Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2026, Vol. 18 Issue (7): 1192-1212    DOI: 10.1016/jaridl.2026.07.002    
Research article     
Surface water dynamics and driving factors in the Huangshui River Basin of the Xining-Haidong Corridor in China from 2000 to 2024 based on Google Earth Engine
CHENG Ruixuan1, QIN Ke1,*(), YIN Sijiang2
1 College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2 Beijing Academy of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Beijing 100102, China
Download: HTML     PDF(2275KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Sustaining surface water in arid mountain-valley corridors has become increasingly difficult under a warming-wetting climate and urbanization. Focusing on the Huangshui River Basin in the Xining-Haidong Corridor of China, this study used Google Earth Engine (GEE) to process Landsat 5/7/8/9 surface reflectance imagery to reconstruct open-water dynamics within the riparian corridor. A three-expert ensemble voting framework integrated spectral water indices, Dynamic Surface Water Extent rules, and a Random Forest classifier, and the extraction results were validated using 1200 manually interpreted points. Trend analysis, Random Forest attribution, and GeoDetector were then applied to assess temporal changes and the combined effects of climate, topography, and human activity. The extraction achieved an overall accuracy of 96.17% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.923. The mapped open-water area increased from 74.33 km2 in 2000 to 121.67 km2 in 2024, corresponding to a net gain of 47.34 km2 (63.68%). The Mann-Kendall test indicated a significant upward trend (Z=6.66; P<0.001), with a Theil-Sen slope of 1.45 km2/a. Sequential Mann-Kendall analysis identified no robust year of abrupt change, although the increasing trend became significant after 2007. Attribution results showed that topography remained the dominant spatial regulator of water persistence, as low-elevation valley floors concentrate both runoff accumulation and human land use. Population density (PD) and nighttime light (NTL) signals were stronger in urbanized reaches, where high impervious-surface values and mapped water co-occurred around managed water environments, including regulated channels, impoundments, and reservoir storage. Overlay analysis of barriers and reservoirs further suggested that engineering regulation may account for part of the persistent water patches along the corridor. These findings reveal a coupled mechanism involving climate, topography, and human regulation in shaping surface water change in a water-limited plateau river corridor, and provide evidence for water-resource management and ecological restoration in the upper Yellow River Basin.



Key wordsLandsat      Google Earth Engine (GEE)      surface water dynamics      riparian corridor      river regulation      GeoDetector     
Received: 31 December 2025      Published: 09 July 2026
Corresponding Authors: *QIN Ke (E-mail: qinke@cau.edu.cn)
About author: First author contact:

Conceptualization: CHENG Ruixuan; Methodology: CHENG Ruixuan; Formal analysis: CHENG Ruixuan, YIN Sijiang; Data curation: YIN Sijiang; Software: YIN Sijiang; Visualization: CHENG Ruixuan; Validation: QIN Ke; Supervision: QIN Ke; Writing - original draft preparation: CHENG Ruixuan; Writing - review and editing: QIN Ke. All authors approved the manuscript.

Cite this article:

CHENG Ruixuan, QIN Ke, YIN Sijiang. Surface water dynamics and driving factors in the Huangshui River Basin of the Xining-Haidong Corridor in China from 2000 to 2024 based on Google Earth Engine. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(7): 1192-1212.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1016/jaridl.2026.07.002     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2026/V18/I7/1192

Fig. 1 Elevation and river networks of the study area. The map shows the 10 km riparian study area along the major river network across Xining City and Haidong City.
Main variable Resolution Period Dataset/GEE collection ID
Annual SWA (km2) 30 m 2000-2024 Landsat Collection 2 Level-2 SR: LANDSAT/LT05/C02/T1_L2; LANDSAT/LE07/C02/T1_L2; LANDSAT/LC08/C02/T1_L2; LANDSAT/LC09/C02/T1_L2.
JRC annual water class 30 m 2000-2021 JRC Global Surface Water Yearly History: JRC/GSW1_4/Yearly History.
Grid-cell SWF 1 km grid 2000-2024 Calculated from the Landsat ensemble mask.
Annual total precipitation (mm) 0.05° 2000-2024 CHIRPS Daily: UCSB CHG/CHIRPS/DAILY.
Annual mean 2-m air temperature (°C) 0.10° 2000-2024 ERA5-Land Monthly Aggregated: ECMWF/ERA5_LAND/MONTHLY_AGGR.
Annual mean RH (%) 0.10° 2000-2024 ERA5-Land Monthly Aggregated: ECMWF/ERA5_LAND/MONTHLY_AGGR.
Daytime LST (°C) 1 km 2000-2024 MODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature Daily: MODIS/061/MOD11A1.
Peak growing-season (May-September) NDVI 250 m 2000-2024 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day: MODIS/061/MOD13Q1.
Elevation (m) 30 m NASADEM: NASA/NASADEM_HGT/001.
Slope (°) 30 m Calculated from NASADEM.
ISF 500 m/10 m source data; aggregated to 1 km 2000-2024 MODIS MCD12Q1 before 2016: MODIS/006/MCD12Q1; Dynamic World from 2016: GOOGLE/DYNAMICWORLD/V1.
CF 500 m/10 m source data; aggregated to 1 km 2000-2024 MODIS MCD12Q1 before 2016: MODIS/006/MCD12Q1; Dynamic World from 2016: GOOGLE/DYNAMICWORLD/V1.
PD (persons/km2) About 100 m; aggregated to 1 km 2000-2024; 2020 layer carried forward for 2021-2024 WorldPop: WorldPop/GP/100m/pop.
NTL DMSP-OLS/VIIRS source data; aggregated to 1 km 2000-2024; 2022 layer carried forward for 2023-2024 NOAA/DMSP-OLS/NIGHTTIME_LIGHTS; NOAA/VIIRS/DNB/MONTHLY_V1/VCMCFG and VCMSLCFG.
HAI 1 km grid 2000-2024 Calculated in this study; arithmetic mean of ISF and min-max-normalized PD.
Dam/barrier location Vector Data-available period Global Dam Watch barriers: projects/sat-io/opendatasets/GDW/GDW_BARRIERS_V1_0.
Reservoir extent Vector Data-available period Global Dam Watch reservoirs: projects/sat-io/opendatasets/GDW/GDW_RESERVOIRS_V1_0.
Major river network Vector HydroSHEDS free-flowing rivers: WWF/HydroSHEDS/v1/FreeFlowingRivers.
Table 1 Main datasets, variables, and analytical roles in the analysis
Fig. 2 Analytical framework of this study. CHIRPS, Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data; ERA5-Land, fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis for land; RH, relative humidity; MODIS, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer; LST, land surface temperature; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; NASADEM, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-digital elevation model; DMSP-OLS, Defense Meteorological Satellite Program-Operational Linescan System; NPP-VIIRS, National Polar-orbiting Partnership-Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite; QA, quality assessment; MNDWI, modified normalized difference water index; E-MNDWI, enhanced-modified normalized difference water index; AWEInsh, automated water extraction index for no-shadow conditions; DSWE, Dynamic Surface Water Extent; ISF, impervious-surface fraction; CF, cropland fraction; PD, population density; NTL, nighttime light; HAI, composite human-activity index; JRC, Joint Research Centre; UF and UB, forward and backward sequential Mann-Kendall statistics, respectively; SWA, surface water area; SWF, surface water fraction; CV, coefficient of variation; PCA, principal component analysis.
Classification Reference: water point Reference: non-water point Row total User's accuracy
Classified: water point 569 15 584 97.42%
Classified: non-water point 31 585 616 95.00%
Column total 600 600 1200 -
Producer's accuracy 94.83% 97.50% - Overall accuracy 96.17%
Kappa coefficient: 0.923
Table 2 Confusion matrix for surface water extraction accuracy assessment
Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of mapped surface water and candidate hydrological barriers in the two representative years 2000 (a) and 2024 (b)
Fig. 4 Interannual trends of SWA and driving factors in the study area during 2000-2024. (a), annual SWA; (b), annual total precipitation; (c), annual mean 2-m air temperature; (d), RH; (e), LST; (f), NDVI; (g), CF; (h), PD; (i), NTL; (j), ISF; (k), HAI; (l), Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between SWA and each driver.
Fig. 5 Spatiotemporal fingerprint (Z-score) of grid-cell SWF and driving factors during 2000-2024. Each cell represents the annual Z-score; red and blue denote positive and negative anomalies relative to the multi-year mean.
Fig. 6 Spatiotemporal heterogeneity ranking of SWF and driving factors quantified by the CV. The red dashed line denotes CV=1.00; variables above this line show high heterogeneity, whereas variables below this line indicate more stable spatiotemporal patterns.
Fig. 7 PCA biplot of candidate driving variables for grid-cell SWF. Arrows represent variable loadings on first principal component (PC1) and second principal component (PC2). Arrow direction indicates the sign of the loading, and arrow length indicates loading magnitude. Red arrows denote the human-activity proxy variables (PD, NTL, ISF and HAI) and blue arrows denote the hydroclimatic, terrain, and vegetation variables; the colors are used only to distinguish these analytical groups. Smaller angles between arrows indicate stronger positive correlations, angles close to 180.00° indicate negative correlations, and near-right angles indicate weak correlations. The dashed circle represents the unit circle.
Fig. 8 Random Forest importance (a) and early-late min-max-normalized profiles (b) of SWF and candidate driving variables. In Figure 8a, the importance is non-negative and bar length represents the magnitude of the importance, which does not indicate the direction of the effect. Values in Figure 8b were normalized to 0-1 across the annual series before averaging within each period.
Fig. 9 Residual binning trend analysis of driving factors. (a), precipitation; (b), air temperature; (c), RH; (d), LST; (e), NDVI; (f), elevation; (g), slope; (h), PD; (i), NTL; (j), ISF; (k), CF; (l), HAI.
Fig. 10 Temporal trends of q-values for each driving factor
Fig. 11 Interaction detector heatmap of driving factors for surface water in the study area in 2001. Diagonal values represent single-factor q-values and off-diagonal values represent two-factor interaction q-values.
[1]   Banner J L, Black B A, Tremaine D M. 2024. Positive unintended consequences of urbanization for climate-resilience of stream ecosystems. npj Urban Sustainability, 4: 16, doi: 10.1038/s42949-024-00144-1.
[2]   Best J. 2019. Anthropogenic stresses on the world's big rivers. Nature Geoscience, 12(1): 7-21.
doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0262-x
[3]   Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45: 5-32.
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[4]   Debeer D, Strobl C. 2020. Conditional permutation importance revisited. BMC Bioinformatics, 21: 307, doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03622-2.
pmid: 32664864
[5]   Dong Y T, Fan L B, Zhao J, et al. 2022. Mapping of small water bodies with integrated spatial information for time series images of optical remote sensing. Journal of Hydrology, 614(Part B): 128580, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128580.
[6]   Evans J, Geerken R. 2004. Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation. Journal of Arid Environments, 57(4): 535-554.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00121-6
[7]   Fan L J, Liu L X, Hu J, et al. 2024. A long-term evaluation of the ecohydrological regime in a semiarid basin: A case study of the Huangshui River in the Yellow River Basin, China. Hydrology, 11(10): 168, doi: 10.3390/hydrology11100168.
[8]   Feyisa G L, Meilby H, Fensholt R, et al. 2014. Automated Water Extraction Index: A new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140: 23-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029
[9]   Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
[10]   Grill G, Lehner B, Thieme M, et al. 2019. Mapping the world's free-flowing rivers. Nature, 569(7755): 215-221.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
[11]   Heritage G, Entwistle N. 2020. Impacts of river engineering on river channel behaviour: Implications for managing downstream flood risk. Water, 12(5): 1355, doi: 10.3390/w12051355.
[12]   Immerzeel W W, Lutz A F, Andrade M, et al. 2020. Importance and vulnerability of the world's water towers. Nature, 577(7790): 364-369.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y
[13]   Jones J W. 2019. Improved automated detection of subpixel-scale inundation—Revised Dynamic Surface Water Extent (DSWE) partial surface water tests. Remote Sensing, 11(4): 374, doi: 10.3390/rs11040374.
[14]   Kaneko H. 2022. Cross-validated permutation feature importance considering correlation between features. Analytical Science Advances, 3(9-10): 278-287.
doi: 10.1002/ansa.v3.9-10
[15]   Konapala G, Mishra A K, Wada Y, et al. 2020. Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nature Communications, 11: 3044, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16757-w.
pmid: 32576822
[16]   Lehner B, Beames P, Mulligan M, et al. 2024. The Global Dam Watch database of river barrier and reservoir information for large-scale applications. Scientific Data, 11: 1069, doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03752-9.
pmid: 39379379
[17]   Li R, Zhu G F, Lu S Y, et al. 2023. Effects of urbanization on the water cycle in the Shiyang River Basin: Based on a stable isotope method. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(24): 4437-4452.
doi: 10.5194/hess-27-4437-2023
[18]   Li X Y, Xin Z B. 2024. Land-use composition, distribution patterns, and influencing factors of villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, based on UAV photogrammetry. Remote Sensing, 16(12): 2213, doi: 10.3390/rs16122213.
[19]   Liu L X, Fan L J, Hu J, et al. 2024. Human activities impacts on runoff and ecological flow in the Huangshui River of the Yellow River Basin, China. Water, 16(16): 2331, doi: 10.3390/w16162331.
[20]   Mann H B. 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13(3): 245-259.
doi: 10.2307/1907187
[21]   Mao X F, Wei X Y, Engel B, et al. 2021. Biological response to 5 years of operations of cascade rubber dams in a plateau urban river, China. River Research and Applications, 37(8): 1201-1211.
doi: 10.1002/rra.v37.8
[22]   Masek J G, Wulder M A, Markham B, et al. 2020. Landsat 9: Empowering open science and applications through continuity. Remote Sensing of Environment, 248: 111968, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111968.
[23]   Mulligan M, van Soesbergen A, Sáenz L. 2020. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Scientific Data, 7: 31, doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0362-5.
pmid: 31964896
[24]   Oswald C J, Kelleher C, Ledford S, et al. 2023. Integrating urban water fluxes and moving beyond impervious surface cover: A review. Journal of Hydrology, 618: 129188, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129188.
[25]   Pekel J F, Cottam A, Gorelick N, et al. 2016. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633): 418-422.
doi: 10.1038/nature20584
[26]   Pickens A H, Hansen M C, Hancher M, et al. 2020. Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 243: 111792, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111792.
[27]   Ran Q W, Aires F, Ciais P, et al. 2023. The status and influencing factors of surface water dynamics on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during 2000-2020. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 4200114, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3231552.
[28]   Sen P K. 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's Tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324): 1379-1389.
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
[29]   Sui T B, Ye C M, Tang R, et al. 2023. Spatio-temporal change monitoring for surface water on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from 1990 to 2020 using remote sensing. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11: 1124425, doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1124425.
[30]   Tyralis H, Papacharalampous G A, Langousis A. 2019. A brief review of random forests for water scientists and practitioners and their recent history in water resources. Water, 11(5): 910, doi: 10.3390/w11050910.
[31]   Vanderhoof M K, Alexander L, Christensen J, et al.2023. High-frequency time series comparison of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellites for mapping open and vegetated water across the United States (2017-2021). Remote Sensing of Environment, 288: 113498, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113498.
[32]   Veldkamp T I E, Wada Y, Aerts J C J H, et al. 2017. Water scarcity hotspots travel downstream due to human interventions in the 20th and 21st century. Nature Communications, 8: 15697, doi: 10.1038/ncomms15697.
pmid: 28643784
[33]   Viviroli D, Dürr H H, Messerli B, et al. 2007. Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resources Research, 43(7): W07447, doi: 10.1029/2006WR005653.
[34]   Viviroli D, Kummu M, Meybeck M, et al. 2020. Increasing dependence of lowland populations on mountain water resources. Nature Sustainability, 3(11): 917-928.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0559-9
[35]   Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G, et al. 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(1): 107-127.
doi: 10.1080/13658810802443457
[36]   Wang J F, Zhang T L, Fu B J. 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecological Indicators, 67: 250-256.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.052
[37]   Wei H, Lu C H, Liu Y Q. 2021. Farmland changes and their ecological impact in the Huangshui River Basin. Land, 10(10): 1082, doi: 10.3390/land10101082.
[38]   Wessels K J, Prince S D, Malherbe J, et al. 2007. Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 68(2): 271-297.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.05.015
[39]   Wies C, Miltenberger R, Grieser G, et al. 2023. Exploring the variable importance in random forests under correlations: A general concept applied to donor organ quality in post-transplant survival. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23: 209, doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02023-2.
pmid: 37726680
[40]   Xiao Z, Ding M J, Li L H, et al. 2024. Divergent changes of surface water and its climatic drivers in the headwater region of the Three Rivers on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 158: 111615, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111615.
[41]   Xu B, Mao X F, Li X Y, et al. 2024. Anthropogenic activities dominated the spatial and temporal changes of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the Hehuang Valley in the northeastern Qinghai Province between 2000 and 2020. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12: 1384032, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1384032.
[42]   Xu H Q. 2006. Modification of normalized difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(14): 3025-3033.
doi: 10.1080/01431160600589179
[43]   Zhang A T, Gu V X. 2023. Global Dam Tracker: A database of more than 35,000 dams with location, catchment, and attribute information. Scientific Data, 10: 111, doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02008-2.
pmid: 36823207
[44]   Zhang J, Du J Q, Fang S F, et al. 2023. Dynamic changes, spatiotemporal differences, and ecological effects of impervious surfaces in the Yellow River Basin, 1986-2020. Remote Sensing, 15(1): 268, doi: 10.3390/rs15010268.
[1] ZHAO Dan, YANG Xiya, GAO Yukun, PAN Jing, YOU Quangang, XUE Xian. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into soil salinity models: Insights from the Minqin Oasis and its desert-oasis transition zone in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(7): 1135-1158.
[2] LYU Xin, LI Xiaobing, WANG Kai, CAO Wanyu, ZHANG Chenhao. Anthropogenic activities amplify spatiotemporal variations in regional ecological security patterns dominated by natural factors: Evidence from the West Liaohe River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(5): 752-773.
[3] QI Wenwen, LI Yuanyuan, SHI Xiang. Evaluation of ecological environmental quality and its driving factors in a mountain basin: A case study of the Manas River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(4): 608-631.
[4] LIU Yuhan, ZHAO Yuanyuan, GAO Guanglei, DING Guodong, LI Ning. Spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces of dust weather events in Central Asia from 2000 to 2020[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2026, 18(1): 1-16.
[5] HE Yuanrong, CHEN Yuhang, ZHONG Liang, LAI Yangfeng, KANG Yuting, LUO Ming, ZHU Yunfei, ZHANG Ming. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecological environment quality and its drivers in the Helan Mountain, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(2): 224-244.
[6] Haoriwa, Zhalagahu, ZHOU Ruiping. Spatiotemporal variation of drought and its influential factors in the Yellow River Basin, China based on vegetation health index[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(10): 1361-1377.
[7] PAN Meihui, CHEN Qing, LI Chenlu, LI Na, GONG Yifu. Spatiotemporal variation and influencing factors of desertification sensitivity on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2025, 17(1): 58-73.
[8] GUO Bing, XU Mei, ZHANG Rui, LUO Wei. A new monitoring index for ecological vulnerability and its application in the Yellow River Basin, China from 2000 to 2022[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(9): 1163-1182.
[9] CHEN Jiazhen, KASIMU Alimujiang, REHEMAN Rukeya, WEI Bohao, HAN Fuqiang, ZHANG Yan. Temporal and spatial variation and prediction of water yield and water conservation in the Bosten Lake Basin based on the PLUS-InVEST model[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(6): 852-875.
[10] ZHANG Mingyu, CAO Yu, ZHANG Zhengyong, ZHANG Xueying, LIU Lin, CHEN Hongjin, GAO Yu, YU Fengchen, LIU Xinyi. Spatiotemporal variation of land surface temperature and its driving factors in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(3): 373-395.
[11] YUAN Ximin, SU Zhiwei, TIAN Fuchang, WANG Pengquan. Spatiotemporal evolution of water conservation function and its driving factors in the Huangshui River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(11): 1484-1504.
[12] LI Haocheng, LI Junfeng, QU Wenying, WANG Wenhuai, Muhammad Arsalan FARID, CAO Zhiheng, MA Chengxiao, FENG Xueting. A novel framework of ecological risk management for urban development in ecologically fragile regions: A case study of Turpan City, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(11): 1604-1632.
[13] WANG Yinping, JIANG Rengui, YANG Mingxiang, XIE Jiancang, ZHAO Yong, LI Fawen, LU Xixi. Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving mechanisms of land use/land cover (LULC) changes in the Jinghe River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 91-109.
[14] LIN Yanmin, HU Zhirui, LI Wenhui, CHEN Haonan, WANG Fang, NAN Xiongxiong, YANG Xuelong, ZHANG Wenjun. Response of ecosystem carbon storage to land use change from 1985 to 2050 in the Ningxia Section of Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 110-130.
[15] WU Jingyan, LUO Jungang, ZHANG Han, YU Mengjie. Driving forces behind the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of land-use and land-cover change: A case study of the Weihe River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(3): 253-273.