Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2020, Vol. 12 Issue (3): 522-537    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-020-0122-6     CSTR: 32276.14.s40333-020-0122-6
Research article     
Market opportunities do not explain the ability of herders to meet livelihood objectives over winter on the Mongolian Plateau
BAI Haihua1, YIN Yanting1, Jane ADDISON2, HOU Yulu3, WANG Linhe4, HOU Xiangyang1,*()
1 Grassland Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huhhot 010010, China
2 CSIRO Land and Water, ATSIP, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
3 Agriculture Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4 College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
Download: HTML     PDF(790KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Drylands under pastoral land use are considered one of the most vulnerable social-ecological systems to global climate change, but the herders' abilities to adapt to the different extreme weather events have received little attention in the drylands. Herders on the Mongolian Plateau (MP; including Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China and Mongolia), have had a long history of adapting climatic variability and extreme weather events. However, it is unclear how changes such as increased levels of infrastructure and market integration affect the ability of herders to achieve the key livelihood objectives: the minimisation of the death and abortion rates of livestock in the winter. Here, we used remotely sensed and household survey data to map, model and explore the climate exposure and sensitivity of herders in the settled area (Inner Mongolia of China) and nomadic area (Mongolia) in the winter of 2012-2013. We aimed to quantify the multi-scaled characteristics of both climate exposure and sensitivity through the lens of key adaptive strategies utilized by herders. Our results showed that the higher levels of infrastructure and market integration, and the lower levels of remoteness on the MP did not increase the herders' ability to achieve the key livelihood objectives. Our results also suggested that exposure to the snow that is comparatively greater than the long-term average (cumulative exposure) may be more important in determining the social-ecological vulnerability than absolute exposure. We suggested that neither the risk management strategies available to these herders, nor the demographic variables, could compensate for the mode of production governing the pastoral systems. Our study could provide further evidence for the complex and scaled nature of climate exposure and sensitivity, and the results imply that any analysis of the relationship among exposure, sensitivity and vulnerability of pastoral households to climate change in the drylands will require a multi-scaled and interdisciplinary approach.



Key wordsclimate change      extreme weather events      adaptive strategies      vulnerability      households      winter      livelihood     
Received: 28 May 2018      Published: 10 May 2020
Corresponding Authors:
About author: *Corresponding authors: HOU Xiangyang (E-mail: houxy16@vip.126.com)

The first and second authors contributed equally to this work.

Cite this article:

BAI Haihua, YIN Yanting, Jane ADDISON, HOU Yulu, WANG Linhe, HOU Xiangyang. Market opportunities do not explain the ability of herders to meet livelihood objectives over winter on the Mongolian Plateau. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 522-537.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-020-0122-6     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2020/V12/I3/522

Variable Measurement item
Death rate Death rate of livestock (%). Death rate_SL (1) and death rate_LL (1): death rate of small and large livestock on the Mongolia Plateau, respectively. Death rate_SL (2) and death rate_LL (2): death rate of small and large livestock in the settled area, respectively. Death rate_SL (3) and death rate_LL (3): death rate of small and large livestock in the nomadic area, respectively. Death rate_SL (4) and death rate_LL (4): death rate of small and large livestock in the three sites (Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun) in the settled area, respectively. Death rate_SL (5) and death rate_LL (5): death rate of small and large livestock in Bayangol in the nomadic area, respectively.
Abortion rate Abortion rate of livestock (%). Abortion rate_SL (1) and abortion rate_LL (1): abortion rate of small and large livestock on the Mongolia Plateau, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (2) and abortion rate_LL (2): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the settled area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (3) and abortion rate_LL (3): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the nomadic area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (4) and abortion rate_LL (4): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the three sites (Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun) in the settled area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (5) and abortion rate_LL (5): abortion rate of small and large livestock in Bayangolin in the nomadic area, respectively.
Area code The settled area=1, and the nomadic area=2.
Latitude Latitude (°N).
Elevation Elevation above the sea level (m).
Education Highest education level of interviewers, which was classed into the following categories: 0=no education; 1=primary school; 2=junior high school; 3=senior high school; and 4=college education.
Age Age (a).
Snow clearing Presence of government facilitated clearing of snow around the homestead and winter shelter. 1, if there is snow clearing by government; 0, otherwise.
Shelter area Total floor area of winter shelter (m2).
Total forage Total dry weight of forage self-prepared and purchased by the household (kg).
Total fodder Total dry weight of fodder grown with or without irrigation and cut by the household (kg).
Livestock number Number of livestock owned by the household through the winter (sheep units).
Snow depth Snow depth in January (cm).
Access to road Distance from households to the nearest road (km).
Table 1 Quantitative variables elicited during the household survey
Fig. 1 Spatial and temporal distributions of snow depth in the winter of 2012-2013
Fig. 2 Total days (a) and longest days (b) of snow cover in the winter of 2012-2013
Fig. 3 Standard deviation between the snow depth in the winter of 2012-2013 and the mean snow depth during the period of 2002-2012
Area Site Proportion of herders impacted (%) Snow clearing percentage (%) Shelter area (m2)* Forage per sheep unit (kg) Fodder per sheep unit (kg) Livestock income (CNY)
Settled area Taibus 100 95 143
(0-300)
125
(0-333)
43
(4-181)
60,618
(5200-167,840)
Duolun 94 78 110
(0-300)
204
(0-333)
44
(5-108)
49,919
(0-180,240)
Zhenglan 97 69 111
(0-360)
199
(0-484)
53
(0-438)
114,556
(0-475,080)
Xilinhot 85 44 110
(30-600)
125
(0-191)
17
(1-78)
232,199
(50,700-630,656)
Abag 85 65 125
(0-400)
95
(0-450)
26
(0-150)
207,351
(21,400-660,120)
West Ujimqin 93 70 129
(0-400)
122
(0-350)
18
(2-130)
194,805
(20,375-772,800)
Mean 92 68 121
(0-600)
141
(0-484)
33
(0-438)
156,047
(0-772,800)
Nomadic area Bayandelger 31 23 35
(0-100)
3
(0-14)
5
(0-48)
164,982
(2704-1,244,745)
Sukhbaatar 50 46 69
(0-800)
4
(0-13)
1
(0-11)
37,759
(2272-102,370)
Undurkhaan 28 62 115
(0-600)
11
(1-15)
2
(0-21)
34,149
(4830-76,064)
Batnorov 10 52 79
(0-280)
9
(0-36)
3
(0-37)
44,597
(1080-193,345)
Bayangol 16 58 159
(0-900)
80
(5-694)
15
(0-144)
155,947
(1153-1,694,615)
Mean 27 38 91
(0-900)
21
(0-694)
5
(0-144)
85,797
(1081-1,694,615)
Table 2 Comparisons of parameters for key adaptive strategies utilized by herders in the winter of 2012-2013
Area Site Death rate Abortion rate
Small livestock Large livestock Small livestock Large livestock
Settled area Taibus 0.173 0.026 0.034 0.033
Duolun 0.111 0.043 0.031 0.045
Zhenglan 0.080 0.048 0.055 0.055
Xilinhot 0.077 0.001 0.069 0.003
Abag 0.067 0.020 0.076 0.040
West Ujimqin 0.073 0.015 0.029 0.019
Mean 0.089 0.025 0.053 0.036
Nomadic area Bayandelger 0.031 0.019 0.045 0.030
Sukhbaatar 0.050 0.000 0.099 0.074
Undurkhaan 0.054 0.023 0.097 0.056
Batnorov 0.034 0.002 0.007 0.037
Bayangol 0.006 0.000 0.026 0.000
Mean 0.033 0.006 0.019 0.006
Table 3 Death and abortion rates of small and large livestock in the winter of 2012-2013
Table 4 Regression results about the death and abortion rates of livestock in the winter of 2012-2013
Independent
variable
Settled area Nomadic area
Death
rate_SL (4)
Death
rate_LL (4)
Abortion
rate_SL (4)
Abortion
rate_LL (4)
Death
rate_SL (5)
Death
rate_LL
(5)
Abortion
rate_SL (5)
Abortion
rate_LL
(5)
Latitude -0.2611** 1.0208** -0.1407 1.0789* 0.0415 - 0.4415*** -
Elevation -170.3728 116.9581*** -29.2672 111.1882** 89.9787 - 796.9826 -
Education -52.6690** -12.4954 -3.3546 -13.3795 2.6314 - 24.9740 -
Age -3.4261* -1.1045 1.2161 -1.1117 -0.0207 - -0.2888 -
Snow clearing -27.3267 21.5546 19.8439 26.0318 6.2191 - -29.0801 -
Shelter area -0.4477* -0.2076 -0.1483 -0.2367 0.0106 - 0.0774 -
Total forage 0.0012* 0.0007* 0.0012*** 0.0007* -0.0001 - -0.0005 -
Total fodder 0.0048 0.0060*** 0.0003 0.0062*** 0.0001 - 0.0103* -
Livestock
number
-0.0539 -0.1192 0.0131 -0.1417 0.0065 - 0.0237 -
Access to road -6.3341* -3.2693* -0.0547 -3.2307 0.2663 - -3.8890* -
Snow depth -11.8029 1.9742 10.4069 1.2794 -9.2525 - -98.2392*** -
Constant 8139.3270 -6236.0630 1213.7350 -6051.7450 -4343.2620 - -38,271.3300 -
R2 0.2662 0.3091 0.2011 0.3015 0.1594 - 0.7307 -
Table 5 Regression results regarding the death and abortion rates of livestock in Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun in the settled area and in Bayangol in the nomadic area
[1]   Addison J.2012. Institutional settings, herder livelihoods and rangeland condition in the Gobi Desert. PhD Dissertation. Australia: University of Queensland.
[2]   Addison J, Brown C.2014. A multi-scaled analysis of the effect of climate, commodity prices and risk on the livelihoods of Mongolian pastoralists. Journal of Arid Environments, 109: 54-64.
[3]   Addison J, Greiner R.2016. Applying the social-ecological systems framework to the evaluation and design of payment for ecosystem service schemes in the Eurasian steppe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(12): 2421-2440.
[4]   Adger W N.1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2): 249-269.
[5]   Christensen J H, Krishna K K, Aldrian E, et al.2013. Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1240-1244.
[6]   Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al.2009. Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet, 373(9676): 1693-1733.
[7]   Ericksen A.2014. Depend on each other and don't just sit: The socialist legacy, responsibility, and winter risk among Mongolian herders. Human Organization, 73(1): 38-49.
[8]   Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Batbuyan B.2012. Cross-boundary and cross-level dynamics increase vulnerability to severe winter disasters (dzud) in Mongolia. Global Environmental Change, 22(4): 836-851.
[9]   Ford J D, Keskitalo E C H, Smith T, et al.2010. Case study and analogue methodologies in climate change vulnerability research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3): 374-392.
[10]   Ford J D.2012. Indigenous health and climate change. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7): 1260-1266.
[11]   Ford J D, McDowell G, Shirley J, et al.2013. The dynamic multiscale nature of climate change vulnerability: An Inuit harvesting example. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5): 1193-1211.
[12]   Gao Q, Zhang X S.1997. A simulation study of responses of the North-east China transect to elevated CO2 and climate change. Ecological Applications, 7(2): 470-483.
[13]   Gonzalez-Megias A, Menéndez R.2012. Climate change effects on above- and below-ground interactions in a dryland ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 367(1606): 3115-3124.
[14]   Hallegatte S.2009. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(2): 240-247.
[15]   Han J.2007. Meteorological factor analysis in snow disaster in the Middle East Pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia. Yinshan Academic Journal (Natural Science Edition), 21(3): 48-51. (in Chinese)
[16]   Han W J, Hou X Y, Olokhnuud C L, et al.2014. The characteristics of plant communities along East Eurasian Steppe Transect. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(6): 1157-1164.
[17]   Kelly P M, Adger W N.2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4): 325-352.
[18]   Langton M, Parsons M, Leonard S, et al.2012. National climate change adaptation research plan for indigenous communities. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF), Gold Coast, Australia.
[19]   Leichenko R, Silva J A.2014. Climate change and poverty: Vulnerability, impacts and alleviation strategies. Climate Change, 5(4): 539-556.
[20]   Li H, Li X, Zhang H.2006. Study about snow disaster grade in Chinese pastoral areas. Journal of Qinghai Meteorology, 1: 24-27. (in Chinese)
[21]   Li W J, Huntsinger L.2011. China's grassland contract policy and its impact on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks. Ecology and Society, 16(2): 1-14.
[22]   Liu Y, Cai Q F, Shi J F, et al.2005. Seasonal precipitation in the south-central Helan Mountain region, China, reconstructed from tree-ring width for the past 224 years. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(10): 2403-2412.
[23]   Lkhagvadorj D, Hauck M, Dulamsuren C, et al.2013. Pastoral nomadism in the forest-steppe of the Mongolian Altai under a changing economy and a warming climate. Journal of Arid Environments, 88: 82-89.
[24]   Marin A.2010. Riders under storms: Contributions of nomadic herders' observations to analysing climate change in Mongolia. Global Environmental Changes, 20(1): 162-176.
[25]   Middleton N, Rueff H, Sternberg T, et al.2014. Explaining spatial variations in climate hazard impacts in western Mongolia. Landscape Ecology, 30(1): 91-107.
[26]   World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Health synthesis. In: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
[27]   Moran E, Ojima D S, Buchman N, et al.2005. Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. In: IGBP (International Geosphere Biosphere Program) Report No. 53/International Human Dimensions Programme Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm.
[28]   Morton J F.2007. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50): 19680-19685.
[29]   Murphy D J.2014. Ecology of rule: Territorial assemblages and environmental governance in rural Mongolia. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3): 759-792.
[30]   Olonbayar M.2010. Livelihood Study of Herders in Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Society for Range Management, 11-16.
[31]   Pachauri R K, Reisinger A.2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 25-28.
[32]   Ranjeet J, Chen J Q, Ouyang Z, et al.2013. Vegetation response to extreme climate events on the Mongolian Plateau from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3): 035033, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035033.
[33]   Riggs G A, Hall D K, Salomonson V V.2006. MODIS snow products user guide to collection 5. Digital Media, 80(6): 1-80.
[34]   Sneath D.1998. State policy and pasture degradation in Inner Asia. Science, 281(5380): 1147-1148.
[35]   Souto T, Ticktin T.2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany, 66(2): 149-164.
[36]   Spickett J T, Brown H L, Katscherian D.2008. Health Impacts of Climate Change: Adaptation Strategies for Western Australia. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health, 9-16.
[37]   Stern P C, Ebi K L, Leichenko R, et al.2013. Managing risk with climate vulnerability science. Nature Climate Change, 3(7): 607-609.
[38]   Sternberg T.2010. Unravelling Mongolia's extreme winter disaster of 2010. Nomadic Peoples, 14(1): 72-86.
[39]   Sternberg T, Thomas D, Middleton N.2011. Drought dynamics on the Mongolian steppe, 1970-2006. International Journal of Climatology, 31(12): 1823-1830.
doi: 10.1002/joc.2195
[40]   Twyman C, Fraser E D G, Stringer L C, et al.2011. Climate science, development practice, and policy interactions in dryland agroecological systems. Ecology and Society, 16(3): 14, doi: 10.5751/ES-04261-160314.
[41]   Upton C.2012. Adaptive capacity and institutional evolution in contemporary pastoral societies. Applied Geography, 33(1): 135-141.
[42]   Vincent K.2007. Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Global Environmental Change, 17(1): 12-24.
[43]   Watson R T, Albritton D L, Barker T, et al.2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 44-48.
[44]   Wang J, Brown D G, Agrawal A.2013. Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods: A comparative study of herder communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, China. Global Environmental Change, 23(6): 1673-1683.
[45]   Wang Z, Sun Q, Chang B.2009. Grassland Disaster. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 188-191. (in Chinese)
[46]   Yeh E.2013. The politics of conservation in contemporary rural China. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(6): 1165-1188.
[47]   Zhen L, Li F, Yan H M, et al.2014. Herders' willingness to accept versus the public sector's willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China. Environmental Research Letters, 9(4): 045003, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003
[1] GUO Bing, XU Mei, ZHANG Rui, LUO Wei. A new monitoring index for ecological vulnerability and its application in the Yellow River Basin, China from 2000 to 2022[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1163-1182.
[2] CHEN Zhuo, SHAO Minghao, HU Zihao, GAO Xin, LEI Jiaqiang. Potential distribution of Haloxylon ammodendron in Central Asia under climate change[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1255-1269.
[3] SUN Chao, BAI Xuelian, WANG Xinping, ZHAO Wenzhi, WEI Lemin. Response of vegetation variation to climate change and human activities in the Shiyang River Basin of China during 2001-2022[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1044-1061.
[4] YAN Yujie, CHENG Yiben, XIN Zhiming, ZHOU Junyu, ZHOU Mengyao, WANG Xiaoyu. Impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation dynamics on the Mongolian Plateau, East Asia from 2000 to 2023[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1062-1079.
[5] YANG Jianhua, LI Yaqian, ZHOU Lei, ZHANG Zhenqing, ZHOU Hongkui, WU Jianjun. Effects of temperature and precipitation on drought trends in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1098-1117.
[6] HAN Qifei, XU Wei, LI Chaofan. Effects of nitrogen deposition on the carbon budget and water stress in Central Asia under climate change[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(8): 1118-1129.
[7] WANG Tongxia, CHEN Fulong, LONG Aihua, ZHANG Zhengyong, HE Chaofei, LYU Tingbo, LIU Bo, HUANG Yanhao. Glacier area change and its impact on runoff in the Manas River Basin, Northwest China from 2000 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 877-894.
[8] DU Lan, TIAN Shengchuan, ZHAO Nan, ZHANG Bin, MU Xiaohan, TANG Lisong, ZHENG Xinjun, LI Yan. Climate and topography regulate the spatial pattern of soil salinization and its effects on shrub community structure in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 925-942.
[9] Haq S MARIFATUL, Darwish MOHAMMED, Waheed MUHAMMAD, Kumar MANOJ, Siddiqui H MANZER, Bussmann W RAINER. Predicting potential invasion risks of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit in the arid area of Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(7): 983-999.
[10] Seyed Morteza MOUSAVI, Hossein BABAZADEH, Mahdi SARAI-TABRIZI, Amir KHOSROJERDI. Assessment of rehabilitation strategies for lakes affected by anthropogenic and climatic changes: A case study of the Urmia Lake, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 752-767.
[11] LI Chuanhua, ZHANG Liang, WANG Hongjie, PENG Lixiao, YIN Peng, MIAO Peidong. Influence of vapor pressure deficit on vegetation growth in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 779-797.
[12] LU Haitian, ZHAO Ruifeng, ZHAO Liu, LIU Jiaxin, LYU Binyang, YANG Xinyue. Impact of climate change and human activities on the spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water area in Gansu Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 798-815.
[13] YANG Zhiwei, CHEN Rensheng, LIU Zhangwen, ZHAO Yanni, LIU Yiwen, WU Wentong. Spatiotemporal variability of rain-on-snow events in the arid region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(4): 483-499.
[14] ZHANG Mingyu, CAO Yu, ZHANG Zhengyong, ZHANG Xueying, LIU Lin, CHEN Hongjin, GAO Yu, YU Fengchen, LIU Xinyi. Spatiotemporal variation of land surface temperature and its driving factors in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 373-395.
[15] WANG Baoliang, WANG Hongxiang, JIAO Xuyang, HUANG Lintong, CHEN Hao, GUO Wenxian. Runoff change in the Yellow River Basin of China from 1960 to 2020 and its driving factors[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(2): 168-194.