Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2019, Vol. 11 Issue (6): 824-836    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-019-0127-1
Orginal Article     
Responses in gross primary production of Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum to a temporal rainfall in a temperate grassland of Inner Mongolia, China
HU Xiaoxing1, Mitsuru HIROTA2, Wuyunna3, Kiyokazu KAWADA2, LI Hao1, MENG Shikang1, Kenji TAMURA2, Takashi KAMIJO1,*()
1 Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
2 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
3 College of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China
Download: HTML     PDF(806KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      


In the arid and semi-arid areas of China, rainfall and drought affect the growth and photosynthetic activities of plants. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is one of the most important indices that measure the photosynthetic ability of plants. This paper focused on the GPP of two representative grassland species (Stipa krylovii Roshev. and Allium polyrhizum Turcz. ex Regel) to demonstrate the effect of a temporal rainfall on the two species. Our research was conducted in a temperate grassland in New Barag Right Banner, Hulun Buir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China, in a dry year 2015. We measured net ecosystem productivity (NEP) and ecosystem respiration flux (ER) using a transparent chamber system and monitored the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), air and soil temperature and humidity simultaneously. Based on the measured values of NEP and ER, we calculated the GPP of the two species before and after the rainfall. The saturated GPP per aboveground biomass (GPPAGB) of A. polyrhizum remarkably increased from 0.033 (±0.018) to 0.185 (±0.055) μmol CO2/(gdw?s) by 5.6-fold and that of S. krylovii decreased from 0.068 (±0.021) to 0.034 (±0.011) μmol CO2/(gdw?s) by 0.5-fold on the 1st and 2nd d after a 9.1 mm rainfall event compared to the values before the rainfall at low temperatures below 35°C. However, on the 1st and 2nd d after the rainfall, both of the saturated GPPAGB values of S. krylovii and A. polyrhizum were significantly lower at high temperatures above 35°C (0.018 (±0.007) and 0.110 (±0.061) μmol CO2/(gdw?s), respectively) than at low temperatures below 35°C (0.034 (±0.011) and 0.185 (±0.055) μmol CO2/(gdw?s), respectively). The results showed that the GPP responses to the temporal rainfall differed between S. krylovii and A. polyrhizum and strongly negative influenced by temperature. The temporal rainfall seems to be more effective on the GPP of A. polyrhizum than S. krylovii. These differences might be related to the different physiological and structural features, the coexistence of the species and their species-specific survival strategies.

Key wordstemperate grassland      gross primary productivity      temporal rainfall      survival strategy      dry year      drought     
Received: 22 May 2018      Published: 10 December 2019
Corresponding Authors: KAMIJO Takashi     E-mail:
Cite this article:

HU Xiaoxing, Mitsuru HIROTA, Wuyunna, Kiyokazu KAWADA, LI Hao, MENG Shikang, Kenji TAMURA, Takashi KAMIJO. Responses in gross primary production of Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum to a temporal rainfall in a temperate grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(6): 824-836.

URL:     OR

1 Adams J M, Faure H, Faure-Denard L, et al. 1990. Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the last glacial maximum to the present. Nature, 348: 711-714.
2 Berry J A, Bj?rkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31: 491-543.
3 Chen L P, Zhao N X, Zhang L H, et al. 2013. Responses of two dominant plant species to drought stress and defoliation in the Inner Mongolia Steppe of China. Plant Ecology, 214(2): 221-229.
4 Chen S H, Zhang H, Wang L Q, et al. 2001. Grassland Plant Roots in Northern China. Jilin: Jilin University Press, 81-83, 470-471. (in Chinese)
5 Chen S P, Lin G H, Huang J H, et al. 2009. Dependence of carbon sequestration on the differential responses of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration to rain pulses in a semiarid steppe. Global Change Biology, 15(10): 2450-2461.
6 Cheng Y X, Kamijo T, Tsubo M, et al. 2013. Phytosociology of Hulunbeier grassland vegetation in Inner Mongolia, China. Phytocoenologia, 43(1-2): 41-51.
7 Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, et al. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437: 529-533.
8 Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, et al. 2001. Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107(1): 43-69.
9 Gao Q, Reynolds J F. 2003. Historical shrub-grass transitions in the northern Chihuahuan Desert: Modeling the effects of shifting rainfall seasonality and event size over a landscape gradient. Global Change Biology, 9(10): 1475-1493.
10 Granier A, Reichstein M, Bréda N, et al. 2007. Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143(1-2): 123-145.
11 Gunin P D, Bazha S N, Danzhalova E V, et al. 2015. Regional features of desertification processes of ecosystems on the border of the Baikal Basin and Central Asian internal drainage basin. Arid Ecosystems, 5(3): 117-133.
12 Guo Q, Hu Z M, Li S G, et al. 2012. Spatial variations in aboveground net primary productivity along a climate gradient in Eurasian temperate grassland: Effects of mean annual precipitation and its seasonal distribution. Global Change Biology, 18(12): 3624-3631.
13 Guo Q, Hu Z M, Li S G, et al. 2016. Exogenous N addition enhances the responses of gross primary productivity to individual precipitation events in a temperate grassland. Scientific Reports, 6: 26901.
14 Han D M, Wang G Q, Xue B L, et al. 2018. Evaluation of semiarid grassland degradation in North China from multiple perspectives. Ecological Engineering, 112: 41-50.
15 Hao Y B, Wang Y F, Mei X R. 2010. The response of ecosystem CO2 exchange to small precipitation pulses over a temperate steppe. Plant Ecology, 209(2): 335-347.
16 Harpole W S, Potts D L, Suding K N. 2007. Ecosystem responses to water and nitrogen amendment in a California grassland. Global Change Biology, 13(11): 2341-2348.
17 Hirota M, Tang Y H, Hu Q W, et al. 2006. Carbon dioxide dynamics and controls in a deep-water wetland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ecosystems, 9(4): 673-688.
18 Hirota M, Zhang P C, Gu S, et al. 2009. Altitudinal variation of ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine grassland from 3600 to 4200 m. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2(4): 197-205.
19 Hirota M, Zhang P C, Gu S, et al. 2010. Small-scale variation in ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine meadow depends on plant biomass and species richness. Journal of Plant Research, 123(4): 531-541.
20 Hodson M J, Bryant J A. 2012. Functional Biology of Plants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 166-188.
21 Hooper D U, Johnson L. 1999. Nitrogen limitation in dryland ecosystems: Responses to geographical and temporal variation in precipitation. Biogeochemistry, 46(1-3): 247-293.
22 Hunt J E, Kelliher F M, Mcseveny T M, et al. 2004. Long-term carbon exchange in a sparse, seasonally dry tussock grassland. Global Change Biology, 10(10): 1785-1800.
23 Huxman T E, Snyder K A, Tissue D, et al. 2004. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141(2): 254-268.
24 Ivanov L A, Ivanova L A, Ronzhina D A, et al. 2004. Structural and functional grounds for Ephedra sinica expansion in Mongolian steppe ecosystems. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 51(4): 469-475.
25 Kawada K, Wuyunna, Nakamura T. 2011. Land degradation of abandoned croplands in the Xilingol steppe region, Inner Mongolia, China. Japanese Society of Grassland Science, 57(1): 58-64.
26 Knapp A K, Smith M D. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science, 291(5503): 481-484.
27 Li F, Zhao W Z, Liu H. 2013. The response of aboveground net primary productivity of desert vegetation to rainfall pulse in the temperate desert region of Northwest China. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e73003.
28 Li S G, Asanuma J, Eugster W, et al. 2005. Net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange over grazed steppe in Central Mongolia. Global Change Biology, 11(11): 1941-1955.
29 Li Z L, Zhang Y T, Yu D F, et al. 2014. The influence of precipitation regimes and elevated CO2 on photosynthesis and biomass accumulation and partitioning in seedlings of the rhizomatous perennial grass Leymus chinensis. PloS ONE, 9(8): e103633.
30 Lin L, Wuyunna, Tamura K, et al. 2013. Variation of soil physicochemical and microbial properties in degraded steppes in Hulunbeir of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(12): 3407-3414. (in Chinese)
31 Liu Y S, Pan Q M, Zhang S X, et al. 2012. Intra-seasonal precipitation amount and pattern differentially affect primary production of two dominant species of Inner Mongolia grassland. Acta Oecologica, 44: 2-10.
32 Ma S Y, Baldocchi D D, Xu L K, et al. 2007. Inter-annual variability in carbon dioxide exchange of an oak/grass savanna and open grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 147(3-4): 157-171.
33 Nakano T, Nemoto M, Shinoda M. 2008. Environmental controls on photosynthetic production and ecosystem respiration in semi-arid grasslands of Mongolia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(10): 1456-1466.
34 Novick K A, Stoy P C, Katul G G, et al. 2004. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland. Oecologia, 138(2): 259-274.
35 Pereira J S, Chaves M M, Caldeira M C, et al. 2006. Water availability and productivity. In: Morison J I, Morecroft M D. Plant Growth and Climate Change. London: Blackwell Publishers, 118-145.
36 Reynolds S, Batello C, Baas S, et al. 2005. Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. In: McGilloway D A. Grassland: A Global Resource. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 323-338.
37 Robertson T R, Bell C W, Zak J C, et al. 2009. Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. New Phytologist, 181: 230-242.
38 Sala O E, Parton W J, Joyce L A, et al. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology, 69(1): 40-45.
39 Schwinning S, Davis K, Richardson L, et al. 2002. Deuterium enriched irrigation indicates different forms of rain use in shrub/grass species of the Colorado Plateau. Oecologia, 130(3): 345-355.
40 Shi Z, Thomey M L, Mowll W, et al. 2014. Differential effects of extreme drought on production and respiration: Synthesis and modeling analysis. Biogeosciences, 11(3): 621-633.
41 Sun J, Liu M, Li S G, et al. 2011. Survival strategy of Stipa krylovii and Agropyron cristatum in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(8): 2148-2158. (in Chinese)
42 Sun J, Du W P. 2017. Effects of precipitation and temperature on net primary productivity and precipitation use efficiency across China’s grasslands. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 54(6): 881-897.
43 Thomey M L, Collins S L, Friggens M T, et al. 2014. Effects of monsoon precipitation variability on the physiological response of two dominant C4 grasses across a semiarid ecotone. Oecologia, 176(3): 751-762.
44 Wang T, Xue X, Zhou L, et al. 2015. Combating aeolian desertification in northern China. Land Degradation and Development, 26(2): 118-132.
45 Wuyunna, Zhang F J, Ran C Q. 2009. Analysis of climatic change in Basin of Kherlen River of Mongolia Plateau for the past 50 years. Journal of Dalian Minzu University, 11(3): 193-195. (in Chinese)
46 Xiong P F, Shu J L, Zhang H, et al. 2017. Small rainfall pulses affected leaf photosynthesis rather than biomass production of dominant species in semiarid grassland community on Loess Plateau of China. Functional Plant Biology, 44(12): 1229-1242.
47 Xu L K, Baldocchi D D. 2004. Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123(1-2): 79-96.
48 Zhang P C, Hirota M, Shen H H, et al. 2009. Characterization of CO2 flux in three Kobresia meadows differing in dominant species. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2(4): 187-196.
49 Zhao N X, Gao Y B, Wang J L, et al. 2006. Genetic diversity and population differentiation of the dominant species Stipa krylovii in the Inner Mongolia steppe. Biochemical Genetics, 44(11-12): 504-517.
[1] HUANG Laiming, ZHAO Wen, SHAO Ming'an. Response of plant physiological parameters to soil water availability during prolonged drought is affected by soil texture[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(7): 688-698.
[2] WANG Chunyuan, YU Minghan, DING Guodong, GAO Guanglei, ZHANG Linlin, HE Yingying, LIU Wei. Size- and leaf age-dependent effects on the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Artemisia ordosica to drought stress[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(7): 744-758.
[3] Nirmal M DAHAL, XIONG Donghong, Nilhari NEUPANE, Belayneh YIGEZ, ZHANG Baojun, YUAN Yong, Saroj KOIRALA, LIU Lin, FANG Yiping. Spatiotemporal analysis of drought variability based on the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index in the Koshi River Basin, Nepal[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(5): 433-454.
[4] Türkan BAYER ALTIN, Bekir N ALTIN. Response of hydrological drought to meteorological drought in the eastern Mediterranean Basin of Turkey[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(5): 470-486.
[5] Ayad M F AL-QURAISHI, Heman A GAZNAYEE, Mattia CRESPI. Drought trend analysis in a semi-arid area of Iraq based on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Normalized Difference Water Index and Standardized Precipitation Index[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(4): 413-430.
[6] WANG Yudan, KONG Yunfeng, CHEN Hao, DING Yongjian. Spatial-temporal characteristics of drought detected from meteorological data with high resolution in Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(4): 561-579.
[7] Hani S SAUDY, Ibrahim M EL-METWALLY, Goma A ABD EL-SAMAD. Physio-biochemical and nutrient constituents of peanut plants under bentazone herbicide for broad-leaved weed control and water regimes in dry land areas[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(4): 630-639.
[8] YANG Meilin, YU Yang, ZHANG Haiyan, WANG Qian, GAN Miao, YU Ruide. Tree ring based drought variability in Northwest Tajikistan since 1895 AD[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(3): 413-422.
[9] LI Yangyang, CHEN Jiacun, AI Shaoshui, SHI Hui. Responses of leaf water potential and gas exchange to the precipitation manipulation in two shrubs on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 267-282.
[10] Sheida DEHGHAN, Nasrin SALEHNIA, Nasrin SAYARI, Bahram BAKHTIARI. Prediction of meteorological drought in arid and semi-arid regions using PDSI and SDSM: a case study in Fars Province, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 318-330.
[11] MAMUT Jannathan, Dunyan TAN, C BASKIN Carol, M BASKIN Jerry. Effects of water stress and NaCl stress on different life cycle stages of the cold desert annual Lachnoloma lehmannii in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(5): 774-784.
[12] HADIAN Fatemeh, JAFARI Reza, BASHARI Hossein, TARTESH Mostafa, D CLARKE Kenneth. Estimation of spatial and temporal changes in net primary production based on Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model in semi-arid rangelands of SemiromCounty, Iran[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(4): 477-494.
[13] DZIKITI Sebinasi, Z JOVANOVIC Nebo, DH BUGAN Richard, RAMOELO Abel, P MAJOZI Nobuhle, NICKLESS Alecia, A CHO Moses, C LE MAITRE David, NTSHIDI Zanele, H PIENAAR Harrison. Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(4): 495-512.
[14] KHAJEDDIN SayedJamaleddin, MATINKHAH SayedHamid, JAFARI Zahra. A drought resistance index to select drought resistant plant species based on leaf water potential measurements[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(4): 623-635.
[15] LIBANDA Brigadier, Mie ZHENG, NGONGA Chilekana. Spatial and temporal patterns of drought in Zambia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11(2): 180-191.