Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land
Journal of Arid Land  2020, Vol. 12 Issue (3): 522-537    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-020-0122-6
Research article     
Market opportunities do not explain the ability of herders to meet livelihood objectives over winter on the Mongolian Plateau
BAI Haihua1, YIN Yanting1, Jane ADDISON2, HOU Yulu3, WANG Linhe4, HOU Xiangyang1,*()
1 Grassland Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huhhot 010010, China
2 CSIRO Land and Water, ATSIP, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
3 Agriculture Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4 College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
Download: HTML     PDF(790KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Drylands under pastoral land use are considered one of the most vulnerable social-ecological systems to global climate change, but the herders' abilities to adapt to the different extreme weather events have received little attention in the drylands. Herders on the Mongolian Plateau (MP; including Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China and Mongolia), have had a long history of adapting climatic variability and extreme weather events. However, it is unclear how changes such as increased levels of infrastructure and market integration affect the ability of herders to achieve the key livelihood objectives: the minimisation of the death and abortion rates of livestock in the winter. Here, we used remotely sensed and household survey data to map, model and explore the climate exposure and sensitivity of herders in the settled area (Inner Mongolia of China) and nomadic area (Mongolia) in the winter of 2012-2013. We aimed to quantify the multi-scaled characteristics of both climate exposure and sensitivity through the lens of key adaptive strategies utilized by herders. Our results showed that the higher levels of infrastructure and market integration, and the lower levels of remoteness on the MP did not increase the herders' ability to achieve the key livelihood objectives. Our results also suggested that exposure to the snow that is comparatively greater than the long-term average (cumulative exposure) may be more important in determining the social-ecological vulnerability than absolute exposure. We suggested that neither the risk management strategies available to these herders, nor the demographic variables, could compensate for the mode of production governing the pastoral systems. Our study could provide further evidence for the complex and scaled nature of climate exposure and sensitivity, and the results imply that any analysis of the relationship among exposure, sensitivity and vulnerability of pastoral households to climate change in the drylands will require a multi-scaled and interdisciplinary approach.

Key words： climate change      extreme weather events      adaptive strategies      vulnerability      households      winter      livelihood     
Received: 28 May 2018      Published: 10 May 2020
Corresponding Authors: Xiangyang HOU     E-mail: houxy16@vip.126.com
About author: *Corresponding authors: HOU Xiangyang (E-mail: houxy16@vip.126.com)

The first and second authors contributed equally to this work.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Haihua BAI
Yanting YIN
ADDISON Jane
Yulu HOU
Linhe WANG
Xiangyang HOU
Cite this article:

BAI Haihua, YIN Yanting, Jane ADDISON, HOU Yulu, WANG Linhe, HOU Xiangyang. Market opportunities do not explain the ability of herders to meet livelihood objectives over winter on the Mongolian Plateau. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 522-537.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-020-0122-6     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2020/V12/I3/522

Variable Measurement item
Death rate Death rate of livestock (%). Death rate_SL (1) and death rate_LL (1): death rate of small and large livestock on the Mongolia Plateau, respectively. Death rate_SL (2) and death rate_LL (2): death rate of small and large livestock in the settled area, respectively. Death rate_SL (3) and death rate_LL (3): death rate of small and large livestock in the nomadic area, respectively. Death rate_SL (4) and death rate_LL (4): death rate of small and large livestock in the three sites (Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun) in the settled area, respectively. Death rate_SL (5) and death rate_LL (5): death rate of small and large livestock in Bayangol in the nomadic area, respectively.
Abortion rate Abortion rate of livestock (%). Abortion rate_SL (1) and abortion rate_LL (1): abortion rate of small and large livestock on the Mongolia Plateau, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (2) and abortion rate_LL (2): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the settled area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (3) and abortion rate_LL (3): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the nomadic area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (4) and abortion rate_LL (4): abortion rate of small and large livestock in the three sites (Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun) in the settled area, respectively. Abortion rate_SL (5) and abortion rate_LL (5): abortion rate of small and large livestock in Bayangolin in the nomadic area, respectively.
Area code The settled area=1, and the nomadic area=2.
Latitude Latitude (°N).
Elevation Elevation above the sea level (m).
Education Highest education level of interviewers, which was classed into the following categories: 0=no education; 1=primary school; 2=junior high school; 3=senior high school; and 4=college education.
Age Age (a).
Snow clearing Presence of government facilitated clearing of snow around the homestead and winter shelter. 1, if there is snow clearing by government; 0, otherwise.
Shelter area Total floor area of winter shelter (m2).
Total forage Total dry weight of forage self-prepared and purchased by the household (kg).
Total fodder Total dry weight of fodder grown with or without irrigation and cut by the household (kg).
Livestock number Number of livestock owned by the household through the winter (sheep units).
Snow depth Snow depth in January (cm).
Access to road Distance from households to the nearest road (km).
Table 1 Quantitative variables elicited during the household survey
Fig. 1 Spatial and temporal distributions of snow depth in the winter of 2012-2013
Fig. 2 Total days (a) and longest days (b) of snow cover in the winter of 2012-2013
Fig. 3 Standard deviation between the snow depth in the winter of 2012-2013 and the mean snow depth during the period of 2002-2012
Area Site Proportion of herders impacted (%) Snow clearing percentage (%) Shelter area (m2)* Forage per sheep unit (kg) Fodder per sheep unit (kg) Livestock income (CNY)
Settled area Taibus 100 95 143
(0-300)		 125
(0-333)		 43
(4-181)		 60,618
(5200-167,840)
Duolun 94 78 110
(0-300)		 204
(0-333)		 44
(5-108)		 49,919
(0-180,240)
Zhenglan 97 69 111
(0-360)		 199
(0-484)		 53
(0-438)		 114,556
(0-475,080)
Xilinhot 85 44 110
(30-600)		 125
(0-191)		 17
(1-78)		 232,199
(50,700-630,656)
Abag 85 65 125
(0-400)		 95
(0-450)		 26
(0-150)		 207,351
(21,400-660,120)
West Ujimqin 93 70 129
(0-400)		 122
(0-350)		 18
(2-130)		 194,805
(20,375-772,800)
Mean 92 68 121
(0-600)		 141
(0-484)		 33
(0-438)		 156,047
(0-772,800)
Nomadic area Bayandelger 31 23 35
(0-100)		 3
(0-14)		 5
(0-48)		 164,982
(2704-1,244,745)
Sukhbaatar 50 46 69
(0-800)		 4
(0-13)		 1
(0-11)		 37,759
(2272-102,370)
Undurkhaan 28 62 115
(0-600)		 11
(1-15)		 2
(0-21)		 34,149
(4830-76,064)
Batnorov 10 52 79
(0-280)		 9
(0-36)		 3
(0-37)		 44,597
(1080-193,345)
Bayangol 16 58 159
(0-900)		 80
(5-694)		 15
(0-144)		 155,947
(1153-1,694,615)
Mean 27 38 91
(0-900)		 21
(0-694)		 5
(0-144)		 85,797
(1081-1,694,615)
Table 2 Comparisons of parameters for key adaptive strategies utilized by herders in the winter of 2012-2013
Area Site Death rate Abortion rate
Small livestock Large livestock Small livestock Large livestock
Settled area Taibus 0.173 0.026 0.034 0.033
Duolun 0.111 0.043 0.031 0.045
Zhenglan 0.080 0.048 0.055 0.055
Xilinhot 0.077 0.001 0.069 0.003
Abag 0.067 0.020 0.076 0.040
West Ujimqin 0.073 0.015 0.029 0.019
Mean 0.089 0.025 0.053 0.036
Nomadic area Bayandelger 0.031 0.019 0.045 0.030
Sukhbaatar 0.050 0.000 0.099 0.074
Undurkhaan 0.054 0.023 0.097 0.056
Batnorov 0.034 0.002 0.007 0.037
Bayangol 0.006 0.000 0.026 0.000
Mean 0.033 0.006 0.019 0.006
Table 3 Death and abortion rates of small and large livestock in the winter of 2012-2013
Table 4 Regression results about the death and abortion rates of livestock in the winter of 2012-2013
Independent
variable		 Settled area Nomadic area
Death
rate_SL (4)		 Death
rate_LL (4)		 Abortion
rate_SL (4)		 Abortion
rate_LL (4)		 Death
rate_SL (5)		 Death
rate_LL
(5)		 Abortion
rate_SL (5)		 Abortion
rate_LL
(5)
Latitude -0.2611** 1.0208** -0.1407 1.0789* 0.0415 - 0.4415*** -
Elevation -170.3728 116.9581*** -29.2672 111.1882** 89.9787 - 796.9826 -
Education -52.6690** -12.4954 -3.3546 -13.3795 2.6314 - 24.9740 -
Age -3.4261* -1.1045 1.2161 -1.1117 -0.0207 - -0.2888 -
Snow clearing -27.3267 21.5546 19.8439 26.0318 6.2191 - -29.0801 -
Shelter area -0.4477* -0.2076 -0.1483 -0.2367 0.0106 - 0.0774 -
Total forage 0.0012* 0.0007* 0.0012*** 0.0007* -0.0001 - -0.0005 -
Total fodder 0.0048 0.0060*** 0.0003 0.0062*** 0.0001 - 0.0103* -
Livestock
number		 -0.0539 -0.1192 0.0131 -0.1417 0.0065 - 0.0237 -
Access to road -6.3341* -3.2693* -0.0547 -3.2307 0.2663 - -3.8890* -
Snow depth -11.8029 1.9742 10.4069 1.2794 -9.2525 - -98.2392*** -
Constant 8139.3270 -6236.0630 1213.7350 -6051.7450 -4343.2620 - -38,271.3300 -
R2 0.2662 0.3091 0.2011 0.3015 0.1594 - 0.7307 -
Table 5 Regression results regarding the death and abortion rates of livestock in Taibus, Zhenglan and Duolun in the settled area and in Bayangol in the nomadic area
[1]   Addison J.2012. Institutional settings, herder livelihoods and rangeland condition in the Gobi Desert. PhD Dissertation. Australia: University of Queensland.
[2]   Addison J, Brown C.2014. A multi-scaled analysis of the effect of climate, commodity prices and risk on the livelihoods of Mongolian pastoralists. Journal of Arid Environments, 109: 54-64.
[3]   Addison J, Greiner R.2016. Applying the social-ecological systems framework to the evaluation and design of payment for ecosystem service schemes in the Eurasian steppe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(12): 2421-2440.
[4]   Adger W N.1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2): 249-269.
[5]   Christensen J H, Krishna K K, Aldrian E, et al.2013. Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1240-1244.
[6]   Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al.2009. Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet, 373(9676): 1693-1733.
[7]   Ericksen A.2014. Depend on each other and don't just sit: The socialist legacy, responsibility, and winter risk among Mongolian herders. Human Organization, 73(1): 38-49.
[8]   Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Batbuyan B.2012. Cross-boundary and cross-level dynamics increase vulnerability to severe winter disasters (dzud) in Mongolia. Global Environmental Change, 22(4): 836-851.
[9]   Ford J D, Keskitalo E C H, Smith T, et al.2010. Case study and analogue methodologies in climate change vulnerability research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3): 374-392.
[10]   Ford J D.2012. Indigenous health and climate change. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7): 1260-1266.
[11]   Ford J D, McDowell G, Shirley J, et al.2013. The dynamic multiscale nature of climate change vulnerability: An Inuit harvesting example. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5): 1193-1211.
[12]   Gao Q, Zhang X S.1997. A simulation study of responses of the North-east China transect to elevated CO2 and climate change. Ecological Applications, 7(2): 470-483.
[13]   Gonzalez-Megias A, Menéndez R.2012. Climate change effects on above- and below-ground interactions in a dryland ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 367(1606): 3115-3124.
[14]   Hallegatte S.2009. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(2): 240-247.
[15]   Han J.2007. Meteorological factor analysis in snow disaster in the Middle East Pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia. Yinshan Academic Journal (Natural Science Edition), 21(3): 48-51. (in Chinese)
[16]   Han W J, Hou X Y, Olokhnuud C L, et al.2014. The characteristics of plant communities along East Eurasian Steppe Transect. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(6): 1157-1164.
[17]   Kelly P M, Adger W N.2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4): 325-352.
[18]   Langton M, Parsons M, Leonard S, et al.2012. National climate change adaptation research plan for indigenous communities. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF), Gold Coast, Australia.
[19]   Leichenko R, Silva J A.2014. Climate change and poverty: Vulnerability, impacts and alleviation strategies. Climate Change, 5(4): 539-556.
[20]   Li H, Li X, Zhang H.2006. Study about snow disaster grade in Chinese pastoral areas. Journal of Qinghai Meteorology, 1: 24-27. (in Chinese)
[21]   Li W J, Huntsinger L.2011. China's grassland contract policy and its impact on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks. Ecology and Society, 16(2): 1-14.
[22]   Liu Y, Cai Q F, Shi J F, et al.2005. Seasonal precipitation in the south-central Helan Mountain region, China, reconstructed from tree-ring width for the past 224 years. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(10): 2403-2412.
[23]   Lkhagvadorj D, Hauck M, Dulamsuren C, et al.2013. Pastoral nomadism in the forest-steppe of the Mongolian Altai under a changing economy and a warming climate. Journal of Arid Environments, 88: 82-89.
[24]   Marin A.2010. Riders under storms: Contributions of nomadic herders' observations to analysing climate change in Mongolia. Global Environmental Changes, 20(1): 162-176.
[25]   Middleton N, Rueff H, Sternberg T, et al.2014. Explaining spatial variations in climate hazard impacts in western Mongolia. Landscape Ecology, 30(1): 91-107.
[26]   World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Health synthesis. In: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
[27]   Moran E, Ojima D S, Buchman N, et al.2005. Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. In: IGBP (International Geosphere Biosphere Program) Report No. 53/International Human Dimensions Programme Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm.
[28]   Morton J F.2007. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50): 19680-19685.
[29]   Murphy D J.2014. Ecology of rule: Territorial assemblages and environmental governance in rural Mongolia. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3): 759-792.
[30]   Olonbayar M.2010. Livelihood Study of Herders in Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Society for Range Management, 11-16.
[31]   Pachauri R K, Reisinger A.2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 25-28.
[32]   Ranjeet J, Chen J Q, Ouyang Z, et al.2013. Vegetation response to extreme climate events on the Mongolian Plateau from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3): 035033, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035033.
[33]   Riggs G A, Hall D K, Salomonson V V.2006. MODIS snow products user guide to collection 5. Digital Media, 80(6): 1-80.
[34]   Sneath D.1998. State policy and pasture degradation in Inner Asia. Science, 281(5380): 1147-1148.
[35]   Souto T, Ticktin T.2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany, 66(2): 149-164.
[36]   Spickett J T, Brown H L, Katscherian D.2008. Health Impacts of Climate Change: Adaptation Strategies for Western Australia. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health, 9-16.
[37]   Stern P C, Ebi K L, Leichenko R, et al.2013. Managing risk with climate vulnerability science. Nature Climate Change, 3(7): 607-609.
[38]   Sternberg T.2010. Unravelling Mongolia's extreme winter disaster of 2010. Nomadic Peoples, 14(1): 72-86.
[39]   Sternberg T, Thomas D, Middleton N.2011. Drought dynamics on the Mongolian steppe, 1970-2006. International Journal of Climatology, 31(12): 1823-1830.
doi: 10.1002/joc.2195
[40]   Twyman C, Fraser E D G, Stringer L C, et al.2011. Climate science, development practice, and policy interactions in dryland agroecological systems. Ecology and Society, 16(3): 14, doi: 10.5751/ES-04261-160314.
[41]   Upton C.2012. Adaptive capacity and institutional evolution in contemporary pastoral societies. Applied Geography, 33(1): 135-141.
[42]   Vincent K.2007. Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Global Environmental Change, 17(1): 12-24.
[43]   Watson R T, Albritton D L, Barker T, et al.2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 44-48.
[44]   Wang J, Brown D G, Agrawal A.2013. Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods: A comparative study of herder communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, China. Global Environmental Change, 23(6): 1673-1683.
[45]   Wang Z, Sun Q, Chang B.2009. Grassland Disaster. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 188-191. (in Chinese)
[46]   Yeh E.2013. The politics of conservation in contemporary rural China. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(6): 1165-1188.
[47]   Zhen L, Li F, Yan H M, et al.2014. Herders' willingness to accept versus the public sector's willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China. Environmental Research Letters, 9(4): 045003, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003
[1] BAI Jie, LI Junli, BAO Anmin, CHANG Cun. Spatial-temporal variations of ecological vulnerability in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(8): 814-834.
[2] WU Jun, DENG Guoning, ZHOU Dongmei, ZHU Xiaoyan, MA Jing, CEN Guozhang, JIN Yinli, ZHANG Jun. Effects of climate change and land-use changes on spatiotemporal distributions of blue water and green water in Ningxia, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(7): 674-687.
[3] WANG Yuejian, GU Xinchen, YANG Guang, YAO Junqiang, LIAO Na. Impacts of climate change and human activities on water resources in the Ebinur Lake Basin, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(6): 581-598.
[4] SA Chula, MENG Fanhao, LUO Min, LI Chenhao, WANG Mulan, ADIYA Saruulzaya, BAO Yuhai. Spatiotemporal variation in snow cover and its effects on grassland phenology on the Mongolian Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 332-349.
[5] Ayad M F AL-QURAISHI, Heman A GAZNAYEE, Mattia CRESPI. Drought trend analysis in a semi-arid area of Iraq based on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Normalized Difference Water Index and Standardized Precipitation Index[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 413-430.
[6] Adilov BEKZOD, Shomurodov HABIBULLO, FAN Lianlian, LI Kaihui, MA Xuexi, LI Yaoming. Transformation of vegetative cover on the Ustyurt Plateau of Central Asia as a consequence of the Aral Sea shrinkage[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(1): 71-87.
[7] HUANG Xiaotao, LUO Geping, CHEN Chunbo, PENG Jian, ZHANG Chujie, ZHOU Huakun, YAO Buqing, MA Zhen, XI Xiaoyan. How precipitation and grazing influence the ecological functions of drought-prone grasslands on the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, China?[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(1): 88-97.
[8] Farzaneh KHAJOEI NASAB, Ahmadreza MEHRABIAN, Hossein MOSTAFAVI. Mapping the current and future distributions of Onosma species endemic to Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(6): 1031-1045.
[9] Mahsa MIRDASHTVAN, Mohsen MOHSENI SARAVI. Influence of non-stationarity and auto-correlation of climatic records on spatio-temporal trend and seasonality analysis in a region with prevailing arid and semi-arid climate, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(6): 964-983.
[10] XU Bo, HUGJILTU Minggagud, BAOYIN Taogetao, ZHONG Yankai, BAO Qinghai, ZHOU Yanlin, LIU Zhiying. Rapid loss of leguminous species in the semi-arid grasslands of northern China under climate change and mowing from 1982 to 2011[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 752-765.
[11] FENG Jian, ZHAO Lingdi, ZHANG Yibo, SUN Lingxiao, YU Xiang, YU Yang. Can climate change influence agricultural GTFP in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China?[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 837-853.
[12] ZHOU Zuhao, HAN Ning, LIU Jiajia, YAN Ziqi, XU Chongyu, CAI Jingya, SHANG Yizi, ZHU Jiasong. Glacier variations and their response to climate change in an arid inland river basin of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 357-373.
[13] LI Xuemei, Slobodan P SIMONOVIC, LI Lanhai, ZHANG Xueting, QIN Qirui. Performance and uncertainty analysis of a short-term climate reconstruction based on multi-source data in the Tianshan Mountains region, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 374-396.
[14] QIAO Xianguo, GUO Ke, LI Guoqing, ZHAO Liqing, LI Frank Yonghong, GAO Chenguang. Assessing the collapse risk of Stipa bungeana grassland in China based on its distribution changes[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 303-317.
[15] Sheida DEHGHAN, Nasrin SALEHNIA, Nasrin SAYARI, Bahram BAKHTIARI. Prediction of meteorological drought in arid and semi-arid regions using PDSI and SDSM: a case study in Fars Province, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 318-330.