Please wait a minute...
Journal of Arid Land  2020, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 609-617    DOI: 10.1007/s40333-020-0076-8
Research article     
Exploring tree diversity and stand structure of savanna woodlands in southeastern Sudan
M M HASOBA Ahmed1,*(), A H SIDDIG Ahmed2,3, E YAGOUB Yousif2
1 Faculty of Forest Sciences and Technology, University of Gezira, Madani 22212, Sudan
2 Faculty of Forestry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum North 13314, Sudan
3 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst 01003, USA
Download: HTML     PDF(675KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Savanna woodlands in Sudan host great biodiversity, provide a plethora of ecosystem goods and services to local communities, and sustain numerous ecological functions. Although the importance of the Acacia trees in these areas is well known, up-to-date information about these woodlands' diversity is limited and changes in their woody vegetation composition, density, diversity and relative frequency are not monitored over time. This study explored tree diversity and stand stage structure in Nuara Reserved Forest, a typical savanna woodland ecosystem in southeastern Sudan. A total of 638 circular sample plots (1000 m2 for each) were established using a systematic sampling grid method. The distance between plots was 200 m. In each plot, all living trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥5.00 cm were identified and counted, and their DBH values were recorded. From these data, tree composition, diversity, density and stage structure were assessed. There were 12,259 individual trees representing four species (Acacia seyal, Balanites aegyptiaca, Acacia Senegal and Acacia mellifera) that belong to two families. The dominant species was Acacia seyal. Average tree density was 191 trees/hm2 and the Shannon-Weiner index for trees diversity was 0.204. Overall, young trees comprised 86.30% of the forest. The state of tree richness and density in the study area was low compared to other similar environments in the region and around the world. We recommended adoption of a proper management system that includes monitoring of woody vegetation diversity in this forest, and management actions to enhance tree diversity and sustain ecosystem services to local communities. In addition to care for the dominant Acacia seyal stands, more attention and conservation should be devoted to reestablishing Acacia senegal and Acacia mellifera trees because of their high ecological and economic values for local communities.



Key wordsspecies diversity      stand structure      savanna woodland ecosystem      forest monitoring      forest management      ecosystem services      Nuara Reserved Forest     
Received: 02 September 2019      Published: 10 July 2020
Corresponding Authors:
About author: *Corresponding author: Ahmed M M HASOBA (E-mail: ahmedhasoba899@gmail.com)
Cite this article:

Ahmed M M HASOBA, Ahmed A H SIDDIG, Yousif E YAGOUB. Exploring tree diversity and stand structure of savanna woodlands in southeastern Sudan. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(4): 609-617.

URL:

http://jal.xjegi.com/10.1007/s40333-020-0076-8     OR     http://jal.xjegi.com/Y2020/V12/I4/609

Fig. 1 Sketch maps for the location of Sennar State in southeastern Sudan (a) and the location of Nuara Reserved Forest (study area) in Sennar State (b), as well as the overview of Nuara Reserved Forest (c)
Fig. 2 Distribution of sample plots in Nuara Reserved Forest
No. Species name Number of plotsa Relative frequency (%) Number of individuals Relative density
(trees/hm2)
1 Acacia seyal 533 84.20 11,638 218.34
2 Balanites aegyptiaca 176 27.80 577 32.78
3 Acacia senegal 15 2.36 40 26.60
4 Acacia mellifera 2 0.31 4 20.00
Total 638b 100.00 12,259
Table 1 Estimates of trees species composition, relative frequency, number of individuals and relative density in Nuara Reserved Forest
Fig. 3 Photo showing very dense sample plot dominated by Acacia seyal trees in Nuara Reserved Forest
Fig. 4 Spatial distribution of average tree density in Nuara Reserved Forest. The black lines within the figure represent the boundaries of forest compartments.
No. Species Number of trees Percentage of species in the stage (%)
Young
(5.00-14.99 cm)
Pre-mature
(15.00-24.99 cm)
Mature
(≥25.00 cm)
1 Acacia seyal 11,638 93.10 6.40 0.42
2 Balanites aegyptiaca 577 56.49 36.56 6.93
3 Acacia Senegal 40 90.00 10.00 0.00
4 Acacia mellifera 4 100.00 0.00 0.00
Total 12,259 86.30 13.35 0.34
Table 2 Percentage of each species in the three tree stand stages in Nuara Reserved Forest
[1]   Abdel Nour H O. 2013. The status of Sudan forests and the changes that have occurred during the period 2000-2011. Nineteenth Annual Forestry Conference “Under the Slogan "Towards a Comprehensive Package for the Protection and Reconstruction of Forests". 24-27 April 2013. Khartoum: FNC (Forests National Corporation).
[2]   Ahmed K M S, Hamid A A, Doka A. 2015. Investigation of spatial risk factors for RVF disease occurrence using remote sensing & GIS—a case study: Sennar State, Sudan. Journal of Geographic Information System, 7(2): 226-257.
doi: 10.4236/jgis.2015.72019
[3]   Baillie J E M, Collen B, Amin R, et al. 2008. Toward monitoring global biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 1(1): 18-26.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00009.x
[4]   Bakr A, Siddig E, Eltohami A. 2018. Threats to green gum arabic production in Sudan. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research, 3(5). BJSTR.MS.ID.000951, doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.03.000951.
[5]   FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2016. Trees, forests and land use in drylands: The first global assessment. FAO. Rome, Italy.
[6]   Ferris-Kaan R, Patterson G S. 1992. Monitoring vegetation changes in conservation management of forests. Forestry Commission Bulletin, 108: 31, doi: https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y5917.
[7]   Gadallah N A H. 2019. Assessment of conservative and protective needs for natural forests in drylands: Case of Wad Al-Bashir Forest, Gedaref State, Sudan. MSc Thesis. Khartoum: Desertification and Desert Cultivation Studies Institute, University of Khartoum, 1-100.
[8]   Giliba R A, Boon E K, Kayombo C J, et al. 2011. Species composition, richness and diversity in Miombo Woodland of Bereku Forest Reserve, Tanzania. Journal of Biodiversity, 2(1): 1-7.
[9]   HCENR (Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources). 2014. Sudan's Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Physical Development, Sudan. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/sd/sd-nr-05-en.pdf.
[10]   Igbinosa H, Ejakhe G. 2015. Tree species composition and diversity in Oban forest. Journal of agricultural studies, 3(1): 10-24.
[11]   Lieberman D, Lieberman M, Peralta R, et al. 1996. Tropical forest structure and composition on a large-scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. The Journal of Ecology, 84(2): 137-152.
[12]   Malik Z A, Bhatt A B. 2015. Phytosociological analysis of woody species in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Western Himalaya, India. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 31(3): 149-163.
[13]   Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1-137.
[14]   Mohammed M. 2018. Decadal working plan for management of riparian forests in Sennar State. Faculty of Forestry, University of Khartoum. Khartoum, Sudan.
[15]   NBSAP.2015. National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2020. Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Physical Development, Sudan. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/sd/sd-nbsap-v2-en.pdf.
[16]   R Core Team.2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-Project.org.
[17]   Shannon C E, Weiner W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 29-125.
[18]   Shuaibu R B, Dagba B I. 2013. Challenges of forest inventory and its effects on forest management and planning in Nigeria. Forestry Association of Nigeria, 1: 200-206.
[19]   Siddig A A H. 2014. Biodiversity of Sudan: Between the harsh conditions, political instability and civil wars. Biodiversity Journal, 5(4): 545-555.
[20]   Siddig A A H, Ellison A M, Ochs A, et al. 2016. How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological changes? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60: 223-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.036
[21]   Siddig A A H, Abdel M T D, El-Nasry H M, et al. 2019a. Biodiversity of Sudan. In: Pullaiah T. Global Biodiversity (Vol. 3). Selected Countries in Africa. Waretown: Apple Academic Press, 275-294.
[22]   Siddig A A H. 2019b. Why is biodiversity data-deficiency an ongoing conservation dilemma in Africa? Journal for Nature Conservation, 50: 125719, doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125719.
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125719
[23]   Suratman M N. 2012. Tree species diversity and forest stand structure of Pahang National Park, Malaysia. In: Lameed G A. Biodiversity Enrichment in a Diverse World. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 473-492.
[24]   Sussman R W. 1994. Plant diversity and structural analysis of a tropical dry forest in Southwestern Madagascar. Biotropica, 26(3): 241-254.
[25]   Thompson I. 2011. Biodiversity, ecosystem thresholds, resilience and forest degradation. Unasylva, 238: 25-30.
[26]   Vardon M, Harris R. 2017. Review of ecosystem condition indicators. Paper for the London Group. https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/lg23_review_of_ecosystem_condition_indicators_vardon-harris.pdf.
[27]   Vidal C, Alberdi I, Redmond J, et al. 2016. The role of European National Forest Inventories for international forestry reporting. Annals of Forest Science, 73(4): 793-806.
[28]   Wakawa L, Suleiman A, Adam L. 2017. Tree species biodiversity of a sahelien ecosystem in North-East Nigeria. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 19(2): 166-173.
[29]   Zhang Q, Liang Y, He H S. 2018. Tree-lists estimation for Chinese boreal forests by integrating Weibull diameter distributions with MODIS-based forest attributes from kNN imputation. Forests, 9(12): 758, doi: 10.3390/f9120758.
[1] LIN Yanmin, HU Zhirui, LI Wenhui, CHEN Haonan, WANG Fang, NAN Xiongxiong, YANG Xuelong, ZHANG Wenjun. Response of ecosystem carbon storage to land use change from 1985 to 2050 in the Ningxia Section of Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 110-130.
[2] WANG Jing, WEI Yulu, PENG Biao, LIU Siqi, LI Jianfeng. Spatiotemporal variations in ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies against the background of the gully control and land consolidation project on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 131-145.
[3] CAO Yijie, MA Yonggang, BAO Anming, CHANG Cun, LIU Tie. Evaluation of the water conservation function in the Ili River Delta of Central Asia based on the InVEST model[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(12): 1455-1473.
[4] Mohsen SHARAFATMANDRAD, Azam KHOSRAVI MASHIZI. Evaluation of restoration success in arid rangelands of Iran based on the variation of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(11): 1290-1314.
[5] YAN Xue, LI Lanhai. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15(1): 1-19.
[6] WANG Yaobin, SHANGGUAN Zhouping. Formation mechanisms and remediation techniques for low-efficiency artificial shelter forests on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(8): 837-848.
[7] LI Feng, LI Yaoming, ZHOU Xuewen, YIN Zun, LIU Tie, XIN Qinchuan. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022, 14(2): 115-138.
[8] YU Yang, CHEN Xi, Ireneusz MALIK, Malgorzata WISTUBA, CAO Yiguo, HOU Dongde, TA Zhijie, HE Jing, ZHANG Lingyun, YU Ruide, ZHANG Haiyan, SUN Lingxiao. Spatiotemporal changes in water, land use, and ecosystem services in Central Asia considering climate changes and human activities[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(9): 881-890.
[9] SUN Chen, MA Yonggang, GONG Lu. Response of ecosystem service value to land use/cover change in the northern slope economic belt of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021, 13(10): 1026-1040.
[10] Robson B de LIMA, Patrícia A B BARRETO-GARCIA, Alessandro de PAULA, Jhuly E S PEREIRA, Flávia F de CARVALHO, Silvio H M GOMES. Improving wood volume predictions in dry tropical forest in the semi-arid Brazil[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(6): 1046-1055.
[11] WEN Jing, QIN Ruimin, ZHANG Shixiong, YANG Xiaoyan, XU Manhou. Effects of long-term warming on the aboveground biomass and species diversity in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12(2): 252-266.
[12] Yang YU, Xi CHEN, HUTTNER Philipp, HINNENTHAL Marie, BRIEDEN Andreas, Lingxiao SUN, DISSE Markus. Model based decision support system for land use changes and socio-economic assessments[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(2): 169-182.
[13] Pingping ZHANG, Ming’an SHAO, Xingchang ZHANG. Spatial pattern of plant species diversity and the influencing factors in a Gobi Desert within the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(3): 379-393.
[14] Fengqin JIA, TIYIP Tashpolat, Nan WU, Changyan TIAN, Yuanming ZHANG. Characteristics of soil seed banks at different geomorphic positions within the longitudinal sand dunes of the Gurbantunggut Desert, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(3): 355-367.
[15] AISHAN Tayierjiang, HALIK ümüt, Florian BETZ, TIYIP Tashpolat, DING Jianli, NUERMAIMAITI Yiliyasijiang. Stand structure and height-diameter relationship of a degraded Populus euphratica forest in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(4): 544-554.