| Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
| Effect of vegetation on soil water retention and storage in a semi-arid alpine forest catchment |
| Chao WANG1, ChuanYan ZHAO2, ZhongLin XU3, Yang WANG2, HuanHua PENG1 |
1 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2 School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China |
|
|
|
Abstract The runoff generated from mountainous regions is recognized as the main water source for inland river basins in arid environments. Thus, the mechanisms by which catchments retain water in soils are to be understood. The water storage capacity of soil depends on its depth and capacity to retain water under gravitational drainage and evapotranspiration. The latter can be studied through soil water retention curve (SWRC), which is closely related to soil properties such as texture, bulk density, porosity, soil organic carbon content, and so on. The present study represented SWRCs using HYDRUS-1D. In the present study, we measured physical and hydraulic properties of soil samples collected from Sabina przewalskii forest (south-facing slope with highest solar radiation), shrubs (west-facing slope with medium radiation), and Picea crassifolia forest (north-facing slope with lowest radiation), and analyzed the differences in soil water storage capacity of these soil samples. Soil water content of those three vegetation covers were also measured to validate the soil water storage capacity and to analyze the relationship between soil organic matter content and soil water content. Statistical analysis showed that different vegetation covers could lead to different soil bulk densities and differences in soil water retention on the three slope aspects. Sand content, porosity, and organic carbon content of the P. crassifolia forest were relatively greater compared with those of the S. przewalskii forest and shrubs. However, silt content and soil bulk density were relatively smaller than those in the S. przewalskii forest and shrubs. In addition, there was a significant linear positive relationship between averaged soil water content and soil organic matter content (P<0.0001). However, this relationship is not significant in the P. crassifolia forest. As depicted in the SWRCs, the water storage capacity of the soil was 39.14% and 37.38% higher in the P. crassifolia forest than in the S. przewalskii forest and shrubs, respectively, at a similar soil depth.
|
|
Received: 23 July 2012
Published: 01 June 2013
|
| Fund: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (91025015) |
|
Corresponding Authors:
ChuanYan ZHAO
E-mail: nanzhr@lzb.ac.cn
|
|
|
| Bellot J, Escarre A. 1998. Stemflow and throughfall determination in a resprouted Mediterranean holm-oak forest. Annals of Forest Science, 55: 847–865.Bultot F, Dupriez G L, Gellens D. 1990. Simulation of land use changes and impacts on the water balance—a case study for Bel-gium. Journal of Hydrology, 114: 327–348. Carey S K, Woo M. 2001. Spatial variability of hillslope water balance, Wolf Creek basin, Subarctic Yukon. Hydrological Processes, 15: 3113–3132.Castillo V M, Gómez-Plaza A, Martínez-Mena M. 2003. The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. Journal of Hydrology, 284: 114–130.Cheng G D, Xiao H L, Xu Z M, et al. 2006. Water issue and its coun-termeasure in the inland river basins of northwest China: a case study in Heihe River Basin. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 28(3): 406–413. Dingman S L. 2002. Physical Hydrology (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 646.Eagleson P S. 2002. Ecohydrology: Darwinian Expression of Vegeta-tion Form and Function. New York: Cambrige University Press.Famiglietti J S, Rudicki J W, Rodell M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology, 210: 259–281.Fiorentino M, Gioia A, Iacobellis V, et al. 2006. Analysis on flood generation processes by means of a continuous simulation model. Advances in Geosciences, 7: 231–236.Gash J H C, Wright I R, Lloyd C R. 1980. Comparative estimates of interception loss from three coniferous forests in Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology, 48: 89–105.Gash J H C, Lloyd C R, Lachaud G. 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology, 170: 79–86.Geroy I J, Gribb M M, Marshall H P, et al. 2011. Aspect influences on soil water retention and storage. Hydrological Processes, 25: 3836–3842.Herbst M, Diekkrüger B, Vereecken H. 2006. Geostatistical co-regionalization of soil hydraulic properties in a micro-scale cat-chment using terrain attributes. Geoderma, 132: 206–221.Hundecha Y, Bárdossy A. 2004. Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. Journal of Hydrology, 292: 281–295.Leij F J, Romano N, Palladino M, et al. 2004. Topographical attributes to predict soil hydraulic properties along a hillslope transect. Water Resources Research, 40, W02407, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001641. Li X, Li X W, Li Z Y, et al. 2009. Watershed allied telemetry experimental research. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, D22103, doi: 10.1029/2008JD011590.Li X R, Jia X H, Dong G R. 2006. Influence of desertification on vegetation pattern variations in the cold semi-arid grasslands of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, North-west China. Journal of Arid Environments, 64: 505–522.Lin H S, Kogelmann W, Walker C, et al. 2006. Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: a hydropedological perspective. Geoderma, 131: 345–368.Liu S G. 1997. A new model for the prediction of rainfall interception in forest canopies. Ecological Modelling, 99: 151–159.Lüscher P, Zürcher K. 2003. Flood Protection in Forests. Report of the Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Report No. 40. Freising: Bavarian State Institute of Forestry.Manfreda S, Rodrìguez-Iturbe I. 2006. On the spatial and temporal sampling of soil moisture fields. Water Resources Research, 42, W05409, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004548.Miralles D G, Gash J H C, Holmes T R H, et al. 2010. Global canopy interception from satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, D16112, doi: 10.1029/2009JD013530.Mualem Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12: 513–522.Murakami S. 2006. A proposal for a new forest canopy interception mechanism: Splash droplet evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 319: 72–82.Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page A L. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy.Penna D, Borga M, Norbiato D, et al. 2009. Hillslope scale soil moisture variability in a steep alpine terrain. Journal of Hydrology, 364: 311–327.Richards L A, Wadleigh C H. 1952. Soil water and plant growth. In: Shaw B T. Soil Physical Conditions and Plant Growth American Society of Agronomy Series Monographs, Volume II. New York: Academic Press, 74–251.Sarah P. 2002. Spatial patterns of soil moisture as affected by shrubs, in different climatic conditions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 73: 237–241.Schaap M G, Leij F J, van Genuchten M T. 1998. Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62: 847–855.Seeger M, Errea M P, Beguería S, et al. 2004. Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees. Journal of Hydrology, 288: 299–311.Simunek J, van Genuchten M T, Sejna M. 2005. The HYDRUS-1D Software Package for Simulating the One-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Media. Riverside: University of California Riverside, 240.Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy, a Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. 2nd ed. Agriculture Handbook No. 436. Washington: USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 869 .Staelens J, de Schrijver A, Verheyen K, et al. 2008. Rainfall parti-tioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a sin-gle beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology. Hydrological Processes, 22: 33–45.Teske M E, Thistle H W. 2004. A library of forest canopy structure for use in interception modeling. Forest Ecology and Management, 198: 341–350.van Genuchten M T. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 892–898.Wang G X, Li Y S, Wang Y B, et al. 2007. Impacts of alpine ecosystem and climatic changes on surface runoff in the source region of Yangtze River. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 29(2): 159–168.Wang G X, Li Y S, Hu H C, et al. 2008. Synergistic effect of vegetation and air temperature changes on soil water content in alpine frost meadow soil in the permafrost region of Qinghai-Tibet. Hy-drological Processes, 22: 3310–3320.Wang G X, Li S N, Hu H C, et al. 2009. Water regime shifts in the active soil layer of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau permafrost region, under different levels of vegetation. Geoderma, 149: 280–289.Wang G X, Liu G S, Li C J. 2012. Effects of changes in alpine grassland vegetation cover on hillslope hydrological processes in a permafrost watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 444–445: 22–33.Wang X Y, Zhao Y, Horn R. 2010. Soil wettability as affected by soil characteristics and land use. Pedosphere, 20: 43–54.Western A W, Grayson R B, Bloschl G, et al. 1999. Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resources Research, 35: 797–810.Xiao H L, Cheng G D. 2006. Water issue and management at basin level in Heihe River, northwestern China. Journal of Desert Re-search, 26(1): 1–5.Xiao Q F, McPherson E G, Simpson J R, et al. 1998. Rainfall inter-ception by Sacramento’s urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 24: 235–244.Xiao Q F, McPherson E G, Ustin S L, et al. 2000. Winter rainfall interception by two mature open-grown trees in Davis, California. Hydrological Processes, 14: 763–784.Xu Z L, Zhao C Y, Feng Z D. 2009. A study of the impact of climate change on the potential distribution of Qinghai Spruce (Picea crassifolia) in Qilian Mountains. Acta Ecologia Sinica, 29: 278–285.Yi X S, Li G S, Yin Y Y. 2012. The impacts of grassland vegetation degradation on soil hydrological and ecological effects in the source region of the Yellow River—a case study in Junmuchang region of Maqin country. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13: 967–981.Zhang K R, Cheng X L, Dang H, et al. 2012. Linking litter production, quality and decomposition to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.005. Zhang W G, An S Q, Xu Z, et al. 2011. The impact of vegetation and soil on runoff regulation in headwater streams on the east Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Catena, 87: 182–189.Zhao C Y, Nan Z R, Cheng G D, et al. 2006. GIS-assisted modeling of the spatial distribution of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) in the Qilian Mountains, northwestern China based on biophysical parameters. Ecological Modeling, 191: 487–500. Zheng H, Chen F L, Ouyang Z Y, et al. 2008. Impacts of reforestation approaches on runoff control in the hilly red soil region of southern China. Journal of Hydrology, 356: 174–184. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
