Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2024, Vol. 16 Issue (9): 1183-1196    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0107-y     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-024-0107-y

CSTR: 32276.14.JAL.0240107y

Research article     
Spatio-temporal evolution analysis of landscape pattern and habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022 based on InVEST model
ZHENG Guoqiang1,2, Li Cunxiu2, LI Runjie3,*(), LUO Jing2, FAN Chunxia2, ZHU Hailing2
1College of Geography, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China
2Qinghai Engineering Consulting Center Co., Ltd., Xining 810001, China
3Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1144KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Habitat quality is an important indicator for evaluating the quality of ecosystem. The Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin plays an important role in the ecological protection of the upper reaches of the Yellow River Basin. To comprehensively analysis the alterations of habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin, this study utilized the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model to calculate the habitat quality index and analyze the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of habitat quality in the study area from 2000 to 2022, and calculated seven landscape pattern indices (number of patches, patch density, largest patch index (LPI), landscape shape index (LSI), contagion index (CONTAG), Shannon diversity index, and Shannon evenness index) to research the variation of landscape pattern in the study area. The results showed that the number of patches, patch density, LPI, LSI, Shannon diversity index, and Shannon evenness index increased from 2000 to 2022, while the CONTAG decreased, indicating that the landscape pattern in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin changed in the direction of distribution fragmentation, shape complexity, and heterogeneity. The average value of the habitat quality index in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022 was 0.90. Based on the value of habitat quality index, we divided the level of habitat quality into five categories: lower (0.00-0.20), low (0.20-0.40), moderate (0.40-0.60), high (0.60-0.80), and higher (0.80-1.00). Most areas were at the higher habitat quality level. The lower habitat quality patches were mainly distributed in Longyang Gorge and Yellow River-Huangshui River Valley. From 2000 to 2022, the habitat quality in most areas was stable; the increase areas were mainly distributed in Guinan County, while the decrease areas were mainly distributed in Xining City, Maqen County, Xinghai County, Qumarleb County, and Darlag County. To show the extent of habitat quality variation, we calculated Sen index. The results showed that the higher habitat quality area had a decrease trending, while other categories had an increasing tendency, and the decreasing was faster than increasing. The research results provide scientific guidance for promoting ecological protection and high-quality development in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin.

Key words： InVEST model      landscape pattern index      habitat quality      largest patch index      landscape shape index      Shannon evenness index     
Received: 11 May 2024      Published: 30 September 2024
CLC:  32276.14.JAL.0240107y  
Corresponding Authors: *LI Runjie (E-mail: rjl@126.com)
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHENG Guoqiang
Li Cunxiu
LI Runjie
LUO Jing
FAN Chunxia
ZHU Hailing
Cite this article:

ZHENG Guoqiang, Li Cunxiu, LI Runjie, LUO Jing, FAN Chunxia, ZHU Hailing. Spatio-temporal evolution analysis of landscape pattern and habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022 based on InVEST model. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1183-1196.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0107-y     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I9/1183

Fig. 1 Location of the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin, China. 1, Datong Hui and Tu Autonomous County; 2, Huzhu Tu Autonomous County; 3, Huangyuan County; 4, Huangzhong County; 5, Xining City; 6, Pingan District; 7, Minhe Hui and Tu Autonomous County; 8, Hualong Hui Autonomous County; 9, Jainca County; 10, Xunhua Salar Autonomous County; 11, Henan Mongolian Autonomous County; 12, Baima County.
Threat factor Maximum impact distance (km) Weight Type of recession Reference
Construction land 10 1.0 Linear Hou et al. (2024)
Cultivated land 8 0.7 Exponential Pan et al. (2022)
Unused land 5 0.3 Exponential Wang and Sun (2024)
Table 1 Threat factors of habitat quality selected by this study
Land use type Habitat suitability Habitat sensitivity
Cultivated land Construction land Unused land
Cultivated land 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40
Forest 1.00 0.70 0.80 0.50
Grassland 1.00 0.70 0.75 0.60
Water body 0.80 0.65 0.70 0.30
Glacier 1.00 0.00 0.80 0.30
Unused land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Construction land 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wetland 1.00 0.70 0.90 0.40
Table 2 Habitat suitability and sensitivity to threat factors for different land use types
Year Number of patches Patch density (patches/hm2) LPI (%) LSI CONTAG Shannon diversity index Shannon evenness index
2000 47,016 0.3111 87.73 81.5409 80.7507 0.5137 0.2470
2005 46,040 0.3046 88.05 78.9123 81.1027 0.5068 0.2437
2010 47,825 0.3164 87.77 80.4385 80.5832 0.5214 0.2507
2015 45,658 0.3021 87.95 79.1291 80.9037 0.5130 0.2467
2020 46,268 0.3061 87.65 82.6330 80.3702 0.5248 0.2524
2022 47,518 0.3144 88.01 82.5149 80.4614 0.5210 0.2505
Table 3 Change in landscape pattern index in the Qinghai Province section in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022
Year Lower
habitat quality		 Low
habitat quality		 Moderate
habitat quality		 High
habitat quality		 Higher
habitat quality
Area
(km2)		 Percentage
(%)		 Area
(km2)		 Percentage
(%)		 Area
(km2)		 Percentage
(%)		 Area
(km2)		 Percentage
(%)		 Area
(km2)		 Percentage
(%)
2000 3608 2.38 5094 3.36 5412 3.56 6351 4.18 131,362 86.52
2005 3426 2.23 4956 3.23 5372 3.50 6541 4.26 133,272 86.78
2010 3213 2.11 5115 3.36 5046 3.32 6318 4.15 132,385 87.05
2015 3867 2.52 5095 3.32 4987 3.25 6704 4.37 132,914 86.55
2020 4738 3.12 5103 3.36 4899 3.23 7001 4.61 130,085 85.68
2022 4572 3.02 5351 3.54 5019 3.32 7271 4.81 128,930 85.30
Table 4 Area of different levels of habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin in 2000 (a), 2005 (b), 2010 (c), 2015 (d), 2020 (e), and 2022 (f)
Period Percentage of area change (%)
Lower habitat quality Low habitat quality Moderate habitat quality High habitat quality Higher habitat quality
2000-2005 -0.15 -0.13 -0.06 0.08 0.26
2005-2010 -0.12 0.13 -0.18 -0.11 0.27
2010-2015 0.41 -0.04 -0.07 0.22 -0.50
2015-2020 0.60 0.04 -0.02 0.24 -0.87
2020-2022 -0.10 0.18 0.09 0.20 -0.38
Sen index 0.082 0.053 0.046 0.059 -0.242
Table 5 Change of area of different levels of habitat quality in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022
Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of habitat quality transition process in the Qinghai Province section of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2022. 1, Datong Hui and Tu Autonomous County; 2, Huzhu Tu Autonomous County; 3, Huangyuan County; 4, Huangzhong County; 5, Xining City; 6, Pingan District; 7, Minhe Hui and Tu Autonomous County; 8, Hualong Hui Autonomous County; 9, Jainca County; 10, Xunhua Salar Autonomous County; 11, Henan Mongolian Autonomous County; 12, Baima County.
[1]   Aneseyee A B, Noszczyk T, Soromessa T, et al. 2020. The InVEST habitat quality model associated with land use/cover changes: a qualitative case study of the Winike Watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia. Remote Sensing, 12(7): 1103, doi: 10.3390/rs12071103.
[2]   Bao Y B, Liu K, Li T, et al. 2015. Effects of land use change on habitat based on InVEST model—Taking Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve in Shaanxi Province as an example. Arid Zone Research, 32(3): 622-629. (in Chinese)
[3]   Cai W M, Tang H J, Chen Y Q, et al. 2004. Landscape pattern of rural residential areas in Yellow River Delta in recent 20 years. Resources Science, 26(5): 89-97. (in Chinese)
[4]   Chen C, Park T, Wang X H, et al. 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature Sustainability, 2(2): 122-129.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7 pmid: 30778399
[5]   Chen Y, Xia R, Hou X K. 2021. Upper Yellow River Basin water ecological environment problems and countermeasures—Taking Huangshui River Typical Basin as an example. Environmental Protection, 49(13): 17-19. (in Chinese)
[6]   Deng G M, Yan X K, Xu G L, et al. 2024. Land use change and habitat quality evolution in county level in NanxiongBasin, northern Guangdong Province. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2024.06.09.0001. (in Chinese)
[7]   Duan B Q, Chen W X, Zeng J. 2024. Landscape fragmentation of rural settlements and its influencing factors in China. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2023.0610. (in Chinese)
[8]   Fellman J B, Hood E, Dryer W, et al. 2015. Stream physical characteristics impact habitat quality for Pacific salmon in two temperate coastal watersheds. PLoS ONE, 10(7): e0132652, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132652.
[9]   Guo J, Zhang Q, Song M H, et al. 2020. Status and function improvement technology of the grassland ecosystem in the upper Yellow River Basin. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 28(5): 1173-1184. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.001
[10]   He P, Zhang H R. 2009. Study on factor analysis and selection of common landscape metrics. Forest Research, 22(4): 470-474. (in Chinese)
[11]   Hou J X, Pan H H, Du Z Q, et al. 2024. Spatiotemporal analysis of water ecosystem services of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province. Arid Land Geography, 47(6): 1047-1060. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.346
[12]   Huang B, Zhang H W. 2024. Evolution and driving force analysis of landscape ecological risk in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. Environmental Ecology, 6(6): 40-48. (in Chinese)
[13]   Jia T C, Hu X W. 2024. Spatial-temporal change and driving force of carbon storage in Three-River-Source National Park based on PLUS-InVEST-Geodector Model. Environmental Science, doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202310046. (in Chinese)
[14]   Jiang F G, Deng M L, Long Y, et al. 2022. Spatial pattern and dynamic change of vegetation greenness from 2001 to 2020 in Tibet, China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 892625, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.892625.
[15]   Jin S H, Liu X, Yang J J, et al. 2022. Spatial-temporal changes of land use/cover change and habitat quality in Sanjiang Plain from 1985 to 2017. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 1032584, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1032584.
[16]   Lai Z Y, Liao F Q, Shu X B, et al. 2024. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution and prediction of habitat quality in Ganjiang River Basin. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 1-21. (in Chinese)
[17]   Lei J R, Chen Y Q, Li L M, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal change of habitat quality in Hainan Island of China based on changes in land use. Ecological Indicators, 145: 109707, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109707.
[18]   Li D K, Ding S Y, Liang G F, et al. 2014. Landscape heterogeneity of mountainous and hilly area in the western Henan Province based on moving window method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(12): 3414-3424. (in Chinese)
[19]   Li L F, Li X J, Niu B B, et al. 2023a. A study on the dynamics of landscape patterns in the Yellow River Delta Region. Water, 15(4): 819, doi: 10.3390/w15040819.
[20]   Li N, Wang L, Wen G C, et al. 2023b. Analysis of area change and driving forces for the Eling Lake at the source of the Yellow River. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 10: 7-13, 33. (in Chinese)
[21]   Lin J P, Zhu C H, Deng A Z, et al. 2022. Causes of changing woodland landscape patterns in southern China. Forests, 13(12): 2183, doi: 10.3390/f13122183.
[22]   Liu C Y, Yang J, Xie B P, et al. 2023a. Temporal and spatial characteristics of habitat quality and its topographic gradient effect in the Gansu-Qinghai section of the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 40(2): 372-383.
[23]   Liu H M, Fang C L, Li Y H. 2019. The coupled human and natural cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8): 1489-1507. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908001
[24]   Liu J Y, Xu D W, Xu J. 2024. Analysis of landscape patterns and spatio-temporal evolution of habitat quality in the Pu River Basin based on the InVEST model. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(2): 258-267. (in Chinese)
[25]   Liu X H, Qiao X J. 2024. Spatio-temporal variation of habitat quality of the Giant Panda National Park in the Qinling Area, China. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 39(3): 179-188. (in Chinese)
[26]   Liu X Y, Liu C, Nie R H, et al. 2023b. Spatio-temporal variation in water use efficiency and its determinants in 2000-2014 in the source region of Yellow River. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 42(9): 61-67. (in Chinese)
[27]   Long Y, Jiang F G, Deng M L, et al. 2023. Spatial-temporal changes and driving factors of eco-environmental quality in the Three-North region of China. Journal of Arid Land, 15(3): 231-252.
[28]   Lü L T, Zhang J, Peng Q Z, et al. 2019. Landscape pattern analysis and prediction in the Dongjiang River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(18): 6850-6859. (in Chinese)
[29]   Ma S Q, Ding W W, Li F J, et al. 2023. Countermeasures of the ecological protection and restoration in the Yellow River Basin in Qinghai Province. Environmental Protection, 51(22): 18-22. (in Chinese)
[30]   Mu Q, Jiang L L, Zhu Y H, et al. 2023. Prediction of changes in and use and habitat quality in Suzhou. Environmental Monitoring Management and Technology, 35(6): 15-21. (in Chinese)
[31]   Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.
[32]   Ou Y Z Y, Liu J G, Xiao H, et al. 2001. An assessment of giant panda habitat in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(11): 1869-1874. (in Chinese)
[33]   Pan Y, Yin Y H, Hou W J, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal variation of habitat quality in the source region of the Yellow River based on land use and vegetation cover changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(19): 7978-7988. (in Chinese)
[34]   Paudel S, Yuan F. 2012. Assessing landscape changes and dynamics using patch analysis and GIS modeling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 16: 66-76.
[35]   Peng J, Xu F X, Wu J, et al. 2019. Spatial differentiation of habitat quality in typical tourist city and their influencing factors mechanisms: a case study of Huangshan City. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 28(10): 2397-2409. (in Chinese)
[36]   Qi Y L, Ma Y L, Zhang H W, et al. 2024. Relationship between population density of plateau pika and environmental factors. Pratacultural Science, 41(6): 1441-1452. (in Chinese)
[37]   Shi J X, Liang X Y, Wei Z, et al. 2024. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity in the influence of landscape patterns on trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services: a case study of the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(4): 6144-6159.
[38]   Sui X, Tong F, Yao C Q, et al. 2007. Land uses and landscape patterns of Qinghai Province in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(2): 123-127. (in Chinese)
[39]   Wang A, Zhang M M, Al Kafy A, et al. 2023a. Predicting the impacts of urban land change on LST and carbon storage using InVEST, CA-ANN and WOA-LSTM models in Guangzhou, China. Earth Science Informatics, 16(1): 437-454.
[40]   Wang B X, Cheng W M. 2022. Effects of land use/cover on regional habitat quality under different geomorphic types based on InVEST model. Remote Sensing, 14(5): 1279, doi: 10.3390/rs14051279.
[41]   Wang F W, Zhang Y H. 2023. Landscape fragmentation analysis and eco-environmental quality assessment at the catchment scale. Journal of Natural Disasters, 32(1): 67-75. (in Chinese)
[42]   Wang G X, Li N, Hu H C. 2009. Hydrologic effect of ecosystem responses to climatic change in the source regions of Yangtze River and Yellow River. Progress in Climate Change Research, 5(4): 202-208. (in Chinese)
[43]   Wang P, Qin S T, Hu H R. 2023b. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of land use change and habitat quality in the Lhasa River Basin over the past three decades. Arid Zone Research, 40(3): 492-503. (in Chinese)
[44]   Wang Y, Gao J X, Jin Y, et al. 2020. Habitat quality of farming-pastoral ecotone in Bairin Right Banner, Inner Mongolia based on land use change and InVEST model from 2005 to 2015. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 36(5): 654-662. (in Chinese)
[45]   Wang Y Q, Sun X Y. 2024. Trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin and their spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Science, doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202402126. (in Chinese)
[46]   Wang Z Y, Shi P J, Li X H, et al. 2024. Response mechanism and promotion path of habitat quality to land use changes in the Hexi Corridor Area. Environmental Science, doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202312250. (in Chinese)
[47]   Wu C X, Gao P, Xu R R, et al. 2024. Influence of landscape pattern changes on water conservation capacity: A case study in an arid/semiarid region of China. Ecological Indicators, 163: 112082, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112082.
[48]   Wu L, Zhou Z F, Zhang L, et al. 2023. Response of landscape pattern change to habitat quality in Karst Area. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(9): 206-217. (in Chinese)
[49]   Wu X F, Li G X, Pan X P, et al. 2015. Response of vegetation cover to temperature and precipitation in the source region of the Yellow River. Resources Science, 37(3): 512-521.
[50]   Xu Y, Gao M K, Zhang Z X. 2024. Land use change and its impact on habitat quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River based on InVEST model. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 31(5): 355-364. (in Chinese)
[51]   Yan L, Cao G C, Kang L G, et al. 2024. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes in habitat quality and driving factors in Gonghe County using the InVEST model. Arid Zone Research, 41(2): 314-325. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.02.14
[52]   Yang F, Yang L Y, Fang Q Y, et al. 2024. Impact of landscape pattern on habitat quality in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2030. Ecological Indicators, 166: 112480, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112480.
[53]   Yang J, Huang X. 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 13(8): 3907-3925.
[54]   Yang W P, Shao H Y, Huang J R, et al. 2023a. Habitat quality assessment of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park cluster. National Parks (English and Chinese), 1(2): 99-109. (in Chinese)
[55]   Yang X G, Ma L Y, Sun H F, et al. 2023b. Study on key paths of comprehensive integration of Qinghai Province into the national strategy for ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. Qinghai Science and Technology, 30(6): 19-25. (in Chinese)
[56]   Yang Z K, Tian J, Li W Y, et al. 2021. Spatio-temporal pattern and evolution trend of ecological environment quality in the Yellow River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(19): 7627-7636. (in Chinese)
[57]   Zang Y Z, Liu Y S, Yang Y Y. 2019. Land use pattern change and its topographic gradient effect in the mountainous areas: A case study of Jinggangshan City. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(7): 1391-1404. (in Chinese)
[58]   Zeng X Y, Song Y H. 2023. Study on the biodiversity distribution pattern of the green space in the central city of Kunming based on the key species and habitat quality assessment. Chinese Garden, 39(9): 126-132. (in Chinese)
[59]   Zhang G K, Deng W, Lü X G, et al. 2007. The dynamic change of wetland landscape patterns in Xinkai River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(3): 204-210. (in Chinese)
[60]   Zhang J T, Zhao F X, Chen J H, et al. 2023. Relationship between species diversity and biomass of different types of alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and their influencing elements. Grassland Science, 40(3): 616-626. (in Chinese)
[61]   Zhang J X, Gu Y X, Shen J Q, et al. 2024a. Analysis of spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of ecological environment quality in the Yellow River Basin. Envrionmental Science, doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202401141. (in Chinese)
[62]   Zhang X Y, Jia W W, Lu S X, et al. 2024b. Ecological assessment and driver analysis of high vegetation cover areas based on new remote sensing index. Ecological Informatics, 82: 102786, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102786.
[63]   Zhang X Y, Zhou Z X, Tang Z X, et al. 2024c. Spatio-temporal variation and prediction of habitat quality in Wuding River Basin. Journal of Desert Research, 44(3): 75-84. (in Chinese)
[64]   Zhang Y Y, Cai X B, Yang C, et al. 2019. Driving force analysis of landscape pattern changes in Honghu Wetland Nature Reserve in recent 40 years. Journal of Lake Sciences, 31(1): 171-182. (in Chinese)
[65]   Zhi F, Zhou Z H, Zhao M, et al. 2024. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of carbon storage in Hefei ecosystem based on PLUS and InVEST models. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(2): 205-215. (in Chinese)
[66]   Zhong L N, Wang J. 2017. Evaluation on effect of land consolidation on habitat quality based on InVEST model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 33(1): 250-255. (in Chinese)
[67]   Zhu J, Gong J, Li J Y. 2020. Spatiotemporal change of habitat quality in ecologically sensitive areas of eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A case study of the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai Province. Resource Science, 42(5): 991-1003. (in Chinese)
[68]   Zhu W H, Zou H, Liu T, et al. 2024. Evaluation of eco-geological environment quality of Bailianhe wetland in eastern Hubei Province. Resources Environment & Engineering, 38(4): 427-436. (in Chinese)
[1] ZUBAIDA Muyibul. Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in Yutian County along the Keriya River Basin, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 943-962.
[2] CHEN Jiazhen, KASIMU Alimujiang, REHEMAN Rukeya, WEI Bohao, HAN Fuqiang, ZHANG Yan. Temporal and spatial variation and prediction of water yield and water conservation in the Bosten Lake Basin based on the PLUS-InVEST model[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 852-875.
[3] ZHU Haiqiang, WANG Jinlong, TANG Junhu, DING Zhaolong, GONG Lu. Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem services and driving factors in the Tianchi Bogda Peak Natural Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 816-833.
[4] WANG Jing, WEI Yulu, PENG Biao, LIU Siqi, LI Jianfeng. Spatiotemporal variations in ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies against the background of the gully control and land consolidation project on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 131-145.
[5] ZHANG Shubao, LEI Jun, TONG Yanjun, ZHANG Xiaolei, LU Danni, FAN Liqin, DUAN Zuliang. Temporal and spatial responses of ecological resilience to climate change and human activities in the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(10): 1245-1268.
[6] LUAN Yongfei, HUANG Guohe, ZHENG Guanghui. Spatiotemporal evolution and prediction of habitat quality in Hohhot City of China based on the InVEST and CA-Markov models[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 20-33.
[7] DONG Jianhong, ZHANG Zhibin, LIU Benteng, ZHANG Xinhong, ZHANG Wenbin, CHEN Long. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of habitat quality in the loess hilly area of the Yellow River Basin: A case study of Lanzhou City, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(6): 637-652.
[8] WU Changxue, QIU Dexun, GAO Peng, MU Xingmin, ZHAO Guangju. Application of the InVEST model for assessing water yield and its response to precipitation and land use in the Weihe River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 426-440.
[9] HE Bing, CHANG Jianxia, GUO Aijun, WANG Yimin, WANG Yan, LI Zhehao. Assessment of river basin habitat quality and its relationship with disturbance factors: A case study of the Tarim River Basin in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 167-185.
[10] LI Feng, LI Yaoming, ZHOU Xuewen, YIN Zun, LIU Tie, XIN Qinchuan. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 115-138.