T, Petrovic A M. 1994. Physical properties of sand as affected by clinoptilolite zeolite particle size and quantity. Journal of Turfgrass Management, 1(1): 1-15.
[31]   Ibrahim H M, Alghamdi A G. 2021. Effect of the particle size of clinoptilolite zeolite on water content and soil water storage in a loamy sand soil. Water, 13(5): 607, doi: 10.3390/w13050607.
[32]   Jia S C, Zhang T J, Hao J S, et al. 2022. Spatial variability of active layer thickness along the Qinghai-Tibet Engineering Corridor resolved using ground-penetrating Radar. Remote Sensing, 14(21): 5606, doi: 10.3390/rs14215606.
[33]   Kopecký M, Macek M, Wild J. 2021. Topographic Wetness Index calculation guidelines based on measured soil moisture and plant species composition. Science of the Total Environment, 757: 143785, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143785.
[34]   Kornelsen K C, Coulibaly P. 2013. Advances in soil moisture retrieval from synthetic aperture radar and hydrological applications. Journal of Hydrology, 476: 460-489.
[35]   Lee J S, Pottier E. 2017. Polarimetric Radar Imaging:from Basics to Applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
[36]   Li J C, Chen W W, Liu Z P. 2018. The Qinghai-Tibet Railway Geological Environment. In: Geological Line Selection for the Qinghai-Tibet Railway Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 11-71.
[37]   Li Z B, Zhao L, Liu G Y, et al. 2022a. Analysis of soil moisture content in the active layer in the permafrost region of the Tuotuo River source in frozen season. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 44(1): 56-68. (in Chinese)
[38]   Li Z B, Zhao L, Wang L X, et al. 2022b. Retrieving soil moisture in the permafrost environment by Sentinel-1/ 2 temporal data on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Remote Sensing, 14(23): 5966, doi: 10.3390/rs14235966.
[39]   Li Z L, Leng P, Zhou C H, et al. 2021. Soil moisture retrieval from remote sensing measurements: Current knowledge and directions for the future. Earth-Science Reviews, 218: 103673, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103673.
[40]   Liu J, Chai L N, Lu Z, et al. 2019. Evaluation of SMAP, SMOS-IC, FY3B, JAXA, and LPRM soil moisture products over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its surrounding areas. Remote Sensing, 11(7): 792, doi: 10.3390/rs11070792.
[41]   Liu L, Schaefer K, Zhang T J, et al. 2012. Estimating 1992-2000 average active layer thickness on the Alaskan North Slope from remotely sensed surface subsidence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 117(F1): 2011JF002041, doi: 10.1029/2011JF002041.
[42]   Liu Y X Y, Yang Y P. 2022. Advances in the quality of global soil moisture products: a review. Remote Sensing, 14(15): 3741, doi: 10.3390/rs14153741.
[43]   Lundberg S M, Lee S I. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates Inc., 4768-4777.
[44]   Luo S, Ren H R, Zhang Y Q. 2023. Estimation of Grassland green biomass using Sentinel-1A SLC image spectral characteristics. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 43(3): 955-961. (in Chinese)
[45]   Ma C F, Li X, McCabe M F. 2020. Retrieval of high-resolution soil moisture through combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data. Remote Sensing, 12(14): 2303, doi: 10.3390/rs12142303.
[46]   Ma Y J, Li X Y, Liu L, et al. 2019. Evapotranspiration and its dominant controls along an elevation gradient in the Qinghai Lake watershed, northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 575: 257-268.
[47]   Ma Y T, Hou P, Zhang L J, et al. 2023. High-resolution quantitative retrieval of soil moisture based on multisource data fusion with random forests: A case study in the Zoige region of the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing, 15(6): 1531, doi: 10.3390/rs15061531.
[48]   Mohamed S A, Metwaly M M, Metwalli M R, et al. 2023. Integrating active and passive remote sensing data for mapping soil salinity using machine learning and feature selection approaches in arid regions. Remote Sensing, 15(7): 1751, doi: 10.3390/rs15071751.
[49]   Neelam M, Colliander A, Mohanty B P, et al. 2020. Multiscale surface roughness for improved soil moisture estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(8): 5264-5276.
[50]   Nguyen T T, Ngo H H, Guo W, et al. 2022. A low-cost approach for soil moisture prediction using multi-sensor data and machine learning algorithm. Science of the Total Environment, 833: 155066, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155066.
[51]   Niu F J, Gao Z Y, Lin Z J, et al. 2019. Vegetation influence on the soil hydrological regime in permafrost regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Geoderma, 354: 113892, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113892.
[52]   Oh Y, Sarabandi K, Ulaby F T. 1992. An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(2): 370-381.
[53]   Peng C C, Zeng J Y, Chen K S, et al. 2023. Global spatiotemporal trend of satellite-based soil moisture and its influencing factors in the early 21st century. Remote Sensing of Environment, 291: 113569, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113569.
[54]   Pouyanfar S, Sadiq S, Yan Y L, et al. 2018. A survey on Deep Learning: Algorithms, Techniques, and Applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5): 1-36.
[55]   Pradhan S N, Anjum M, Jena P. 2018. Estimation of soil moisture content by remote sensing methods: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(1S): 1786-1792.
[56]   Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, et al. 2018. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. NIPS'18: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: Curran Associates Inc., 6639-6649.
[57]   Qu Y Q, Zhu Z L, Montzka C, et al. 2021. Inter-comparison of several soil moisture downscaling methods over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Journal of hydrology, 592: 125616, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125616.
[58]   Rani A, Kumar N, Kumar J, et al. 2022. Machine learning for soil moisture assessment. In: Poonia R C, Singh V, Nayak S R. Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture. New York: Academic Press, 143-168.
[59]   Reading A M, Cracknell M J, Bombardieri D J, et al. 2015. Combining machine learning and geophysical inversion for applied geophysics. ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2015(1): 1-5.
[60]   Senanayake I P, Pathira Arachchilage K R L, Yeo I Y, et al. 2024. Spatial downscaling of satellite-based soil moisture products using machine learning techniques: A review. Remote Sensing, 16(12): 2067, doi: 10.3390/rs16122067.
[61]   Seneviratne S I, Corti T, Davin E L, et al. 2010. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 99(3-4): 125-161.
[62]   Singh A, Gaurav K, Sonkar G K, et al. 2023. Strategies to measure soil moisture using traditional methods, automated sensors, remote sensing, and machine learning techniques: review, bibliometric analysis, applications, research findings, and future directions. IEEE Access, 11: 13605-13635.
[63]   Srivastava H S, Patel P, Navalgund R R, et al. 2008. Retrieval of surface roughness using multi-polarized Envisat-1 ASAR data. Geocarto International, 23(1): 67-77.
[64]   Taghavi-Bayat A, Gerke M, Riedel B. 2024. Soil moisture retrieval at high spatial resolution over alpine ecosystems on Nagqu-Tibetan plateau: A comparative study on semiempirical and machine learning approaches. Science of Remote Sensing, 9: 100135, doi: 10.1016/j.srs.2024.100135.
[65]   Tibshirani R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1): 267-288.
[66]   Ulaby F T, Moore R K, Fung A K. 1986. Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive, Volume I: Microwave Remote Sensing Fundamentals and Radiometry. Norwood: Artech House Publishers, 1-456.
[67]   Veihmeyer F J, Hendrickson A H. 1950. Soil moisture in relation to plant growth. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1(1): 285-304.
[68]   Wang C, Zhang Z J, Paloscia S, et al. 2018. Permafrost soil moisture monitoring using multi-temporal TerraSAR-X data in Beiluhe of Northern Tibet, China. Remote Sensing, 10(10): 1577, doi: 10.3390/rs10101577.
[69]   Wang L X, Wang S G, Ran Y H. 2014. Data sharing and data set application of watershed allied telemetry experimental research. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(11): 2020-2024.
[70]   Wang Z W, Wang Q, Zhao L, et al. 2016. Mapping the vegetation distribution of the permafrost zone on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 13: 1035-1046.
[71]   Wu G L, Liu Y, Yang Z, et al. 2017. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils. Journal of Hydrology, 546: 133-139.
[72]   Wu G L, Li X L, Gao J. 2021. The evolution of hummock-depression micro-topography in an alpine marshy wetland in Sanjiangyuan as inferred from vegetation and soil characteristics. Ecology and Evolution, 11(9): 3901-3916.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.7278 pmid: 33976783
[73]   Wu W F, Huang X, Shao Z F, et al. 2022. SAR-DRDNet: A SAR image despeckling network with detail recovery. Neurocomputing, 493: 253-267.
[74]   Wu Y B, Zhang J, Deng Y C, et al. 2014. Effects of warming on root diameter, distribution, and longevity in an alpine meadow. Plant Ecology, 215: 1057-1066.
[75]   Xu L, Abbaszadeh P, Moradkhani H, et al. 2020. Continental drought monitoring using satellite soil moisture, data assimilation and an integrated drought index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 250: 112028, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112028.
[76]   Yao T D, Piao S L, Shen M G, et al. 2017. Chained impacts on modern environment of interaction between Westerlies and Indian Monsoon on Tibetan Plateau. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version), 32(9): 976-984. (in Chinese)
[77]   Yin G A, Niu F J, Lin Z J, et al. 2017. Effects of local factors and climate on permafrost conditions and distribution in Beiluhe basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Science of the Total Environment, 581-582: 472-485.
[78]   Zeng J Y, Li Z, Chen Q, et al. 2015. Evaluation of remotely sensed and reanalysis soil moisture products over the Tibetan Plateau using in-situ observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 163: 91-110.
[79]   Zeng J Y, Shi P F, Chen K S, et al. 2021. Assessment and error analysis of satellite soil moisture products over the third pole. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 1-18.
[80]   Zhang K, Li X, Zheng D H, et al. 2022. Estimation of global irrigation water use by the integration of multiple satellite observations. Water Resources Research, 58(3): e2021WR030031, doi: 10.1029/2021WR030031.
[81]   Zhang L, Xue Z H, Liu H, et al. 2023. Enhanced generalized regression neural network with backward sequential feature selection for machine-learning-driven soil moisture estimation: A case study over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16: 7173-7185.
[82]   Zhang T J, Frauenfeld O W, Serreze M C, et al. 2005. Spatial and temporal variability in active layer thickness over the Russian Arctic drainage basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110(D16): 2004JD005642, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005642.
[83]   Zhang X F, Zhang H, Wang C, et al. 2021. Soil moisture estimation based on the distributed scatterers adaptive filter over the QTP permafrost region using sentinel-1 and high-resolution TerraSAR-X data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(3): 902-928.
[84]   Zhao H F, Li J, Yuan Q Q, et al. 2022. Downscaling of soil moisture products using deep learning: Comparison and analysis on Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 607: 127570, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127570.
[85]   Zhou F J, Yao M M, Fan X W, et al. 2022. Evidence of warming from long-term records of climate and permafrost in the hinterland of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 836085, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.836085.
[86]   Zwieback S, Berg A A. 2019. Fine-scale SAR soil moisture estimation in the subarctic tundra. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(7): 4898-4912.
[1] JIA Xu, WEI Baocheng, ZHANG Zhijie, CHEN Lulu, LIU Mengna, ZHAO Yiming, WANG Jing. Probability and spatiotemporal dynamics of active fire occurrence in Inner Mongolia, China from 2000 to 2022[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(8): 1084-1102.
[2] JIN Zizhen, QIN Xiang, LI Xiaoying, ZHAO Qiudong, ZHANG Jingtian, MA Xinxin, WANG Chunlin, HE Rui, WANG Renjun. Quantitative analysis of factors driving the variations in snow cover fraction in the Qilian Mountains, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(7): 888-911.
[3] Mashael MAASHI, Nada ALZABEN, Noha NEGM, Venkatesan VEERAMANI, Sabarunisha Sheik BEGUM, Geetha PALANIAPPAN. Forecasting land use changes in crop classification and drought using remote sensing[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(5): 575-589.
[4] NIU Jiqiang, LIU Zijian, CHEN Feiyan, LIU Gangjun, ZHOU Junli, ZHOU Peng, LI Hongrui, LI Mengyang. Variations of soil moisture and its influencing factors in arid and semi-arid areas, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(5): 624-643.
[5] HE Dequan, LU Haijing, HU Xiasong, WANG Cheng, LIU Changyi, ZHAO Yingxiao, LI Shuaifei, DENG Taiguo. Mechanical properties and enhanced soil shear strength of herbaceous plant roots in the alpine meadow layer of the permafrost region on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(4): 515-537.
[6] Komeh ZINAT, Hamzeh SAEID, Memarian HADI, Attarchi SARA, LU Linlin, Naboureh AMIN, Alavipanah KAZEM SEYED. Impact of urban sprawl on land surface temperature in the Mashhad City, Iran: A deep learning and cloud- based remote sensing analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(3): 285-303.
[7] SUN Huaizhang, ZHAO Xueqiang, CHEN Yangbo, LIU Jun. Impacts of extreme climate and vegetation phenology on net primary productivity across the Qinghai- Xizang Plateau, China from 1982 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(3): 350-367.
[8] ZHANG Xuebin, LIU Yanni, YIN Junfeng, SHI Peiji, FENG Haoyuan, SHI Jing. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(2): 145-166.
[9] LIU Yuke, HUANG Chenlu, YANG Chun, CHEN Chen. Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors of vegetation net primary productivity in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China from 2001 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(1): 74-92.
[10] LIANG Shen, WANG Shu, LIU Yabin, PANG Jinghao, ZHU Haili, LI Guorong, HU Xiasong. Mechanism underlying the uprooting of taproot-type shrub species in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai- Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(10): 1426-1443.
[11] QIANG Yuquan, ZHANG Jinchun, XU Xianying, LIU Hujun, DUAN Xiaofeng. Stem sap flow of Haloxylon ammodendron at different ages and its response to physical factors in the Minqin oasis-desert transition zone, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(7): 842-857.
[12] ZHANG Hui, Giri R KATTEL, WANG Guojie, CHUAI Xiaowei, ZHANG Yuyang, MIAO Lijuan. Enhanced soil moisture improves vegetation growth in an arid grassland of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(7): 871-885.
[13] Khouloud ZAGOUB, Khouloud KRICHEN, Mohamed CHAIEB, Lobna F MNIF. Morphological and physiological responses to drought stress of carob trees in Mediterranean ecosystems[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(5): 562-577.
[14] ZHOU Qian, DING Jianli, GE Xiangyu, LI Ke, ZHANG Zipeng, GU Yongsheng. Estimation of soil organic matter in the Ogan-Kuqa River Oasis, Northwest China, based on visible and near-infrared spectroscopy and machine learning[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(2): 191-204.
[15] WANG Yuxia, ZHANG Jing, YU Xiaojun. Effects of mulch and planting methods on Medicago ruthenica seed yield and soil physical-chemical properties[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 894-909.