Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2023, Vol. 15 Issue (1): 1-19    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-022-0074-0
Research article     
Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia
YAN Xue1,2, LI Lanhai1,2,3,4,5,*()
1State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
2Ili Station for Watershed Ecosystem Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xinyuan 835800, China
3CAS Research Centre for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Urumqi 830011, China
4Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Utilization in Arid Zone, Urumqi 830011, China
5University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Download: HTML     PDF(2281KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      


Land use/land cover (LULC) change and climate change are two major factors affecting the provision of ecosystem services which are closely related to human well-being. However, a clear understanding of the relationships between these two factors and ecosystem services in Central Asia is still lacking. This study aimed to comprehensively assess ecosystem services in Central Asia and analyze how they are impacted by changes in LULC and climate. The spatiotemporal patterns of three ecosystem services during the period of 2000-2015, namely the net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and soil retention, were quantified and mapped by the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) model, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model, and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Scenarios were used to determine the relative importance and combined effect of LULC change and climate change on ecosystem services. Then, the relationships between climate factors (precipitation and temperature) and ecosystem services, as well as between LULC change and ecosystem services, were further discussed. The results showed that the high values of ecosystem services appeared in the southeast of Central Asia. Among the six biomes (alpine forest region (AFR), alpine meadow region (AMR), typical steppe region (TSR), desert steppe region (DSR), desert region (DR), and lake region (LR)), the values of ecosystem services followed the order of AFR>AMR>TSR>DSR> DR>LR. In addition, the values of ecosystem services fluctuated during the period of 2000-2015, with the most significant decreases observed in the southeast mountainous area and northwest of Central Asia. LULC change had a greater impact on the NPP, while climate change had a stronger influence on the water yield and soil retention. The combined LULC change and climate change exhibited a significant synergistic effect on ecosystem services in most of Central Asia. Moreover, ecosystem services were more strongly and positively correlated with precipitation than with temperature. The greening of desert areas and forest land expansion could improve ecosystem services, but unreasonable development of cropland and urbanization have had an adverse impact on ecosystem services. According to the results, ecological stability in Central Asia can be achieved through the natural vegetation protection, reasonable urbanization, and ecological agriculture development.

Key wordsecosystem services      land use/land cover change      climate change      net primary productivity      water yield      soil retention      Central Asia     
Received: 30 March 2022      Published: 31 January 2023
Corresponding Authors: LI Lanhai     E-mail:
Cite this article:

YAN Xue, LI Lanhai. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 1-19.

URL:     OR

Fig. 1 Spatial patterns of elevation (a) and six biomes (b) in Central Asia. AFR, alpine forest region; AMR, alpine meadow region; TSR, typical steppe region; DSR, desert steppe region; DR, desert region; LR, lake region.
Fig. 2 Spatial distributions of the average annual temperature (a) and average annual precipitation (b) during the period of 2000-2015 in Central Asia
Fig. 3 Trends of the annual average temperature (a) and annual precipitation (b) during the period of 2000-2015 in each biome of Central Asia
Rainfed cropland Irrigated
Grassland Forest
2000 Rainfed cropland 373,662.88 3.38 4245.69 753.74 920.47 146.07 57.86
Irrigated cropland 0.00 232,996.33 1618.22 101.45 3482.09 124.18 19.91
Grassland 14,634.09 5773.17 2,224,851.37 3394.54 1759.50 3395.67 264.15
Forest land 176.22 121.93 1453.65 67,103.45 23.01 12.96 85.01
Urban land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3161.58 0.00 0.00
Bare land 195.57 2298.41 56,069.34 48.19 177.44 962,453.34 621.10
Water body 187.12 137.05 2143.70 440.84 3.76 19,614.26 104,579.04
Table 1 Land use/land cover (LULC) conversion matrix from 2000 to 2015 in Central Asia (unit: km2)
Fig. 4 Spatial patterns of land use/land cover (LULC) in 2000 (a) and 2015 (b) in Central Asia
Fig. 5 Spatial patterns of the NPP (a, b), water yield (d, e), and soil retention (g, h) in 2000 and 2015, as well as their changes between 2000 and 2015 (c, NPP; f, water yield; i, soil retention) in Central Asia. NPP, net primary productivity.
Fig. 6 Spatial distributions of relative importance of LULC change and climate change on the NPP (a), water yield (b), and soil retention (c) during the period of 2000-2015 in Central Asia
Fig. 7 Spatial distributions of the combined effect of LULC change and climate change on the NPP (a), water yield (b), and soil retention (c) during the period of 2000-2015 in Central Asia
NPP Water yield Soil retention Precipitation
Water yield 1.00**
Soil retention 1.00** 1.00**
Precipitation 1.00** 1.00** 1.00**
Temperature -0.54 -0.54 -0.54 -0.54
Table 2 Correlation coefficients among the NPP, water yield, soil retention, precipitation, and temperature at the biome scale in Central Asia
Fig. 8 Partial correlations of the NPP with temperature (a) and precipitation (b), partial correlations of water yield with temperature (c) and precipitation (d), and simple correlation between soil retention and temperature (e)
[1]   Akpoti K, Dossou-Yovo E R, Zwart S J, et al. 2021. The potential for expansion of irrigated rice under alternate wetting and drying in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Water Management, 247: 106758, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106758.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106758
[2]   Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: FAO, 103-156.
[3]   Ashrafi S, Kerachian R, Pourmoghim P, et al. 2022. Evaluating and improving the sustainability of ecosystem services in river basins under climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 806: 150702, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150702.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150702
[4]   Bai Y, Ochuodho T O, Yang J. 2019. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecological Indicators, 102: 51-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079
[5]   Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M, et al. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 341(6141): 45-50.
doi: 10.1126/science.1234379 pmid: 23828934
[6]   Cairns J, Niederlehner B R. 1995. Ecosystem health concepts as a management tool. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 4: 91-95.
doi: 10.1007/BF00044792
[7]   Carvalho R M, Szlafsztein C F. 2019. Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: the influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 245: 844-852.
doi: S0269-7491(18)30565-7 pmid: 30504036
[8]   Chen H, Zhang X P, Abla M, et al. 2018. Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA, 170: 141-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.006
[9]   Chen X, Bai J, Li X Y, et al. 2013. Changes in land use/land cover and ecosystem services in Central Asia during 1990-2009. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 116-127.
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.005
[10]   Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo F J, et al. 2019. Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Science of the Total Environment, 685: 1181-1192.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.275
[11]   Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R, et al. 1998. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 3-15.
doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
[12]   Costanza R, Groot R, Braat L, et al. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28: 1-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[13]   Covaleda S, Lancho J F G, García-Oliva F, et al. 2011. Land-use effects on the distribution of soil organic carbon within particle-size fractions of volcanic soils in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico). Soil Use and Management, 27(2): 186-194.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00341.x
[14]   Feng Z H, Wang L Q, Peng Q, et al. 2022. Effect of environmental factors on soil properties under different land use types in a typical basin of the North China Plain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344: 131084, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131084.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131084
[15]   Field C B, Behrenfeld M J, Randerson J T, et al. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 281(5374): 237-240.
doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237 pmid: 9657713
[16]   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2007. Soil Permeability. Rome, Italy. [2022-02-01].
[17]   Fu Q, Li B, Hou Y, et al. 2017. Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions: a case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Science of the Total Environment, 607-608: 633-646.
[18]   Gauthier T D. 2001. Detecting trends using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Environmental Forensics, 2(4): 359-362.
doi: 10.1080/713848278
[19]   Hoyer R, Chang H. 2014. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization. Applied Geography, 53: 402-416.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.023
[20]   Huxman T E, Snyder K, Tissue D T, et al. 2004. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141(2): 254-268.
pmid: 15338414
[21]   Jia G E, Shevliakova P, Artaxo N, et al. 2019. Land-climate interactions. In: Shukla P R, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, et al. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. [2022-02-01].
[22]   Jiao L, An W M, Li Z S, et al. 2020. Regional variation in soil water and vegetation characteristics in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106399, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106399.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106399
[23]   Jilili A, Ma L. 2015. Overview of Central Asian Environments. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 18-60. (in Chinese)
[24]   Keeler B L, Hamel P, McPhearson T, et al. 2019. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability, 2: 29-38.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
[25]   Kendall M G. 1949. Rank Correlation Methods. London, United Kingdom: Griffin, 140-141.
[26]   Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, et al. 2011. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecological Indicators, 11(2): 676-687.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007
[27]   Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature, 529(7584): 84-87.
doi: 10.1038/nature16467
[28]   Li G Y, Jiang C H, Zhang Y H, et al. 2021. Whether land greening in different geomorphic units are beneficial to water yield in the Yellow River Basin? Ecological Indicators, 120: 106926, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106926.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106926
[29]   Li J W, Dong S C, Li Y, et al. 2022. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services in the China-Mongolia-Russia economic corridor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 360: 132175, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132175.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132175
[30]   Li J Y, Chen H X, Zhang C. 2020. Impacts of climate change on key soil ecosystem services and interactions in Central Asia. Ecological Indicators, 116: 106490, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106490.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106490
[31]   Li J Y, Chen X, Kurban A, et al. 2021. Coupled SSPs-RCPs scenarios to project the future dynamic variations of water-soil-carbon-biodiversity services in Central Asia. Ecological Indicators, 129: 107936, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107936.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107936
[32]   Li J Y, Zhang C. 2021. Exploring the relationship between key ecosystem services and socioecological drivers in alpine basins: A case of Issyk-Kul Basin in Central Asia. Global Ecology and Conservation, 29: e01729, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01729.
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01729
[33]   Li S X, Liu Y, Yang H, et al. 2021. Integrating ecosystem services modeling into effectiveness assessment of national protected areas in a typical arid region in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 297: 113408, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113408.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113408
[34]   Li Z H, Deng X Z, Jin G, et al. 2020. Tradeoffs between agricultural production and ecosystem services: A case study in Zhangye, Northwest China. Science of The Total Environment, 707: 136032, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136032.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136032
[35]   Liu C Y, Dong X F, Liu Y Y. 2015. Changes of NPP and their relationship to climate factors based on the transformation of different scales in Gansu, China. CATENA, 125: 190-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.027
[36]   Liu R R, Dong X B, Wang X C, et al. 2021. Study on the relationship among the urbanization process, ecosystem services and human well-being in an arid region in the context of carbon flow: Taking the Manas river basin as an example. Ecological Indicators, 132: 108248, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108248.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108248
[37]   Lorencová E, Frélichová J, Nelson E, et al. 2013. Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 33: 183-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.012
[38]   Ma S, Li Y, Zhang Y H, et al. 2022. Distinguishing the relative contributions of climate and land use/cover changes to ecosystem services from a geospatial perspective. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108645, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108645.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108645
[39]   Mann H B. 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 13: 245-259.
doi: 10.2307/1907187
[40]   McCool D K, Foster G R, Mutchler C K, et al. 1989. Revised slope length factor for the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 32(5): 1571-1576.
doi: 10.13031/2013.31192
[41]   Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being:Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 5-14.
[42]   Mo K, Chen Q W, Chen C, et al. 2019. Spatiotemporal variation of correlation between vegetation cover and precipitation in an arid mountain-oasis river basin in northwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 574: 138-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.044
[43]   Muleta T T, Senbeta F, Abebe T. 2016. Land use/land cover analysis and ecosystem services valuation in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 26(2): 111-123.
doi: 10.1080/14728028.2016.1221780
[44]   Nearing M A, Pruski F F, O'Neal M R. 2004. Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: A review. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 59(1): 43-50.
[45]   Nelson E J, Kareiva P, Ruckelshaus M, et al. 2013. Climate change's impact on key ecosystem services and the human well-being they support in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(9): 483-893.
[46]   Olorunfemi F B, Raheem U. 2013. Floods and rainstorms impacts, responses and coping among households in Ilorin, Kwara Stat. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(4): 135-148.
[47]   Peng J, Tian L, Zhang Z M, et al. 2020. Distinguishing the impacts of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China. Ecosystem Services, 46: 101199, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101199.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101199
[48]   Pereira L S, Paredes P, Eholpankulov E D, et al. 2009. Irrigation scheduling strategies for cotton to cope with water scarcity in the Fergana Valley, Central Asia. Agricultural Water Management, 96(5): 723-735.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.013
[49]   Petrov G N, Normatov I S. 2010. Conflict of interests between water users in the Central Asian region and possible ways to its elimination. Water Resources, 37: 113-120.
doi: 10.1134/S0097807810010112
[50]   Poppenborg P, Koellner T. 2013. Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practices? An analysis of farmers' decision-making in a South Korean watershed. Land Use Policy, 31: 422-429.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.007
[51]   Qiu J Q, Huang T, Yu D Y. 2022. Evaluation and optimization of ecosystem services under different land use scenarios in a semiarid landscape mosaic. Ecological Indicators, 135: 108516, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108516.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108516
[52]   Qiu L, Wei X, Zhang X, et al. 2012. Soil organic carbon losses due to land use change in a semiarid grassland. Plant and Soil, 355: 299-309.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1099-x
[53]   Rafiei-Sardooi E, Azareh A, Shooshtari S J, et al. 2022. Long-term assessment of land-use and climate change on water scarcity in an arid basin in Iran. Ecologhical Modelling, 467: 109934, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109934.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109934
[54]   Rai R, Zhang Y, Paudel B, et al. 2018. Land use and land cover dynamics and assessing the ecosystem service values in the trans-boundary Gandaki river basin, Central Himalayas. Sustainability, 10(9): 3052, doi: 10.3390/su10093052.
doi: 10.3390/su10093052
[55]   Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1-48.
[56]   Reynolds J F, Kemp P R, Ogle K, et al. 2004. Modifying the 'pulse-reserve' paradigm for deserts of North America: Precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. Oecologia, 141(2): 194-210.
pmid: 15042457
[57]   Rimal B, Sharma R, Kunwar R, et al. 2019. Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 38: 100963, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100963.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100963
[58]   Sannigrahi S, Zhang Q, Joshi P K, et al. 2020. Examining effects of climate change and land use dynamic on biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services of a natural reserve region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257: 120424, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120424.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120424
[59]   Shangguan W, Dai Y J, Duan Q Y, et al. 2014. A global soil data set for earth system modeling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6(1): 249-263.
doi: 10.1002/2013MS000293
[60]   Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, et al. 2014. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford: Stanford University. [2022-05-15].
[61]   Sharpley A N, Williams J R. 1990. EPIC-Erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. model documentation. Unites States Department of Agriculture, 1768: 1-235.
[62]   Su S L, Xiao R, Jiang Z L, et al. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, 34: 295-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.001
[63]   Sun J, Du W P. 2017. Effects of precipitation and temperature on net primary productivity and precipitation use efficiency across China's grasslands. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 54(6): 881-897.
[64]   Sun S S, Liu X P, He Y H, et al. 2020. Responses of physiological characteristics of annual C 4 herbs to precipitation and wind changes in semi-arid sandy grassland, Northern China. Polish Journal of Ecology, 68(2): 121-131.
[65]   Tao Y, Li F, Wang R S, et al. 2015. Effects of land use and cover change on terrestrial carbon stocks in urbanized areas: a study from Changzhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103: 651-657.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.055
[66]   Trumbore S, Brando P, Hartmann H. 2015. Forest health and global change. Science, 349(6250): 814-818.
doi: 10.1126/science.aac6759 pmid: 26293952
[67]   van der Knijff J M, Jones R J A, Montanarella L. 2000. Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. Brussels, Belgium. [2022-02-01].
[68]   Vermeulen S J, Campbell B M, Ingram J S I. 2012. Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1): 195-222.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608
[69]   Vitousek P M, Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H, et al. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience, 36(6): 368-373.
doi: 10.2307/1310258
[70]   Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al. 1997. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494-499.
doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494
[71]   Vogel E, Donat M G, Alexander L V, et al. 2019. The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields. Environmental Research Letters, 14(5): 054010, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b
[72]   Wang J, Rich P M, Price K P. 2003. Temporal responses of NDVI to precipitation and temperature in the central Great Plains, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(11): 2345-2364.
doi: 10.1080/01431160210154812
[73]   Wang S J, Liu Z T, Chen Y X, et al. 2021. Factors influencing ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta, China: Spatiotemporal differentiation and varying importance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168: 105477, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105477.
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105477
[74]   Wei H J, Fan W G, Wang X C, et al. 2017. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: a review. Ecosystem Services, 25: 15-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
[75]   Weiskopf S R, Rubenstein M A, Crozier L G, et al. 2020. Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Science of The Total Environment, 733: 137782, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782
[76]   Wu D D, Xie X H, Tong J X, et al. 2020. Sensitivity of vegetation growth to precipitation in a typical afforestation area in the Loess Plateau: Plant-Water Coupled Modelling. Ecological Modelling, 430: 109128, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109128.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109128
[77]   Xu X L, Liu W, Scanlon B R, et al. 2013. Local and global factors controlling water-energy balances within the Budyko framework. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(23): 6123-6129.
doi: 10.1002/2013GL058324
[78]   Yang S T, Yu X Y, Ding J L, et al. 2017. A review of water issues research in Central Asia. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 79-93. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701007
[79]   Yu Y, Chen X, MALIK I, et al. 2021. Spatiotemporal changes in water, land use, and ecosystem services in Central Asia considering climate changes and human activities. Journal of Arid Land, 13(9): 881-890.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-021-0084-3
[80]   Yue D X, Zhou Y Y, Guo J J, et al. 2022. Ecosystem service evaluation and optimisation in the Shule River Basin, China. CATENA, 215: 106320, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106320.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106320
[81]   Zhang H M, Yang Q K, Li R, et al. 2013. Extension of a GIS procedure for calculating the RUSLE equation LS factor. Computers & Geosciences, 52: 177 -188.
doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.027
[82]   Zhang Y S, Lu X, Liu B Y, et al. 2021. Spatial relationships between ecosystem services and socioecological drivers across a large-scale region: a case study in the Yellow River Basin. Science of The Total Environment, 766: 142480, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142480.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142480
[83]   Zhou J, Fu B J, Gao G Y, et al. 2016. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA, 137: 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.015
[84]   Zhu W Q, Pan Y Z, Zhang J S. 2007. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing. Journal of Plant Ecology, 31(3): 413-424. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU Yifeng, GUO Bing, LU Miao, ZANG Wenqian, YU Tao, CHEN Donghua. Quantitative distinction of the relative actions of climate change and human activities on vegetation evolution in the Yellow River Basin of China during 1981-2019[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 91-108.
[2] ZHANG Yin, GULIMIRE Hanati, SULITAN Danierhan, HU Keke. Monitoring and analysis of snow cover change in an alpine mountainous area in the Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(9): 962-977.
[3] JIN Junfang, YIN Shuyan, YIN Hanmin. Impact of land use/land cover types on surface humidity in northern China in the early 21st century[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(7): 705-718.
[4] HUANG Xiaoran, BAO Anming, GUO Hao, MENG Fanhao, ZHANG Pengfei, ZHENG Guoxiong, YU Tao, QI Peng, Vincent NZABARINDA, DU Weibing. Spatiotemporal changes of typical glaciers and their responses to climate change in Xinjiang, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(5): 502-520.
[5] YAO Linlin, ZHOU Hongfei, YAN Yingjie, LI Lanhai, SU Yuan. Projection of hydrothermal condition in Central Asia under four SSP-RCP scenarios[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(5): 521-536.
[6] SUN Dingzhao, LIANG Youjia, PENG Shouzhang. Scenario simulation of water retention services under land use/cover and climate changes: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 390-410.
[7] WU Changxue, QIU Dexun, GAO Peng, MU Xingmin, ZHAO Guangju. Application of the InVEST model for assessing water yield and its response to precipitation and land use in the Weihe River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 426-440.
[8] ZHANG Zhen, GU Zhengnan, Hu Kehong, XU Yangyang, ZHAO Jinbiao. Spatial variability between glacier mass balance and environmental factors in the High Mountain Asia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(4): 441-454.
[9] WANG Hongwei, QI Yuan, LIAN Xihong, ZHANG Jinlong, YANG Rui, ZHANG Meiting. Effects of climate change and land use/cover change on the volume of the Qinghai Lake in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(3): 245-261.
[10] LI Feng, LI Yaoming, ZHOU Xuewen, YIN Zun, LIU Tie, XIN Qinchuan. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 115-138.
[11] ZHANG Xueting, CHEN Rensheng, LIU Guohua. Economic losses from reduced freshwater under future climate scenarios: An example from the Urumqi River, Tianshan Mountains[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 139-153.
[12] Mohadeseh AMIRI, Mosfata TARKESH, Mohammad SHAFIEZADEH. Modelling the biological invasion of Prosopis juliflora using geostatistical-based bioclimatic variables under climate change in arid zones of southwestern Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 203-224.
[13] CHEN Limei, Abudureheman HALIKE, YAO Kaixuan, WEI Qianqian. Spatiotemporal variation in vegetation net primary productivity and its relationship with meteorological factors in the Tarim River Basin of China from 2001 to 2020 based on the Google Earth Engine[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(12): 1377-1394.
[14] Kunal KARAN, Dharmaveer SINGH, Pushpendra K SINGH, Birendra BHARATI, Tarun P SINGH, Ronny BERNDTSSON. Implications of future climate change on crop and irrigation water requirements in a semi-arid river basin using CMIP6 GCMs[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(11): 1234-1257.
[15] WU Shupu, GAO Xin, LEI Jiaqiang, ZHOU Na, GUO Zengkun, SHANG Baijun. Ecological environment quality evaluation of the Sahel region in Africa based on remote sensing ecological index[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(1): 14-33.