Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2026, Vol. 18 Issue (6): 1059-1075    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridl.2026.06.008    
Research article     
Effects of soil salinity on nitrogen fate and use efficiency in a maize (Zea mays L.) field under arid conditions
DU Linjuan1,2,3, GAO Tong1,2,3, CHEN Zhijun1,2,3, PAN Cunzhen1,2,3, HAN Jingwen1,2,3, TIAN Yu1,2,3, XIONG Yunwu1,2,3,*(), HUANG Guanhua1,2,3
1 State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Agricultural Water Resources, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2 Chinese-Israeli International Center for Research and Training in Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
3 Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Water-Saving and Water Resources, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1702KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Soil salinization is a critical factor influencing nitrogen dynamics and crop productivity in arid irrigated areas. In salt-affected areas, a significant mismatch exists between high nitrogen fertilizer input and low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). This research quantitatively evaluates the influence of soil salinity on the fate and distribution pathways of nitrogen, as well as the total nitrogen balance and NUE in maize (Zea mays L.) fields. A two-year field experiment was conducted in the Hetao Irrigation District, located in the upper reaches of the Yellow River basin, China, to monitor nitrogen loss pathways (N2O emissions, NH3 volatilization, and nitrogen leaching) and crop physiological responses under three salinity gradients (non-saline, slightly saline, and moderately saline). The results demonstrated that salinity stress significantly intensified the loss of reactive nitrogen, increasing the cumulative N2O emissions by 55.61%-283.05% and NH3 volatilization by up to 80.61%. Notably, nitrate leaching increased by 97.44%-248.93% in slightly saline fields, posing a higher environmental risk than in moderately saline fields. The accelerated loss of reactive nitrogen, coupled with suppressed maize growth and grain yield, led to a substantial decline in the partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer. Therefore, tailored water and fertilizer practices (e.g., precision irrigation, split fertilization or urease inhibitor application) are required in a salt-affected field to reduce reactive nitrogen losses and enhance NUE.



Key wordssoil salinity      maize growth      nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)      gaseous nitrogen loss      arid areas     
Received: 27 November 2025      Published: 30 June 2026
Corresponding Authors: * XIONG Yunwu (E-mail: yxiong@cau.edu.cn)
About author: First author contact:

Formal analysis and writing - original draft preparation: DU Linjuan; Writing - review and editing: GAO Tong; Investigation: CHEN Zhijun; PAN Cunzhen; HAN Jingwen; TIAN Yu; Resources: HUANG Guanhua; Conceptualization and funding acquisition: XIONG Yunwu. All authors approved the manuscript.

Cite this article:

DU Linjuan, GAO Tong, CHEN Zhijun, PAN Cunzhen, HAN Jingwen, TIAN Yu, XIONG Yunwu, HUANG Guanhua. Effects of soil salinity on nitrogen fate and use efficiency in a maize (Zea mays L.) field under arid conditions. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(6): 1059-1075.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1016/j.jaridl.2026.06.008     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2026/V18/I6/1059

Fig. 1 Meteorological data during the growing season of maize in 2022 and 2023
Soil depth (cm) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Soil texture Bulk density
(g/cm3)
Organic matter
(g/kg)
EC (μS/cm) pH
NS LS MS NS LS MS
0-20 50.83 41.32 7.85 Sandy loam 1.49 8.55 193.0 410.0 2351.0 8.76 9.38 8.84
20-40 46.32 50.35 3.33 1.53 8.80 220.0 545.0 922.0 9.01 9.52 9.20
Mean 48.58 45.84 5.59 1.51 8.68 206.5 477.5 1636.5 8.89 9.45 9.02
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of different salinized soils
Fig. 2 Soil water variation during the the growing seasons of maize in different salt-affected fields. (a-c), soil water contents at the 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm layers in 2022, respectively; (d-f), soil water contents at the 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm layers in 2023, respectively. NS, non-saline; LS, slightly saline; MS, moderately saline. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 3 Soil electrical conductivity (EC) variations during the growing seasons of maize in different salt-affected fields. (a-c), EC values at the 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm layers in 2022, respectively; (d-f), EC values at the 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm layers in 2023, respectively. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 4 Cumulative N2O emission and NH3 volatilization in different salt-affected fields in 2022 (a and c) and 2023 (b and d). Different lowercase letter indicates significant difference among different salt treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 5 Cumulative nitrogen (N) leaching during the maize growing seasons in different salt-affected fields. Different lowercase letter within the same year indicates significant difference among different salt treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 6 N uptake during the maize growing seasons in different salt-affected fields. Different lowercase letter within the same year indicates significant difference among different salt treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 7 Soil residual N at the depth of 0-100 cm after havevst in different salt-affected fields. Different lowercase letter within the same year indicates significant difference among different salt treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Year Treatment N fate (%)
Maize N uptake NH3 volatilization N2O emission N leaching Soil residual N
2022 NS 87.74±0.99a 0.41±0.09a 0.27±0.05b 1.61±0.53c 9.96±0.79b
LS 88.98±0.66a 0.37±0.06a 1.02±0.32a 5.51±0.63a 4.13±0.54c
MS 75.46±4.03b 0.26±0.07a 0.99±0.34a 3.95±0.75b 19.34±4.20a
2023 NS 93.77±5.78a 1.04±0.01b 0.53±0.18b 1.48±0.08b 6.50±0.13c
LS 77.61±0.97b 1.31±0.11a 0.96±0.06a 3.09±0.48a 17.03±0.33b
MS 71.45±1.54b 1.15±0.09ab 0.94±0.18a 2.95±0.52a 23.52±1.83a
Table 2 Nitrogen (N) fate and distribution in the maize-soil system under different salt-affected fields in 2022 and 2023
Fig. 8 Soil N surplus and deficit in different salt-affected fields. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different salt treatments in 2022 at P<0.05 level; and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different salt treatments in 2023 at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Fig. 9 Maize grwoth properties in different salt-affected fields. (a and b), leaf area index (LAI) in 2022 and 2023, respectively; (c and d), plant height in 2022 and 2023, respectively; (e and f), aboveground dry biomass in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicates significant differences among different salt treatments at P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.
Year Treatment Yield
(t/hm2)
ETa
(mm)
WUEET
(kg/(hm2•mm))
WUEIrrig
(kg/(hm2•mm))
PFPn
(kg/kg)
2022 NS 16.6±0.4a 634.1±13.6a 2.62±0.1a 3.95±0.1a 66.4±1.8a
LS 14.1±0.2b 599.6±12.6b 2.35±0.1b 3.36±0.1b 56.4±0.7b
MS 11.6±1.0c 586.5±13.9b 1.98±0.1c 2.76±0.2c 46.4±4.2c
2023 NS 14.9±0.6a 592.7±12.3a 2.51±0.1a 3.54±0.2a 59.5±2.6a
LS 14.0±0.4ab 584.1±6.7a 2.40±0.1a 3.34±0.1ab 56.1±1.8a
MS 12.4±1.6b 545.5±1.1b 2.27±0.3b 2.95±0.4b 49.6±2.6b
Table 3 Grain yield, actual water evapotranspiration (ETa), water use efficiency (WUE), and nitrogen use efficiency of maize under different salt-affected fields
[1]   Akhtar M, Hussain F, Ashraf M Y, et al. 2012. Influence of salinity on nitrogen transformations in soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43(12): 1674-1683.
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2012.681738
[2]   Arif Y, Singh P, Siddiqui H, et al. 2020. Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: An omic approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 156: 64-77.
doi: S0981-9428(20)30424-1 pmid: 32906023
[3]   Chen Z J, Li Y, Zhang X C, et al. 2022. Effects of lignite bioorganic product on sunflower growth, water and nitrogen productivity in saline-sodic farmlands at Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 271: 107806, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107806.
[4]   Chen Z J, Li Y, Hu M, et al. 2024. Soil aggregate stability helps construct a stable nitrogen fixation system in lignite-based amendment-driven saline-sodic soil remediation. Soil and Tillage Research, 240: 106090, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2024.106090.
[5]   Dias Freitas E, Lacerda C, Ferreira J F S, et al. 2017. Evidence of nitrogen and potassium losses in soil columns cultivated with maize under salt stress. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 22(8): 553-557.
doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n8p553-557
[6]   Franklin R B, Morrissey E M, Morina J C. 2017. Changes in abundance and community structure of nitrate-reducing bacteria along a salinity gradient in tidal wetlands. Pedobiologia, 60: 21-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.12.002
[7]   Gavrichkova O, Brykova R, Brugnoli E, et al. 2020. Secondary soil salinization in urban lawns: Microbial functioning, vegetation state, and implications for carbon balance. Land Degradation & Development, 31(17): 2591-2604.
doi: 10.1002/ldr.v31.17
[8]   Ghosh P K, Bandyopadhyay A K K, Manna M C, et al. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology, 95(1): 85-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.012 pmid: 15207300
[9]   Guo X W, Du S Y, Guo H J, et al. 2023. Long-term saline water drip irrigation alters soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community structure, and nitrogen transformations in cotton. Applied Soil Ecology, 182: 104719, doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104719.
[10]   Hassani A, Azapagic A, Shokri N. 2021. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nature Communications, 12: 6663, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3.
[11]   Hessini K, Issaoui K, Ferchichi S, et al. 2019. Interactive effects of salinity and nitrogen forms on plant growth, photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment in maize. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 139: 171-178.
doi: S0981-9428(19)30087-7 pmid: 30897508
[12]   Ivushkin K, Bartholomeus H, Bregt A K, et al. 2019. Global mapping of soil salinity change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231: 111260, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111260.
[13]   Kumar V, Wagenet R J. 1985. Salt effects on urea hydrolysis and nitrification during leaching through laboratory soil columns. Plant and Soil, 85: 219-227.
doi: 10.1007/BF02139626
[14]   Li C J, Xiong Y W, Cui Z, et al. 2020a. Effect of irrigation and fertilization regimes on grain yield, water and nitrogen productivity of mulching cultivated maize (Zea mays L.) in the Hetao Irrigation District of China. Agricultural Water Management, 232: 106065, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106065.
[15]   Li Y W, Xu J Z, Liu S M, et al. 2020b. Salinity-induced concomitant increases in soil ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission. Geoderma, 361: 114053, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114053.
[16]   Liao Q, Gu S J, Kang S Z, et al. 2022. Mild water and salt stress improve water use efficiency by decreasing stomatal conductance via osmotic adjustment in field maize. Science of The Total Environment, 805: 150364, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150364.
[17]   Mao R Z, Tian K X, Matsumoto S, et al. 1997. Salinity indicators of salt-affected soils and their relationship with chemical composition. Soils, 6(11): 326-330. (in Chinese)
[18]   Minhas P S, Ramos T B, Ben-Gal A, et al. 2020. Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues. Agricultural Water Management, 227: 105832, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105832.
[19]   Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 651-681.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 pmid: 18444910
[20]   Parihar P, Singh S, Singh R, et al. 2015. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22: 4056-4075.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1
[21]   Raij-Hoffman I, Dahan O, Dahlke H E, et al. 2024. Assessing nitrate leaching during drought and extreme precipitation: Exploring deep vadose-zone monitoring, groundwater observations, and field mass balance. Water Resources Research, 60(11): e2024WR037973, doi: 10.1029/2024WR037973.
[22]   Reddy N, Crohn D M. 2014. Effects of soil salinity and carbon availability from organic amendments on nitrous oxide emissions. Geoderma, 235-236: 363-371.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.07.022
[23]   Rodriguez P, Torrecillas A, Morales M A, et al. 2005. Effects of NaCl salinity and water stress on growth and leaf water relations of Asteriscus maritimus plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 53(2): 113-123.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.005
[24]   Sarrazin F J, Kumar R, Basu N B, et al. 2022. Characterizing catchment-scale nitrogen legacies and constraining their uncertainties. Water Resources Research, 58(4): e2021WR031587, doi: 10.1029/2021WR031587.
[25]   Shainberg I, Letey J. 1984. Response of soils to sodic and saline conditions. Hilgardia, 52(2): 1-57.
[26]   Shirazi M A, Boersma L. 1984. A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48: 142-147.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800010026x
[27]   Singh A. 2022. Soil salinity: A global threat to sustainable development. Soil Use and Management, 38(1): 39-67.
doi: 10.1111/sum.v38.1
[28]   Singh B, Bajwa M S. 1986. Studies on urea hydrolysis in salt affected soils. Fertilizer Research, 8: 231-240.
doi: 10.1007/BF01048624
[29]   Tardieu F, Simonneau T, Muller B. 2018. The physiological basis of drought tolerance in crop plants: A scenario-dependent probabilistic approach. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 69: 433-459.
[30]   Wankhade S D, Cornejo M J, Mateu-Andrés I, et al. 2013. Morpho-physiological variations in response to NaCl stress during vegetative and reproductive development of rice. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 323-333.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1075-y
[31]   Weissman G, Bel G, Ben-Gal A, et al. 2020. Increased irrigation water salinity enhances nitrate transport to deep unsaturated soil. Vadose Zone Journal, 19(1): e20041, doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20041.
[32]   Yu Y X, Zhao C Y, Zheng N G, et al. 2019. Interactive effects of soil texture and salinity on nitrous oxide emissions following crop residue amendment. Geoderma, 337: 1146-1154.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.012
[33]   Yu Y X, Li X, Zhao C Y, et al. 2020. Soil salinity changes the temperature sensitivity of soil carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. CATENA, 195: 104912, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104912.
[34]   Zhang L H, Song L P, Wang B C, et al. 2018. Co-effects of salinity and moisture on CO2 and N2O emissions of laboratory- incubated salt affected soils from different vegetation types. Geoderma, 332: 109-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.025
[35]   Zhang X, Davidson E A, Mauzerall D L, et al. 2015. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 528: 51-59.
doi: 10.1038/nature15743
[36]   Zhu H, Yang J S, Yao R J, et al. 2020. Interactive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil. CATENA, 190: 104527, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104527.
[37]   Zörb C, Geilfus C M, Dietz K J. 2019. Salinity and crop yield. Plant Biology, 1: 31-38.
[1] HUANG Cheng, HOU Shengtong, WANG Bao, SONG Yuchuan, Aikeremu ABULATIJIANG, MIN Jiuzhou, SHENG Jiandong, JIANG Ping'an, WANG Ze, CHENG Junhui. Effects of a combination of biochar and cow manure on soil nutrients and cotton yield in salinized fields[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(7): 1014-1026.
[2] NIU Jiqiang, LIU Zijian, CHEN Feiyan, LIU Gangjun, ZHOU Junli, ZHOU Peng, LI Hongrui, LI Mengyang. Variations of soil moisture and its influencing factors in arid and semi-arid areas, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(5): 624-643.
[3] LU Haitian, ZHAO Ruifeng, ZHAO Liu, LIU Jiaxin, LYU Binyang, YANG Xinyue. Impact of climate change and human activities on the spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water area in Gansu Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 798-815.
[4] TANG Xiaoyan, FENG Yongjiu, LEI Zhenkun, CHEN Shurui, WANG Jiafeng, WANG Rong, TANG Panli, WANG Mian, JIN Yanmin, TONG Xiaohua. Urban growth scenario projection using heuristic cellular automata in arid areas considering the drought impact[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(4): 580-601.
[5] LI Chaoqun, HAN Wenting, PENG Manman. Effects of drip and flood irrigation on carbon dioxide exchange and crop growth in the maize ecosystem in the Hetao Irrigation District, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(2): 282-297.
[6] Mohamed K EL-GHANNAM, Fatma WASSAR, Sabah MORSY, Mohamed HAFEZ, Chiter M PARIHAR, Kent O BURKEY, Ahmed M ABDALLAH. Controlled drainage in the Nile River delta of Egypt: a promising approach for decreasing drainage off-site effects and enhancing yield and water use efficiency of wheat[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 460-476.
[7] JING Bo, SHI Wenjuan, DIAO Ming. Nitrogen application levels based on critical nitrogen absorption regulate processing tomatoes productivity, nitrogen uptake, nitrate distributions, and root growth in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(10): 1231-1244.
[8] Besma ZARAI, Christian WALTER, Didier MICHOT, Jean P MONTOROI, Mohamed HACHICHA. Integrating multiple electromagnetic data to map spatiotemporal variability of soil salinity in Kairouan region, Central Tunisia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 186-202.
[9] LI Feng, LI Yaoming, ZHOU Xuewen, YIN Zun, LIU Tie, XIN Qinchuan. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 115-138.
[10] Abdulrahim M AL-ISMAILI, Moustafa A FADEL, Hemantha JAYASURIYA, L H Janitha JEEWANTHA, Adel AL-MAHDOURI, Talal AL-SHUKEILI. Potential reduction in water consumption of greenhouse evaporative coolers in arid areas via earth-tube heat exchangers[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 388-396.
[11] ZHANG Yongkun, HUANG Mingbin. Spatial variability and temporal stability of actual evapotranspiration on a hillslope of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(2): 189-204.
[12] MU Le, LU Yixiao, LIU Minguo, YANG Huimin, FENG Qisheng. Characterizing the spatiotemporal variations of evapotranspiration and aridity index in mid-western China from 2001 to 2016[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(12): 1230-1243.
[13] LIU Zhaogang, CHEN Zhi, YU Guirui, ZHANG Tianyou, YANG Meng. A bibliometric analysis of carbon exchange in global drylands[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(11): 1089-1102.
[14] Nadia KAMALI, Hamid SIROOSI, Ahmad SADEGHIPOUR. Impacts of wind erosion and seasonal changes on soil carbon dioxide emission in southwestern Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(4): 690-700.
[15] Pingping XUE, Xuelai ZHAO, Yubao GAO, Xingdong HE. Phenotypic plasticity of Artemisia ordosica seedlings in response to different levels of calcium carbonate in soil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(1): 58-65.