Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2024, Vol. 16 Issue (12): 1633-1647    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0069-0    
Research article     
Impact of climate change on water resources in the Yarmouk River Basin of Jordan
Abdelaziz Q BASHABSHEH*(), Kamel K ALZBOON
Environmental Engineering Department, Al-Huson University College, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Irbid 21510, Jordan
Download: HTML     PDF(942KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Understanding the impact of climate change on water resources is important for developing regional adaptive water management strategies. This study investigated the impact of climate change on water resources in the Yarmouk River Basin (YRB) of Jordan by analyzing the historical trends and future projections of temperature, precipitation, and streamflow. Simple linear regression was used to analyze temperature and precipitation trends from 1989 to 2017 at Irbid, Mafraq, and Samar stations. The Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) was applied to predict changes in temperature and precipitation from 2018 to 2100 under three Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios (i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5), and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to estimate their potential impact on streamflow at Addasiyia station. Analysis of data from 1989 to 2017 revealed that mean maximum and minimum temperatures increased at all stations, with average rises of 1.62°C and 1.39°C, respectively. The precipitation trends varied across all stations, showing a significant increase at Mafraq station, an insignificant increase at Irbid station, and an insignificant decrease at Samar station. Historical analysis of streamflow data revealed a decreasing trend with a slope of -0.168. Significant increases in both mean minimum and mean maximum temperatures across all stations suggested that evaporation is the dominant process within the basin, leading to reduced streamflow. Under the RCP scenarios, projections indicated that mean maximum temperatures will increase by 0.32°C to 1.52°C, while precipitation will decrease by 8.5% to 43.0% throughout the 21st century. Future streamflow projections indicated reductions in streamflow ranging from 8.7% to 84.8% over the same period. The mathematical model results showed a 39.4% reduction in streamflow by 2050, nearly double the SWAT model's estimate under RCP8.5 scenario. This research provides novel insights into the regional impact of climate change on water resources, emphasizing the urgent need to address these environmental challenges to ensure a sustainable water supply in Jordan.



Key wordsstreamflow      climate change      Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)      Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM)      Yarmouk River Basin      Jordan     
Received: 05 May 2024      Published: 31 December 2024
Corresponding Authors: *Abdelaziz Q BASHABSHEH (E-mail: abdelazizbashabsheh@gmail.com)
Cite this article:

Abdelaziz Q BASHABSHEH, Kamel K ALZBOON. Impact of climate change on water resources in the Yarmouk River Basin of Jordan. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(12): 1633-1647.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0069-0     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I12/1633

Fig. 1 Overview of the Yarmouk River Basin (YRB) and the locations of meteorological stations, rainfall stations, and streamflow gauge station
Station name Pettitt's test SNHT Von Neumann's test
α P-value Check α P-value Check α P-value Check
Irbid 0.05 0.944 OK 0.05 0.874 OK 0.05 0.341 OK
Mafraq 0.05 0.066 OK 0.05 0.138 OK 0.05 0.032 NOT OK
Samar 0.05 0.033 NOT OK 0.05 0.739 OK 0.05 0.743 OK
Table 1 Homogeneity test results for annual precipitation data series
Station Name Pettitt's test SNHT Von Neumann's test
α P-value Check α P-value Check α P-value Check
Irbid 0.05 0.069 OK 0.05 0.176 OK 0.05 0.415 OK
Mafraq 0.05 0.099 OK 0.05 0.261 OK 0.05 0.723 OK
Samar 0.05 0.006 NOT OK 0.05 0.115 OK 0.05 0.022 NOT OK
Table 2 Homogeneity test results for annual mean temperature data series
Station name Pettitt's test SNHT Von Neumann's test
α P-value Check α P-value Check α P-value Check
Addasiyia 0.05 0.227 OK 0.05 0.699 OK 0.05 0.16 OK
Table 3 Homogeneity test results for streamflow data series
Fig. 2 Trend of mean maximum temperature at Irbid, Mafraq, and Samar stations during 1989-2017
Fig. 3 Trend of mean minimum temperature at Irbid, Mafraq, and Samar stations during 1989-2017
Fig. 4 Trend of annual precipitation at Irbid, Mafraq, and Samar stations during 1989-2017
Period RCP2.6 RCP4.5 RCP8.5
Temperature change (°C) Rate of change in precipitation (%) Temperature change (°C) Rate of change in precipitation (%) Temperature change (°C) Rate of change in precipitation (%)
2018-2050 0.32 -8.5 0.37 -10.3 0.44 -12.3
2051-2079 0.42 -10.7 0.61 -18.7 0.10 -29.6
2080-2100 0.42 -11.4 0.73 -21.6 1.52 -43.2
Table 4 Projected changes in temperature and precipitation under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 scenarios for different future periods
Parameter Definition Unit Estimated value Calibrated value Range
CN2 Curve number - 83 76 0-100
Sol_Awc Available water capacity of the soil layer mmH2O/mm soil 0.10 0.13 -
Gw_Delay Groundwater delay time d 310 450 -
ESCO Soil evaporation compensation factor - 0.95 0.75 0.00-1.00
Sol_K Saturated hydraulic conductivity mm/h 3.0 11.5 0.0-100.0
Sol_Z Depth from soil surface to bottom of layer mm 300 1100 0-2000
Table 5 Parameters used in the SWAT model calibration
Objective function Calibration (1992-2008) Validation (2009-2017)
R2 0.964 0.863
NSE 0.936 0.834
PBIAS (%) 9.7 12.6
Simulated mean (m3/s) 3.242 2.271
Observed mean (m3/s) 3.594 2.023
Observed Std Dev (m3/s) 11.022 4.524
Simulated Std Dev (m3/s) 9.111 3.494
Table 6 Summary of the objective functions in streamflow simulation during the calibration and validation periods
Fig. 5 Observed monthly streamflow versus simulated streamflow during 1992-2017
Fig. 6 Temporal variations in observed streamflow during 1989-2017
Fig. 7 Predicted changes of the simulated streamflow under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 scenarios for different future periods
Number Observed streamflow (m3/s) Simulated streamflow (m3/s) Error (m3/s)
1 1.021 1.036 -0.015
2 1.036 0.987 0.049
3 1.020 1.008 0.012
4 1.003 1.235 -0.232
5 0.927 1.174 -0.247
6 1.001 1.089 -0.088
7 0.995 0.967 0.028
8 1.007 1.080 -0.073
9 1.000 0.983 0.017
10 1.000 0.980 0.020
11 0.968 1.316 -0.348
12 1.000 1.071 -0.071
13 0.979 0.984 -0.005
14 0.970 0.997 -0.027
15 0.968 1.062 -0.094
16 0.980 1.258 -0.278
17 1.001 1.089 -0.088
18 3.013 2.367 0.646
19 0.983 1.040 -0.057
20 0.999 1.026 -0.027
21 0.968 1.059 -0.091
Table 7 Performance evaluation of the mathematical model for monthly streamflow predictions during 1989-2017
Fig. 8 Predicted changes of the streamflow using the mathematical model for different future periods
[1]   Abbaspour K C, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, et al. 2015. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology, 524: 733-752.
[2]   Abdulla F, Al-Shurafat A W. 2020. Assessment of the impact of potential climate change on the surface water of a trans-boundary basin: Case study Yarmouk River. Procedia Manufacturing, 44: 172-179.
[3]   Abu-Zreig M, Hani L B. 2021. Assessment of the SWAT model in simulating watersheds in arid regions: Case study of the Yarmouk River Basin (Jordan). Open Geosciences, 13(1): 377-389.
[4]   Al-Bakri J T, Shawash S, Ghanim A, et al. 2016. Geospatial techniques for improved water management in Jordan. Water, 8(4): 132, doi: 10.3390/w8040132.
[5]   Al-Hasani I, Al-Qinna M, Hammouri N A. 2023. Potential impacts of climate change on surface water resources in arid regions using downscaled regional circulation model and soil water assessment tool, a case study of Amman-Zerqa Basin, Jordan. Climate, 11(3): 51, doi: 10.3390/cli11030051.
[6]   Al-Jaafreh O, Nagy I. 2018. The environmental challenges, problems, and management: A case study of Jordan. Zbornik Radova Departmana za Geografiju, Turizam i Hotelijerstvo, (47-1): 53-70.
[7]   Al-Kharabsheh A. 2020. Challenges to sustainable water management in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences, 11(1): 38-48.
[8]   Al-Kharabsheh N M. 2022. Assessment of water resources in Yarmouk River Basin using geospatial technique during the period 1980-2020. Journal of Arid Land, 14(2): 154-166.
[9]   Al Sabeh H, Abdallah C, Merheb M, et al. 2022. Scenario simulation and analysis in the transboundary Yarmouk River basin using a WEAP model. International Journal of River Basin Management, 22(2): 217-238.
[10]   Alexandersson H. 1986. A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. Journal of Climatology, 6(6): 661-675.
[11]   Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[12]   Alqatarneh G, Al-Zboon K K. 2022. Water Poverty Index: a tool for water resources management in Jordan. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 233(11): 461, doi: 10.1007/s11270-022-05892-3.
[13]   Alzboon K K, La'aly A, Alrawashdeh K A B. 2021. Climate change indicators in Jordan: A new approach using area method. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(1).
[14]   Arnold J G, Moriasi D N, Gassman P W, et al. 2012. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4): 1491-1508.
[15]   Balascio C C, Palmeri D J, Gao H. 1998. Use of a genetic algorithm and multiobjective programming for calibration of a hydrologic model. Transactions of the ASAE, 41(3): 615-619.
[16]   Cheng Q P, Zhong F L, Wang P. 2021. Potential linkages of extreme climate events with vegetation and large-scale circulation indices in an endorheic river basin in northwest China. Atmospheric Research, 247: 105256, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105256.
[17]   ESCWA (Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia). 2013. Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. [2024-01-06]. https://www.unescwa.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pdf/e_escwa_sdpd_13_inventory_e.pdf.
[18]   ESCWA. 2015. Yarmouk River. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. [2023-12-30]. https://archive.unescwa.org/yarmouk-river.
[19]   Feyereisen G W, Strickland T C, Bosch D D, et al. 2007. Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the Little River watershed. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3): 843-855.
[20]   Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, et al. 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4): 1211-1250.
[21]   Hammouri N, El-Naqa A. 2007. Drought assessment using GIS and remote sensing in Amman-Zarqa basin, Jordan. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 1(2): 142-152.
[22]   Hammouri N, Adamowski J, Freiwan M, et al. 2011. Using SWAT to assess the impacts of climate change on the water resources of North Jordan. Inter-Islamic Network on Space Sciences & Technology (ISNET), Royal Jordanian Geographic Centre (RJGC), 65-72.
[23]   Hammouri N, Adamowski J, Freiwan M, et al. 2017. Climate change impacts on surface water resources in arid and semi-arid regions: A case study in northern Jordan. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 52: 141-156.
[24]   Hargreaves G H, Samani Z A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1(2): 96-99.
[25]   Hussein H, Natta A, Yehya A A K, et al. 2020. Syrian refugees, water scarcity, and dynamic policies: How do the new refugee discourses impact water governance debates in Lebanon and Jordan? Water, 12(2): 325, doi: 10.3390/w12020325.
[26]   IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[27]   IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[28]   IPCC. 2021. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 3-32.
[29]   IPCC. 2022. Climate Change 2022:Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[30]   MOENV (Ministry of Environment), UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2009. Jordan's Second National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). [2024-01-05]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Jordan%20SNC.pdf.
[31]   MOENV, UNDP. 2014. Jordan's Third National Communication on Climate Change. [2023-12-01]. https://www.undp.org/arab-states/publications/jordans-third-national-communication-climate-change.
[32]   MOENV. 2021. The National Climate Change Adaptation Plan of Jordan. [2024-03-13]. https://www.moenv.gov.jo/ebv4.0/root_storage/ar/eb_list_page/final_draft_nap-2021.pdf.
[33]   MWI (Ministry of Water and Irrigation). 2020. Jordan Water Sector Facts and Figures. [2023-12-15]. https://www.pseau.org/outils/ouvrages/mwi_jordan_water_sector_facts_and_figures_2015.pdf.
[34]   Pettitt A N. 1979. A non-parametric approach to the change-point detection. Journal of the Royal Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28: 126-135.
[35]   Refsgaard J C. 1997. Parameterisation, calibration, and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 198(1-4): 69-97.
[36]   Sada A A, Abu-Allaban M, Al-Malabeh A. 2015. Temporal and spatial analysis of climate change at Northern Jordanian Badia. Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7(2): 87-93.
[37]   Santhi C, Arnold J G, Williams J R, et al. 2001. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(5): 1169-1188.
[38]   Shammout M W, Shatanawi K, Abualhaija M M. 2023a. Influence of population growth on supply, demand, and quality issues of water resources in the Yarmouk River Basin in Jordan. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 11(1): 171-178.
[39]   Shammout M W, Shatanawi K, Zamil M A, et al. 2023b. A long-term estimation and modeling of domestic water resources in the Yarmouk River Basin-Jordan. Water Conservation and Management, 7(2): 107-113.
[40]   Shatanawi K, Rahbeh M, Shatanawi M. 2013. Characterizing, monitoring, and forecasting drought in the Jordan River basin. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 5(12): 1192-1202.
[41]   UNICEF (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund). 2022. Tapped Out: The Costs of Water Stress in Jordan. [2023-12-16]. https://www.unicef.org/jordan/media/11356/file/water%20stress%20in%20Jordan%20report.pdf.
[42]   USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2017. Climate Change Risk Profile: Jordan-Fact Sheet. [2023-12-27]. https://www.climatelinks.org/sites/default/files/asset/document/2017_USAID_Climate%20Change%20Risk%20Profile_Jordan.pdf.
[43]   Von Neumann J. 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12(4): 367-395.
[44]   Williams J R, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, et al. 2008. History of model development at Temple, Texas. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53(5): 948-960.
[45]   WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2023. Past Eight Years Confirmed to Be the Eight Warmest on Record. [2023-12-31]. https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/past-eight-years-confirmed-be-eight-warmest-record.
[1] CHEN Zhuo, SHAO Minghao, HU Zihao, GAO Xin, LEI Jiaqiang. Potential distribution of Haloxylon ammodendron in Central Asia under climate change[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1255-1269.
[2] SUN Chao, BAI Xuelian, WANG Xinping, ZHAO Wenzhi, WEI Lemin. Response of vegetation variation to climate change and human activities in the Shiyang River Basin of China during 2001-2022[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1044-1061.
[3] YAN Yujie, CHENG Yiben, XIN Zhiming, ZHOU Junyu, ZHOU Mengyao, WANG Xiaoyu. Impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation dynamics on the Mongolian Plateau, East Asia from 2000 to 2023[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1062-1079.
[4] YANG Jianhua, LI Yaqian, ZHOU Lei, ZHANG Zhenqing, ZHOU Hongkui, WU Jianjun. Effects of temperature and precipitation on drought trends in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1098-1117.
[5] HAN Qifei, XU Wei, LI Chaofan. Effects of nitrogen deposition on the carbon budget and water stress in Central Asia under climate change[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1118-1129.
[6] WANG Tongxia, CHEN Fulong, LONG Aihua, ZHANG Zhengyong, HE Chaofei, LYU Tingbo, LIU Bo, HUANG Yanhao. Glacier area change and its impact on runoff in the Manas River Basin, Northwest China from 2000 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 877-894.
[7] DU Lan, TIAN Shengchuan, ZHAO Nan, ZHANG Bin, MU Xiaohan, TANG Lisong, ZHENG Xinjun, LI Yan. Climate and topography regulate the spatial pattern of soil salinization and its effects on shrub community structure in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 925-942.
[8] Haq S MARIFATUL, Darwish MOHAMMED, Waheed MUHAMMAD, Kumar MANOJ, Siddiqui H MANZER, Bussmann W RAINER. Predicting potential invasion risks of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit in the arid area of Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 983-999.
[9] Seyed Morteza MOUSAVI, Hossein BABAZADEH, Mahdi SARAI-TABRIZI, Amir KHOSROJERDI. Assessment of rehabilitation strategies for lakes affected by anthropogenic and climatic changes: A case study of the Urmia Lake, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 752-767.
[10] LI Chuanhua, ZHANG Liang, WANG Hongjie, PENG Lixiao, YIN Peng, MIAO Peidong. Influence of vapor pressure deficit on vegetation growth in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 779-797.
[11] LU Haitian, ZHAO Ruifeng, ZHAO Liu, LIU Jiaxin, LYU Binyang, YANG Xinyue. Impact of climate change and human activities on the spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water area in Gansu Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 798-815.
[12] YANG Zhiwei, CHEN Rensheng, LIU Zhangwen, ZHAO Yanni, LIU Yiwen, WU Wentong. Spatiotemporal variability of rain-on-snow events in the arid region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(4): 483-499.
[13] XU Wenjie, DING Jianli, BAO Qingling, WANG Jinjie, XU Kun. Improving the accuracy of precipitation estimates in a typical inland arid area of China using a dynamic Bayesian model averaging approach[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 331-354.
[14] ZHANG Mingyu, CAO Yu, ZHANG Zhengyong, ZHANG Xueying, LIU Lin, CHEN Hongjin, GAO Yu, YU Fengchen, LIU Xinyi. Spatiotemporal variation of land surface temperature and its driving factors in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 373-395.
[15] WANG Baoliang, WANG Hongxiang, JIAO Xuyang, HUANG Lintong, CHEN Hao, GUO Wenxian. Runoff change in the Yellow River Basin of China from 1960 to 2020 and its driving factors[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(2): 168-194.