Effects of drip and flood irrigation on carbon dioxide exchange and crop growth in the maize ecosystem in the Hetao Irrigation District, China

doi:10.1007/s40333-024-0093-0

Journal of Arid Land

2024, Vol. 16

Issue (2): 282-297 DOI: 10.1007/s40333-024-0093-0 CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-024-0093-0

Research article

Effects of drip and flood irrigation on carbon dioxide exchange and crop growth in the maize ecosystem in the Hetao Irrigation District, China

LI Chaoqun¹, HAN Wenting²^,³^,^*(

), PENG Manman¹

¹College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Heze University, Heze 274015, China
²College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
³Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

Download:

HTML

PDF(2250KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Drip irrigation and flood irrigation are major irrigation methods for maize crops in the Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. This research delves into the effects of these irrigation methods on carbon dioxide (CO₂) exchange and crop growth in this region. The experimental site was divided into drip and flood irrigation zones. The irrigation schedules of this study aligned with the local commonly used irrigation schedule. We employed a developed chamber system to measure the diurnal CO₂ exchange of maize plants during various growth stages under both drip and flood irrigation methods. From May to September in 2020 and 2021, two sets of repeated experiments were conducted. In each experiment, a total of nine measurements of CO₂ exchange were performed to obtain carbon exchange data at different growth stages of maize crop. During each CO₂ exchange measurement event, CO₂ flux data were collected every two hours over a day-long period to capture the diurnal variations in CO₂ exchange. During each CO₂ exchange measurement event, the biological parameters (aboveground biomass and crop growth rate) of maize and environmental parameters (including air humidity, air temperature, precipitation, soil water content, and photosynthetically active radiation) were measured. The results indicated a V-shaped trend in net ecosystem CO₂ exchange in daytime, reducing slowly at night, while the net assimilation rate (net primary productivity) exhibited a contrasting trend. Notably, compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation demonstrated significantly higher average daily soil CO₂ emission and greater average daily CO₂ absorption by maize plants. Consequently, within the maize ecosystem, drip irrigation appeared more conducive to absorbing atmospheric CO₂. Furthermore, drip irrigation demonstrated a faster crop growth rate and increased aboveground biomass compared with flood irrigation. A strong linear relationship existed between leaf area index and light utilization efficiency, irrespective of the irrigation method. Notably, drip irrigation displayed superior light use efficiency compared with flood irrigation. The final yield results corroborated these findings, indicating that drip irrigation yielded higher harvest index and overall yield than flood irrigation. The results of this study provide a basis for the selection of optimal irrigation methods commonly used in the Hetao Irrigation District. This research also serves as a reference for future irrigation studies that consider measurements of both carbon emissions and yield simultaneously.

Key words： carbon dioxide exchange maize growth drip irrigation harvest index net primary productivity Hetao Irrigation District

Received: 14 August 2023 Published: 29 February 2024

Corresponding Authors: ^*HAN Wenting (E-mail: hwt@nwafu.edu.cn)

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Chaoqun
	HAN Wenting
	PENG Manman

Cite this article:

LI Chaoqun, HAN Wenting, PENG Manman. Effects of drip and flood irrigation on carbon dioxide exchange and crop growth in the maize ecosystem in the Hetao Irrigation District, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(2): 282-297.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-024-0093-0 OR http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2024/V16/I2/282

Fig. 1 Distribution of irrigation canals in the Hetao Irrigation District and the location of experimental site

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram showing the experimental fields with drip irrigation (a) and flood irrigation (b)

Fig. 3 Irrigation and fertilization schedule in 2020 (a) and 2021 (b). The solid arrow represents the fertilization time of drip irrigation and the dotted line arrow represents the fertilization time of flood irrigation.

Fig. 4 Chambers for measuring greenhouse gas CO₂ flux during nighttime (a) and daytime (b)

Fig. 5 Changes in meteorology, volumetric soil water content, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) during the maize growth period in 2020 and 2021. (a), daily average air humidity and average air temperature; (b), precipitation and soil water content at a depth of 10.00 cm (VWC₁₀); (c), average PAR value during daytime. DOY, day of year.

Fig. 6 Daily changes in net primary productivity (NPP), net ecosystem CO₂ exchange (NEE), and soil respiration (Rs) of maize ecosystem under drip and flood irrigation conditions in 2020. (a), DOY183 in 2020; (b), DOY193 in 2020; (c), DOY203 in 2020; (d), DOY211 in 2020; (e), DOY217 in 2020; (f), DOY227 in 2020; (g), DOY238 in 2020; (h), DOY248 in 2020; (i), DOY257 in 2020.

Fig. 7 Daily changes in NPP, NEE, and Rs of maize ecosystems under drip and flood irrigation conditions in 2021. (a), DOY185 in 2021; (b), DOY196 in 2021; (c), DOY204 in 2021; (d), DOY213 in 2021; (e), DOY219 in 2021; (f), DOY228 in 2021; (g), DOY239 in 2021; (h), DOY250 in 2021; (i), DOY258 in 2021.

Fig. 8 Changes in light response parameters of maize under drip and flood irrigation conditions during the maize growth period in 2020 (a) and 2021 (b). α represents an approximation of the canopy light use efficiency, and (β+γ)₂₀₀₀ represents the average maximum canopy light uptake capacity. α_FI, α value under flood irrigation condition; α_DI, α value under drip irrigation condition; (β+γ)_2000-FI, (β+γ)₂₀₀₀ value under flood irrigation condition; (β+γ)_2000-DI, (β+γ)₂₀₀₀ value under drip irrigation condition.

Fig. 9 Relationship between the main light response parameters and crop biological parameters. (a), relationship between α and leaf area index (LAI); (b), relationship between (β+γ)₂₀₀₀ and aboveground biomass (AGB).

Fig. 10 Variations in AGB and crop growth rate (CGR) in different growth periods of maize in 2020 (a) and 2021 (b). AGB_FI, AGB value under flood irrigation condition; AGB_DI, AGB value under drip irrigation condition; CGR_FI, CGR value under flood irrigation condition; CGR_DI, CGR value under drip irrigation condition.

Table 1 Main biological parameters of maize under drip and flood irrigation conditions in 2020 and 2021


[1]	Dong Q G, Yang Y C, Zhang T B, et al. 2018. Impacts of ridge with plastic mulch-furrow irrigation on soil salinity, spring maize yield and water use efficiency in an arid saline area. Agriculture Water Management, 201: 268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.011

[2]	Dugas W A, Heuer M L, Mayeux H S. 1999. Carbon dioxide fluxes over bermudagrass, native prairie, and sorghum. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93(2): 121-139. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00118-X

[3]	Elsgaard L, Görres C M, Hoffmann C C, et al. 2012. Net ecosystem exchange of CO₂ and carbon balance for eight temperate organic soils under agricultural management. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 162: 52-67. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.001

[4]	Flessa H, Wild U, Klemisch M, et al. 1998. Nitrous oxide and methane fluxes from organic soils under agriculture. European Journal of Soil Science, 49(2): 327-335. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.00156.x

[5]	Fu F B, Li F S, Kang S Z. 2017. Alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation improves water- and nitrogen- use efficiencies of sweet-waxy maize with nitrogen fertigation. Scientific Reports, 7: 17256, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17560-2. pmid: 29222451

[6]	Gao Y F, Zhao C Y, Ashiq M W, et al. 2019. Actual evapotranspiration of subalpine meadows in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 11(3): 371-384. doi: 10.1007/s40333-019-0012-y

[7]	Guo K, Liu X J. 2021. Reclamation effect of freezing saline water irrigation on heavy saline-alkali soil in the Hetao Irrigation District of North China. Catena, 204: 105420, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105420.

[8]	Guo S F, Qi Y C, Peng Q, et al. 2017. Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain. Journal of Arid Land, 9(2): 222-233. doi: 10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9

[9]	Ito A. 2011. A historical meta-analysis of global terrestrial net primary productivity: are estimates converging? Globle Change Biology, 17(10): 3161-3175.

[10]	Leghari S J, Hu K L, Wei Y C, et al. 2021. Modelling water consumption, N fates and maize yield under different water-saving management practices in China and Pakistan. Agriculture Water Management, 255: 107033, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107033.

[11]	Li C Q, Han W T, Peng M M, et al. 2020. Developing an automated gas sampling chamber for measuring variations in CO₂ exchange in a maize ecosystem at night. Sensors, 20(21): 6117, doi: 10.3390/s20216117.

[12]	Li C Q, Han W T, Peng M M. 2021a. Improving the spatial and temporal estimating of daytime variation in maize net primary production using unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 103: 102467, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102467.

[13]	Li C Q, Han W T, Peng M M, et al. 2021b. Abiotic and biotic factors contribute to CO₂ exchange variation at the hourly scale in a semiarid maize cropland. Science of the Total Environment, 784: 147170, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147170.

[14]	Li Y L, Tenhunen J, Mirzaei H, et al. 2008a. Assessment and up-scaling of CO₂ exchange by patches of the herbaceous vegetation mosaic in a Portuguese cork oak woodland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(8-9): 1318-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.03.013

[15]	Li Y L, Tenhunen J, Owen K, et al. 2008b. Patterns in CO₂ gas exchange capacity of grassland ecosystems in the Alps. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(1): 51-68. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.002

[16]	Limpens J, Berendse F, Blodau C, et al. 2008. Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications - a synthesis. Biogeosciences, 5(5): 1475-1491. doi: 10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008

[17]	Lindner S, Xue W, Nay-Htoon B, et al. 2016. Canopy scale CO₂ exchange and productivity of transplanted paddy and direct seeded rainfed rice production systems in S. Korea. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 228-229: 229-238. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.014

[18]	Otieno D O, Wartinger M, Nishiwaki A, et al. 2009. Responses of CO₂ exchange and primary production of the ecosystem components to environmental changes in a mountain peatland. Ecosystems, 12: 590-603. doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9245-5

[19]	Peng M M, Han W T, Li C Q, et al. 2021. Diurnal and seasonal CO₂ exchange and yield of maize cropland under different irrigation treatments in semiarid Inner Mongolia. Agricultural Water Management, 255: 107041, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107041.

[20]	Peng M M, Han W T, Li C Q, et al. 2022. Modeling the daytime net primary productivity of maize at the canopy scale based on UAV multispectral imagery and machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367: 133041, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133041.

[21]	Polifka S, Wiedner K, Glaser B. 2018. Increased CO₂ fluxes from a sandy Cambisol under agricultural use in the Wendland region, Northern Germany, three years after biochar substrates application. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 10(7): 432-443. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.2018.10.issue-7

[22]	Pu S H, Li G Y, Tang G M, et al. 2019. Effects of biochar on water movement characteristics in sandy soil under drip irrigation. Journal of Arid Land, 11(5): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s40333-019-0106-6

[23]	Tian D, Zhang Y Y, Mu Y J, et al. 2017. The effect of drip irrigation and drip fertigation on N₂O and NO emissions, water saving and grain yields in a maize field in the North China Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 575: 1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.166

[24]	Umair M, Hussain T, Jiang H B, et al. 2019. Water-saving potential of subsurface drip irrigation for winter wheat. Sustainability, 11(10): 2978, doi: 10.3390/su11102978.

[25]	Wachiye S, Merbold L, Vesala T, et al. 2021. Soil greenhouse gas emissions from a sisal chronosequence in Kenya. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 307: 108465, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108465.

[26]	Wei C C, Li F H, Yang P L, et al. 2019. Effects of irrigation water salinity on soil properties, N₂O emission and yield of spring maize under mulched drip irrigation. Water, 11(8): 1548, doi: 10.3390/w11081548.

[27]	Wei C C, Ren S M, Yang P L, et al. 2021. Effects of irrigation methods and salinity on CO₂ emissions from farmland soil during growth and fallow periods. Science of the Total Environment, 752: 141639, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141639.

[28]	Wu X D, Wang Z H, Guo L, et al. 2023. Timing and water temperature of drip irrigation regulate cotton growth and yield under film mulching in arid areas of Xinjiang. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 103(12): 5754-5769. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v103.12

[29]	Wu Y, Li F, Zheng H C, et al. 2019. Effects of three types of soil amendments on yield and soil nitrogen balance of maize-wheat rotation system in the Hetao Irrigation Area, China. Journal of Arid Land, 11(6): 904-915. doi: 10.1007/s40333-019-0005-x

[30]	Xi M, Zhang X L, Kong F L, et al. 2019. CO₂ exchange under different vegetation covers in a coastal wetland of Jiaozhou Bay, China. Ecological Engineering, 137: 26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.025

[31]	Xu Z Z, Zhou G S, Han G X, et al. 2018. The relationship between leaf and ecosystem CO₂ exchanges in a maize field. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40(8): 156, doi: 10.1007/s11738-018-2732-6.

[32]	Xue W, Jeong S, Ko J, et al. 2017. Linking canopy reflectance to crop structure and photosynthesis to capture and interpret spatiotemporal dimensions of per-field photosynthetic productivity. Biogeosciences, 14(5): 1315-1332. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-1315-2017

[33]	Yang W Z, Jiao Y, Yang M D, et al. 2021. Absorbed carbon dioxide in saline soil from northwest China. Catena, 207: 105677, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105677.

[34]	Zhang Q B, Yang L, Xu Z Z, et al. 2014. Effects of cotton field management practices on soil CO₂ emission and C balance in an arid region of Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 6(4): 468-477. doi: 10.1007/s40333-014-0003-y

[35]	Zhang Q Z, Wang C K, Zhou Z H. 2019. Does the net primary production converge across six temperate forest types under the same climate? Forest Ecology and Management, 448: 535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.035

[36]	Zhang W L, Chen S P, Chen J, et al. 2007. Biophysical regulations of carbon fluxes of a steppe and a cultivated cropland in semiarid Inner Mongolia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 146(3-4): 216-229. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.06.002

[37]	Zhao Y G, Pang H C, Wang J, et al. 2014. Effects of straw mulch and buried straw on soil moisture and salinity in relation to sunflower growth and yield. Field Crops Research, 161: 16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.006

[38]	Zogg G P, Zak D R, Burton A J, et al. 1996. Fine root respiration in northern hardwood forests in relation to temperature and nitrogen availability. Tree Physiology, 16(8): 719-725. pmid: 14871695

[1]	ZHU Haiqiang, WANG Jinlong, TANG Junhu, DING Zhaolong, GONG Lu. Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem services and driving factors in the Tianchi Bogda Peak Natural Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 816-833.

[2]	YAN Xue, LI Lanhai. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 1-19.

[3]	CHEN Limei, Abudureheman HALIKE, YAO Kaixuan, WEI Qianqian. Spatiotemporal variation in vegetation net primary productivity and its relationship with meteorological factors in the Tarim River Basin of China from 2001 to 2020 based on the Google Earth Engine[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(12): 1377-1394.

[4]	LI Cheng, WANG Qingsong, LUO Shuai, QUAN Hao, WANG Naijiang, LUO Xiaoqi, ZHANG Tibin, DING Dianyuan, DONG Qin'ge, FENG Hao. Reducing water and nitrogen inputs combined with plastic mulched ridge-furrow irrigation improves soil water and salt status in arid saline areas, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(8): 761-776.

[5]	SUN Lingxiao, YU Yang, GAO Yuting, ZHANG Haiyan, YU Xiang, HE Jing, WANG Dagang, Ireneusz MALIK, Malgorzata WISTUBA, YU Ruide. Temporal and spatial variations of net primary productivity and its response to groundwater of a typical oasis in the Tarim Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(11): 1142-1154.

[6]	Shenghai PU, Guangyong LI, Guangmu TANG, Yunshu ZHANG, Wanli XU, Pan LI, Guangping FENG, Feng DING. Effects of biochar on water movement characteristics in sandy soil under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 740-753.

[7]	Qinli XIONG, Yang XIAO, Waseem A HALMY Marwa, A DAKHIL Mohammed, Pinghan LIANG, Chenggang LIU, Lin ZHANG, PANDEY Bikram, Kaiwen PAN, B EL KAFRAWAY Sameh, Jun CHEN. Monitoring the impact of climate change andhuman activities on grassland vegetation dynamics in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateauof China during 2000-2015[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 637-651.

[8]	Jun ZHANG, Peng DONG, Haoyu ZHANG, Chaoran MENG, Xinjiang ZHANG, Jianwei HOU, Changzhou WEI. Low soil temperature reducing the yield of drip irrigated rice in arid area by influencing anther development and pollination[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(3): 419-430.

[9]	Tong HENG, Renkuan LIAO, Zhenhua WANG, Wenyong WU, Wenhao LI, Jinzhu ZHANG. Effects of combined drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage on water and salt transport of saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(6): 932-945.

[10]	Wei JIAO, Yaning CHEN, Weihong LI, Chenggang ZHU, Zhi LI. Estimation of net primary productivity and its driving factors in the Ili River Valley, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(5): 781-793.

[11]	Xiaotao HUANG, Geping LUO, Feipeng YE, Qifei HAN. Effects of grazing on net primary productivity, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in the grasslands of Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(4): 588-600.

[12]	Juan HU, Jinggui WU, Xiaojing QU. Decomposition characteristics of organic materials and their effects on labile and recalcitrant organic carbon fractions in a semi-arid soil under plastic mulch and drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(1): 115-128.

[13]	Shufang GUO, Yuchun QI, Qin PENG, Yunshe DONG, Yunlong HE, Zhongqing YAN, Liqin WANG. Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(2): 222-233.

[14]	WenXuan MAI, ChangYan TIAN, Li LI. Localized salt accumulation: the main reason for cotton root length decrease during advanced growth stages under drip irrigation with mulch film in a saline soil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(3): 361-370.

[15]	Wei ZHOU, ZhengGuo SUN, JianLong LI, ChengCheng GANG, ChaoBin ZHANG. Desertification dynamic and the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification in the Heihe River Basin based on NPP[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(4): 465-479.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed