Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2020, Vol. 12 Issue (5): 791-805    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-020-0016-7
Research article     
Responses of Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. in the sandy and loamy soils to water stress
PEI Yanwu1,2, HUANG Laiming1,2,3,*(), SHAO Ming'an1,2,3, ZHANG Yinglong4
1Key Laboratory of Ecosystems Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2College of Natural Resources and Environment, State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
3College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4Shenmu Ecological Association, Shenmu 719399, China
Download: HTML     PDF(405KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      


Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. is a major species that is widely planted in afforested soils with different textures in the transitional zone between Mu Us Desert and Loess Plateau, China. However, the responses of A. pedunculata to increasing intensity of water stress in different textural soils are not clear. Here, we conducted a soil column experiment to evaluate the effects of different textures (sandy and loamy) on water consumption, water use efficiency (WUE), biomass accumulation and ecological adaptability of A. pedunculata under increasing water stress, i.e., 90% (±5%) FC (field capacity), 75% (±5%) FC, 60% (±5%) FC, 45% (±5%) FC and 30% (±5%) FC in 2018. A. pedunculata grown in the sandy soil with the lowest (30% FC) and highest (90% FC) water contents had respectively 21.3%-37.0% and 4.4%-20.4% less transpiration than those with other water treatments (45%-75% FC). In contrast, A. pedunculata transpiration in the loamy soil decreased with decreasing water content. The magnitude of decrease in transpiration increased with increasing level of water deficit (45% and 30% FC). Mean daily and cumulative transpirations of the plant were significantly lower in the sandy soil than in the loamy soil under good water condition (90% FC), but the reverse was noted under water deficit treatments (45% and 30% FC). Plant height, stem diameter and total biomass initially increased with decreasing water content from 90% to 75% FC and then declined under severe water deficit conditions (45% and 30% FC) in the sandy soil. However, these plant parameters decreased with decreasing water content in the loamy soil. WUE in the sandy soil was 7.8%-12.3% higher than that in the loamy soil, which initially increased with decreasing water content from 90% to 75% FC and then declined under water deficit conditions (45% and 30% FC). The study showed that plant transpiration, biomass production and WUE responded differentially to increasing intensity of water stress in the sandy and loamy soils. The contrasting responses of A. pedunculata to water stress in different textural soils can guide future revegetation programs in the northern region of Chinese Loess Plateau by considering plant adaptability to varying soil and water conditions.

Key wordssoil texture      water consumption      biomass production      water use efficiency      Loess Plateau     
Received: 14 January 2020      Published: 10 September 2020
Corresponding Authors:
About author: *Corresponding author: HUANG Laiming (E-mail:
Cite this article:

PEI Yanwu, HUANG Laiming, SHAO Ming'an, ZHANG Yinglong. Responses of Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. in the sandy and loamy soils to water stress. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(5): 791-805.

URL:     OR

Soil type BD (g/cm3) Ks (10°C, cm/h) FC (g/g) PSD (%) SOC
TN (g/kg) SOC/TN TP (g/kg) TN/TP
Clay Silt Sand
Sandy soil 1.65 13.44 0.15 5.15 31.28 63.58 2.07 1.32 1.57 1.38 0.96
Loamy soil 1.36 8.23 0.27 13.88 51.13 34.99 3.49 1.54 2.27 1.67 0.74
Table 1 Soil physical and chemical properties in the study area
Soil type Water treatment Range of soil water content (g/g) Average soil water content (g/g)
Sandy soil AW1 0.125?0.139 0.132
AW2 0.102?0.117 0.110
AW3 0.080?0.095 0.088
AW4 0.058?0.073 0.066
AW5 0.036?0.051 0.044
Loamy soil BW1 0.229?0.256 0.243
BW2 0.189?0.216 0.203
BW3 0.149?0.176 0.162
BW4 0.108?0.135 0.122
BW5 0.067?0.094 0.081
Table 2 Soil water contents under different textural soils and water treatments
Fig. 1 Daily evaporation (a) and transpiration (b and c) from May to September in 2018. A and B represent the sandy soil and loamy soil, respectively. W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 denote the five levels of water treatment, which are respectively 90% (±5%) FC (field capacity), 75% (±5%) FC, 60% (±5%) FC, 45% (±5%) FC and 30% (±5%) FC. AWμ and BWμ respectively represent mean daily transpiration of the sandy soil and loamy soil under different water treatments. The abbreviations are the same as in Figures 2-4. Bars represent standard errors.
Soil type Water treatment Mean daily transpiration (kg) Cumulative transpiration (kg)
Sandy soil AW1 0.152±0.020a 16.66±0.513a
AW2 0.195±0.039b 21.78±1.157b
AW3 0.196±0.021b 21.76±0.873bcd
AW4 0.179±0.040c 19.52±0.752cd
AW5 0.114±0.021e 12.08±0.664f
Mean 0.147 18.36
Loamy soil BW1 0.199±0.027b 21.04±0.996b
BW2 0.210±0.036b 22.36±0.574bc
BW3 0.192±0.024b 20.20±0.637d
BW4 0.090±0.016d 9.16±0.344e
BW5 0.054±0.014f 5.50±0.218g
Mean 0.132 15.65
Table 3 Mean daily and cumulative transpirations under different textural soils and water treatments
Fig. 2 Plant height (a and b) and stem diameter (c and d) of A. pedunculata from May to September in 2018 under different textural soils and water treatments. Bars represent standard errors.
Soil type Water treatment H (cm) D (mm)
Sandy soil AW1 46.3±3.5a 9.25±0.62a
AW2 61.2±4.7b 10.78±0.38a
AW3 73.5±5.2c 12.94±0.51b
AW4 66.2±5.1b 12.30±0.47b
AW5 58.5±4.3b 9.35±0.21a
Loamy soil BW1 89.6±7.8d 14.87±0.98c
BW2 74.5±6.7c 11.62±0.67ab
BW3 50.5±4.8a 10.62±0.43b
BW4 57.8±3.2ab 8.42±0.23a
BW5 57.1±2.8ab 8.35±0.20a
Table 4 Plant height (H) and stem diameter (D) under different textural soils and water treatments at the end of the growing season
Fig. 3 Aboveground (a) and belowground (b) biomasses, total biomass (c) and root to shoot ratio (d) of A. pedunculata under different textural soils and water treatments. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different water treatments within the same soil texture at P<0.05 level. Bars represent standard errors.
Fig. 4 Water use efficiency (WUE) of A. pedunculata under different textural soils and water treatments. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different water treatments within the same soil texture at P<0.05 level. The horizontal dashed line represents mean WUE under different water treatments.
[1]   Alberti G, Vicca S, Inglima I, et al. 2015. Soil C: N stoichiometry controls carbon sink partitioning between above-ground tree biomass and soil organic matter in high fertility forests. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8(2): 195-206.
doi: 10.3832/ifor1196-008
[2]   Blackman C J, Brodribb T J, Jordan G J. 2010. Leaf hydraulics and drought stress: response, recovery and survivorship in four woody temperate plant species. Plant, Cell and Environment, 32(11): 1584-1595.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02023.x pmid: 19627564
[3]   Blum A. 2009. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research, 112(2-3): 119-123.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009
[4]   Bozorov T A, Usmanov R M, Yang H L, et al. 2018. Effect of water deficiency on relationships between metabolism, physiology, biomass and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Arid Land, 10(3): 441-456.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-018-0009-y
[5]   Bui H, Maloney, E D. 2018. Changes in Madden-Julian oscillation precipitation and wind variance under global warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(14): 7148-7155.
doi: 10.1029/2018GL078504
[6]   Chen H S, Shao M A, Li Y Y. 2008. Soil desiccation in the Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma, 143(1-2): 91-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.013
[7]   Dolferus R, Ji X, Richards R. 2011. Abiotic stress and control of grain number in cereals. Plant Science, 181(4): 331-341.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.05.015
[8]   Duong T, Penfold C, Marschner P. 2012. Amending soils of different texture with six compost types: impact on soil nutrient availability, plant growth and nutrient uptake. Plant and Soil, 354(1-2): 197-209.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1056-8
[9]   Fang S M, Zhao C Y, Jian S Q. 2016. Canopy transpiration of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation forest in the Loess Plateau region of China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(5): 376-385.
doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5291-4
[10]   Feng X M, Fu B J, Piao S L, et al. 2016. Revegetation in China's loess plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1019-1022.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3092
[11]   Feng Z, Wang X, Wu G. 1999. The Biomass and Productivity of the Forestry Ecosystem in China. Beijing: Scientific Publishing, 18-39. (in Chinese)
[12]   Fu Y L, Ma H L, Chen S Y, et al. 2018. Control of proline accumulation under drought via a novel pathway comprising the histone methylase CAU1 and the transcription factor ANAC055. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(3): 579-588.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx419 pmid: 29253181
[13]   Gooding M J, Ellis R H, Shewry P R, et al. 2003. Effects of restricted water availability and increased temperature on the grain filling, drying and quality of winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 37(3): 295-309.
doi: 10.1006/jcrs.2002.0501
[14]   Huang L M, Shao M A. 2019. Advances and perspectives on soil water research in China's Loess Plateau. Earth-Science Reviews, 199: 102962.
doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102962
[15]   Huang L M, Shao M A, Pei Y W, et al. 2019. Review on biological characteristics and abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms and applications of Amygdalus pedunculata. Soils, 51(2): 217-223. (in Chinese)
[16]   ISSCAS (Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences). 1978. Methods for Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 55-150. (in Chinese)
[17]   Jiao L, Lu N, Sun G, et al. 2016. Biophysical controls on canopy transpiration in a black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) plantation on the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Ecohydrology, 9(6): 1068-1081.
doi: 10.1002/eco.v9.6
[18]   Jin S S, Wang Y K, Wang X, et al. 2019. Effect of pruning intensity on soil moisture and water use efficiency in jujube (Ziziphus jujube Mill.) plantations in the hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Journal of Arid Land, 11(3): 446-460.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-019-0129-z
[19]   Katerji N, Mastrorilli M. 2009. The effect of soil texture on the water use efficiency of irrigated crops: results of a multi-year experiment carried out in the Mediterranean region. European Journal of Agronomy, 30(2): 95-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.07.009
[20]   Kiani S P, Grieu P, Maury P, et al. 2007. Genetic variability for physiological traits under drought conditions and differential expression of water stress-associated genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114(2): 193-207.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0419-7
[21]   Korup K, Laerke P E, Baadsgaard H, et al. 2018. Biomass production and water use efficiency in perennial grasses during and after drought stress. Global Climate Bioenergy, 10(1): 12-27.
[22]   Kpoghomou B K, Sapra V T, Beyl C A. 2010. Sensitivity to drought stress of three soybean cultivars during different growth stages. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 164(2): 104-109.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1990.tb00793.x
[23]   Landi S, Hausman J F, Guerriero G, et al. 2017. Poaceae vs. abiotic stress: focus on drought and salt stress, recent insights and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(8): 1214-1223.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01214
[24]   Lei Z Y, Han J M, Yi X P, et al. 2018. Coordinated variation between veins and stomata in cotton and its relationship with water-use efficiency under drought stress. Photosynthetica, 56(4): 1326-1335.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-018-0847-z
[25]   Li Y, Wallach R, Cohen Y. 2002. The role of soil hydraulic conductivity on the spatial and temporal variation of root water uptake in drip-irrigated corn. Plant and Soil, 243(2): 131-142.
doi: 10.1023/A:1019911908635
[26]   Liberati D, Dedato G, Guidolotti G, et al. 2018. Linking photosynthetic performances with the changes in cover degree of three Mediterranean shrubs under climate manipulation. Oikos, 127(11): 1633-1645.
doi: 10.1111/oik.05263
[27]   Liu X, Fan Y Y, Long J X, et al. 2013. Effects of soil water and nitrogen availability on photosynthesis and water use efficiency of Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25(3): 585-595.
doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60081-3
[28]   Lu X L, Zhuang Q L. 2010. Evaluating evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems in the conterminous United States using MODIS and AmeriFlux data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(9): 1924-1939.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.04.001
[29]   Ma J, Li R Q, Wang H G, et al. 2017. Transcriptomics analyses reveal wheat responses to drought stress during reproductive stages under field conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 592-605.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00592 pmid: 28484474
[30]   Ma Y Q, An Y, Shui J F, et al. 2011. Adaptability evaluation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars on the Loess Plateau of China. Plant Science, 181(6): 638-643.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.003
[31]   Mao N, Huang L M, Shao M A. 2018. Vertical distribution of soil organic and inorganic carbon under different vegetation covers in two toposequences of Liudaogou watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 73: 479-491. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.2489/jswc.73.4.479
[32]   Mathobo R, Marais D, Steyn J M. 2017. The effect of drought stress on yield, leaf gaseous exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agricultural Water Management, 180: 118-125.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.005
[33]   Mi M X, Shao M A, Liu B X. 2016. Effect of rock fragments content on water consumption, biomass and water-use efficiency of plants under different water conditions. Ecological Engineering, 94: 574-582.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.044
[34]   Nelissen H, Sun X, Rymen B, et al. 2018. The reduction in maize leaf growth under mild drought affects the transition between cell division and cell expansion and cannot be restored by elevated gibberellic acid levels. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 16(2): 615-627.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12801 pmid: 28730636
[35]   Pei Y W, Huang L M, Jia X X, et al. 2018. Effects of drought stress on the physiological and ecological characteristics of Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. and Salix psammophila seedlings in soils with different texture on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 32(5): 237-242. (in Chinese)
[36]   Pei Y W, Huang L M, Jia X X, et al. 2019. Soil water availability and its influencing factors in soils under two types of shrubberies typical of the Loess Plateau. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 56(3): 627-637. (in Chinese)
[37]   Qin J, Xi W M, Alexander R, et al. 2016. Effects of forest plantation types on leaf traits of Ulmus pumila and Robinia pseudoacacia on the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Engineering, 97: 416-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.038
[38]   Quick W P, Chaves M M, Wendler R, et al. 1992. The effect of water stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in four species grown under field conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 15(1): 25-35.
doi: 10.1111/pce.1992.15.issue-1
[39]   Roncucci N, Nicoletta N, Bonari E, et al. 2015. Influence of soil texture and crop management on the productivity of miscanthus in the Mediterranean. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 7(5): 998-1008.
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.2015.7.issue-5
[40]   Shao M A, Wang Y Q, Xia Y H, et al. 2018. Soil drought and water carrying capacity for vegetation in the critical zone of the Loess Plateau: a review. Vadose Zone Journal, 17(1): 1-8.
doi: 10.2136/vzj2018.01.0021
[41]   Su Y Z, Wang J Q, Yang R, et al. 2015. Soil texture controls vegetation biomass and organic carbon storage in arid desert grassland in the middle of Hexi Corridor region in northwest china. Soil Research, 53(4): 366-376.
doi: 10.1071/SR14207
[42]   Sun W Y, Song X Y, Mu X M, et al. 2015. Spatiotemporal vegetation cover variations associated with climate change and ecological restoration in the loess plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 209-210(1): 87-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.002
[43]   Swain P, Raman A, Singh S P, et al. 2017. Breeding drought tolerant rice for shallow rainfed ecosystem of eastern India. Field Crops Research, 209: 168-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.007 pmid: 28775653
[44]   Taghvaeian S, Chavez J L, Bausch W C, et al. 2014. Minimizing instrumentation requirement for estimating crop water stress index and transpiration of maize. Irrigation Science, 32(1): 53-65.
doi: 10.1007/s00271-013-0415-z
[45]   Tang Y K, Xu W, Chen Y M, et al. 2018. Water use strategies for two dominant tree species in pure and mixed plantations of the semiarid Chinese Loess Plateau. Ecohydrology, 11(4): e1943.
doi: 10.1002/eco.v11.4
[46]   Tian G, Huang Y, Ying S. 1987. The soil physical properties with relation to the loess genesis in the loess region. Memoir of NISWC, Academic Sinica, 1: 1-12. (in Chinese)
[47]   Tramontini S, van Leeuwen C, Domec J, et al. 2013. Impact of soil texture and water availability on the hydraulic control of plant and grape-berry development. Plant and Soil, 368(1-2): 215-230.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1507-x
[48]   Verslues P E. 2017. Time to grow: factors that control plant growth during mild to moderate drought stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 40(2): 177-179.
doi: 10.1111/pce.v40.2
[49]   Wang S, Fu B J, Chen H B, et al. 2018. Regional development boundary of China's Loess Plateau: Water limit and land shortage. Land Use Policy, 74: 130-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.003
[50]   Wang W, Wang H L, Xiao X Z, et al. 2019. Wild almond (Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.) as potential nutritional resource for the future: studies on its chemical composition and nutritional value. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 13(1): 250-258.
doi: 10.1007/s11694-018-9939-5
[51]   Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. 2018. A new index to quantify dried soil layers in water-limited ecosystems: A case study on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geoderma, 322: 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.007
[52]   Wu Y Z, Huang M A, Warrington D N. 2011a. Growth and transpiration of maize and winter wheat in response to water deficits in pots and plots. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71(1): 65-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.015
[53]   Wu Y Z, Huang M B, Warrington D. 2011b. Responses of different physiological indices for maize (Zea mays) to soil water availability. Pedosphere, 21(5): 639-649.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60166-5
[54]   Xu B C, Xu W Z, Huang J, et al. 2011. Biomass allocation, relative competitive ability and water use efficiency of two dominant species in semiarid Loess Plateau under water stress. Plant Science, 181(6): 644-651.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.005
[55]   Yan W M, Zhong Y Q, Shangguan Z P. 2016. Evaluation of physiological traits of summer maize under drought stress. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 66(2): 133-140.
[56]   Yan W M, Zhong Y Q, Shangguan Z P. 2017. Rapid response of the carbon balance strategy in Robinia pseudoacacia and Amorpha fruticosa to recurrent drought. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 138: 46-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.03.009
[57]   Yu M Z, Zhang L L, Xu X X, et al. 2015. Impact of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties of calcaric regosols on the Loess Plateau, NW China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 178(3): 486-498.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201400090
[58]   Zarebanadkouki M, Ahmed M A, Carminati A. 2015. Hydraulic conductivity of the root-soil interface of lupin in sandy soil after drying and rewetting. Plant and Soil, 398(1): 1-14.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2671-6
[59]   Zhang X. 2002. Study on the composition of soil particles and texture zoning of the Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 3: 11-13. (in Chinese)
[60]   Zhang X B, Lei L, Lai J S, et al. 2018. Effects of drought stress and water recovery on physiological responses and gene expression in maize seedlings. Biomed Central Plant Biology, 18(1): 68-79.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1281-x pmid: 29685101
[61]   Zhang W Q, Wang Y Q, He K N, et al. 2008. Factors affecting transpiration of Pinus tabulaeformis in a semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 3(2): 194-199.
doi: 10.1007/s11461-008-0026-7
[1] Selam LJALEM, Emiru BIRHANE, Kassa TEKA, Daniel H BERHE. Parkland trees on smallholder farms ameliorate soil physical-chemical properties in the semi-arid area of Tigray, Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 1-13.
[2] WANG Jing, WEI Yulu, PENG Biao, LIU Siqi, LI Jianfeng. Spatiotemporal variations in ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies against the background of the gully control and land consolidation project on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 131-145.
[3] MA Xinxin, ZHAO Yunge, YANG Kai, MING Jiao, QIAO Yu, XU Mingxiang, PAN Xinghui. Long-term light grazing does not change soil organic carbon stability and stock in biocrust layer in the hilly regions of drylands[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(8): 940-959.
[4] Teame G KEBEDE, Emiru BIRHANE, Kiros-Meles AYIMUT, Yemane G EGZIABHER. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve biomass, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller under different water levels[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(8): 975-988.
[5] QIANG Yuquan, ZHANG Jinchun, XU Xianying, LIU Hujun, DUAN Xiaofeng. Stem sap flow of Haloxylon ammodendron at different ages and its response to physical factors in the Minqin oasis-desert transition zone, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(7): 842-857.
[6] ZHANG Yixin, LI Peng, XU Guoce, MIN Zhiqiang, LI Qingshun, LI Zhanbin, WANG Bin, CHEN Yiting. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of extreme precipitation on the Loess Plateau of China facing the precipitation process[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 439-459.
[7] Mohamed K EL-GHANNAM, Fatma WASSAR, Sabah MORSY, Mohamed HAFEZ, Chiter M PARIHAR, Kent O BURKEY, Ahmed M ABDALLAH. Controlled drainage in the Nile River delta of Egypt: a promising approach for decreasing drainage off-site effects and enhancing yield and water use efficiency of wheat[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 460-476.
[8] HAN Mengxue, ZHANG Lin, LIU Xiaoqiang. Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters improves wolfberry yield and economic benefits on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(11): 1376-1390.
[9] SUN Liquan, GUO Huili, CHEN Ziyu, YIN Ziming, FENG Hao, WU Shufang, Kadambot H M SIDDIQUE. Check dam extraction from remote sensing images using deep learning and geospatial analysis: A case study in the Yanhe River Basin of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 34-51.
[10] LIU Yulin, LI Jiwei, HAI Xuying, WU Jianzhao, DONG Lingbo, PAN Yingjie, SHANGGUAN Zhouping, WANG Kaibo, DENG Lei. Carbon inputs regulate the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in temperate forests[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(9): 1055-1068.
[11] WANG Yaobin, SHANGGUAN Zhouping. Formation mechanisms and remediation techniques for low-efficiency artificial shelter forests on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 837-848.
[12] WANG Fengjiao, FU Bojie, LIANG Wei, JIN Zhao, ZHANG Liwei, YAN Jianwu, FU Shuyi, GOU Fen. Assessment of drought and its impact on winter wheat yield in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(7): 771-786.
[13] SUN Dingzhao, LIANG Youjia, PENG Shouzhang. Scenario simulation of water retention services under land use/cover and climate changes: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 390-410.
[14] LI Panpan, WANG Bing, YANG Yanfen, LIU Guobin. Effects of vegetation near-soil-surface factors on runoff and sediment reduction in typical grasslands on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(3): 325-340.
[15] WU Huining, CUI Qiaoyu. High-frequency climatic fluctuations over the past 30 ka in northwestern margin of the East Asian monsoon region, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(12): 1331-1343.