| Research Articles |
|
|
|
|
| Relationship between dew presence and Bassia dasyphylla plant growth |
| YanLi ZHUANG1,2, Sophia RATCLIFFE3 |
1 Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2 Hydrology and Ecology Laboratory of Watershed, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3 Institute for Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany |
|
|
|
Abstract Dew has been recognized for its ecological significance and has also been identified as an additional source of water in arid zones. We used factorial control experiment, under dew presence in the field, to explore photosynthetic performance, water status and growth response of desert annual herbage. Bassia dasyphylla seedlings were grown in contrasting dew treatments (dew-absent and dew-present) and different watering regimes (normal and deficient). The effects of dew on the water status and photosynthetic performance of Bassia dasyphylla, grown in a desert area of the Hexi Corridor in Northwestern China, were evaluated. The results indicated the presence of dew significantly increased relative water content (RWC) of shoots and total biomass of plants in both water regimes, and enhanced the diurnal shoot water potential and stomatal conductance in the early morning, as well as photosynthetic rate, which reached its maximum only in the water-stressed regime. The presence of dew increased aboveground growth of plants and photosynthate accumulation in leaves, but decreased the root-to-shoot ratio in both water regimes. Dew may have an important role in improving plant water status and ameliorating the adverse effects of plants exposed to prolonged drought.
|
|
Received: 11 August 2011
Published: 05 March 2012
|
| Fund: The National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (30771767 and 40601016). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
|
|
|
| Barradas V L, Glez-Medellín M G. 1999. Dew and its effect on two heliophile under storey species of a tropical dry deciduous forest in Mexico. International Journal of Biometeorology, 43(1): 1–7.Boucher J E, Munson A D, Bernier P Y. 1995. Foliar absorption of dew influences shoot water potential and root growth in Pinus strobes seedlings. Tree Physiology, 15(12): 819–823.Breazeale E L, McGeorge W T. 1953. Influence of atmospheric humidity on root growth. Soil Science, 76(5): 361–365.Breshears D D, McDowell N G, Goddard K L, et al. 2008. Foliar absorption of intercepted rainfall improves woody plant water status most during drought. Ecology, 89(1): 41–48.Chaumont M, Osorio M L, Chaves M M, et al. 1997. The absence of photoinhibition during the mid-morning depression of photosynthesis in Vitis vinifera grown in semi-arid and temperate climate. Journal of Plant Physiology, 150(6): 743–751.Clus O, Ortega P, Muselli M, et al. 2008. Study of dew water collection in humid tropical islands. Journal of Hydrology, 361(1–2): 159–171.Duvdevani S. 1947. An optical method of dew estimation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 73(317–318): 282–296.Duvdevani S. 1964. Dew in Israel and its effect on plants. Soil Science, 98(1): 14–21.Grammatikopoulus G, Manetas Y. 1994. Direct absorption of water by hairy leaves of Phlomis fruticosa and its contribution to drought avoidance. Canadian Journal of Botany, 72(12): 1805–1811.Kaiser W M. 1987. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiologia Plantarum, 71(1): 142–149.Katz C, Oren R, Schulze E D, et al. 1989. Uptake of water and solutes through twigs of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Trees, 3(1): 33–37. Kidron G J. 1998. A simple weighing method for dew and fog measurements. Weather, 53: 428–433.Kidron G J. 1999. Differential water distribution over dune slopes as affected by slope position and microbiotic crust, Negev Desert, Israel. Hydrological Processes, 13(11): 1665–1682.Kidron G J, Yair A, Danin A. 2000. Dew variability within a small arid drainage basin in the Negev Highlands, Israel. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 126(562): 63–80. Li X Y. 2002. Effects of gravel and sand mulches on dew deposition in the semiarid region of China. Journal of Hydrology, 260(1–4): 151–160.Loik M E, Breshears D D, Lauenroth W K, et al. 2004. A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA. Oecologia, 141(2): 269–281. Meinzer F C. 1993. Stomatal control of transpiration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8(8): 289–294.Monteith J L. 1963. Dew: facts and fallacies. In: Rutter A J, Whitehead F H. The Water Relations of Plants. New York: Wiley, 37–56. Munné-Bosch S, Nogues S, Alegre L. 1999. Diurnal variations of photosynthesis and dew absorption by leaves in two evergreen shrubs growing in Mediterranean field conditions. New Phytologist, 144(1): 109–119. Munné-Bosch S. 2010. Direct foliar absorption of rainfall water and its biological significance in dryland ecosystems. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(3): 417–418.Quick W P, Chaves M M, Wendler R, et al. 1992. The effect of water stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in four species grown under field conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 15(1): 25–35.Rundel P W. 1982. Water uptake by organs other roots. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, et al. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Physiological Plant Ecology Ⅱ: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 111–134.Schulze E D, Hall A E. 1982. Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, et al. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 615–676.Shachak M, Steinberger Y. 1980. An algae-desert snail food chain: energy flow and soil turnover. Oecologia, 46(3): 402–411.Stark N, Love L D. 1969. Water relations of three warm desert species. Israel Journal of Botany, 18(4): 175–190.Stewart J B. 1977. Evaporation from the wet canopy of a pine forest. Water Resource Research, 13(6): 915–921.Stone E C, Fowells H A. 1955. The survival value of dew as determined under laboratory conditions with Pinus ponderosa. Forest Science, 1:183–188.Stone E C, Schachori A Y, Stanley R G. 1956. Water absorption from the atmosphere by plants growing in dry soil. Science, 111: 546–548.Stone E C. 1957a. Dew as an ecological factor: I. A review of the literature. Ecology, 38: 407–413.Stone E C. 1957b. Dew as an ecological factor: II. The effect of artificial dew on the survival of Pinus ponderosa and associated species. Ecology, 38: 414–422.Stone E C. 1963. The ecological importance of dew. Quarterly Review of Biology, 38: 328–341.Waisel Y. 1958. Dew absorption by plants of arid zones. Bull Research Council Israel Section, D6: 180–186.Yates D J, Hutley L B. 1995. Foliar uptake of water by wet leaves of Sloanea woollsii, an Australian subtropical rainforest tree. Australian Journal of Botany, 43(2): 157–167.Zhang J, Zhang Y M, Alison D, et al. 2009. The influence of biological soil crusts on dew deposition in Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China. Journal of Hydrology, 379(3–4): 220–228.Zhao W Z, Liu B. 2010. The response of sap flow in shrubs to rainfall pulses in the desert region of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(9): 1297–1306. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
