Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2023, Vol. 15 Issue (12): 1455-1473    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-023-0074-8
Research article     
Evaluation of the water conservation function in the Ili River Delta of Central Asia based on the InVEST model
CAO Yijie1,2, MA Yonggang2,3,4,5,*(), BAO Anming6,7,8, CHANG Cun6,7,8, LIU Tie6,7,8
1College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
3College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
4Xinjiang Jinghe Observation and Research Station of Temperate Desert Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Jinghe 833300, China
5Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Education Ministry, Urumqi 830046, China
6State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
7University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
8Key Laboratory of GIS & RS Application, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China
Download: HTML     PDF(7283KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

The Ili River Delta (IRD) is an ecological security barrier for the Lake Balkhash and an important water conservation area in Central Asia. In this study, we selected the IRD as a typical research area, and simulated the water yield and water conservation from 1975 to 2020 using the water yield module of the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model. We further analyzed the temporal and spatial variations in the water yield and water conservation in the IRD from 1975 to 2020, and investigated the main driving factors (precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, land use/land cover change, and inflow from the Ili River) of the water conservation variation based on the linear regression, piecewise linear regression, and Pearson's correlation coefficient analyses. The results indicated that from 1975 to 2020, the water yield and water conservation in the IRD showed a decreasing trend, and the spatial distribution pattern was "high in the east and low in the west"; overall, the water conservation of all land use types decreased slightly. The water conservation volume of grassland was the most reduced, although the area of grassland increased owing to the increased inflow from the Ili River. At the same time, the increased inflow has led to the expansion of wetland areas, the improvement of vegetation growth, and the increase of regional evapotranspiration, thus resulting in an overall reduction in the water conservation. The water conservation depth and precipitation had similar spatial distribution patterns; the change in climate factors was the main reason for the decline in the water conservation function in the delta. The reservoir in the upper reaches of the IRD regulated runoff into the Lake Balkhash, promoted vegetation restoration, and had a positive effect on the water conservation; however, this positive effect cannot offset the negative effect of enhanced evapotranspiration. These results provide a reference for the rational allocation of water resources and ecosystem protection in the IRD.



Key wordswater conservation function      water yield      Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model      climate change      land use/land cover change (LUCC)      Ili River Delta      Lake Balkhash     
Received: 16 April 2023      Published: 31 December 2023
Corresponding Authors: *MA Yonggang (E-mail: mayg@xju.edu.cn)
Cite this article:

CAO Yijie, MA Yonggang, BAO Anming, CHANG Cun, LIU Tie. Evaluation of the water conservation function in the Ili River Delta of Central Asia based on the InVEST model. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(12): 1455-1473.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-023-0074-8     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2023/V15/I12/1455

Fig. 1 Overview of the Ili-Balkhash Basin based on the digital elevation model (DEM) (a) and spatial distribution of land use types in the Ili River Delta (IRD) in 2020 (b)
Data type Unit Data source/Parameter processing method
Precipitation mm The CRU TS4.04 data (1975-2020), a global annual precipitation dataset at the resolution of 0.5°×0.5° (http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/cru/data/cru_ts/).
Potential evapotranspiration mm The ERA5 data (1975-2020), a global annual evapotranspiration dataset at the resolution of 0.1°×0.1° (https://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/climate-reanalysis).
Land use data - The dataset (1990, 2010, 2015, and 2020) was provided by the Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (RESDC) (http://www.resdc.cn).
Soil depth mm HWSD version 1.1 soil data (2009) (https://data.apps.fao.org/).
Root depth mm Canadell et al. (1996); Sharp et al. (2018).
Biophysical table - The InVEST model.
PAWC - PAWC is the difference between the field water holding capacity and permanent wilting coefficient, which was calculated by empirical equations using data including the percentages of sand, silt, and clay, and organic matter content based on the HWSD version 1.1 soil data (Wang et al., 2021b).
Velocity coefficient - Referring to the InVEST model manual (Sharp et al., 2018).
Topographic index - Calculated from soil depth, percentage slope, and drainage area data.
Percentage slope % Percentage slope was based on DEM and calculated using the slope tool in ArcGIS.
Drainage area - Drainage area was based on DEM and calculated using the slope tool in ArcGIS.
Soil saturation conductivity mm/d Soil saturation conductivity was calculated in the Neuro Theta model using soil clay, silt, and coarse sand mass fractions based on the HWSD version 1.1 soil data (Li et al., 2022a).
Runoff m3 The discharge observation data (1975-2020) at hydrological stations along the Ili River were collected from the National Cryosphere Desert Data Center (http://www.ncdc.ac.cn).
NDVI - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (https://ladsweb.nascom.nasa.gov/search/) (1990-2020).
DEM m United States Geological Survey (https://www.usgs.gov/) (2020).
Water level m The water level data (1975-2020) of the Lake Balkhash were from Jason 1/2/3 altimetry satellite data (United States Geological Survey, https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/) and studies of Nakayama et al. (1997) and Long et al. (2011).
Table 1 Description of data sources and parameter processing methods used in this study
Lucode LULC_veg LULC_desc Root_depth (mm) Kc
1 1 Grassland 2500 0.65
2 0 Wetland 2000 1.20
3 0 Water body 1 0.90
4 1 Forest land 3000 1.00
5 1 Cropland 2000 0.85
6 0 Construction land 1 0.30
7 0 Unused land 100 0.50
Table 2 Biophysical parameters of land use types
Fig. 2 Comparison of the simulated water conservation volume from the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model and the measured water conservation volume from the surface runoff volume at the Uskerma hydrological station
Fig. 3 Temporal variations in the annual average water yield depth (a) and annual water conservation volume (b) of the IRD during 1975-2020
Fig. 4 Spatial distribution of the annual average water yield depth and annual average water conservation depth of the IRD in 1975 (a1 and b1), 1985 (a2 and b2), 1995 (a3 and b3), 2005 (a4 and b4), 2015 (a5 and b5), and 2020 (a6 and b6). Note that the blank area in each figure is the Lake Balkhash, and the calculations of the water yield depth and water conservation depth in the Lake Balkhash region were excluded.
Fig. 5 Spatial distribution of the water conservation volume variation in the IRD during 1975-2020
Fig. 6 Spatial distribution of average annual precipitation (a) and average annual potential evapotranspiration (b), temporal changes in annual precipitation (c) and annual potential evapotranspiration (d), and variations of precipitation (e) and potential evapotranspiration (f) at different water conservation depths in the IRD during 1975-2020. The different colors in Figure 6e and f represent the precipitation or potential evapotranspiration corresponding to different water conservation depths. The box plots represent the range of values for precipitation or potential evapotranspiration at different water conservation depths. Box boundaries indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers below and above the box indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively. The black horizontal line within each box indicates the median.
Fig. 7 Land use types and their area changes in the IRD from 1990 to 2020. (a1-a4), spatial distribution of land use types in 1990, 2000, 2015, and 2020; (b), the area of each land use type in 1990, 2000, 2015, and 2020; (c), the rate of change in area of each land use type from 1990 to 2020; (d), bar chart showing the land use transfer among different land use types from 1990 to 2020.
Fig. 8 Temporal variations in the annual water conservation volume and annual average NDVI from 1975 to 2020 (a1-a3), in the area and annual potential evapotranspiration from 1990 to 2020 (b1-b3), and in the water yield depth from 1975 to 2020 (c1-c3) for grassland, cropland and forest land in the IRD
Fig. 9 Spatial distribution of grassland (with different levels of coverage) and forest land in the IRD in 1990 (a), 2000 (b), 2015 (c), and 2020 (d)
Fig. 10 Temporal variations in the annual water conservation volume and annual runoff at the Uskerma hydrological station (a), and the changes of the water level of the Lake Balkhash (b) in the IRD from 1975 to 2020. The red line shows the connection between the maximum and minimum water levels during the period 1975-1990, reflecting sharp drop in the water level; the orange line shows the connection between the water level in 1990 and the maximum water level during the period 1990-2020, reflecting an increase in the water level.
[1]   Bai Y, Chu D, Tian L, et al. 2014. Assessing the importance of water conservation function in Wuhan City Circle. Journal of Geo-information Science, 16(2): 233-241. (in Chinese)
[2]   Bao Y B, Li T, Liu H, et al. 2016. Spatial and temporal changes of water conservation of Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi Province by InVEST model. Geographical Research, 35(4): 664-676. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201604006
[3]   Baral H, Keenan R J, Sharma S K, et al. 2014. Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in north-central Victoria, Australia. Ecological Indicators, 36: 552-562.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.022
[4]   Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B, et al. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108(4): 583-595.
doi: 10.1007/BF00329030 pmid: 28307789
[5]   Cao Y J, Ma Y G, Liu T, et al. 2022. Analysis of spatial-temporal variations and driving factors of typical tail-reach wetlands in the Ili-Balkhash Basin, Central Asia. Remote Sensing, 14(16): 3986, doi: 10.3390/rs14163986.
[6]   Deng K M, Shi P L, Xie G D, 2002. Water conservation of forest ecosystem in the upper reaches of Yangtze River and its benefits. Resources Science, 24(6): 68-73. (in Chinese)
[7]   Deng M J, Wang Z J, Wang J Y, 2011. Analysis of Balkhash Lake ecological water level evolvement and its regulation strategy. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 42(4): 403-413.
[8]   Fan L Y, Cai T Y, Wen Q, et al. 2023. Scenario simulation of land use change and carbon storage response in Henan Province, China: 1990-2050. Ecological Indicators, 154: 110660, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110660.
[9]   Gao Y H, Wang H L, Zhou X, et al. 2016. Remote sensing monitoring and analyses of the dynamic change of Balkhash Lake in the last 30 years. Environment and Sustainable Development, 41(1): 102-106. (in Chinese)
[10]   Guo L D, Xia Z Q, Wang Z J, 2011. Comparisons of hydrological variations and environmental effects between Aral Sea and Lake Balkhash. Advances in Water Science, 22(6): 764-770. (in Chinese)
[11]   Guo L D, Xia Z Q. 2014. Temperature and precipitation long-term trends and variations in the Ili-Balkhash Basin. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 115(1): 219-229.
doi: 10.1007/s00704-013-0883-3
[12]   Hong Y C, Bai L, Yu S L. 2018. Study on the change of water conservation function of Mu Chuan County. Technology Innovation and Application, (25): 91-92. (in Chinese)
[13]   Hu Y T, Zhang F, Luo Z Z, et al. 2023. Soil and water conservation effects of different types of vegetation cover on runoff and erosion driven by climate and underlying surface conditions. CATENA, 231: 107347, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107347.
[14]   Hu M, Sheng Y W. 2022. Study on variation characteristics of precipitation and water resources in Qingdao. Journal of China Hydrology, 42(1): 103-108, 28. (in Chinese)
[15]   Hu W M, Li G, Li Z N. 2021. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the water conservation function and its driving factors in regional lake wetlands—Two types of homogeneous lakes as examples. Ecological Indicators, 130: 108069, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108069.
[16]   Jia G Y, Hu W M, Zhang B, et al. 2022. Assessing impacts of the ecological retreat project on water conservation in the Yellow River Basin. Science of the Total Environment, 828: 154483, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154483.
[17]   Jin X. 2016. Study on the red line for water containment protection in typical semi-arid areas. MSc Thesis. Xi'an: Northwest University. (in Chinese)
[18]   Lee Rodgers J, Alan Nicewander W. 1988. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1): 59-66.
[19]   Li M Y, Liang D, Xia J, et al. 2021. Evaluation of water conservation function of Danjiang River Basin in Qinling Mountains, China based on InVEST model. Journal of Environmental Management, 286: 112212, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112212.
[20]   Li X, Cui X, He X F, et al. 2022a. Analyses of spatial and temporal characteristics of water conservation function in Qaidam Basin. Pratacultural Science, 39(4): 660-671. (in Chinese)
[21]   Li X, Zou C X, Chen Y M, et al. 2022b. Spatial-temporal pattern changes and driving factors of water conservation function in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2000 to 2019. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(5): 265-274. (in Chinese)
[22]   Li Y Y, Ma X S, Qi G H, et al. 2022c. Studies on water retention function of Anhui Province based on InVEST model of parameter localization. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 31(2): 313-325. (in Chinese)
[23]   Liu S. 2019. Wetland ecosystem services evaluation based on the InVEST model. MSc Thesis. Harbin: Harbin Normal University. (in Chinese)
[24]   Long A H, Deng M J, Xie L, et al. 2011. A study of the water balance of Lake Balkhash. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 33(6): 1341-1352. (in Chinese)
[25]   Luo G P, Wang Y G, Zhu L, et al. 2012. Influence mechanism of landscape structure in River Ili Delta. Arid Land Geography, 35(6): 897-908. (in Chinese)
[26]   Marquès M, Bangash R F, Kumar V, et al. 2013. The impact of climate change on water provision under a low flow regime: A case study of the ecosystem services in the Francoli River basin. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263: 224-232.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.049
[27]   Nakayama Y, Tanaka S, Sugimura T, et al. 1997. Analysis of hydrological changes in lakes of Asian arid zone by satellite data. Earth Surface Remote Sensing, 3222: 201-210.
[28]   Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.
doi: 10.1890/080023
[29]   Qiao X R, Li Z J, Lin J K, et al. 2023. Assessing current and future soil erosion under changing land use based on InVEST and FLUS models in the Yihe River Basin, North China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.07.001.
[30]   Sánchez-Canales M, López-Benito A, Passuello A, et al. 2012. Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem service valuation in a Mediterranean watershed. Science of the Total Environment, 440: 140-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.071
[31]   Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, et al. 2018. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project: Stanford University, University of Minnesota, the Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. [2022-12-17]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323832082_InVEST_User's_Guide.
[32]   Su C H, Fu B J. 2013. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global and Planetary Change, 101: 119-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.12.014
[33]   Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162: 265-283.
[34]   Wang H Y, Song J X, Wu Q. 2022a. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of water conservation function of Qinling Mountains under the background of climate change. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 36(5): 212-219. (in Chinese)
[35]   Wang J F, Wu T L, Li Q, et al. 2021a. Quantifying the effect of environmental drivers on water conservation variation in the eastern Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107493, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107493.
[36]   Wang J Y, Lu J Y. 2009. Hydrological and ecological impacts of water resources development in the Ili River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 24(7): 1297-1307. (in Chinese)
[37]   Wang N, Bi H X, Peng R D, et al. 2023. Disparities in soil and water conservation functions among different forest types and implications for afforestation on the Loess Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 155: 110935, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110935.
[38]   Wang X X, Shen H T, Li X Y, et al. 2013. Concepts, processes and quantification methods of the forest water conservation at the multiple scales. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(4): 1019-1030. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb
[39]   Wang Y F, Ye A Z, Peng D Z, et al. 2022b. Spatiotemporal variations in water conservation function of the Tibetan Plateau under climate change based on InVEST model. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 41: 101064, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101064.
[40]   Wang Z, Xue Z C, Wang L, et al. 2021b. Analysis of the spatio-temporal characteristics of the water retention function of the Wulie River Basin in Chengde City. Pratacultural Science, 38(6): 1047-1059. (in Chinese)
[41]   Wang Z, Huang Y, Liu T, et al. 2022c. Analysis of the water demand-supply gap and scarcity index in Lower Amu Darya River Basin, Central Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2): 743, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020743.
[42]   Wen X, Théau J. 2020. Spatiotemporal analysis of water-related ecosystem services under ecological restoration scenarios: a case study in northern Shaanxi, China. Science of the Total Environment, 720: 137477, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137477.
[43]   Wu D, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al. 2016. Spatiotemporal dynamics of water regulation service of grassland ecosystem in China. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 23(5): 256-260. (in Chinese)
[44]   Wu Q, Song J X, Sun H T, et al. 2023. Spatiotemporal variations of water conservation function based on EOF analysis at multi time scales under different ecosystems of Heihe River Basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 325: 116532, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.116532.
[45]   Xiao T T, Xia Z Q, Guo L D, et al. 2011. Temperature characteristics in the Balkhash Lake Basin from 1936 to 2005. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 39(4): 391-396. (in Chinese)
[46]   Xie L, Long A H, Deng M J, et al. 2011. Study on ecological water consumption in delta of the lower reaches of Ili River. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 33(6): 1330-1340. (in Chinese)
[47]   Xie Y C. 2015. Spatiotemporal change of ecosystem services based on InVEST Model in the Bailong River Watershed, Gansu. PhD Dissertation. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University. (in Chinese)
[48]   Xu F, Zhao L L, Jia Y W, et al. 2022. Evaluation of water conservation function of Beijiang River basin in Nanling Mountains, China, based on WEP-L model. Ecological Indicators, 134: 108383, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108383.
[49]   Xue J, Li Z S, Feng Q, et al. 2022a. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of water conservation amount in the Qilian Mountains from 1980 to 2017. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 44(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)
[50]   Xue J, Li Z X, Feng Q, et al. 2022b. Spatiotemporal variations of water conservation and its influencing factors in ecological barrier region, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 42: 101164, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101164.
[51]   Yang C D. 1993. Changes in the water level of Lake Balkhash and its causes. Arid Land Geography, 16(1): 36-42. (in Chinese)
[52]   Yang D, Liu W, Tang L Y, et al. 2019. Estimation of water provision service for monsoon catchments of South China: Applicability of the InVEST model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 182: 133-143.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.011
[53]   Yao J, Chen Q H, Li Q F, et al. 2022. Spatial and temporal variability of evapotranspiration and influencing factors in the Ili River-Balkhash Lake Basin. Arid Zone Research, 39(5): 1564-1575. (in Chinese)
[54]   Yin G D, Wang X, Zhang X, et al. 2020. InVEST Model based estimation of water yield in North China and its sensitivities to climate variables. Water, 12(6): 1692, doi: 10.3390/w12061692.
[55]   Yu X L, Wen J G, Yu J L, et al. 2010. Image correction algorithm of water quality remote sensing based on piecewise linear regression. Remote Sensing Information, 32(6): 39-43.
[56]   Zhang X N, Li X D, Ning L L, et al. 2022. A bibliometric evaluation of the status of the water conservation function of grassland ecosystems. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 31(6): 35-49. (in Chinese)
[57]   Zheng Q H, Luo G P, Zhu L, et al. 2010. Prediction of landscape patterns in Ili River Delta based on CA_Markov model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(4): 873-882. (in Chinese)
[58]   Zhou W J, Xia Z Q, Huang F, et al. 2013. Variation characteristics of precipitation and its annual distribution in Balkhash Lake Basin. Water Resources and Power, 31(6): 10-13. (in Chinese)
[1] LIN Yanmin, HU Zhirui, LI Wenhui, CHEN Haonan, WANG Fang, NAN Xiongxiong, YANG Xuelong, ZHANG Wenjun. Response of ecosystem carbon storage to land use change from 1985 to 2050 in the Ningxia Section of Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 110-130.
[2] ZHAO Xuqin, LUO Min, MENG Fanhao, SA Chula, BAO Shanhu, BAO Yuhai. Spatiotemporal changes of gross primary productivity and its response to drought in the Mongolian Plateau under climate change[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 46-70.
[3] Mitiku A WORKU, Gudina L FEYISA, Kassahun T BEKETIE, Emmanuel GARBOLINO. Projecting future precipitation change across the semi-arid Borana lowland, southern Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(9): 1023-1036.
[4] QIN Guoqiang, WU Bin, DONG Xinguang, DU Mingliang, WANG Bo. Evolution of groundwater recharge-discharge balance in the Turpan Basin of China during 1959-2021[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(9): 1037-1051.
[5] MA Jinpeng, PANG Danbo, HE Wenqiang, ZHANG Yaqi, WU Mengyao, LI Xuebin, CHEN Lin. Response of soil respiration to short-term changes in precipitation and nitrogen addition in a desert steppe[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(9): 1084-1106.
[6] ZHANG Hui, Giri R KATTEL, WANG Guojie, CHUAI Xiaowei, ZHANG Yuyang, MIAO Lijuan. Enhanced soil moisture improves vegetation growth in an arid grassland of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(7): 871-885.
[7] ZHANG Zhen, XU Yangyang, LIU Shiyin, DING Jing, ZHAO Jinbiao. Seasonal variations in glacier velocity in the High Mountain Asia region during 2015-2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(6): 637-648.
[8] GAO Xiang, WEN Ruiyang, Kevin LO, LI Jie, YAN An. Heterogeneity and non-linearity of ecosystem responses to climate change in the Qilian Mountains National Park, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(5): 508-522.
[9] Reza DEIHIMFARD, Sajjad RAHIMI-MOGHADDAM, Farshid JAVANSHIR, Alireza PAZOKI. Quantifying major sources of uncertainty in projecting the impact of climate change on wheat grain yield in dryland environments[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(5): 545-561.
[10] Sakine KOOHI, Hadi RAMEZANI ETEDALI. Future meteorological drought conditions in southwestern Iran based on the NEX-GDDP climate dataset[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 377-392.
[11] Mehri SHAMS GHAHFAROKHI, Sogol MORADIAN. Investigating the causes of Lake Urmia shrinkage: climate change or anthropogenic factors?[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 424-438.
[12] ZHANG Yixin, LI Peng, XU Guoce, MIN Zhiqiang, LI Qingshun, LI Zhanbin, WANG Bin, CHEN Yiting. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of extreme precipitation on the Loess Plateau of China facing the precipitation process[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(4): 439-459.
[13] Adnan ABBAS, Asher S BHATTI, Safi ULLAH, Waheed ULLAH, Muhammad WASEEM, ZHAO Chengyi, DOU Xin, Gohar ALI. Projection of precipitation extremes over South Asia from CMIP6 GCMs[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(3): 274-296.
[14] ZHAO Lili, LI Lusheng, LI Yanbin, ZHONG Huayu, ZHANG Fang, ZHU Junzhen, DING Yibo. Monitoring vegetation drought in the nine major river basins of China based on a new developed Vegetation Drought Condition Index[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(12): 1421-1438.
[15] YAN Xue, LI Lanhai. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 1-19.